Aeson: derive some (but not all) fields of a struct
I have a large struct which I need to be an instance of FromJSON so that I can parse my json data into it.
I would like to derive automatically, but a single field needs "special care" in that it is an object in json and I want it to be an array of the values in my struct. How can I do this without writing a huge FromJson implementation repeating all the fields?
Example json:
{"myobject": {"one": 1, "two": 2}, ...many_more_fields...}
Example struct:
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject :: [Int],
...many_more_fields,...
} deriving (Generic)
How do I do this elegantly?
json haskell aeson
asked Nov 23 '18 at 15:01
Marius MelzerMarius Melzer
466
add a comment |
I have a large struct which I need to be an instance of FromJSON so that I can parse my json data into it.
I would like to derive automatically, but a single field needs "special care" in that it is an object in json and I want it to be an array of the values in my struct. How can I do this without writing a huge FromJson implementation repeating all the fields?
Example json:
{"myobject": {"one": 1, "two": 2}, ...many_more_fields...}
Example struct:
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject :: [Int],
...many_more_fields,...
} deriving (Generic)
How do I do this elegantly?
json haskell aeson
asked Nov 23 '18 at 15:01
Marius MelzerMarius Melzer
466
related: stackoverflow.com/questions/53352563/…
– assembly.jc
Nov 23 '18 at 15:42
add a comment |
I have a large struct which I need to be an instance of FromJSON so that I can parse my json data into it.
I would like to derive automatically, but a single field needs "special care" in that it is an object in json and I want it to be an array of the values in my struct. How can I do this without writing a huge FromJson implementation repeating all the fields?
Example json:
{"myobject": {"one": 1, "two": 2}, ...many_more_fields...}
Example struct:
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject :: [Int],
...many_more_fields,...
} deriving (Generic)
How do I do this elegantly?
json haskell aeson
asked Nov 23 '18 at 15:01
Marius MelzerMarius Melzer
466
I have a large struct which I need to be an instance of FromJSON so that I can parse my json data into it.
I would like to derive automatically, but a single field needs "special care" in that it is an object in json and I want it to be an array of the values in my struct. How can I do this without writing a huge FromJson implementation repeating all the fields?
Example json:
{"myobject": {"one": 1, "two": 2}, ...many_more_fields...}
Example struct:
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject :: [Int],
...many_more_fields,...
} deriving (Generic)
How do I do this elegantly?
json haskell aeson
json haskell aeson
asked Nov 23 '18 at 15:01
Marius MelzerMarius Melzer
466
asked Nov 23 '18 at 15:01
Marius MelzerMarius Melzer
466
asked Nov 23 '18 at 15:01
Marius MelzerMarius Melzer
466
asked Nov 23 '18 at 15:01
Marius MelzerMarius Melzer
466
asked Nov 23 '18 at 15:01
Marius MelzerMarius Melzer
466
466
related: stackoverflow.com/questions/53352563/…
– assembly.jc
Nov 23 '18 at 15:42
add a comment |
related: stackoverflow.com/questions/53352563/…
– assembly.jc
Nov 23 '18 at 15:42
related: stackoverflow.com/questions/53352563/…
– assembly.jc
Nov 23 '18 at 15:42
related: stackoverflow.com/questions/53352563/…
– assembly.jc
Nov 23 '18 at 15:42
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You should create a newtype for your special field:
newtype MySpecialType = MySpecialType [Int]
instance FromJSON MySpecialType where ....
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject:: MySpecialType,
...
}
Now the instance for MyStruct becomes entirely regular and can be handed off to Template Haskell in the normal way.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 15:13
Paul JohnsonPaul Johnson
13.6k23449
add a comment |
To avoid carrying the newtype from Paul Johnson's very good answer all across the codebase, you can also generalize your type as follows, making the type of myobject a parameter:
data MyStruct_ intList = MyStruct {
myobject :: intlist,
...
} deriving (Functor, Generic)
type MyStruct = MyStruct [Int]
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = (fmap . fmap) ((MySpecialType i) -> i)
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
genericParseJSON above gets instantiated with MyStruct MySpecialType, and then the field gets unwrapped via fmap (noting MyStruct_ is a Functor)
I also just wrote a blogpost about "type surgery", applied to this kind of problem so that you can keep the original type unmodified.
The generic-data-surgery library can derive a generic type with the same Generic structure as MyStruct_ MySpecialType above, to be used by aeson's genericParseJSON. The surgery modifyRField then applies the function (MySpecialType i) -> i to the myobject field, finally yielding MyStruct.
import Generic.Data.Surgery (fromOR, toOR', modifyRField)
-- The original type
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject :: [Int],
...
} deriving (Generic)
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = fmap (fromOR . modifyRField @"myobject" ((MySpecialType i) -> i) . toOR')
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
answered Nov 26 '18 at 14:44
Li-yao XiaLi-yao Xia
12k1327
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53448958%2faeson-derive-some-but-not-all-fields-of-a-struct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You should create a newtype for your special field:
newtype MySpecialType = MySpecialType [Int]
instance FromJSON MySpecialType where ....
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject:: MySpecialType,
...
}
Now the instance for MyStruct becomes entirely regular and can be handed off to Template Haskell in the normal way.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 15:13
Paul JohnsonPaul Johnson
13.6k23449
add a comment |
You should create a newtype for your special field:
newtype MySpecialType = MySpecialType [Int]
instance FromJSON MySpecialType where ....
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject:: MySpecialType,
...
}
Now the instance for MyStruct becomes entirely regular and can be handed off to Template Haskell in the normal way.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 15:13
Paul JohnsonPaul Johnson
13.6k23449
add a comment |
You should create a newtype for your special field:
newtype MySpecialType = MySpecialType [Int]
instance FromJSON MySpecialType where ....
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject:: MySpecialType,
...
}
Now the instance for MyStruct becomes entirely regular and can be handed off to Template Haskell in the normal way.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 15:13
Paul JohnsonPaul Johnson
13.6k23449
You should create a newtype for your special field:
newtype MySpecialType = MySpecialType [Int]
instance FromJSON MySpecialType where ....
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject:: MySpecialType,
...
}
Now the instance for MyStruct becomes entirely regular and can be handed off to Template Haskell in the normal way.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 15:13
Paul JohnsonPaul Johnson
13.6k23449
answered Nov 23 '18 at 15:13
Paul JohnsonPaul Johnson
13.6k23449
answered Nov 23 '18 at 15:13
Paul JohnsonPaul Johnson
13.6k23449
answered Nov 23 '18 at 15:13
Paul JohnsonPaul Johnson
13.6k23449
13.6k23449
add a comment |
add a comment |
To avoid carrying the newtype from Paul Johnson's very good answer all across the codebase, you can also generalize your type as follows, making the type of myobject a parameter:
data MyStruct_ intList = MyStruct {
myobject :: intlist,
...
} deriving (Functor, Generic)
type MyStruct = MyStruct [Int]
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = (fmap . fmap) ((MySpecialType i) -> i)
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
genericParseJSON above gets instantiated with MyStruct MySpecialType, and then the field gets unwrapped via fmap (noting MyStruct_ is a Functor)
I also just wrote a blogpost about "type surgery", applied to this kind of problem so that you can keep the original type unmodified.
The generic-data-surgery library can derive a generic type with the same Generic structure as MyStruct_ MySpecialType above, to be used by aeson's genericParseJSON. The surgery modifyRField then applies the function (MySpecialType i) -> i to the myobject field, finally yielding MyStruct.
import Generic.Data.Surgery (fromOR, toOR', modifyRField)
-- The original type
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject :: [Int],
...
} deriving (Generic)
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = fmap (fromOR . modifyRField @"myobject" ((MySpecialType i) -> i) . toOR')
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
answered Nov 26 '18 at 14:44
Li-yao XiaLi-yao Xia
12k1327
add a comment |
To avoid carrying the newtype from Paul Johnson's very good answer all across the codebase, you can also generalize your type as follows, making the type of myobject a parameter:
data MyStruct_ intList = MyStruct {
myobject :: intlist,
...
} deriving (Functor, Generic)
type MyStruct = MyStruct [Int]
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = (fmap . fmap) ((MySpecialType i) -> i)
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
genericParseJSON above gets instantiated with MyStruct MySpecialType, and then the field gets unwrapped via fmap (noting MyStruct_ is a Functor)
I also just wrote a blogpost about "type surgery", applied to this kind of problem so that you can keep the original type unmodified.
The generic-data-surgery library can derive a generic type with the same Generic structure as MyStruct_ MySpecialType above, to be used by aeson's genericParseJSON. The surgery modifyRField then applies the function (MySpecialType i) -> i to the myobject field, finally yielding MyStruct.
import Generic.Data.Surgery (fromOR, toOR', modifyRField)
-- The original type
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject :: [Int],
...
} deriving (Generic)
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = fmap (fromOR . modifyRField @"myobject" ((MySpecialType i) -> i) . toOR')
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
answered Nov 26 '18 at 14:44
Li-yao XiaLi-yao Xia
12k1327
add a comment |
To avoid carrying the newtype from Paul Johnson's very good answer all across the codebase, you can also generalize your type as follows, making the type of myobject a parameter:
data MyStruct_ intList = MyStruct {
myobject :: intlist,
...
} deriving (Functor, Generic)
type MyStruct = MyStruct [Int]
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = (fmap . fmap) ((MySpecialType i) -> i)
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
genericParseJSON above gets instantiated with MyStruct MySpecialType, and then the field gets unwrapped via fmap (noting MyStruct_ is a Functor)
I also just wrote a blogpost about "type surgery", applied to this kind of problem so that you can keep the original type unmodified.
The generic-data-surgery library can derive a generic type with the same Generic structure as MyStruct_ MySpecialType above, to be used by aeson's genericParseJSON. The surgery modifyRField then applies the function (MySpecialType i) -> i to the myobject field, finally yielding MyStruct.
import Generic.Data.Surgery (fromOR, toOR', modifyRField)
-- The original type
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject :: [Int],
...
} deriving (Generic)
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = fmap (fromOR . modifyRField @"myobject" ((MySpecialType i) -> i) . toOR')
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
answered Nov 26 '18 at 14:44
Li-yao XiaLi-yao Xia
12k1327
To avoid carrying the newtype from Paul Johnson's very good answer all across the codebase, you can also generalize your type as follows, making the type of myobject a parameter:
data MyStruct_ intList = MyStruct {
myobject :: intlist,
...
} deriving (Functor, Generic)
type MyStruct = MyStruct [Int]
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = (fmap . fmap) ((MySpecialType i) -> i)
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
genericParseJSON above gets instantiated with MyStruct MySpecialType, and then the field gets unwrapped via fmap (noting MyStruct_ is a Functor)
I also just wrote a blogpost about "type surgery", applied to this kind of problem so that you can keep the original type unmodified.
The generic-data-surgery library can derive a generic type with the same Generic structure as MyStruct_ MySpecialType above, to be used by aeson's genericParseJSON. The surgery modifyRField then applies the function (MySpecialType i) -> i to the myobject field, finally yielding MyStruct.
import Generic.Data.Surgery (fromOR, toOR', modifyRField)
-- The original type
data MyStruct = MyStruct {
myobject :: [Int],
...
} deriving (Generic)
instance FromJSON MyStruct where
parseJSON = fmap (fromOR . modifyRField @"myobject" ((MySpecialType i) -> i) . toOR')
. genericParseJSON defaultOptions
answered Nov 26 '18 at 14:44
Li-yao XiaLi-yao Xia
12k1327
answered Nov 26 '18 at 14:44
Li-yao XiaLi-yao Xia
12k1327
answered Nov 26 '18 at 14:44
Li-yao XiaLi-yao Xia
12k1327
answered Nov 26 '18 at 14:44
Li-yao XiaLi-yao Xia
12k1327
12k1327
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53448958%2faeson-derive-some-but-not-all-fields-of-a-struct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
related: stackoverflow.com/questions/53352563/…
– assembly.jc
Nov 23 '18 at 15:42