Derivative of a Function of the Diag function












0












$begingroup$


Suppose there is a vector $U in mathbb{R}^n$. How would you find the derivative of:



$$
F(U)=traceleft(diag(U) A diag(U) right)
$$

where $A in mathbb{R}^{n times n} succ 0 $ and where $diag(cdot)$ creates a diagonal matrix with $(cdot)$ on the leading diagonal. Where the derivative is taken with respect to the vector $U$, i.e.



$$
{partial F(U) over partial U } \
$$



I am more interested in the method used. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Suppose there is a vector $U in mathbb{R}^n$. How would you find the derivative of:



    $$
    F(U)=traceleft(diag(U) A diag(U) right)
    $$

    where $A in mathbb{R}^{n times n} succ 0 $ and where $diag(cdot)$ creates a diagonal matrix with $(cdot)$ on the leading diagonal. Where the derivative is taken with respect to the vector $U$, i.e.



    $$
    {partial F(U) over partial U } \
    $$



    I am more interested in the method used. Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      1



      $begingroup$


      Suppose there is a vector $U in mathbb{R}^n$. How would you find the derivative of:



      $$
      F(U)=traceleft(diag(U) A diag(U) right)
      $$

      where $A in mathbb{R}^{n times n} succ 0 $ and where $diag(cdot)$ creates a diagonal matrix with $(cdot)$ on the leading diagonal. Where the derivative is taken with respect to the vector $U$, i.e.



      $$
      {partial F(U) over partial U } \
      $$



      I am more interested in the method used. Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose there is a vector $U in mathbb{R}^n$. How would you find the derivative of:



      $$
      F(U)=traceleft(diag(U) A diag(U) right)
      $$

      where $A in mathbb{R}^{n times n} succ 0 $ and where $diag(cdot)$ creates a diagonal matrix with $(cdot)$ on the leading diagonal. Where the derivative is taken with respect to the vector $U$, i.e.



      $$
      {partial F(U) over partial U } \
      $$



      I am more interested in the method used. Thanks in advance.







      derivatives matrix-calculus trace






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 7 '18 at 9:45









      p32fr4p32fr4

      377




      377






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Posting the solution I identified.



          Due to the trace operator evaluating the above is equivalent to evaluating:



          $$
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_i A_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial U }=
          left( begin{align}
          begin{array}
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}&\
          vdots &\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_n}&\
          end{array}end{align}right) \
          $$



          which becomes:



          $$
          {partial left( trace(diag(U) A diag(U)) right)over partial U} = 2 diag( A) U
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            You can also derive this using two identities involving the Hadamard product $${rm Diag}(x),A,{rm Diag}(y)=Aodot xy^T$$ $${rm Tr}(Aodot xy^T)=x^T(Iodot A)y=phi$$ So that $$dphi=y^T(Iodot A)dx+x^T(Iodot A)dy$$ Setting $y=x=u$ this becomes $$dphi=2u^T(Iodot A)du$$ $$frac{partialphi}{partial u}=2(Iodot A)u$$
            $endgroup$
            – greg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:39












          • $begingroup$
            That is a nice alternative thanks @greg
            $endgroup$
            – p32fr4
            Dec 21 '18 at 10:03











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029708%2fderivative-of-a-function-of-the-diag-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Posting the solution I identified.



          Due to the trace operator evaluating the above is equivalent to evaluating:



          $$
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_i A_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial U }=
          left( begin{align}
          begin{array}
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}&\
          vdots &\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_n}&\
          end{array}end{align}right) \
          $$



          which becomes:



          $$
          {partial left( trace(diag(U) A diag(U)) right)over partial U} = 2 diag( A) U
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            You can also derive this using two identities involving the Hadamard product $${rm Diag}(x),A,{rm Diag}(y)=Aodot xy^T$$ $${rm Tr}(Aodot xy^T)=x^T(Iodot A)y=phi$$ So that $$dphi=y^T(Iodot A)dx+x^T(Iodot A)dy$$ Setting $y=x=u$ this becomes $$dphi=2u^T(Iodot A)du$$ $$frac{partialphi}{partial u}=2(Iodot A)u$$
            $endgroup$
            – greg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:39












          • $begingroup$
            That is a nice alternative thanks @greg
            $endgroup$
            – p32fr4
            Dec 21 '18 at 10:03
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Posting the solution I identified.



          Due to the trace operator evaluating the above is equivalent to evaluating:



          $$
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_i A_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial U }=
          left( begin{align}
          begin{array}
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}&\
          vdots &\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_n}&\
          end{array}end{align}right) \
          $$



          which becomes:



          $$
          {partial left( trace(diag(U) A diag(U)) right)over partial U} = 2 diag( A) U
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            You can also derive this using two identities involving the Hadamard product $${rm Diag}(x),A,{rm Diag}(y)=Aodot xy^T$$ $${rm Tr}(Aodot xy^T)=x^T(Iodot A)y=phi$$ So that $$dphi=y^T(Iodot A)dx+x^T(Iodot A)dy$$ Setting $y=x=u$ this becomes $$dphi=2u^T(Iodot A)du$$ $$frac{partialphi}{partial u}=2(Iodot A)u$$
            $endgroup$
            – greg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:39












          • $begingroup$
            That is a nice alternative thanks @greg
            $endgroup$
            – p32fr4
            Dec 21 '18 at 10:03














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Posting the solution I identified.



          Due to the trace operator evaluating the above is equivalent to evaluating:



          $$
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_i A_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial U }=
          left( begin{align}
          begin{array}
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}&\
          vdots &\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_n}&\
          end{array}end{align}right) \
          $$



          which becomes:



          $$
          {partial left( trace(diag(U) A diag(U)) right)over partial U} = 2 diag( A) U
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Posting the solution I identified.



          Due to the trace operator evaluating the above is equivalent to evaluating:



          $$
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_i A_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial U }=
          left( begin{align}
          begin{array}
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_1}&\
          vdots &\
          {partial left(sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} u_iA_{(i,i)}u_iright)over partial u_n}&\
          end{array}end{align}right) \
          $$



          which becomes:



          $$
          {partial left( trace(diag(U) A diag(U)) right)over partial U} = 2 diag( A) U
          $$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 7 '18 at 10:47









          p32fr4p32fr4

          377




          377








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            You can also derive this using two identities involving the Hadamard product $${rm Diag}(x),A,{rm Diag}(y)=Aodot xy^T$$ $${rm Tr}(Aodot xy^T)=x^T(Iodot A)y=phi$$ So that $$dphi=y^T(Iodot A)dx+x^T(Iodot A)dy$$ Setting $y=x=u$ this becomes $$dphi=2u^T(Iodot A)du$$ $$frac{partialphi}{partial u}=2(Iodot A)u$$
            $endgroup$
            – greg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:39












          • $begingroup$
            That is a nice alternative thanks @greg
            $endgroup$
            – p32fr4
            Dec 21 '18 at 10:03














          • 2




            $begingroup$
            You can also derive this using two identities involving the Hadamard product $${rm Diag}(x),A,{rm Diag}(y)=Aodot xy^T$$ $${rm Tr}(Aodot xy^T)=x^T(Iodot A)y=phi$$ So that $$dphi=y^T(Iodot A)dx+x^T(Iodot A)dy$$ Setting $y=x=u$ this becomes $$dphi=2u^T(Iodot A)du$$ $$frac{partialphi}{partial u}=2(Iodot A)u$$
            $endgroup$
            – greg
            Dec 7 '18 at 23:39












          • $begingroup$
            That is a nice alternative thanks @greg
            $endgroup$
            – p32fr4
            Dec 21 '18 at 10:03








          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          You can also derive this using two identities involving the Hadamard product $${rm Diag}(x),A,{rm Diag}(y)=Aodot xy^T$$ $${rm Tr}(Aodot xy^T)=x^T(Iodot A)y=phi$$ So that $$dphi=y^T(Iodot A)dx+x^T(Iodot A)dy$$ Setting $y=x=u$ this becomes $$dphi=2u^T(Iodot A)du$$ $$frac{partialphi}{partial u}=2(Iodot A)u$$
          $endgroup$
          – greg
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:39






          $begingroup$
          You can also derive this using two identities involving the Hadamard product $${rm Diag}(x),A,{rm Diag}(y)=Aodot xy^T$$ $${rm Tr}(Aodot xy^T)=x^T(Iodot A)y=phi$$ So that $$dphi=y^T(Iodot A)dx+x^T(Iodot A)dy$$ Setting $y=x=u$ this becomes $$dphi=2u^T(Iodot A)du$$ $$frac{partialphi}{partial u}=2(Iodot A)u$$
          $endgroup$
          – greg
          Dec 7 '18 at 23:39














          $begingroup$
          That is a nice alternative thanks @greg
          $endgroup$
          – p32fr4
          Dec 21 '18 at 10:03




          $begingroup$
          That is a nice alternative thanks @greg
          $endgroup$
          – p32fr4
          Dec 21 '18 at 10:03


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029708%2fderivative-of-a-function-of-the-diag-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Berounka

          Sphinx de Gizeh

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...