Closed subset of $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$
$begingroup$
In the context of weak solutions of boundary value problems, I want to show that the set $${u in W^{1, 2}([a, b], mathbb{R}) ; : ; u(a) = 0 = u(b) }$$ is closed in $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
Is there any elementary way of proving it?
I might know one way by using the, due Sobolev's embedding theorem, well-defined and continuous dirac delta $delta_a$ and $delta_b$ on $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
However, I want to refrain from distribution theory.
Hints are appreciated.
functional-analysis sobolev-spaces self-learning
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the context of weak solutions of boundary value problems, I want to show that the set $${u in W^{1, 2}([a, b], mathbb{R}) ; : ; u(a) = 0 = u(b) }$$ is closed in $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
Is there any elementary way of proving it?
I might know one way by using the, due Sobolev's embedding theorem, well-defined and continuous dirac delta $delta_a$ and $delta_b$ on $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
However, I want to refrain from distribution theory.
Hints are appreciated.
functional-analysis sobolev-spaces self-learning
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 19:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the context of weak solutions of boundary value problems, I want to show that the set $${u in W^{1, 2}([a, b], mathbb{R}) ; : ; u(a) = 0 = u(b) }$$ is closed in $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
Is there any elementary way of proving it?
I might know one way by using the, due Sobolev's embedding theorem, well-defined and continuous dirac delta $delta_a$ and $delta_b$ on $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
However, I want to refrain from distribution theory.
Hints are appreciated.
functional-analysis sobolev-spaces self-learning
$endgroup$
In the context of weak solutions of boundary value problems, I want to show that the set $${u in W^{1, 2}([a, b], mathbb{R}) ; : ; u(a) = 0 = u(b) }$$ is closed in $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
Is there any elementary way of proving it?
I might know one way by using the, due Sobolev's embedding theorem, well-defined and continuous dirac delta $delta_a$ and $delta_b$ on $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
However, I want to refrain from distribution theory.
Hints are appreciated.
functional-analysis sobolev-spaces self-learning
functional-analysis sobolev-spaces self-learning
asked Dec 6 '18 at 17:27
TaufiTaufi
570411
570411
$begingroup$
How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 19:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 19:04
$begingroup$
How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 19:04
$begingroup$
How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 19:04
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:34
$begingroup$
Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 12:50
$begingroup$
@Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 7 '18 at 13:05
$begingroup$
Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 17:14
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028792%2fclosed-subset-of-w1-2a-b-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:34
$begingroup$
Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 12:50
$begingroup$
@Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 7 '18 at 13:05
$begingroup$
Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 17:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:34
$begingroup$
Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 12:50
$begingroup$
@Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 7 '18 at 13:05
$begingroup$
Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 17:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.
$endgroup$
Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.
edited Dec 7 '18 at 12:49
answered Dec 7 '18 at 3:13
Gio67Gio67
12.5k1626
12.5k1626
$begingroup$
You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:34
$begingroup$
Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 12:50
$begingroup$
@Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 7 '18 at 13:05
$begingroup$
Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 17:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:34
$begingroup$
Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 12:50
$begingroup$
@Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 7 '18 at 13:05
$begingroup$
Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:34
$begingroup$
Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:34
$begingroup$
Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 12:50
$begingroup$
Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 12:50
$begingroup$
@Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 7 '18 at 13:05
$begingroup$
@Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 7 '18 at 13:05
$begingroup$
Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 17:14
$begingroup$
Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 17:14
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028792%2fclosed-subset-of-w1-2a-b-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 19:04