Closed subset of $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$












2












$begingroup$


In the context of weak solutions of boundary value problems, I want to show that the set $${u in W^{1, 2}([a, b], mathbb{R}) ; : ; u(a) = 0 = u(b) }$$ is closed in $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.



Is there any elementary way of proving it?



I might know one way by using the, due Sobolev's embedding theorem, well-defined and continuous dirac delta $delta_a$ and $delta_b$ on $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
However, I want to refrain from distribution theory.



Hints are appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 6 '18 at 19:04


















2












$begingroup$


In the context of weak solutions of boundary value problems, I want to show that the set $${u in W^{1, 2}([a, b], mathbb{R}) ; : ; u(a) = 0 = u(b) }$$ is closed in $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.



Is there any elementary way of proving it?



I might know one way by using the, due Sobolev's embedding theorem, well-defined and continuous dirac delta $delta_a$ and $delta_b$ on $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
However, I want to refrain from distribution theory.



Hints are appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 6 '18 at 19:04
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


In the context of weak solutions of boundary value problems, I want to show that the set $${u in W^{1, 2}([a, b], mathbb{R}) ; : ; u(a) = 0 = u(b) }$$ is closed in $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.



Is there any elementary way of proving it?



I might know one way by using the, due Sobolev's embedding theorem, well-defined and continuous dirac delta $delta_a$ and $delta_b$ on $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
However, I want to refrain from distribution theory.



Hints are appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




In the context of weak solutions of boundary value problems, I want to show that the set $${u in W^{1, 2}([a, b], mathbb{R}) ; : ; u(a) = 0 = u(b) }$$ is closed in $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.



Is there any elementary way of proving it?



I might know one way by using the, due Sobolev's embedding theorem, well-defined and continuous dirac delta $delta_a$ and $delta_b$ on $W^{1,2}([a, b], mathbb{R})$.
However, I want to refrain from distribution theory.



Hints are appreciated.







functional-analysis sobolev-spaces self-learning






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 6 '18 at 17:27









TaufiTaufi

570411




570411












  • $begingroup$
    How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 6 '18 at 19:04




















  • $begingroup$
    How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 6 '18 at 19:04


















$begingroup$
How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 19:04






$begingroup$
How do you define $u(a)$ and $u(b)$ to begin with? I don't think you can avoid using the Sobolev embedding theorem.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 19:04












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:34












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 17:14











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028792%2fclosed-subset-of-w1-2a-b-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:34












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 17:14
















1












$begingroup$

Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:34












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 17:14














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Usually Sobolev spaces are defined in open sets, so it should be $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. Anyway, if $u$ is a smooth function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, by the fundamental theorem of calculus,
$$u(x)-u(y)=int_x^y u'(s),ds.$$
Using Holder's inequality you have that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$
for all $a<x<y<b$. If now $u$ is a function in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$, using density of smooth functions you can find a sequence of smooth functions $u_n$ that converge to $u$ in $W^{1,2}((a,b),mathbb{R})$. By taking a subsequence you can find a subsequence which converges to $u$ a.e. in $(a,b)$. Since $$|u_n(x)-u_n(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'_n(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2},$$ letting $ntoinfty$ you get
that
$$|u(x)-u(y)|le |x-y|^{1/2}left( int_x^y |u'(s)|^2,dsright)^{1/2}$$ for a.e. $x,yin (a,b)$. This is telling you that $u$ has a representative $bar u$ which is Holder continuous. In particular, $bar u$ can be extended in $[a,b]$. So it makes now sense to talk about $bar u(a)$ and $bar u(b)$ (to answer MaoWao's question).
Now you can use the Ascoli-Arzela theorem to prove that your set is closed. I am skipping the details.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 7 '18 at 12:49

























answered Dec 7 '18 at 3:13









Gio67Gio67

12.5k1626




12.5k1626












  • $begingroup$
    You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:34












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 17:14


















  • $begingroup$
    You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:28










  • $begingroup$
    Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
    $endgroup$
    – Taufi
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:34












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 12:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
    $endgroup$
    – Gio67
    Dec 7 '18 at 17:14
















$begingroup$
You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:28




$begingroup$
You mean $y$, not $x$, in the LHS?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:28












$begingroup$
Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:34






$begingroup$
Moreover, trying fill in the details you skipped, I need to show that the elements of the subset are equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. I would then conclude with Arzela-Ascoli that the set is compact and hence closed?
$endgroup$
– Taufi
Dec 7 '18 at 12:34














$begingroup$
Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 12:50




$begingroup$
Yes, I corrected the misprints. Exactly, you need to show equi-continuity and uniform boundedness.
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 12:50












$begingroup$
@Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 7 '18 at 13:05




$begingroup$
@Gio67 Of course you just proved the Sobolev embedding theorem in the one-dimensional case, so it's not essentially different from the approach suggested in the op (as I said, I have a hard time imagining one).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 7 '18 at 13:05












$begingroup$
Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 17:14




$begingroup$
Yeah, I don't think there is any other alternative
$endgroup$
– Gio67
Dec 7 '18 at 17:14


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028792%2fclosed-subset-of-w1-2a-b-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Sphinx de Gizeh

Fiat S.p.A.