Node js - Synchronous execution of Websocket's object functions
I have the following like functionality
//Have to connect to a websocket
var websocket = new WebSocket(wsUri);
var channel = new WebChannel(websocket);
The webchannel returns an object that has list of functions
//The following functions
actualTest1Value = 1;
actualTest2Value = 2;
objectReturned = channel.object.objectReturned
test1= objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample");
test2 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample1");
if(test1 === actualTest1Value && test2 === actualTest2Value)
{
//do some Operation
}
The problem here is, the test1 and test 2 is undefined because of the asynchronous nature of node js. As the object is returned from a server, I cannot add a promise to the functions of the object. Is there any way to execute this synchronously?
javascript node.js server-side-scripting
add a comment |
I have the following like functionality
//Have to connect to a websocket
var websocket = new WebSocket(wsUri);
var channel = new WebChannel(websocket);
The webchannel returns an object that has list of functions
//The following functions
actualTest1Value = 1;
actualTest2Value = 2;
objectReturned = channel.object.objectReturned
test1= objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample");
test2 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample1");
if(test1 === actualTest1Value && test2 === actualTest2Value)
{
//do some Operation
}
The problem here is, the test1 and test 2 is undefined because of the asynchronous nature of node js. As the object is returned from a server, I cannot add a promise to the functions of the object. Is there any way to execute this synchronously?
javascript node.js server-side-scripting
2
No there is not. Sry.
– mtkopone
Nov 23 '18 at 12:59
Is there a way to atleast wait untill the execution returns a value?
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 13:06
Still struggling here
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 16:04
add a comment |
I have the following like functionality
//Have to connect to a websocket
var websocket = new WebSocket(wsUri);
var channel = new WebChannel(websocket);
The webchannel returns an object that has list of functions
//The following functions
actualTest1Value = 1;
actualTest2Value = 2;
objectReturned = channel.object.objectReturned
test1= objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample");
test2 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample1");
if(test1 === actualTest1Value && test2 === actualTest2Value)
{
//do some Operation
}
The problem here is, the test1 and test 2 is undefined because of the asynchronous nature of node js. As the object is returned from a server, I cannot add a promise to the functions of the object. Is there any way to execute this synchronously?
javascript node.js server-side-scripting
I have the following like functionality
//Have to connect to a websocket
var websocket = new WebSocket(wsUri);
var channel = new WebChannel(websocket);
The webchannel returns an object that has list of functions
//The following functions
actualTest1Value = 1;
actualTest2Value = 2;
objectReturned = channel.object.objectReturned
test1= objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample");
test2 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample1");
if(test1 === actualTest1Value && test2 === actualTest2Value)
{
//do some Operation
}
The problem here is, the test1 and test 2 is undefined because of the asynchronous nature of node js. As the object is returned from a server, I cannot add a promise to the functions of the object. Is there any way to execute this synchronously?
javascript node.js server-side-scripting
javascript node.js server-side-scripting
asked Nov 23 '18 at 12:55
venkatvenkat
1689
1689
2
No there is not. Sry.
– mtkopone
Nov 23 '18 at 12:59
Is there a way to atleast wait untill the execution returns a value?
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 13:06
Still struggling here
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 16:04
add a comment |
2
No there is not. Sry.
– mtkopone
Nov 23 '18 at 12:59
Is there a way to atleast wait untill the execution returns a value?
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 13:06
Still struggling here
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 16:04
2
2
No there is not. Sry.
– mtkopone
Nov 23 '18 at 12:59
No there is not. Sry.
– mtkopone
Nov 23 '18 at 12:59
Is there a way to atleast wait untill the execution returns a value?
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 13:06
Is there a way to atleast wait untill the execution returns a value?
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 13:06
Still struggling here
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 16:04
Still struggling here
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 16:04
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I did a small workaround to execute one after the other.
test1 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample", function(returnVal){
test1 = returnVal;
compare();
});
test2 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample1", function(returnVal){
test2 = returnVal;
compare();
});
After this wrap the comparison in a separate function
function compare()
{
//before doing this check test2 is not undefined, because both values will be
//defined on second callback.
if(test1 === actualTest1Value && test2 === actualTest2Value)
{
//do some Operation
}
}
I was lucky to have test1 and test2 as global variables and calling the function compare() on the callback of each functions and comparing both values only when the callback comes from second one helped me.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447131%2fnode-js-synchronous-execution-of-websockets-object-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I did a small workaround to execute one after the other.
test1 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample", function(returnVal){
test1 = returnVal;
compare();
});
test2 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample1", function(returnVal){
test2 = returnVal;
compare();
});
After this wrap the comparison in a separate function
function compare()
{
//before doing this check test2 is not undefined, because both values will be
//defined on second callback.
if(test1 === actualTest1Value && test2 === actualTest2Value)
{
//do some Operation
}
}
I was lucky to have test1 and test2 as global variables and calling the function compare() on the callback of each functions and comparing both values only when the callback comes from second one helped me.
add a comment |
I did a small workaround to execute one after the other.
test1 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample", function(returnVal){
test1 = returnVal;
compare();
});
test2 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample1", function(returnVal){
test2 = returnVal;
compare();
});
After this wrap the comparison in a separate function
function compare()
{
//before doing this check test2 is not undefined, because both values will be
//defined on second callback.
if(test1 === actualTest1Value && test2 === actualTest2Value)
{
//do some Operation
}
}
I was lucky to have test1 and test2 as global variables and calling the function compare() on the callback of each functions and comparing both values only when the callback comes from second one helped me.
add a comment |
I did a small workaround to execute one after the other.
test1 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample", function(returnVal){
test1 = returnVal;
compare();
});
test2 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample1", function(returnVal){
test2 = returnVal;
compare();
});
After this wrap the comparison in a separate function
function compare()
{
//before doing this check test2 is not undefined, because both values will be
//defined on second callback.
if(test1 === actualTest1Value && test2 === actualTest2Value)
{
//do some Operation
}
}
I was lucky to have test1 and test2 as global variables and calling the function compare() on the callback of each functions and comparing both values only when the callback comes from second one helped me.
I did a small workaround to execute one after the other.
test1 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample", function(returnVal){
test1 = returnVal;
compare();
});
test2 = objectReturned.getValueFor("Sample1", function(returnVal){
test2 = returnVal;
compare();
});
After this wrap the comparison in a separate function
function compare()
{
//before doing this check test2 is not undefined, because both values will be
//defined on second callback.
if(test1 === actualTest1Value && test2 === actualTest2Value)
{
//do some Operation
}
}
I was lucky to have test1 and test2 as global variables and calling the function compare() on the callback of each functions and comparing both values only when the callback comes from second one helped me.
edited Nov 24 '18 at 7:11
answered Nov 24 '18 at 7:05
venkatvenkat
1689
1689
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447131%2fnode-js-synchronous-execution-of-websockets-object-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
No there is not. Sry.
– mtkopone
Nov 23 '18 at 12:59
Is there a way to atleast wait untill the execution returns a value?
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 13:06
Still struggling here
– venkat
Nov 23 '18 at 16:04