Mixed mathematical chemical problem
How to calculate the concentration of all species present in a solution with $mathrm{0.3~M}$ $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$?
The whole truth is that any time that you add any phosphate ion into an aqueous solution, then you will have all four phosphate species. The $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$ solution contains the ions $mathrm{Na^+}$, $mathrm{H^+}$, $mathrm{OH^−}$, $mathrm{H_2PO_4^{-}}$, $mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}$, $mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}$ and undissociated acid $mathrm{H_3PO_4}$.
I form seven independent equations in order to specify the unknown concentrations of the seven species present in an aqueous solution of $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$. these equations are:
$$
K_1 = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}]}{[mathrm{H_3PO_4}]} = 7.6 times 10^{−3} tag{1}$$
$$K_2 = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}]}{[mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}]} = 6.2 times 10^{−8} tag{2}$$
$$K_{3} = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}]}{[mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}]} = 2.1 times 10^{−13} tag{3}$$
$$K_mathrm{w} = {[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{OH^-}]} = 1 times 10^{−14} label{eq:4}tag{4}
$$
$$C_mathrm{P} =[mathrm{Na^+}]= [mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}]_0 ={0.3}tag{5}$$
$$C_mathrm{P} = [mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}] + [mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}] + [mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}] + [mathrm{H_3PO_4}] tag{6}$$
$${[mathrm{H_3PO_4}] + [mathrm{H^+}] = [mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}] + 2[mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}] +frac{K_mathrm{w}}{[mathrm{H^+}]}}tag{7}$$
Neglecting $[mathrm{Na^+}]$ and equation $eqref{eq:4}$, then given $C_mathrm{P} = {0.3}$ and $K_mathrm{w}=1times10^{−14}$, how to solve five equations to find five variables using wolframalpha for solving quintic equation?
systems-of-equations nonlinear-system chemistry
add a comment |
How to calculate the concentration of all species present in a solution with $mathrm{0.3~M}$ $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$?
The whole truth is that any time that you add any phosphate ion into an aqueous solution, then you will have all four phosphate species. The $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$ solution contains the ions $mathrm{Na^+}$, $mathrm{H^+}$, $mathrm{OH^−}$, $mathrm{H_2PO_4^{-}}$, $mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}$, $mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}$ and undissociated acid $mathrm{H_3PO_4}$.
I form seven independent equations in order to specify the unknown concentrations of the seven species present in an aqueous solution of $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$. these equations are:
$$
K_1 = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}]}{[mathrm{H_3PO_4}]} = 7.6 times 10^{−3} tag{1}$$
$$K_2 = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}]}{[mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}]} = 6.2 times 10^{−8} tag{2}$$
$$K_{3} = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}]}{[mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}]} = 2.1 times 10^{−13} tag{3}$$
$$K_mathrm{w} = {[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{OH^-}]} = 1 times 10^{−14} label{eq:4}tag{4}
$$
$$C_mathrm{P} =[mathrm{Na^+}]= [mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}]_0 ={0.3}tag{5}$$
$$C_mathrm{P} = [mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}] + [mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}] + [mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}] + [mathrm{H_3PO_4}] tag{6}$$
$${[mathrm{H_3PO_4}] + [mathrm{H^+}] = [mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}] + 2[mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}] +frac{K_mathrm{w}}{[mathrm{H^+}]}}tag{7}$$
Neglecting $[mathrm{Na^+}]$ and equation $eqref{eq:4}$, then given $C_mathrm{P} = {0.3}$ and $K_mathrm{w}=1times10^{−14}$, how to solve five equations to find five variables using wolframalpha for solving quintic equation?
systems-of-equations nonlinear-system chemistry
@Claude Leibovici
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:11
add a comment |
How to calculate the concentration of all species present in a solution with $mathrm{0.3~M}$ $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$?
The whole truth is that any time that you add any phosphate ion into an aqueous solution, then you will have all four phosphate species. The $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$ solution contains the ions $mathrm{Na^+}$, $mathrm{H^+}$, $mathrm{OH^−}$, $mathrm{H_2PO_4^{-}}$, $mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}$, $mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}$ and undissociated acid $mathrm{H_3PO_4}$.
I form seven independent equations in order to specify the unknown concentrations of the seven species present in an aqueous solution of $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$. these equations are:
$$
K_1 = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}]}{[mathrm{H_3PO_4}]} = 7.6 times 10^{−3} tag{1}$$
$$K_2 = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}]}{[mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}]} = 6.2 times 10^{−8} tag{2}$$
$$K_{3} = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}]}{[mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}]} = 2.1 times 10^{−13} tag{3}$$
$$K_mathrm{w} = {[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{OH^-}]} = 1 times 10^{−14} label{eq:4}tag{4}
$$
$$C_mathrm{P} =[mathrm{Na^+}]= [mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}]_0 ={0.3}tag{5}$$
$$C_mathrm{P} = [mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}] + [mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}] + [mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}] + [mathrm{H_3PO_4}] tag{6}$$
$${[mathrm{H_3PO_4}] + [mathrm{H^+}] = [mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}] + 2[mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}] +frac{K_mathrm{w}}{[mathrm{H^+}]}}tag{7}$$
Neglecting $[mathrm{Na^+}]$ and equation $eqref{eq:4}$, then given $C_mathrm{P} = {0.3}$ and $K_mathrm{w}=1times10^{−14}$, how to solve five equations to find five variables using wolframalpha for solving quintic equation?
systems-of-equations nonlinear-system chemistry
How to calculate the concentration of all species present in a solution with $mathrm{0.3~M}$ $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$?
The whole truth is that any time that you add any phosphate ion into an aqueous solution, then you will have all four phosphate species. The $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$ solution contains the ions $mathrm{Na^+}$, $mathrm{H^+}$, $mathrm{OH^−}$, $mathrm{H_2PO_4^{-}}$, $mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}$, $mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}$ and undissociated acid $mathrm{H_3PO_4}$.
I form seven independent equations in order to specify the unknown concentrations of the seven species present in an aqueous solution of $mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}$. these equations are:
$$
K_1 = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}]}{[mathrm{H_3PO_4}]} = 7.6 times 10^{−3} tag{1}$$
$$K_2 = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}]}{[mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}]} = 6.2 times 10^{−8} tag{2}$$
$$K_{3} = frac{[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}]}{[mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}]} = 2.1 times 10^{−13} tag{3}$$
$$K_mathrm{w} = {[mathrm{H^+}][mathrm{OH^-}]} = 1 times 10^{−14} label{eq:4}tag{4}
$$
$$C_mathrm{P} =[mathrm{Na^+}]= [mathrm{NaH_2PO_4}]_0 ={0.3}tag{5}$$
$$C_mathrm{P} = [mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}] + [mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}] + [mathrm{H_2PO_4^-}] + [mathrm{H_3PO_4}] tag{6}$$
$${[mathrm{H_3PO_4}] + [mathrm{H^+}] = [mathrm{HPO_4^{2-}}] + 2[mathrm{PO_4^{3-}}] +frac{K_mathrm{w}}{[mathrm{H^+}]}}tag{7}$$
Neglecting $[mathrm{Na^+}]$ and equation $eqref{eq:4}$, then given $C_mathrm{P} = {0.3}$ and $K_mathrm{w}=1times10^{−14}$, how to solve five equations to find five variables using wolframalpha for solving quintic equation?
systems-of-equations nonlinear-system chemistry
systems-of-equations nonlinear-system chemistry
edited Dec 18 '18 at 15:54
andselisk
264311
264311
asked Dec 5 '18 at 12:10
Adnan AL-AmlehAdnan AL-Amleh
1163
1163
@Claude Leibovici
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:11
add a comment |
@Claude Leibovici
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:11
@Claude Leibovici
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:11
@Claude Leibovici
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:11
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Too long for a comment. This just deals with the numerical aspects of the problem.
Starting from @Batominovski answer, let us define both sides of the charge balance.
$$text{lhs}=y^5+(C_P+K_1),y^4+K_1K_2,y^3+K_1K_2K_3,y^2$$
$$text{rhs}=K_w,y^3+(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2),y^2+(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3),y+K_1K_2K_3K_w$$
Instead of solving $text{lhs}=text{rhs}$ for $y$, let $y=10^{-text{pH}}$ and consider that we look for the zero of function
$$f(text{pH})=log(text{lhs})-log(text{rhs})$$ which, if plooted, looks quite linear.
As a proof, using a Taylor expansion built at $text{pH}=7$ (corresponding to $ y=sqrt{k_w}$), the first estimate is $text{pH}=4.65444$ while the exact solution is $text{pH}=4.66886$. One more iteration of Newton method and we are done (as shown below for a ridiculous number of significant figures)
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & text{pH}_n \
0 & 7.00000000000 \
1 & 4.65444138638 \
2 & 4.66886040691 \
3 & 4.66886042380
end{array}
right)$$
@Claudi leibovici : I got the same as your answer by WolframAlpha with the appreciation of the powerful effort and noble interest.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 7 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
For simplicity, write $x_0:=[texttt{H}_3texttt{PO}_4]$, $x_1:=[texttt{H}_2texttt{PO}_4^-]$, $x_2:=[texttt{H}texttt{PO}_4^{2-}]$, and $x_3:=[texttt{PO}_4^{3-}]$ so that $x_i$ is the concentration of the phosphate species with negative-$i$ charge, for $i=0,1,2,3$. Let $y$ denote $[texttt{H}^+]$. Therefore,
$$x_0+x_1+x_2+x_3=C_P,,$$
$$x_0+y=x_2+2x_3+frac{K_w}{y},,$$
$$K_1=frac{yx_1}{x_0},,$$
$$K_2=frac{yx_2}{x_1},,$$
and
$$K_3=frac{yx_3}{x_2},.$$
This gives $x_1=dfrac{K_1x_0}{y}$, $x_2=dfrac{K_2x_1}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}$, and $x_3=dfrac{K_3x_2}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}$. Hence, we end up with two equations in $x_0$ and $y$:
$$x_0+frac{K_1x_0}{y}+frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}=C_Ptag{*}$$
and
$$x_0+y=frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{2K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}+frac{K_w}{y},.tag{#}$$
From (*), we easily get
$$x_0=frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},.$$
Plugging this into (#) yields
$$frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},left(1-frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}-frac{2K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}right)+y-frac{K_w}{y}=0,.$$
That is,
$$y^5+(C_P+K_1)y^4+(K_1K_2-K_w)y^3-(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2-K_1K_2K_3)y^2-(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3)y-K_1K_2K_3K_w=0,.$$
I think you need a numerical solver to solve for $y$ from the last equation. Once you know $y$, you can find the values of $x_0$, $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$.
Mathematica tells me that there is only one positive real solution $y$ (or using Descartes's Rule of Signs, you know that there exists only one positive real solution) to the previous equation, which is $yapprox 2.1times 10^{-5}$. This means $x_0approx 8.4times 10^{-4}$, $x_1approx 0.30$, $x_2approx 8.6times 10^{-4}$, and $x_3approx 8.5times 10^{-12}$. In a sense, you should expect $x_1approx C_P=0.30$. After all, the dissociative reactions into other phosphate species are quite weak.
thanks, I appreciate to derive a quintic equation to compare it with my equation.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:53
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026989%2fmixed-mathematical-chemical-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Too long for a comment. This just deals with the numerical aspects of the problem.
Starting from @Batominovski answer, let us define both sides of the charge balance.
$$text{lhs}=y^5+(C_P+K_1),y^4+K_1K_2,y^3+K_1K_2K_3,y^2$$
$$text{rhs}=K_w,y^3+(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2),y^2+(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3),y+K_1K_2K_3K_w$$
Instead of solving $text{lhs}=text{rhs}$ for $y$, let $y=10^{-text{pH}}$ and consider that we look for the zero of function
$$f(text{pH})=log(text{lhs})-log(text{rhs})$$ which, if plooted, looks quite linear.
As a proof, using a Taylor expansion built at $text{pH}=7$ (corresponding to $ y=sqrt{k_w}$), the first estimate is $text{pH}=4.65444$ while the exact solution is $text{pH}=4.66886$. One more iteration of Newton method and we are done (as shown below for a ridiculous number of significant figures)
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & text{pH}_n \
0 & 7.00000000000 \
1 & 4.65444138638 \
2 & 4.66886040691 \
3 & 4.66886042380
end{array}
right)$$
@Claudi leibovici : I got the same as your answer by WolframAlpha with the appreciation of the powerful effort and noble interest.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 7 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
Too long for a comment. This just deals with the numerical aspects of the problem.
Starting from @Batominovski answer, let us define both sides of the charge balance.
$$text{lhs}=y^5+(C_P+K_1),y^4+K_1K_2,y^3+K_1K_2K_3,y^2$$
$$text{rhs}=K_w,y^3+(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2),y^2+(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3),y+K_1K_2K_3K_w$$
Instead of solving $text{lhs}=text{rhs}$ for $y$, let $y=10^{-text{pH}}$ and consider that we look for the zero of function
$$f(text{pH})=log(text{lhs})-log(text{rhs})$$ which, if plooted, looks quite linear.
As a proof, using a Taylor expansion built at $text{pH}=7$ (corresponding to $ y=sqrt{k_w}$), the first estimate is $text{pH}=4.65444$ while the exact solution is $text{pH}=4.66886$. One more iteration of Newton method and we are done (as shown below for a ridiculous number of significant figures)
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & text{pH}_n \
0 & 7.00000000000 \
1 & 4.65444138638 \
2 & 4.66886040691 \
3 & 4.66886042380
end{array}
right)$$
@Claudi leibovici : I got the same as your answer by WolframAlpha with the appreciation of the powerful effort and noble interest.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 7 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
Too long for a comment. This just deals with the numerical aspects of the problem.
Starting from @Batominovski answer, let us define both sides of the charge balance.
$$text{lhs}=y^5+(C_P+K_1),y^4+K_1K_2,y^3+K_1K_2K_3,y^2$$
$$text{rhs}=K_w,y^3+(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2),y^2+(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3),y+K_1K_2K_3K_w$$
Instead of solving $text{lhs}=text{rhs}$ for $y$, let $y=10^{-text{pH}}$ and consider that we look for the zero of function
$$f(text{pH})=log(text{lhs})-log(text{rhs})$$ which, if plooted, looks quite linear.
As a proof, using a Taylor expansion built at $text{pH}=7$ (corresponding to $ y=sqrt{k_w}$), the first estimate is $text{pH}=4.65444$ while the exact solution is $text{pH}=4.66886$. One more iteration of Newton method and we are done (as shown below for a ridiculous number of significant figures)
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & text{pH}_n \
0 & 7.00000000000 \
1 & 4.65444138638 \
2 & 4.66886040691 \
3 & 4.66886042380
end{array}
right)$$
Too long for a comment. This just deals with the numerical aspects of the problem.
Starting from @Batominovski answer, let us define both sides of the charge balance.
$$text{lhs}=y^5+(C_P+K_1),y^4+K_1K_2,y^3+K_1K_2K_3,y^2$$
$$text{rhs}=K_w,y^3+(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2),y^2+(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3),y+K_1K_2K_3K_w$$
Instead of solving $text{lhs}=text{rhs}$ for $y$, let $y=10^{-text{pH}}$ and consider that we look for the zero of function
$$f(text{pH})=log(text{lhs})-log(text{rhs})$$ which, if plooted, looks quite linear.
As a proof, using a Taylor expansion built at $text{pH}=7$ (corresponding to $ y=sqrt{k_w}$), the first estimate is $text{pH}=4.65444$ while the exact solution is $text{pH}=4.66886$. One more iteration of Newton method and we are done (as shown below for a ridiculous number of significant figures)
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & text{pH}_n \
0 & 7.00000000000 \
1 & 4.65444138638 \
2 & 4.66886040691 \
3 & 4.66886042380
end{array}
right)$$
answered Dec 7 '18 at 11:27
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
119k1157132
119k1157132
@Claudi leibovici : I got the same as your answer by WolframAlpha with the appreciation of the powerful effort and noble interest.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 7 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
@Claudi leibovici : I got the same as your answer by WolframAlpha with the appreciation of the powerful effort and noble interest.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 7 '18 at 16:10
@Claudi leibovici : I got the same as your answer by WolframAlpha with the appreciation of the powerful effort and noble interest.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 7 '18 at 16:10
@Claudi leibovici : I got the same as your answer by WolframAlpha with the appreciation of the powerful effort and noble interest.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 7 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
For simplicity, write $x_0:=[texttt{H}_3texttt{PO}_4]$, $x_1:=[texttt{H}_2texttt{PO}_4^-]$, $x_2:=[texttt{H}texttt{PO}_4^{2-}]$, and $x_3:=[texttt{PO}_4^{3-}]$ so that $x_i$ is the concentration of the phosphate species with negative-$i$ charge, for $i=0,1,2,3$. Let $y$ denote $[texttt{H}^+]$. Therefore,
$$x_0+x_1+x_2+x_3=C_P,,$$
$$x_0+y=x_2+2x_3+frac{K_w}{y},,$$
$$K_1=frac{yx_1}{x_0},,$$
$$K_2=frac{yx_2}{x_1},,$$
and
$$K_3=frac{yx_3}{x_2},.$$
This gives $x_1=dfrac{K_1x_0}{y}$, $x_2=dfrac{K_2x_1}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}$, and $x_3=dfrac{K_3x_2}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}$. Hence, we end up with two equations in $x_0$ and $y$:
$$x_0+frac{K_1x_0}{y}+frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}=C_Ptag{*}$$
and
$$x_0+y=frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{2K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}+frac{K_w}{y},.tag{#}$$
From (*), we easily get
$$x_0=frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},.$$
Plugging this into (#) yields
$$frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},left(1-frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}-frac{2K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}right)+y-frac{K_w}{y}=0,.$$
That is,
$$y^5+(C_P+K_1)y^4+(K_1K_2-K_w)y^3-(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2-K_1K_2K_3)y^2-(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3)y-K_1K_2K_3K_w=0,.$$
I think you need a numerical solver to solve for $y$ from the last equation. Once you know $y$, you can find the values of $x_0$, $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$.
Mathematica tells me that there is only one positive real solution $y$ (or using Descartes's Rule of Signs, you know that there exists only one positive real solution) to the previous equation, which is $yapprox 2.1times 10^{-5}$. This means $x_0approx 8.4times 10^{-4}$, $x_1approx 0.30$, $x_2approx 8.6times 10^{-4}$, and $x_3approx 8.5times 10^{-12}$. In a sense, you should expect $x_1approx C_P=0.30$. After all, the dissociative reactions into other phosphate species are quite weak.
thanks, I appreciate to derive a quintic equation to compare it with my equation.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:53
add a comment |
For simplicity, write $x_0:=[texttt{H}_3texttt{PO}_4]$, $x_1:=[texttt{H}_2texttt{PO}_4^-]$, $x_2:=[texttt{H}texttt{PO}_4^{2-}]$, and $x_3:=[texttt{PO}_4^{3-}]$ so that $x_i$ is the concentration of the phosphate species with negative-$i$ charge, for $i=0,1,2,3$. Let $y$ denote $[texttt{H}^+]$. Therefore,
$$x_0+x_1+x_2+x_3=C_P,,$$
$$x_0+y=x_2+2x_3+frac{K_w}{y},,$$
$$K_1=frac{yx_1}{x_0},,$$
$$K_2=frac{yx_2}{x_1},,$$
and
$$K_3=frac{yx_3}{x_2},.$$
This gives $x_1=dfrac{K_1x_0}{y}$, $x_2=dfrac{K_2x_1}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}$, and $x_3=dfrac{K_3x_2}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}$. Hence, we end up with two equations in $x_0$ and $y$:
$$x_0+frac{K_1x_0}{y}+frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}=C_Ptag{*}$$
and
$$x_0+y=frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{2K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}+frac{K_w}{y},.tag{#}$$
From (*), we easily get
$$x_0=frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},.$$
Plugging this into (#) yields
$$frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},left(1-frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}-frac{2K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}right)+y-frac{K_w}{y}=0,.$$
That is,
$$y^5+(C_P+K_1)y^4+(K_1K_2-K_w)y^3-(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2-K_1K_2K_3)y^2-(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3)y-K_1K_2K_3K_w=0,.$$
I think you need a numerical solver to solve for $y$ from the last equation. Once you know $y$, you can find the values of $x_0$, $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$.
Mathematica tells me that there is only one positive real solution $y$ (or using Descartes's Rule of Signs, you know that there exists only one positive real solution) to the previous equation, which is $yapprox 2.1times 10^{-5}$. This means $x_0approx 8.4times 10^{-4}$, $x_1approx 0.30$, $x_2approx 8.6times 10^{-4}$, and $x_3approx 8.5times 10^{-12}$. In a sense, you should expect $x_1approx C_P=0.30$. After all, the dissociative reactions into other phosphate species are quite weak.
thanks, I appreciate to derive a quintic equation to compare it with my equation.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:53
add a comment |
For simplicity, write $x_0:=[texttt{H}_3texttt{PO}_4]$, $x_1:=[texttt{H}_2texttt{PO}_4^-]$, $x_2:=[texttt{H}texttt{PO}_4^{2-}]$, and $x_3:=[texttt{PO}_4^{3-}]$ so that $x_i$ is the concentration of the phosphate species with negative-$i$ charge, for $i=0,1,2,3$. Let $y$ denote $[texttt{H}^+]$. Therefore,
$$x_0+x_1+x_2+x_3=C_P,,$$
$$x_0+y=x_2+2x_3+frac{K_w}{y},,$$
$$K_1=frac{yx_1}{x_0},,$$
$$K_2=frac{yx_2}{x_1},,$$
and
$$K_3=frac{yx_3}{x_2},.$$
This gives $x_1=dfrac{K_1x_0}{y}$, $x_2=dfrac{K_2x_1}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}$, and $x_3=dfrac{K_3x_2}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}$. Hence, we end up with two equations in $x_0$ and $y$:
$$x_0+frac{K_1x_0}{y}+frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}=C_Ptag{*}$$
and
$$x_0+y=frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{2K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}+frac{K_w}{y},.tag{#}$$
From (*), we easily get
$$x_0=frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},.$$
Plugging this into (#) yields
$$frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},left(1-frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}-frac{2K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}right)+y-frac{K_w}{y}=0,.$$
That is,
$$y^5+(C_P+K_1)y^4+(K_1K_2-K_w)y^3-(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2-K_1K_2K_3)y^2-(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3)y-K_1K_2K_3K_w=0,.$$
I think you need a numerical solver to solve for $y$ from the last equation. Once you know $y$, you can find the values of $x_0$, $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$.
Mathematica tells me that there is only one positive real solution $y$ (or using Descartes's Rule of Signs, you know that there exists only one positive real solution) to the previous equation, which is $yapprox 2.1times 10^{-5}$. This means $x_0approx 8.4times 10^{-4}$, $x_1approx 0.30$, $x_2approx 8.6times 10^{-4}$, and $x_3approx 8.5times 10^{-12}$. In a sense, you should expect $x_1approx C_P=0.30$. After all, the dissociative reactions into other phosphate species are quite weak.
For simplicity, write $x_0:=[texttt{H}_3texttt{PO}_4]$, $x_1:=[texttt{H}_2texttt{PO}_4^-]$, $x_2:=[texttt{H}texttt{PO}_4^{2-}]$, and $x_3:=[texttt{PO}_4^{3-}]$ so that $x_i$ is the concentration of the phosphate species with negative-$i$ charge, for $i=0,1,2,3$. Let $y$ denote $[texttt{H}^+]$. Therefore,
$$x_0+x_1+x_2+x_3=C_P,,$$
$$x_0+y=x_2+2x_3+frac{K_w}{y},,$$
$$K_1=frac{yx_1}{x_0},,$$
$$K_2=frac{yx_2}{x_1},,$$
and
$$K_3=frac{yx_3}{x_2},.$$
This gives $x_1=dfrac{K_1x_0}{y}$, $x_2=dfrac{K_2x_1}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}$, and $x_3=dfrac{K_3x_2}{y}=dfrac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}$. Hence, we end up with two equations in $x_0$ and $y$:
$$x_0+frac{K_1x_0}{y}+frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}=C_Ptag{*}$$
and
$$x_0+y=frac{K_1K_2x_0}{y^2}+frac{2K_1K_2K_3x_0}{y^3}+frac{K_w}{y},.tag{#}$$
From (*), we easily get
$$x_0=frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},.$$
Plugging this into (#) yields
$$frac{C_P}{1+frac{K_1}{y}+frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}+frac{K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}},left(1-frac{K_1K_2}{y^2}-frac{2K_1K_2K_3}{y^3}right)+y-frac{K_w}{y}=0,.$$
That is,
$$y^5+(C_P+K_1)y^4+(K_1K_2-K_w)y^3-(K_1K_w+C_PK_1K_2-K_1K_2K_3)y^2-(K_1K_2K_w+2C_PK_1K_2K_3)y-K_1K_2K_3K_w=0,.$$
I think you need a numerical solver to solve for $y$ from the last equation. Once you know $y$, you can find the values of $x_0$, $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$.
Mathematica tells me that there is only one positive real solution $y$ (or using Descartes's Rule of Signs, you know that there exists only one positive real solution) to the previous equation, which is $yapprox 2.1times 10^{-5}$. This means $x_0approx 8.4times 10^{-4}$, $x_1approx 0.30$, $x_2approx 8.6times 10^{-4}$, and $x_3approx 8.5times 10^{-12}$. In a sense, you should expect $x_1approx C_P=0.30$. After all, the dissociative reactions into other phosphate species are quite weak.
edited Dec 19 '18 at 0:04
answered Dec 5 '18 at 12:41
BatominovskiBatominovski
1
1
thanks, I appreciate to derive a quintic equation to compare it with my equation.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:53
add a comment |
thanks, I appreciate to derive a quintic equation to compare it with my equation.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:53
thanks, I appreciate to derive a quintic equation to compare it with my equation.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:53
thanks, I appreciate to derive a quintic equation to compare it with my equation.
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:53
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026989%2fmixed-mathematical-chemical-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
@Claude Leibovici
– Adnan AL-Amleh
Dec 5 '18 at 12:11