Quotient of compactly supported functions where denomiator has larger support.












2














If $ phi, varphi in mathcal{D} $ are given test functions and $ text{Supp} varphi subseteq text{Supp} phi $. I have used many times in my PDE class that the quotient $ varphi / phi $ is well-defined and smooth because $ phi $ vanishes on sets where $ varphi $ vanishes.



I have never quiet thought this through. What is the right point of view in looking at the well-definedness of this function? Is it that we assign the value zero to the expression $0/0$, or perhaps any other reason? Is this statement even correct, in the sense that there has to be some additional assumption on the support? In particular, if $ phi in mathcal{D}$. Then since $ text{Supp} phi' subseteq text{Supp} phi $ , does it make sense to write $ phi' / phi$?



Many thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • You meant $phi$ has no zeros in its support. For $phi'/phi$ try with $phi(x) = e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:43












  • A piece of unrelated advice: $phi$ and $varphi$ are the same symbol. It's confusing do use both, it's like you would use "a" and "$a$" as two symbols. Rather, use $phi$ and $theta$, or $varphi$ and $theta$.
    – 5xum
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:49










  • @5xum Mixing $phi,varphi$ is the common notation for functions in $C^infty_c$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:52










  • @reuns Are you sure you aren't talking about mixing $Phi$ and $varphi$?
    – 5xum
    Dec 5 '18 at 12:01










  • @Meagain $e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$ is the first example of a smooth function vanishing for $x < 0$ and $e^{-1/(1-x^2)}1_{|x| < 1}$ is the first example in $C^infty_c$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 12:05
















2














If $ phi, varphi in mathcal{D} $ are given test functions and $ text{Supp} varphi subseteq text{Supp} phi $. I have used many times in my PDE class that the quotient $ varphi / phi $ is well-defined and smooth because $ phi $ vanishes on sets where $ varphi $ vanishes.



I have never quiet thought this through. What is the right point of view in looking at the well-definedness of this function? Is it that we assign the value zero to the expression $0/0$, or perhaps any other reason? Is this statement even correct, in the sense that there has to be some additional assumption on the support? In particular, if $ phi in mathcal{D}$. Then since $ text{Supp} phi' subseteq text{Supp} phi $ , does it make sense to write $ phi' / phi$?



Many thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • You meant $phi$ has no zeros in its support. For $phi'/phi$ try with $phi(x) = e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:43












  • A piece of unrelated advice: $phi$ and $varphi$ are the same symbol. It's confusing do use both, it's like you would use "a" and "$a$" as two symbols. Rather, use $phi$ and $theta$, or $varphi$ and $theta$.
    – 5xum
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:49










  • @5xum Mixing $phi,varphi$ is the common notation for functions in $C^infty_c$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:52










  • @reuns Are you sure you aren't talking about mixing $Phi$ and $varphi$?
    – 5xum
    Dec 5 '18 at 12:01










  • @Meagain $e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$ is the first example of a smooth function vanishing for $x < 0$ and $e^{-1/(1-x^2)}1_{|x| < 1}$ is the first example in $C^infty_c$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 12:05














2












2








2







If $ phi, varphi in mathcal{D} $ are given test functions and $ text{Supp} varphi subseteq text{Supp} phi $. I have used many times in my PDE class that the quotient $ varphi / phi $ is well-defined and smooth because $ phi $ vanishes on sets where $ varphi $ vanishes.



I have never quiet thought this through. What is the right point of view in looking at the well-definedness of this function? Is it that we assign the value zero to the expression $0/0$, or perhaps any other reason? Is this statement even correct, in the sense that there has to be some additional assumption on the support? In particular, if $ phi in mathcal{D}$. Then since $ text{Supp} phi' subseteq text{Supp} phi $ , does it make sense to write $ phi' / phi$?



Many thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question













If $ phi, varphi in mathcal{D} $ are given test functions and $ text{Supp} varphi subseteq text{Supp} phi $. I have used many times in my PDE class that the quotient $ varphi / phi $ is well-defined and smooth because $ phi $ vanishes on sets where $ varphi $ vanishes.



I have never quiet thought this through. What is the right point of view in looking at the well-definedness of this function? Is it that we assign the value zero to the expression $0/0$, or perhaps any other reason? Is this statement even correct, in the sense that there has to be some additional assumption on the support? In particular, if $ phi in mathcal{D}$. Then since $ text{Supp} phi' subseteq text{Supp} phi $ , does it make sense to write $ phi' / phi$?



Many thanks in advance!







real-analysis calculus analysis pde






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 5 '18 at 11:26









MeagainMeagain

16910




16910












  • You meant $phi$ has no zeros in its support. For $phi'/phi$ try with $phi(x) = e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:43












  • A piece of unrelated advice: $phi$ and $varphi$ are the same symbol. It's confusing do use both, it's like you would use "a" and "$a$" as two symbols. Rather, use $phi$ and $theta$, or $varphi$ and $theta$.
    – 5xum
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:49










  • @5xum Mixing $phi,varphi$ is the common notation for functions in $C^infty_c$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:52










  • @reuns Are you sure you aren't talking about mixing $Phi$ and $varphi$?
    – 5xum
    Dec 5 '18 at 12:01










  • @Meagain $e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$ is the first example of a smooth function vanishing for $x < 0$ and $e^{-1/(1-x^2)}1_{|x| < 1}$ is the first example in $C^infty_c$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 12:05


















  • You meant $phi$ has no zeros in its support. For $phi'/phi$ try with $phi(x) = e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:43












  • A piece of unrelated advice: $phi$ and $varphi$ are the same symbol. It's confusing do use both, it's like you would use "a" and "$a$" as two symbols. Rather, use $phi$ and $theta$, or $varphi$ and $theta$.
    – 5xum
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:49










  • @5xum Mixing $phi,varphi$ is the common notation for functions in $C^infty_c$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 11:52










  • @reuns Are you sure you aren't talking about mixing $Phi$ and $varphi$?
    – 5xum
    Dec 5 '18 at 12:01










  • @Meagain $e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$ is the first example of a smooth function vanishing for $x < 0$ and $e^{-1/(1-x^2)}1_{|x| < 1}$ is the first example in $C^infty_c$
    – reuns
    Dec 5 '18 at 12:05
















You meant $phi$ has no zeros in its support. For $phi'/phi$ try with $phi(x) = e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 11:43






You meant $phi$ has no zeros in its support. For $phi'/phi$ try with $phi(x) = e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 11:43














A piece of unrelated advice: $phi$ and $varphi$ are the same symbol. It's confusing do use both, it's like you would use "a" and "$a$" as two symbols. Rather, use $phi$ and $theta$, or $varphi$ and $theta$.
– 5xum
Dec 5 '18 at 11:49




A piece of unrelated advice: $phi$ and $varphi$ are the same symbol. It's confusing do use both, it's like you would use "a" and "$a$" as two symbols. Rather, use $phi$ and $theta$, or $varphi$ and $theta$.
– 5xum
Dec 5 '18 at 11:49












@5xum Mixing $phi,varphi$ is the common notation for functions in $C^infty_c$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 11:52




@5xum Mixing $phi,varphi$ is the common notation for functions in $C^infty_c$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 11:52












@reuns Are you sure you aren't talking about mixing $Phi$ and $varphi$?
– 5xum
Dec 5 '18 at 12:01




@reuns Are you sure you aren't talking about mixing $Phi$ and $varphi$?
– 5xum
Dec 5 '18 at 12:01












@Meagain $e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$ is the first example of a smooth function vanishing for $x < 0$ and $e^{-1/(1-x^2)}1_{|x| < 1}$ is the first example in $C^infty_c$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 12:05




@Meagain $e^{-1/x^2}1_{x > 0}$ is the first example of a smooth function vanishing for $x < 0$ and $e^{-1/(1-x^2)}1_{|x| < 1}$ is the first example in $C^infty_c$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 12:05










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026962%2fquotient-of-compactly-supported-functions-where-denomiator-has-larger-support%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026962%2fquotient-of-compactly-supported-functions-where-denomiator-has-larger-support%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Sphinx de Gizeh

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...