A rook up, can black end the checks and thereby win (LiChess.org puzzle 74754)?
A LiChess.org puzzle ends at this position with white to move. Apparently, black has a win here, but running through moves with LiChess's Stockfish, I can't seem to figure out how to end the checks.
[FEN "1K6/PPPq2PP/5P2/3p4/1p2Q3/7p/8/k2r4 w - - 0 1"]
Question: Can black end the checks and win?
Maybe there's a humanly understandable reason that the checks don't end. Or maybe the web version of Stockfish is not looking deep enough.
perpetual
add a comment |
A LiChess.org puzzle ends at this position with white to move. Apparently, black has a win here, but running through moves with LiChess's Stockfish, I can't seem to figure out how to end the checks.
[FEN "1K6/PPPq2PP/5P2/3p4/1p2Q3/7p/8/k2r4 w - - 0 1"]
Question: Can black end the checks and win?
Maybe there's a humanly understandable reason that the checks don't end. Or maybe the web version of Stockfish is not looking deep enough.
perpetual
Unfortunately, often engine-generated puzzles suck!
– Ywapom
Dec 5 '18 at 17:57
Well i played about 30 moves with stockfish, and really couldnt get out of checks, despite the evaluation always being -2 or better for black. So it really does look like stockfish has a hard time accessing the position as a draw
– Isac
Dec 6 '18 at 11:46
@Isac: I had no trouble winning as black against Stockfish level 7 on lichess.org; against 8 I ended up in a rook and pawn endgame that ended up drawn, but which I think might have been winnable with better play. I think one of Stockfish 8's moves is sub-optimal, however.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
add a comment |
A LiChess.org puzzle ends at this position with white to move. Apparently, black has a win here, but running through moves with LiChess's Stockfish, I can't seem to figure out how to end the checks.
[FEN "1K6/PPPq2PP/5P2/3p4/1p2Q3/7p/8/k2r4 w - - 0 1"]
Question: Can black end the checks and win?
Maybe there's a humanly understandable reason that the checks don't end. Or maybe the web version of Stockfish is not looking deep enough.
perpetual
A LiChess.org puzzle ends at this position with white to move. Apparently, black has a win here, but running through moves with LiChess's Stockfish, I can't seem to figure out how to end the checks.
[FEN "1K6/PPPq2PP/5P2/3p4/1p2Q3/7p/8/k2r4 w - - 0 1"]
Question: Can black end the checks and win?
Maybe there's a humanly understandable reason that the checks don't end. Or maybe the web version of Stockfish is not looking deep enough.
perpetual
perpetual
asked Dec 5 '18 at 7:04
Rebecca J. StonesRebecca J. Stones
640317
640317
Unfortunately, often engine-generated puzzles suck!
– Ywapom
Dec 5 '18 at 17:57
Well i played about 30 moves with stockfish, and really couldnt get out of checks, despite the evaluation always being -2 or better for black. So it really does look like stockfish has a hard time accessing the position as a draw
– Isac
Dec 6 '18 at 11:46
@Isac: I had no trouble winning as black against Stockfish level 7 on lichess.org; against 8 I ended up in a rook and pawn endgame that ended up drawn, but which I think might have been winnable with better play. I think one of Stockfish 8's moves is sub-optimal, however.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
add a comment |
Unfortunately, often engine-generated puzzles suck!
– Ywapom
Dec 5 '18 at 17:57
Well i played about 30 moves with stockfish, and really couldnt get out of checks, despite the evaluation always being -2 or better for black. So it really does look like stockfish has a hard time accessing the position as a draw
– Isac
Dec 6 '18 at 11:46
@Isac: I had no trouble winning as black against Stockfish level 7 on lichess.org; against 8 I ended up in a rook and pawn endgame that ended up drawn, but which I think might have been winnable with better play. I think one of Stockfish 8's moves is sub-optimal, however.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
Unfortunately, often engine-generated puzzles suck!
– Ywapom
Dec 5 '18 at 17:57
Unfortunately, often engine-generated puzzles suck!
– Ywapom
Dec 5 '18 at 17:57
Well i played about 30 moves with stockfish, and really couldnt get out of checks, despite the evaluation always being -2 or better for black. So it really does look like stockfish has a hard time accessing the position as a draw
– Isac
Dec 6 '18 at 11:46
Well i played about 30 moves with stockfish, and really couldnt get out of checks, despite the evaluation always being -2 or better for black. So it really does look like stockfish has a hard time accessing the position as a draw
– Isac
Dec 6 '18 at 11:46
@Isac: I had no trouble winning as black against Stockfish level 7 on lichess.org; against 8 I ended up in a rook and pawn endgame that ended up drawn, but which I think might have been winnable with better play. I think one of Stockfish 8's moves is sub-optimal, however.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
@Isac: I had no trouble winning as black against Stockfish level 7 on lichess.org; against 8 I ended up in a rook and pawn endgame that ended up drawn, but which I think might have been winnable with better play. I think one of Stockfish 8's moves is sub-optimal, however.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Looks like you are correct with your second assumption - the evaluation didn't (cannot) look deep enough.
It's a classic application of the horizon effect.
The white queen essentially has half of the chessboard at her disposal to give checks, while the black king has no shelter (the single rook is not enough (but moving it every now and then will reset the 3-fold-repetition countdown) and the black queen is cut off) but a lot of space to run around. The pawn on g5 will fall with check at some point and reset the 50-move countdown, too. The number of lines increases exponentially and since none of them actually changes anything significant about the position, Stockfish cannot efficiently prune any of them. Thus the search tree grows too large to process even for a modern engine on presumably good hardware.
PS: I've tried and removed the white pawns and the black pawn on g5 who look insignificant to the perpetual at first glance to reduce the number of chessmen to 7 - low enough to use Lichess' tablebase. And indeed, that position is won for black. However, this is meaningless as both sides will quickly play moves that are impossible in the puzzle position, e.g. the white queen will move to a1 and the black king will run towards e3.
The pawns are a key aspect of the position, since black can maneuver things so white would need to push one. Black's level of control goes down when White pushes a pawn, however, since until White has done that many king-rook forks won't be a threat.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:09
add a comment |
At first I thought that the black king could hide on h5, but then I realized that I had made a fatal mistake for white in my analysis. With this mistake corrected, it is clear that black's king cannot hide on h5 without allowing a capture on e8 with check.
[FEN "4r2k/8/p7/3Q2p1/4p3/2P5/PP2qPPP/6K1 w - - 0 1"]
1.Qd4+ Kh7 2.Qd7 Kh6 3.Qc6+! Kg7 4.Qd7+! Kf6 5.Qd6+ (4.Qc7?? Kg8!)(3.Qd6+?? Kh5 {White is out of checks, and under the threat of mate on e1. It is, however, not game over just yet.} 4.h3 (4.g3 Qg4! {shuts down white's play completely.}) Qe1+ 5.Kh2 Qxf2 6.Qd7!? {Trying to set up a little trap.} Rh8 (6...Qf8?? 7.Qh7+ Qh6 8.g4+! {and now white is winning.}) 7.Qg7 (7.Qg4 Kg6 8. Qxe4+ Qf5 9.Qe6+ Qf6 10.Qe4+ Kh6! {White is out of checks, and black is winning.})( 7.g4+ Kg6! 8.Qe6+ Qf6 9.Qxe4+ Kh6 {and black's king is safe. Game over.}) Qf8)
The final position seems like a draw to me, since black cannot really escape the queen checks by any other means than by getting the king to c2. But this seems impossible, since that requires black's king to cross the d-file at some point, which white will be able to prevent.
Edit: I realized that my initial line was incorrect, and that white shouldn't just check along the d-file.
1
I throw in 3. Qc6+ instead of 3. Qd6+, and now 3...Kh5 fails because White can take the rook with check (also not engine checked).
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 13:58
@Annatar Thanks for pointing it out. I realized this as well, but only after I had already posted my answer. My analysis (and subsequent evaluation of the position) is now updated.
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:00
It was not a bad thought. And at the very least it's a much better attempt to swindle a win out of an unalert opponent than just running around aimlessly.
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 14:06
@Annatar Agreed, but in the end I tried so hard to swindle white in my analysis that I ended up swindling myself :)
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:12
After Qd6+, can black play Re6 and try to run with the king towards g4?
– user1583209
Dec 5 '18 at 15:44
|
show 3 more comments
My feeling is that since black has mate in 1 threat, he can leave the rook undefended and march the K to go behind white's a/b/c pawns and end the checks. How exactly to get there I'm not sure, but I think white can't always keep d3 defended while giving checks non-stop.
Edit: After trying half hour against my phone, I now agree with the comments and other answers that such a plan is not possible.
2
The only path toward c2 is through c4-d3. But when the black king goes to c4, the wQ can stop it either with Qd4 or Qa6 (the later is even winning). It means the bK has to go to c4 when the wQ doesn't control either c4,d4,or a6. On such an open board it is only feasible if the wQ stands on b8,e8,e7 or f8 after bR has moved away. (from h7 it wouldn't be checking the bK on d5/c5/b5). Forcing the queen to allow the rook to move and to occupy such remote squares for checking the bK on the 5th rank would be quite a feat.
– Evargalo
Dec 5 '18 at 11:34
Such is impossible.
– QuIcKmAtHs
Dec 5 '18 at 13:55
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "435"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23146%2fa-rook-up-can-black-end-the-checks-and-thereby-win-lichess-org-puzzle-74754%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Looks like you are correct with your second assumption - the evaluation didn't (cannot) look deep enough.
It's a classic application of the horizon effect.
The white queen essentially has half of the chessboard at her disposal to give checks, while the black king has no shelter (the single rook is not enough (but moving it every now and then will reset the 3-fold-repetition countdown) and the black queen is cut off) but a lot of space to run around. The pawn on g5 will fall with check at some point and reset the 50-move countdown, too. The number of lines increases exponentially and since none of them actually changes anything significant about the position, Stockfish cannot efficiently prune any of them. Thus the search tree grows too large to process even for a modern engine on presumably good hardware.
PS: I've tried and removed the white pawns and the black pawn on g5 who look insignificant to the perpetual at first glance to reduce the number of chessmen to 7 - low enough to use Lichess' tablebase. And indeed, that position is won for black. However, this is meaningless as both sides will quickly play moves that are impossible in the puzzle position, e.g. the white queen will move to a1 and the black king will run towards e3.
The pawns are a key aspect of the position, since black can maneuver things so white would need to push one. Black's level of control goes down when White pushes a pawn, however, since until White has done that many king-rook forks won't be a threat.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:09
add a comment |
Looks like you are correct with your second assumption - the evaluation didn't (cannot) look deep enough.
It's a classic application of the horizon effect.
The white queen essentially has half of the chessboard at her disposal to give checks, while the black king has no shelter (the single rook is not enough (but moving it every now and then will reset the 3-fold-repetition countdown) and the black queen is cut off) but a lot of space to run around. The pawn on g5 will fall with check at some point and reset the 50-move countdown, too. The number of lines increases exponentially and since none of them actually changes anything significant about the position, Stockfish cannot efficiently prune any of them. Thus the search tree grows too large to process even for a modern engine on presumably good hardware.
PS: I've tried and removed the white pawns and the black pawn on g5 who look insignificant to the perpetual at first glance to reduce the number of chessmen to 7 - low enough to use Lichess' tablebase. And indeed, that position is won for black. However, this is meaningless as both sides will quickly play moves that are impossible in the puzzle position, e.g. the white queen will move to a1 and the black king will run towards e3.
The pawns are a key aspect of the position, since black can maneuver things so white would need to push one. Black's level of control goes down when White pushes a pawn, however, since until White has done that many king-rook forks won't be a threat.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:09
add a comment |
Looks like you are correct with your second assumption - the evaluation didn't (cannot) look deep enough.
It's a classic application of the horizon effect.
The white queen essentially has half of the chessboard at her disposal to give checks, while the black king has no shelter (the single rook is not enough (but moving it every now and then will reset the 3-fold-repetition countdown) and the black queen is cut off) but a lot of space to run around. The pawn on g5 will fall with check at some point and reset the 50-move countdown, too. The number of lines increases exponentially and since none of them actually changes anything significant about the position, Stockfish cannot efficiently prune any of them. Thus the search tree grows too large to process even for a modern engine on presumably good hardware.
PS: I've tried and removed the white pawns and the black pawn on g5 who look insignificant to the perpetual at first glance to reduce the number of chessmen to 7 - low enough to use Lichess' tablebase. And indeed, that position is won for black. However, this is meaningless as both sides will quickly play moves that are impossible in the puzzle position, e.g. the white queen will move to a1 and the black king will run towards e3.
Looks like you are correct with your second assumption - the evaluation didn't (cannot) look deep enough.
It's a classic application of the horizon effect.
The white queen essentially has half of the chessboard at her disposal to give checks, while the black king has no shelter (the single rook is not enough (but moving it every now and then will reset the 3-fold-repetition countdown) and the black queen is cut off) but a lot of space to run around. The pawn on g5 will fall with check at some point and reset the 50-move countdown, too. The number of lines increases exponentially and since none of them actually changes anything significant about the position, Stockfish cannot efficiently prune any of them. Thus the search tree grows too large to process even for a modern engine on presumably good hardware.
PS: I've tried and removed the white pawns and the black pawn on g5 who look insignificant to the perpetual at first glance to reduce the number of chessmen to 7 - low enough to use Lichess' tablebase. And indeed, that position is won for black. However, this is meaningless as both sides will quickly play moves that are impossible in the puzzle position, e.g. the white queen will move to a1 and the black king will run towards e3.
edited Dec 5 '18 at 9:42
answered Dec 5 '18 at 7:58
AnnatarAnnatar
2,100913
2,100913
The pawns are a key aspect of the position, since black can maneuver things so white would need to push one. Black's level of control goes down when White pushes a pawn, however, since until White has done that many king-rook forks won't be a threat.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:09
add a comment |
The pawns are a key aspect of the position, since black can maneuver things so white would need to push one. Black's level of control goes down when White pushes a pawn, however, since until White has done that many king-rook forks won't be a threat.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:09
The pawns are a key aspect of the position, since black can maneuver things so white would need to push one. Black's level of control goes down when White pushes a pawn, however, since until White has done that many king-rook forks won't be a threat.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:09
The pawns are a key aspect of the position, since black can maneuver things so white would need to push one. Black's level of control goes down when White pushes a pawn, however, since until White has done that many king-rook forks won't be a threat.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:09
add a comment |
At first I thought that the black king could hide on h5, but then I realized that I had made a fatal mistake for white in my analysis. With this mistake corrected, it is clear that black's king cannot hide on h5 without allowing a capture on e8 with check.
[FEN "4r2k/8/p7/3Q2p1/4p3/2P5/PP2qPPP/6K1 w - - 0 1"]
1.Qd4+ Kh7 2.Qd7 Kh6 3.Qc6+! Kg7 4.Qd7+! Kf6 5.Qd6+ (4.Qc7?? Kg8!)(3.Qd6+?? Kh5 {White is out of checks, and under the threat of mate on e1. It is, however, not game over just yet.} 4.h3 (4.g3 Qg4! {shuts down white's play completely.}) Qe1+ 5.Kh2 Qxf2 6.Qd7!? {Trying to set up a little trap.} Rh8 (6...Qf8?? 7.Qh7+ Qh6 8.g4+! {and now white is winning.}) 7.Qg7 (7.Qg4 Kg6 8. Qxe4+ Qf5 9.Qe6+ Qf6 10.Qe4+ Kh6! {White is out of checks, and black is winning.})( 7.g4+ Kg6! 8.Qe6+ Qf6 9.Qxe4+ Kh6 {and black's king is safe. Game over.}) Qf8)
The final position seems like a draw to me, since black cannot really escape the queen checks by any other means than by getting the king to c2. But this seems impossible, since that requires black's king to cross the d-file at some point, which white will be able to prevent.
Edit: I realized that my initial line was incorrect, and that white shouldn't just check along the d-file.
1
I throw in 3. Qc6+ instead of 3. Qd6+, and now 3...Kh5 fails because White can take the rook with check (also not engine checked).
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 13:58
@Annatar Thanks for pointing it out. I realized this as well, but only after I had already posted my answer. My analysis (and subsequent evaluation of the position) is now updated.
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:00
It was not a bad thought. And at the very least it's a much better attempt to swindle a win out of an unalert opponent than just running around aimlessly.
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 14:06
@Annatar Agreed, but in the end I tried so hard to swindle white in my analysis that I ended up swindling myself :)
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:12
After Qd6+, can black play Re6 and try to run with the king towards g4?
– user1583209
Dec 5 '18 at 15:44
|
show 3 more comments
At first I thought that the black king could hide on h5, but then I realized that I had made a fatal mistake for white in my analysis. With this mistake corrected, it is clear that black's king cannot hide on h5 without allowing a capture on e8 with check.
[FEN "4r2k/8/p7/3Q2p1/4p3/2P5/PP2qPPP/6K1 w - - 0 1"]
1.Qd4+ Kh7 2.Qd7 Kh6 3.Qc6+! Kg7 4.Qd7+! Kf6 5.Qd6+ (4.Qc7?? Kg8!)(3.Qd6+?? Kh5 {White is out of checks, and under the threat of mate on e1. It is, however, not game over just yet.} 4.h3 (4.g3 Qg4! {shuts down white's play completely.}) Qe1+ 5.Kh2 Qxf2 6.Qd7!? {Trying to set up a little trap.} Rh8 (6...Qf8?? 7.Qh7+ Qh6 8.g4+! {and now white is winning.}) 7.Qg7 (7.Qg4 Kg6 8. Qxe4+ Qf5 9.Qe6+ Qf6 10.Qe4+ Kh6! {White is out of checks, and black is winning.})( 7.g4+ Kg6! 8.Qe6+ Qf6 9.Qxe4+ Kh6 {and black's king is safe. Game over.}) Qf8)
The final position seems like a draw to me, since black cannot really escape the queen checks by any other means than by getting the king to c2. But this seems impossible, since that requires black's king to cross the d-file at some point, which white will be able to prevent.
Edit: I realized that my initial line was incorrect, and that white shouldn't just check along the d-file.
1
I throw in 3. Qc6+ instead of 3. Qd6+, and now 3...Kh5 fails because White can take the rook with check (also not engine checked).
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 13:58
@Annatar Thanks for pointing it out. I realized this as well, but only after I had already posted my answer. My analysis (and subsequent evaluation of the position) is now updated.
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:00
It was not a bad thought. And at the very least it's a much better attempt to swindle a win out of an unalert opponent than just running around aimlessly.
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 14:06
@Annatar Agreed, but in the end I tried so hard to swindle white in my analysis that I ended up swindling myself :)
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:12
After Qd6+, can black play Re6 and try to run with the king towards g4?
– user1583209
Dec 5 '18 at 15:44
|
show 3 more comments
At first I thought that the black king could hide on h5, but then I realized that I had made a fatal mistake for white in my analysis. With this mistake corrected, it is clear that black's king cannot hide on h5 without allowing a capture on e8 with check.
[FEN "4r2k/8/p7/3Q2p1/4p3/2P5/PP2qPPP/6K1 w - - 0 1"]
1.Qd4+ Kh7 2.Qd7 Kh6 3.Qc6+! Kg7 4.Qd7+! Kf6 5.Qd6+ (4.Qc7?? Kg8!)(3.Qd6+?? Kh5 {White is out of checks, and under the threat of mate on e1. It is, however, not game over just yet.} 4.h3 (4.g3 Qg4! {shuts down white's play completely.}) Qe1+ 5.Kh2 Qxf2 6.Qd7!? {Trying to set up a little trap.} Rh8 (6...Qf8?? 7.Qh7+ Qh6 8.g4+! {and now white is winning.}) 7.Qg7 (7.Qg4 Kg6 8. Qxe4+ Qf5 9.Qe6+ Qf6 10.Qe4+ Kh6! {White is out of checks, and black is winning.})( 7.g4+ Kg6! 8.Qe6+ Qf6 9.Qxe4+ Kh6 {and black's king is safe. Game over.}) Qf8)
The final position seems like a draw to me, since black cannot really escape the queen checks by any other means than by getting the king to c2. But this seems impossible, since that requires black's king to cross the d-file at some point, which white will be able to prevent.
Edit: I realized that my initial line was incorrect, and that white shouldn't just check along the d-file.
At first I thought that the black king could hide on h5, but then I realized that I had made a fatal mistake for white in my analysis. With this mistake corrected, it is clear that black's king cannot hide on h5 without allowing a capture on e8 with check.
[FEN "4r2k/8/p7/3Q2p1/4p3/2P5/PP2qPPP/6K1 w - - 0 1"]
1.Qd4+ Kh7 2.Qd7 Kh6 3.Qc6+! Kg7 4.Qd7+! Kf6 5.Qd6+ (4.Qc7?? Kg8!)(3.Qd6+?? Kh5 {White is out of checks, and under the threat of mate on e1. It is, however, not game over just yet.} 4.h3 (4.g3 Qg4! {shuts down white's play completely.}) Qe1+ 5.Kh2 Qxf2 6.Qd7!? {Trying to set up a little trap.} Rh8 (6...Qf8?? 7.Qh7+ Qh6 8.g4+! {and now white is winning.}) 7.Qg7 (7.Qg4 Kg6 8. Qxe4+ Qf5 9.Qe6+ Qf6 10.Qe4+ Kh6! {White is out of checks, and black is winning.})( 7.g4+ Kg6! 8.Qe6+ Qf6 9.Qxe4+ Kh6 {and black's king is safe. Game over.}) Qf8)
The final position seems like a draw to me, since black cannot really escape the queen checks by any other means than by getting the king to c2. But this seems impossible, since that requires black's king to cross the d-file at some point, which white will be able to prevent.
Edit: I realized that my initial line was incorrect, and that white shouldn't just check along the d-file.
edited Dec 5 '18 at 13:58
answered Dec 5 '18 at 13:10
ScoungedScounged
3,4941319
3,4941319
1
I throw in 3. Qc6+ instead of 3. Qd6+, and now 3...Kh5 fails because White can take the rook with check (also not engine checked).
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 13:58
@Annatar Thanks for pointing it out. I realized this as well, but only after I had already posted my answer. My analysis (and subsequent evaluation of the position) is now updated.
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:00
It was not a bad thought. And at the very least it's a much better attempt to swindle a win out of an unalert opponent than just running around aimlessly.
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 14:06
@Annatar Agreed, but in the end I tried so hard to swindle white in my analysis that I ended up swindling myself :)
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:12
After Qd6+, can black play Re6 and try to run with the king towards g4?
– user1583209
Dec 5 '18 at 15:44
|
show 3 more comments
1
I throw in 3. Qc6+ instead of 3. Qd6+, and now 3...Kh5 fails because White can take the rook with check (also not engine checked).
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 13:58
@Annatar Thanks for pointing it out. I realized this as well, but only after I had already posted my answer. My analysis (and subsequent evaluation of the position) is now updated.
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:00
It was not a bad thought. And at the very least it's a much better attempt to swindle a win out of an unalert opponent than just running around aimlessly.
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 14:06
@Annatar Agreed, but in the end I tried so hard to swindle white in my analysis that I ended up swindling myself :)
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:12
After Qd6+, can black play Re6 and try to run with the king towards g4?
– user1583209
Dec 5 '18 at 15:44
1
1
I throw in 3. Qc6+ instead of 3. Qd6+, and now 3...Kh5 fails because White can take the rook with check (also not engine checked).
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 13:58
I throw in 3. Qc6+ instead of 3. Qd6+, and now 3...Kh5 fails because White can take the rook with check (also not engine checked).
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 13:58
@Annatar Thanks for pointing it out. I realized this as well, but only after I had already posted my answer. My analysis (and subsequent evaluation of the position) is now updated.
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:00
@Annatar Thanks for pointing it out. I realized this as well, but only after I had already posted my answer. My analysis (and subsequent evaluation of the position) is now updated.
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:00
It was not a bad thought. And at the very least it's a much better attempt to swindle a win out of an unalert opponent than just running around aimlessly.
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 14:06
It was not a bad thought. And at the very least it's a much better attempt to swindle a win out of an unalert opponent than just running around aimlessly.
– Annatar
Dec 5 '18 at 14:06
@Annatar Agreed, but in the end I tried so hard to swindle white in my analysis that I ended up swindling myself :)
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:12
@Annatar Agreed, but in the end I tried so hard to swindle white in my analysis that I ended up swindling myself :)
– Scounged
Dec 5 '18 at 14:12
After Qd6+, can black play Re6 and try to run with the king towards g4?
– user1583209
Dec 5 '18 at 15:44
After Qd6+, can black play Re6 and try to run with the king towards g4?
– user1583209
Dec 5 '18 at 15:44
|
show 3 more comments
My feeling is that since black has mate in 1 threat, he can leave the rook undefended and march the K to go behind white's a/b/c pawns and end the checks. How exactly to get there I'm not sure, but I think white can't always keep d3 defended while giving checks non-stop.
Edit: After trying half hour against my phone, I now agree with the comments and other answers that such a plan is not possible.
2
The only path toward c2 is through c4-d3. But when the black king goes to c4, the wQ can stop it either with Qd4 or Qa6 (the later is even winning). It means the bK has to go to c4 when the wQ doesn't control either c4,d4,or a6. On such an open board it is only feasible if the wQ stands on b8,e8,e7 or f8 after bR has moved away. (from h7 it wouldn't be checking the bK on d5/c5/b5). Forcing the queen to allow the rook to move and to occupy such remote squares for checking the bK on the 5th rank would be quite a feat.
– Evargalo
Dec 5 '18 at 11:34
Such is impossible.
– QuIcKmAtHs
Dec 5 '18 at 13:55
add a comment |
My feeling is that since black has mate in 1 threat, he can leave the rook undefended and march the K to go behind white's a/b/c pawns and end the checks. How exactly to get there I'm not sure, but I think white can't always keep d3 defended while giving checks non-stop.
Edit: After trying half hour against my phone, I now agree with the comments and other answers that such a plan is not possible.
2
The only path toward c2 is through c4-d3. But when the black king goes to c4, the wQ can stop it either with Qd4 or Qa6 (the later is even winning). It means the bK has to go to c4 when the wQ doesn't control either c4,d4,or a6. On such an open board it is only feasible if the wQ stands on b8,e8,e7 or f8 after bR has moved away. (from h7 it wouldn't be checking the bK on d5/c5/b5). Forcing the queen to allow the rook to move and to occupy such remote squares for checking the bK on the 5th rank would be quite a feat.
– Evargalo
Dec 5 '18 at 11:34
Such is impossible.
– QuIcKmAtHs
Dec 5 '18 at 13:55
add a comment |
My feeling is that since black has mate in 1 threat, he can leave the rook undefended and march the K to go behind white's a/b/c pawns and end the checks. How exactly to get there I'm not sure, but I think white can't always keep d3 defended while giving checks non-stop.
Edit: After trying half hour against my phone, I now agree with the comments and other answers that such a plan is not possible.
My feeling is that since black has mate in 1 threat, he can leave the rook undefended and march the K to go behind white's a/b/c pawns and end the checks. How exactly to get there I'm not sure, but I think white can't always keep d3 defended while giving checks non-stop.
Edit: After trying half hour against my phone, I now agree with the comments and other answers that such a plan is not possible.
edited Dec 5 '18 at 15:57
answered Dec 5 '18 at 11:06
jf328jf328
973411
973411
2
The only path toward c2 is through c4-d3. But when the black king goes to c4, the wQ can stop it either with Qd4 or Qa6 (the later is even winning). It means the bK has to go to c4 when the wQ doesn't control either c4,d4,or a6. On such an open board it is only feasible if the wQ stands on b8,e8,e7 or f8 after bR has moved away. (from h7 it wouldn't be checking the bK on d5/c5/b5). Forcing the queen to allow the rook to move and to occupy such remote squares for checking the bK on the 5th rank would be quite a feat.
– Evargalo
Dec 5 '18 at 11:34
Such is impossible.
– QuIcKmAtHs
Dec 5 '18 at 13:55
add a comment |
2
The only path toward c2 is through c4-d3. But when the black king goes to c4, the wQ can stop it either with Qd4 or Qa6 (the later is even winning). It means the bK has to go to c4 when the wQ doesn't control either c4,d4,or a6. On such an open board it is only feasible if the wQ stands on b8,e8,e7 or f8 after bR has moved away. (from h7 it wouldn't be checking the bK on d5/c5/b5). Forcing the queen to allow the rook to move and to occupy such remote squares for checking the bK on the 5th rank would be quite a feat.
– Evargalo
Dec 5 '18 at 11:34
Such is impossible.
– QuIcKmAtHs
Dec 5 '18 at 13:55
2
2
The only path toward c2 is through c4-d3. But when the black king goes to c4, the wQ can stop it either with Qd4 or Qa6 (the later is even winning). It means the bK has to go to c4 when the wQ doesn't control either c4,d4,or a6. On such an open board it is only feasible if the wQ stands on b8,e8,e7 or f8 after bR has moved away. (from h7 it wouldn't be checking the bK on d5/c5/b5). Forcing the queen to allow the rook to move and to occupy such remote squares for checking the bK on the 5th rank would be quite a feat.
– Evargalo
Dec 5 '18 at 11:34
The only path toward c2 is through c4-d3. But when the black king goes to c4, the wQ can stop it either with Qd4 or Qa6 (the later is even winning). It means the bK has to go to c4 when the wQ doesn't control either c4,d4,or a6. On such an open board it is only feasible if the wQ stands on b8,e8,e7 or f8 after bR has moved away. (from h7 it wouldn't be checking the bK on d5/c5/b5). Forcing the queen to allow the rook to move and to occupy such remote squares for checking the bK on the 5th rank would be quite a feat.
– Evargalo
Dec 5 '18 at 11:34
Such is impossible.
– QuIcKmAtHs
Dec 5 '18 at 13:55
Such is impossible.
– QuIcKmAtHs
Dec 5 '18 at 13:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23146%2fa-rook-up-can-black-end-the-checks-and-thereby-win-lichess-org-puzzle-74754%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Unfortunately, often engine-generated puzzles suck!
– Ywapom
Dec 5 '18 at 17:57
Well i played about 30 moves with stockfish, and really couldnt get out of checks, despite the evaluation always being -2 or better for black. So it really does look like stockfish has a hard time accessing the position as a draw
– Isac
Dec 6 '18 at 11:46
@Isac: I had no trouble winning as black against Stockfish level 7 on lichess.org; against 8 I ended up in a rook and pawn endgame that ended up drawn, but which I think might have been winnable with better play. I think one of Stockfish 8's moves is sub-optimal, however.
– supercat
Dec 6 '18 at 17:04