Show that the density of Random Variable $Y=aX+b$ exists and if $X$ ~$mathcal{N}(mu,sigma^{2})$ then how is...
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a real random variable and $f$ the density belonging to $X$. Let $aneq0$, and $b in mathbb R$, while $Y:=aX+b$. Show:
i) The density of $Y$ wrt the lebesgue measure exists and is $g(x):=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a}), xinmathbb R$
ii) Find the distribution of $Y$ if $X$ ~ $mathcal{N}(mu,sigma^{2})$
My steps:
i) I think I've got a good grasp of the it, but still got a few questions.
I will just do the case $a>0$ here: Let $c in mathbb R$
$P(Yleq c)=P(aX+bleq c)=P(Xleqfrac{c-b}{a})$ and we know the distribution of RV $X$, thus: $P(Xleqfrac{c-b}{a})=int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dlambda(x)=int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dx$
now I set $y=ax + b Rightarrow dy=adx$
Therefore $int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dx=int_{-infty}^{c}frac{1}{a}f(frac{x-b}{a})dx$
Using that case $a < 0$ too, we get $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a}), xinmathbb R$
Now I have the proposed density function, I need to show that it is indeed a pdf. On measurability, it is clear since $int_{-infty}^{c}frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})dx$ exists that $g(x):=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable on $(infty, c], forall c in mathbb R$. And since ${ (infty, c] |c in mathbb R}$ is a generator of the $mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$, therefore $g$ is borel measurable. (Is this correct reasoning?)
First Question: I would think that an alternative way of showing that $g$ is Borel-Measurable is simply stating that $g$ is the product of borel-measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ as well as $f(frac{x-b}{a})$, and is therefore borel-measurable. I have a feeling that this my however not be so simple because $f(x)$ being measurable does not imply that $f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is indeed borel-measurable. Any notes, clarification on this would be of great help.
ii) I get $Y$ ~ $mathcal{N}(b+amu,(asigma)^2)$
real-analysis probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a real random variable and $f$ the density belonging to $X$. Let $aneq0$, and $b in mathbb R$, while $Y:=aX+b$. Show:
i) The density of $Y$ wrt the lebesgue measure exists and is $g(x):=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a}), xinmathbb R$
ii) Find the distribution of $Y$ if $X$ ~ $mathcal{N}(mu,sigma^{2})$
My steps:
i) I think I've got a good grasp of the it, but still got a few questions.
I will just do the case $a>0$ here: Let $c in mathbb R$
$P(Yleq c)=P(aX+bleq c)=P(Xleqfrac{c-b}{a})$ and we know the distribution of RV $X$, thus: $P(Xleqfrac{c-b}{a})=int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dlambda(x)=int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dx$
now I set $y=ax + b Rightarrow dy=adx$
Therefore $int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dx=int_{-infty}^{c}frac{1}{a}f(frac{x-b}{a})dx$
Using that case $a < 0$ too, we get $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a}), xinmathbb R$
Now I have the proposed density function, I need to show that it is indeed a pdf. On measurability, it is clear since $int_{-infty}^{c}frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})dx$ exists that $g(x):=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable on $(infty, c], forall c in mathbb R$. And since ${ (infty, c] |c in mathbb R}$ is a generator of the $mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$, therefore $g$ is borel measurable. (Is this correct reasoning?)
First Question: I would think that an alternative way of showing that $g$ is Borel-Measurable is simply stating that $g$ is the product of borel-measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ as well as $f(frac{x-b}{a})$, and is therefore borel-measurable. I have a feeling that this my however not be so simple because $f(x)$ being measurable does not imply that $f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is indeed borel-measurable. Any notes, clarification on this would be of great help.
ii) I get $Y$ ~ $mathcal{N}(b+amu,(asigma)^2)$
real-analysis probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Hint for ii): Apply i).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 5 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
@Did Is my reasoning for as to why g(x) is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x−b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x−b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 15:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be a real random variable and $f$ the density belonging to $X$. Let $aneq0$, and $b in mathbb R$, while $Y:=aX+b$. Show:
i) The density of $Y$ wrt the lebesgue measure exists and is $g(x):=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a}), xinmathbb R$
ii) Find the distribution of $Y$ if $X$ ~ $mathcal{N}(mu,sigma^{2})$
My steps:
i) I think I've got a good grasp of the it, but still got a few questions.
I will just do the case $a>0$ here: Let $c in mathbb R$
$P(Yleq c)=P(aX+bleq c)=P(Xleqfrac{c-b}{a})$ and we know the distribution of RV $X$, thus: $P(Xleqfrac{c-b}{a})=int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dlambda(x)=int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dx$
now I set $y=ax + b Rightarrow dy=adx$
Therefore $int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dx=int_{-infty}^{c}frac{1}{a}f(frac{x-b}{a})dx$
Using that case $a < 0$ too, we get $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a}), xinmathbb R$
Now I have the proposed density function, I need to show that it is indeed a pdf. On measurability, it is clear since $int_{-infty}^{c}frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})dx$ exists that $g(x):=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable on $(infty, c], forall c in mathbb R$. And since ${ (infty, c] |c in mathbb R}$ is a generator of the $mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$, therefore $g$ is borel measurable. (Is this correct reasoning?)
First Question: I would think that an alternative way of showing that $g$ is Borel-Measurable is simply stating that $g$ is the product of borel-measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ as well as $f(frac{x-b}{a})$, and is therefore borel-measurable. I have a feeling that this my however not be so simple because $f(x)$ being measurable does not imply that $f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is indeed borel-measurable. Any notes, clarification on this would be of great help.
ii) I get $Y$ ~ $mathcal{N}(b+amu,(asigma)^2)$
real-analysis probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
$endgroup$
Let $X$ be a real random variable and $f$ the density belonging to $X$. Let $aneq0$, and $b in mathbb R$, while $Y:=aX+b$. Show:
i) The density of $Y$ wrt the lebesgue measure exists and is $g(x):=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a}), xinmathbb R$
ii) Find the distribution of $Y$ if $X$ ~ $mathcal{N}(mu,sigma^{2})$
My steps:
i) I think I've got a good grasp of the it, but still got a few questions.
I will just do the case $a>0$ here: Let $c in mathbb R$
$P(Yleq c)=P(aX+bleq c)=P(Xleqfrac{c-b}{a})$ and we know the distribution of RV $X$, thus: $P(Xleqfrac{c-b}{a})=int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dlambda(x)=int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dx$
now I set $y=ax + b Rightarrow dy=adx$
Therefore $int_{-infty}^{frac{c-b}{a}}f(x)dx=int_{-infty}^{c}frac{1}{a}f(frac{x-b}{a})dx$
Using that case $a < 0$ too, we get $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a}), xinmathbb R$
Now I have the proposed density function, I need to show that it is indeed a pdf. On measurability, it is clear since $int_{-infty}^{c}frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})dx$ exists that $g(x):=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable on $(infty, c], forall c in mathbb R$. And since ${ (infty, c] |c in mathbb R}$ is a generator of the $mathcal{B}(mathbb R)$, therefore $g$ is borel measurable. (Is this correct reasoning?)
First Question: I would think that an alternative way of showing that $g$ is Borel-Measurable is simply stating that $g$ is the product of borel-measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ as well as $f(frac{x-b}{a})$, and is therefore borel-measurable. I have a feeling that this my however not be so simple because $f(x)$ being measurable does not imply that $f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is indeed borel-measurable. Any notes, clarification on this would be of great help.
ii) I get $Y$ ~ $mathcal{N}(b+amu,(asigma)^2)$
real-analysis probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
real-analysis probability probability-theory probability-distributions random-variables
edited Dec 9 '18 at 19:16
SABOY
asked Dec 5 '18 at 22:43
SABOYSABOY
526311
526311
2
$begingroup$
Hint for ii): Apply i).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 5 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
@Did Is my reasoning for as to why g(x) is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x−b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x−b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 15:49
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Hint for ii): Apply i).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 5 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
@Did Is my reasoning for as to why g(x) is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x−b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x−b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 15:49
2
2
$begingroup$
Hint for ii): Apply i).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 5 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
Hint for ii): Apply i).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 5 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
@Did Is my reasoning for as to why g(x) is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x−b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x−b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 15:49
$begingroup$
@Did Is my reasoning for as to why g(x) is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x−b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x−b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 15:49
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In the language of measure theoretic probability $int, dx$ is same as $int , dlambda(x)$ where $lambda$ is Lebesgue measure. So there is no Riemann integral involved here.
$int f(frac {x-b} a), dx$ is not $1$. You have to make substitution $y= frac {x-b} a$ to evaluate this integral. If you do this you will get $int g(x), dx=1$.
The variance of $Y$ is $a^{2}sigma^{2}$ not $asigma^{2}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is my reasoning for as to why $g(x)$ is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x-b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 12:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am going to address just the measurability part: it is a fallacy to claim that since some integrals involving $g$ exist, then $g$ is measurable.
There would be no way to define the integral if $g$ was not measurable.
The sound reasoning, in this case, is to write before starting any kind of computation: let $g=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$.
Then $g=h_1 circ f circ h_2$, where $h_1=|a|^{-1}Id$ and $f$ and $h_2= frac{Id-b}{a}$ are $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}) rightarrow (mathbb{R},mathcal{B})$ measurable, therefore $g$ is measurable.
Then you can make the computations and change variables in your integrals and everything else.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027762%2fshow-that-the-density-of-random-variable-y-axb-exists-and-if-x-mathcaln%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In the language of measure theoretic probability $int, dx$ is same as $int , dlambda(x)$ where $lambda$ is Lebesgue measure. So there is no Riemann integral involved here.
$int f(frac {x-b} a), dx$ is not $1$. You have to make substitution $y= frac {x-b} a$ to evaluate this integral. If you do this you will get $int g(x), dx=1$.
The variance of $Y$ is $a^{2}sigma^{2}$ not $asigma^{2}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is my reasoning for as to why $g(x)$ is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x-b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 12:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the language of measure theoretic probability $int, dx$ is same as $int , dlambda(x)$ where $lambda$ is Lebesgue measure. So there is no Riemann integral involved here.
$int f(frac {x-b} a), dx$ is not $1$. You have to make substitution $y= frac {x-b} a$ to evaluate this integral. If you do this you will get $int g(x), dx=1$.
The variance of $Y$ is $a^{2}sigma^{2}$ not $asigma^{2}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is my reasoning for as to why $g(x)$ is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x-b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 12:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the language of measure theoretic probability $int, dx$ is same as $int , dlambda(x)$ where $lambda$ is Lebesgue measure. So there is no Riemann integral involved here.
$int f(frac {x-b} a), dx$ is not $1$. You have to make substitution $y= frac {x-b} a$ to evaluate this integral. If you do this you will get $int g(x), dx=1$.
The variance of $Y$ is $a^{2}sigma^{2}$ not $asigma^{2}$.
$endgroup$
In the language of measure theoretic probability $int, dx$ is same as $int , dlambda(x)$ where $lambda$ is Lebesgue measure. So there is no Riemann integral involved here.
$int f(frac {x-b} a), dx$ is not $1$. You have to make substitution $y= frac {x-b} a$ to evaluate this integral. If you do this you will get $int g(x), dx=1$.
The variance of $Y$ is $a^{2}sigma^{2}$ not $asigma^{2}$.
answered Dec 5 '18 at 23:58
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
52.6k32055
52.6k32055
$begingroup$
Is my reasoning for as to why $g(x)$ is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x-b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 12:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is my reasoning for as to why $g(x)$ is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x-b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 12:03
$begingroup$
Is my reasoning for as to why $g(x)$ is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x-b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 12:03
$begingroup$
Is my reasoning for as to why $g(x)$ is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x-b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 12:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am going to address just the measurability part: it is a fallacy to claim that since some integrals involving $g$ exist, then $g$ is measurable.
There would be no way to define the integral if $g$ was not measurable.
The sound reasoning, in this case, is to write before starting any kind of computation: let $g=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$.
Then $g=h_1 circ f circ h_2$, where $h_1=|a|^{-1}Id$ and $f$ and $h_2= frac{Id-b}{a}$ are $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}) rightarrow (mathbb{R},mathcal{B})$ measurable, therefore $g$ is measurable.
Then you can make the computations and change variables in your integrals and everything else.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am going to address just the measurability part: it is a fallacy to claim that since some integrals involving $g$ exist, then $g$ is measurable.
There would be no way to define the integral if $g$ was not measurable.
The sound reasoning, in this case, is to write before starting any kind of computation: let $g=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$.
Then $g=h_1 circ f circ h_2$, where $h_1=|a|^{-1}Id$ and $f$ and $h_2= frac{Id-b}{a}$ are $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}) rightarrow (mathbb{R},mathcal{B})$ measurable, therefore $g$ is measurable.
Then you can make the computations and change variables in your integrals and everything else.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am going to address just the measurability part: it is a fallacy to claim that since some integrals involving $g$ exist, then $g$ is measurable.
There would be no way to define the integral if $g$ was not measurable.
The sound reasoning, in this case, is to write before starting any kind of computation: let $g=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$.
Then $g=h_1 circ f circ h_2$, where $h_1=|a|^{-1}Id$ and $f$ and $h_2= frac{Id-b}{a}$ are $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}) rightarrow (mathbb{R},mathcal{B})$ measurable, therefore $g$ is measurable.
Then you can make the computations and change variables in your integrals and everything else.
$endgroup$
I am going to address just the measurability part: it is a fallacy to claim that since some integrals involving $g$ exist, then $g$ is measurable.
There would be no way to define the integral if $g$ was not measurable.
The sound reasoning, in this case, is to write before starting any kind of computation: let $g=frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x-b}{a})$.
Then $g=h_1 circ f circ h_2$, where $h_1=|a|^{-1}Id$ and $f$ and $h_2= frac{Id-b}{a}$ are $(mathbb{R},mathcal{B}) rightarrow (mathbb{R},mathcal{B})$ measurable, therefore $g$ is measurable.
Then you can make the computations and change variables in your integrals and everything else.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 23:40
MindlackMindlack
2,70717
2,70717
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027762%2fshow-that-the-density-of-random-variable-y-axb-exists-and-if-x-mathcaln%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Hint for ii): Apply i).
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 5 '18 at 22:46
$begingroup$
@Did Is my reasoning for as to why g(x) is measurable sound? Surely, as an alternative, why can I not say $frac{1}{|a|}f(frac{x−b}{a})$ is measurable simply as the product of two measurable functions $frac{1}{|a|}$ and $f(frac{x−b}{a})$??
$endgroup$
– SABOY
Dec 6 '18 at 15:49