Clarification of rulings on Carrionette












7















It is my understanding that the individual card rulings on Gatherer are essentially clarifying comments. i.e. they are "just" an application of the comprehensive rules to that specific card.



With that in mind, the rulings for Carrionette state:




A creature with Protection from Creatures can’t be targeted by this card’s ability.




But, when Carrionette is in the graveyard, it is not a creature. My guess is that rule 112 covers this somehow, but I'm not seeing it.










share|improve this question





























    7















    It is my understanding that the individual card rulings on Gatherer are essentially clarifying comments. i.e. they are "just" an application of the comprehensive rules to that specific card.



    With that in mind, the rulings for Carrionette state:




    A creature with Protection from Creatures can’t be targeted by this card’s ability.




    But, when Carrionette is in the graveyard, it is not a creature. My guess is that rule 112 covers this somehow, but I'm not seeing it.










    share|improve this question



























      7












      7








      7








      It is my understanding that the individual card rulings on Gatherer are essentially clarifying comments. i.e. they are "just" an application of the comprehensive rules to that specific card.



      With that in mind, the rulings for Carrionette state:




      A creature with Protection from Creatures can’t be targeted by this card’s ability.




      But, when Carrionette is in the graveyard, it is not a creature. My guess is that rule 112 covers this somehow, but I'm not seeing it.










      share|improve this question
















      It is my understanding that the individual card rulings on Gatherer are essentially clarifying comments. i.e. they are "just" an application of the comprehensive rules to that specific card.



      With that in mind, the rulings for Carrionette state:




      A creature with Protection from Creatures can’t be targeted by this card’s ability.




      But, when Carrionette is in the graveyard, it is not a creature. My guess is that rule 112 covers this somehow, but I'm not seeing it.







      magic-the-gathering






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 5 '18 at 21:11









      Glorfindel

      2,5261828




      2,5261828










      asked Dec 5 '18 at 21:05









      JohnJohn

      2,6231430




      2,6231430






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          13














          'creature' is not only a permanent type, but also a card type. Rule 702.16a states:




          702.16a Protection is a static ability, written “Protection from [quality].”

          ...

          If the quality is a card type, subtype, or supertype, the ability applies to sources that are permanents with that card type, subtype, or supertype and to any sources not on the battlefield that are of that card type, subtype, or supertype. This is an exception to rule 109.2.



          109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.




          (emphasis mine)



          so even though while a graveyarded Carrionette is not a creature by rule 109.2, it's still a card with type 'creature' which is sufficient for the protection ability.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            It is not clear to me why 109.2 does not apply here. "Protection from creatures" is an ability that includes a card type and does not include the word "card". It sounds like 702.16a and 109.2 contradict each other.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • 109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • Because the expanded definition of the ability explicitly states that it applies to non-permanent objects.

            – murgatroid99
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:17






          • 3





            @GendoIkari I don't know why they made an exception to rule 109.2, but they did.

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:18






          • 1





            @GendoIkari thanks for pointing that out, it's slightly more convoluted than I originally thought (but still covered by the rules...).

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:24













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "147"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44294%2fclarification-of-rulings-on-carrionette%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          13














          'creature' is not only a permanent type, but also a card type. Rule 702.16a states:




          702.16a Protection is a static ability, written “Protection from [quality].”

          ...

          If the quality is a card type, subtype, or supertype, the ability applies to sources that are permanents with that card type, subtype, or supertype and to any sources not on the battlefield that are of that card type, subtype, or supertype. This is an exception to rule 109.2.



          109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.




          (emphasis mine)



          so even though while a graveyarded Carrionette is not a creature by rule 109.2, it's still a card with type 'creature' which is sufficient for the protection ability.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            It is not clear to me why 109.2 does not apply here. "Protection from creatures" is an ability that includes a card type and does not include the word "card". It sounds like 702.16a and 109.2 contradict each other.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • 109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • Because the expanded definition of the ability explicitly states that it applies to non-permanent objects.

            – murgatroid99
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:17






          • 3





            @GendoIkari I don't know why they made an exception to rule 109.2, but they did.

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:18






          • 1





            @GendoIkari thanks for pointing that out, it's slightly more convoluted than I originally thought (but still covered by the rules...).

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:24


















          13














          'creature' is not only a permanent type, but also a card type. Rule 702.16a states:




          702.16a Protection is a static ability, written “Protection from [quality].”

          ...

          If the quality is a card type, subtype, or supertype, the ability applies to sources that are permanents with that card type, subtype, or supertype and to any sources not on the battlefield that are of that card type, subtype, or supertype. This is an exception to rule 109.2.



          109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.




          (emphasis mine)



          so even though while a graveyarded Carrionette is not a creature by rule 109.2, it's still a card with type 'creature' which is sufficient for the protection ability.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            It is not clear to me why 109.2 does not apply here. "Protection from creatures" is an ability that includes a card type and does not include the word "card". It sounds like 702.16a and 109.2 contradict each other.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • 109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • Because the expanded definition of the ability explicitly states that it applies to non-permanent objects.

            – murgatroid99
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:17






          • 3





            @GendoIkari I don't know why they made an exception to rule 109.2, but they did.

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:18






          • 1





            @GendoIkari thanks for pointing that out, it's slightly more convoluted than I originally thought (but still covered by the rules...).

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:24
















          13












          13








          13







          'creature' is not only a permanent type, but also a card type. Rule 702.16a states:




          702.16a Protection is a static ability, written “Protection from [quality].”

          ...

          If the quality is a card type, subtype, or supertype, the ability applies to sources that are permanents with that card type, subtype, or supertype and to any sources not on the battlefield that are of that card type, subtype, or supertype. This is an exception to rule 109.2.



          109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.




          (emphasis mine)



          so even though while a graveyarded Carrionette is not a creature by rule 109.2, it's still a card with type 'creature' which is sufficient for the protection ability.






          share|improve this answer















          'creature' is not only a permanent type, but also a card type. Rule 702.16a states:




          702.16a Protection is a static ability, written “Protection from [quality].”

          ...

          If the quality is a card type, subtype, or supertype, the ability applies to sources that are permanents with that card type, subtype, or supertype and to any sources not on the battlefield that are of that card type, subtype, or supertype. This is an exception to rule 109.2.



          109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.




          (emphasis mine)



          so even though while a graveyarded Carrionette is not a creature by rule 109.2, it's still a card with type 'creature' which is sufficient for the protection ability.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 5 '18 at 21:23

























          answered Dec 5 '18 at 21:10









          GlorfindelGlorfindel

          2,5261828




          2,5261828








          • 1





            It is not clear to me why 109.2 does not apply here. "Protection from creatures" is an ability that includes a card type and does not include the word "card". It sounds like 702.16a and 109.2 contradict each other.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • 109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • Because the expanded definition of the ability explicitly states that it applies to non-permanent objects.

            – murgatroid99
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:17






          • 3





            @GendoIkari I don't know why they made an exception to rule 109.2, but they did.

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:18






          • 1





            @GendoIkari thanks for pointing that out, it's slightly more convoluted than I originally thought (but still covered by the rules...).

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:24
















          • 1





            It is not clear to me why 109.2 does not apply here. "Protection from creatures" is an ability that includes a card type and does not include the word "card". It sounds like 702.16a and 109.2 contradict each other.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • 109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.

            – GendoIkari
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:16











          • Because the expanded definition of the ability explicitly states that it applies to non-permanent objects.

            – murgatroid99
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:17






          • 3





            @GendoIkari I don't know why they made an exception to rule 109.2, but they did.

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:18






          • 1





            @GendoIkari thanks for pointing that out, it's slightly more convoluted than I originally thought (but still covered by the rules...).

            – Glorfindel
            Dec 5 '18 at 21:24










          1




          1





          It is not clear to me why 109.2 does not apply here. "Protection from creatures" is an ability that includes a card type and does not include the word "card". It sounds like 702.16a and 109.2 contradict each other.

          – GendoIkari
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:16





          It is not clear to me why 109.2 does not apply here. "Protection from creatures" is an ability that includes a card type and does not include the word "card". It sounds like 702.16a and 109.2 contradict each other.

          – GendoIkari
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:16













          109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.

          – GendoIkari
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:16





          109.2. If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes a card type or subtype, but doesn’t include the word “card,” “spell,” “source,” or “scheme,” it means a permanent of that card type or subtype on the battlefield.

          – GendoIkari
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:16













          Because the expanded definition of the ability explicitly states that it applies to non-permanent objects.

          – murgatroid99
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:17





          Because the expanded definition of the ability explicitly states that it applies to non-permanent objects.

          – murgatroid99
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:17




          3




          3





          @GendoIkari I don't know why they made an exception to rule 109.2, but they did.

          – Glorfindel
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:18





          @GendoIkari I don't know why they made an exception to rule 109.2, but they did.

          – Glorfindel
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:18




          1




          1





          @GendoIkari thanks for pointing that out, it's slightly more convoluted than I originally thought (but still covered by the rules...).

          – Glorfindel
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:24







          @GendoIkari thanks for pointing that out, it's slightly more convoluted than I originally thought (but still covered by the rules...).

          – Glorfindel
          Dec 5 '18 at 21:24




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44294%2fclarification-of-rulings-on-carrionette%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Berounka

          Fiat S.p.A.

          Type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'