Stokes' Theorem - Vector Field












2














I am having problems trying to verify Stokes' theorem (below) as part of a question.



$$iint_{S} text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S=oint_{c} vec F cdot dvec r$$



The vector field in question is $vec F=(xy,z^3,xz^2)$ and I am looking over a triangle plane that joins $(0,0,1)$ , $(0,4,1)$ and $(4,0,1). $



Computing the surface integral (over the triangle plane) does not seem to yield the same answer as the closed line integral (taking around the edge of the triangle) so I know I am making a mistake somewhere!



My working is below:



Surface Integral:



Function of plane: $$f(z) = z-1$$



Unit normal to plane:



$$vec n = frac{nabla f}{mod{(nabla f)}} = (0,0,1)$$



Also,



$$dS = dA(0,0,1) cdot vec n = dA = dxdy$$



Curl of vector field:



$$ text{curl} vec F = (-3z^2,-z^2,-x)$$



Working out the surface integral:



$$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$
$$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$



Limits are $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,4]$



$$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_4 -x dydx $$



$$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{64}{3}$$



Line Integral



Traversing the edges in an anticlockwise direction, I have split the triangle into three lines. $l_1$ from $(0,0,1)$ to $(0,4,1)$ , $l_2$ from $(0,4,1)$ to $(4,0,1)$ and $l_3$ from $(4,0,1)$ to $(0,0,1)$ .



Also,



$$dvec r = (dx,dy,dz)$$



$l_1$



$$ int_{l_1}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_1} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_1} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_1$ $x=0$ $dx=0$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ ($y$ varies).



$$ = int_{l_1} dy $$



$$ = int_{0}^4 dy $$



$$ = 4 $$



$l_3$



$$ int_{l_3}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_3} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_3} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_3$ $y=0$ $dy=0$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ ($x$ varies).



$$ = 0 $$



$l_2$



$$ int_{l_2}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_1} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_2} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_2$ $x$ and $y$ vary, $y=4-x$ $dy=-dx$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ .



$$ = int_{l_3} x(4-x)dx - int_{l_3} dx$$



$$ = int_{0}^4 4x-x^2-1dx $$



$$ = 32-frac{64}{3}-4 $$



$$ = frac{20}{3} $$



And so
$$oint_{c} vec F cdot dvec r = 4 + frac{20}{3} = frac{32}{3}$$



Can anyone see where I am going wrong? Hopefully, I am missing something relatively simple!



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • you must not normalize $n$ (you will get 32/3 for the curl integral), i that case $dS=(0,0,16)$ I can write the details if you want.
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:45












  • @PicaudVincent not sure what you mean here? It was my understanding I should normalise the normal vector of the plane and also use $dS=dA vec ncdot (0,0,1) $ ? But here the normal I calculated has magnitude 1?
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:50










  • I m currently writing the details, plz hold on
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:52










  • Wait I think my limits on my surface integral may be wrong!
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:54










  • I think I have made an error in the limits applied to my surface integral. Working out the surface integral: $$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$ $$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$ Limits should be $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,0]$ (bottom limit on y should be 0 not 4). $$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_0 -x dydx $$ $$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{32}{3}$$
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:04
















2














I am having problems trying to verify Stokes' theorem (below) as part of a question.



$$iint_{S} text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S=oint_{c} vec F cdot dvec r$$



The vector field in question is $vec F=(xy,z^3,xz^2)$ and I am looking over a triangle plane that joins $(0,0,1)$ , $(0,4,1)$ and $(4,0,1). $



Computing the surface integral (over the triangle plane) does not seem to yield the same answer as the closed line integral (taking around the edge of the triangle) so I know I am making a mistake somewhere!



My working is below:



Surface Integral:



Function of plane: $$f(z) = z-1$$



Unit normal to plane:



$$vec n = frac{nabla f}{mod{(nabla f)}} = (0,0,1)$$



Also,



$$dS = dA(0,0,1) cdot vec n = dA = dxdy$$



Curl of vector field:



$$ text{curl} vec F = (-3z^2,-z^2,-x)$$



Working out the surface integral:



$$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$
$$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$



Limits are $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,4]$



$$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_4 -x dydx $$



$$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{64}{3}$$



Line Integral



Traversing the edges in an anticlockwise direction, I have split the triangle into three lines. $l_1$ from $(0,0,1)$ to $(0,4,1)$ , $l_2$ from $(0,4,1)$ to $(4,0,1)$ and $l_3$ from $(4,0,1)$ to $(0,0,1)$ .



Also,



$$dvec r = (dx,dy,dz)$$



$l_1$



$$ int_{l_1}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_1} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_1} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_1$ $x=0$ $dx=0$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ ($y$ varies).



$$ = int_{l_1} dy $$



$$ = int_{0}^4 dy $$



$$ = 4 $$



$l_3$



$$ int_{l_3}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_3} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_3} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_3$ $y=0$ $dy=0$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ ($x$ varies).



$$ = 0 $$



$l_2$



$$ int_{l_2}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_1} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_2} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_2$ $x$ and $y$ vary, $y=4-x$ $dy=-dx$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ .



$$ = int_{l_3} x(4-x)dx - int_{l_3} dx$$



$$ = int_{0}^4 4x-x^2-1dx $$



$$ = 32-frac{64}{3}-4 $$



$$ = frac{20}{3} $$



And so
$$oint_{c} vec F cdot dvec r = 4 + frac{20}{3} = frac{32}{3}$$



Can anyone see where I am going wrong? Hopefully, I am missing something relatively simple!



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • you must not normalize $n$ (you will get 32/3 for the curl integral), i that case $dS=(0,0,16)$ I can write the details if you want.
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:45












  • @PicaudVincent not sure what you mean here? It was my understanding I should normalise the normal vector of the plane and also use $dS=dA vec ncdot (0,0,1) $ ? But here the normal I calculated has magnitude 1?
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:50










  • I m currently writing the details, plz hold on
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:52










  • Wait I think my limits on my surface integral may be wrong!
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:54










  • I think I have made an error in the limits applied to my surface integral. Working out the surface integral: $$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$ $$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$ Limits should be $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,0]$ (bottom limit on y should be 0 not 4). $$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_0 -x dydx $$ $$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{32}{3}$$
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:04














2












2








2







I am having problems trying to verify Stokes' theorem (below) as part of a question.



$$iint_{S} text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S=oint_{c} vec F cdot dvec r$$



The vector field in question is $vec F=(xy,z^3,xz^2)$ and I am looking over a triangle plane that joins $(0,0,1)$ , $(0,4,1)$ and $(4,0,1). $



Computing the surface integral (over the triangle plane) does not seem to yield the same answer as the closed line integral (taking around the edge of the triangle) so I know I am making a mistake somewhere!



My working is below:



Surface Integral:



Function of plane: $$f(z) = z-1$$



Unit normal to plane:



$$vec n = frac{nabla f}{mod{(nabla f)}} = (0,0,1)$$



Also,



$$dS = dA(0,0,1) cdot vec n = dA = dxdy$$



Curl of vector field:



$$ text{curl} vec F = (-3z^2,-z^2,-x)$$



Working out the surface integral:



$$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$
$$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$



Limits are $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,4]$



$$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_4 -x dydx $$



$$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{64}{3}$$



Line Integral



Traversing the edges in an anticlockwise direction, I have split the triangle into three lines. $l_1$ from $(0,0,1)$ to $(0,4,1)$ , $l_2$ from $(0,4,1)$ to $(4,0,1)$ and $l_3$ from $(4,0,1)$ to $(0,0,1)$ .



Also,



$$dvec r = (dx,dy,dz)$$



$l_1$



$$ int_{l_1}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_1} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_1} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_1$ $x=0$ $dx=0$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ ($y$ varies).



$$ = int_{l_1} dy $$



$$ = int_{0}^4 dy $$



$$ = 4 $$



$l_3$



$$ int_{l_3}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_3} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_3} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_3$ $y=0$ $dy=0$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ ($x$ varies).



$$ = 0 $$



$l_2$



$$ int_{l_2}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_1} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_2} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_2$ $x$ and $y$ vary, $y=4-x$ $dy=-dx$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ .



$$ = int_{l_3} x(4-x)dx - int_{l_3} dx$$



$$ = int_{0}^4 4x-x^2-1dx $$



$$ = 32-frac{64}{3}-4 $$



$$ = frac{20}{3} $$



And so
$$oint_{c} vec F cdot dvec r = 4 + frac{20}{3} = frac{32}{3}$$



Can anyone see where I am going wrong? Hopefully, I am missing something relatively simple!



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question















I am having problems trying to verify Stokes' theorem (below) as part of a question.



$$iint_{S} text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S=oint_{c} vec F cdot dvec r$$



The vector field in question is $vec F=(xy,z^3,xz^2)$ and I am looking over a triangle plane that joins $(0,0,1)$ , $(0,4,1)$ and $(4,0,1). $



Computing the surface integral (over the triangle plane) does not seem to yield the same answer as the closed line integral (taking around the edge of the triangle) so I know I am making a mistake somewhere!



My working is below:



Surface Integral:



Function of plane: $$f(z) = z-1$$



Unit normal to plane:



$$vec n = frac{nabla f}{mod{(nabla f)}} = (0,0,1)$$



Also,



$$dS = dA(0,0,1) cdot vec n = dA = dxdy$$



Curl of vector field:



$$ text{curl} vec F = (-3z^2,-z^2,-x)$$



Working out the surface integral:



$$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$
$$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$



Limits are $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,4]$



$$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_4 -x dydx $$



$$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{64}{3}$$



Line Integral



Traversing the edges in an anticlockwise direction, I have split the triangle into three lines. $l_1$ from $(0,0,1)$ to $(0,4,1)$ , $l_2$ from $(0,4,1)$ to $(4,0,1)$ and $l_3$ from $(4,0,1)$ to $(0,0,1)$ .



Also,



$$dvec r = (dx,dy,dz)$$



$l_1$



$$ int_{l_1}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_1} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_1} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_1$ $x=0$ $dx=0$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ ($y$ varies).



$$ = int_{l_1} dy $$



$$ = int_{0}^4 dy $$



$$ = 4 $$



$l_3$



$$ int_{l_3}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_3} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_3} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_3$ $y=0$ $dy=0$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ ($x$ varies).



$$ = 0 $$



$l_2$



$$ int_{l_2}vec F cdot dvec r = int_{l_1} (xy,z^3,xz^2) cdot (dx,dy,dz)$$



$$ = int_{l_2} xydx+z^3dy+xz^2dz $$



Across $l_2$ $x$ and $y$ vary, $y=4-x$ $dy=-dx$ $z=1$ $dz=0$ .



$$ = int_{l_3} x(4-x)dx - int_{l_3} dx$$



$$ = int_{0}^4 4x-x^2-1dx $$



$$ = 32-frac{64}{3}-4 $$



$$ = frac{20}{3} $$



And so
$$oint_{c} vec F cdot dvec r = 4 + frac{20}{3} = frac{32}{3}$$



Can anyone see where I am going wrong? Hopefully, I am missing something relatively simple!



Thanks!







vector-fields surface-integrals line-integrals stokes-theorem






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 3 '18 at 22:31

























asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:19









Ctrp

133




133












  • you must not normalize $n$ (you will get 32/3 for the curl integral), i that case $dS=(0,0,16)$ I can write the details if you want.
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:45












  • @PicaudVincent not sure what you mean here? It was my understanding I should normalise the normal vector of the plane and also use $dS=dA vec ncdot (0,0,1) $ ? But here the normal I calculated has magnitude 1?
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:50










  • I m currently writing the details, plz hold on
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:52










  • Wait I think my limits on my surface integral may be wrong!
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:54










  • I think I have made an error in the limits applied to my surface integral. Working out the surface integral: $$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$ $$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$ Limits should be $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,0]$ (bottom limit on y should be 0 not 4). $$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_0 -x dydx $$ $$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{32}{3}$$
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:04


















  • you must not normalize $n$ (you will get 32/3 for the curl integral), i that case $dS=(0,0,16)$ I can write the details if you want.
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:45












  • @PicaudVincent not sure what you mean here? It was my understanding I should normalise the normal vector of the plane and also use $dS=dA vec ncdot (0,0,1) $ ? But here the normal I calculated has magnitude 1?
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:50










  • I m currently writing the details, plz hold on
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:52










  • Wait I think my limits on my surface integral may be wrong!
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 20:54










  • I think I have made an error in the limits applied to my surface integral. Working out the surface integral: $$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$ $$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$ Limits should be $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,0]$ (bottom limit on y should be 0 not 4). $$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_0 -x dydx $$ $$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{32}{3}$$
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:04
















you must not normalize $n$ (you will get 32/3 for the curl integral), i that case $dS=(0,0,16)$ I can write the details if you want.
– Picaud Vincent
Dec 3 '18 at 20:45






you must not normalize $n$ (you will get 32/3 for the curl integral), i that case $dS=(0,0,16)$ I can write the details if you want.
– Picaud Vincent
Dec 3 '18 at 20:45














@PicaudVincent not sure what you mean here? It was my understanding I should normalise the normal vector of the plane and also use $dS=dA vec ncdot (0,0,1) $ ? But here the normal I calculated has magnitude 1?
– Ctrp
Dec 3 '18 at 20:50




@PicaudVincent not sure what you mean here? It was my understanding I should normalise the normal vector of the plane and also use $dS=dA vec ncdot (0,0,1) $ ? But here the normal I calculated has magnitude 1?
– Ctrp
Dec 3 '18 at 20:50












I m currently writing the details, plz hold on
– Picaud Vincent
Dec 3 '18 at 20:52




I m currently writing the details, plz hold on
– Picaud Vincent
Dec 3 '18 at 20:52












Wait I think my limits on my surface integral may be wrong!
– Ctrp
Dec 3 '18 at 20:54




Wait I think my limits on my surface integral may be wrong!
– Ctrp
Dec 3 '18 at 20:54












I think I have made an error in the limits applied to my surface integral. Working out the surface integral: $$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$ $$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$ Limits should be $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,0]$ (bottom limit on y should be 0 not 4). $$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_0 -x dydx $$ $$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{32}{3}$$
– Ctrp
Dec 3 '18 at 21:04




I think I have made an error in the limits applied to my surface integral. Working out the surface integral: $$ int int _ S text{curl} vec F cdot dvec S = int int _ S (-3z^2,-z^2,-x) cdot (0,0,1) dxdy$$ $$ = int int _ S -x dxdy $$ Limits should be $x = [0,4]$,$y=[4-x,0]$ (bottom limit on y should be 0 not 4). $$ = int^4_0int^{4-x}_0 -x dydx $$ $$ = int^4 _0 x^2 dx=frac{32}{3}$$
– Ctrp
Dec 3 '18 at 21:04










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














The surface associated to your triangle is defined by: $lambda_1in[0,1], lambda_2in[0,1]$ such that $lambda_1+lambda_2le 1$
$$
t(lambda_1,lambda_2)=lambda_1(v_2-v_1)+lambda_2(v_3-v_1)+v1=(4lambda_2,4lambda_1,1)
$$

the Curvilinear abscissa are:
$$
gamma_1(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_1}}=(0,4,0)
$$

$$
gamma_2(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_2}}=(4,0,0)
$$

Thus surface element $dS$ is
$$
dS=gamma_1wedge gamma_2 dlambda_1dlambda_2=(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2
$$

So
begin{align}
intint curl F.dS&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1} underbrace{(-3z^2,-z^2,-x)circ t(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(-3,-1,-4lambda_2)} cdot underbrace{dS(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2} \
&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1}64lambda_2dlambda_1dlambda_2 \ &=64int_{lambda_1=0}^1frac{1}{2}(1-lambda_1)^2dlambda_1\&=frac{32}{3}
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Thanks - another way to do it I think. Problem with my original question is I think the limits on my integral were wrong. I have commented on the original question with the amendments.
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:16










  • @Ctrp thanks, the important thing is to understand what you are doing and get the right result :)
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:21













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024606%2fstokes-theorem-vector-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














The surface associated to your triangle is defined by: $lambda_1in[0,1], lambda_2in[0,1]$ such that $lambda_1+lambda_2le 1$
$$
t(lambda_1,lambda_2)=lambda_1(v_2-v_1)+lambda_2(v_3-v_1)+v1=(4lambda_2,4lambda_1,1)
$$

the Curvilinear abscissa are:
$$
gamma_1(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_1}}=(0,4,0)
$$

$$
gamma_2(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_2}}=(4,0,0)
$$

Thus surface element $dS$ is
$$
dS=gamma_1wedge gamma_2 dlambda_1dlambda_2=(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2
$$

So
begin{align}
intint curl F.dS&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1} underbrace{(-3z^2,-z^2,-x)circ t(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(-3,-1,-4lambda_2)} cdot underbrace{dS(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2} \
&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1}64lambda_2dlambda_1dlambda_2 \ &=64int_{lambda_1=0}^1frac{1}{2}(1-lambda_1)^2dlambda_1\&=frac{32}{3}
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Thanks - another way to do it I think. Problem with my original question is I think the limits on my integral were wrong. I have commented on the original question with the amendments.
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:16










  • @Ctrp thanks, the important thing is to understand what you are doing and get the right result :)
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:21


















0














The surface associated to your triangle is defined by: $lambda_1in[0,1], lambda_2in[0,1]$ such that $lambda_1+lambda_2le 1$
$$
t(lambda_1,lambda_2)=lambda_1(v_2-v_1)+lambda_2(v_3-v_1)+v1=(4lambda_2,4lambda_1,1)
$$

the Curvilinear abscissa are:
$$
gamma_1(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_1}}=(0,4,0)
$$

$$
gamma_2(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_2}}=(4,0,0)
$$

Thus surface element $dS$ is
$$
dS=gamma_1wedge gamma_2 dlambda_1dlambda_2=(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2
$$

So
begin{align}
intint curl F.dS&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1} underbrace{(-3z^2,-z^2,-x)circ t(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(-3,-1,-4lambda_2)} cdot underbrace{dS(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2} \
&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1}64lambda_2dlambda_1dlambda_2 \ &=64int_{lambda_1=0}^1frac{1}{2}(1-lambda_1)^2dlambda_1\&=frac{32}{3}
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Thanks - another way to do it I think. Problem with my original question is I think the limits on my integral were wrong. I have commented on the original question with the amendments.
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:16










  • @Ctrp thanks, the important thing is to understand what you are doing and get the right result :)
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:21
















0












0








0






The surface associated to your triangle is defined by: $lambda_1in[0,1], lambda_2in[0,1]$ such that $lambda_1+lambda_2le 1$
$$
t(lambda_1,lambda_2)=lambda_1(v_2-v_1)+lambda_2(v_3-v_1)+v1=(4lambda_2,4lambda_1,1)
$$

the Curvilinear abscissa are:
$$
gamma_1(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_1}}=(0,4,0)
$$

$$
gamma_2(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_2}}=(4,0,0)
$$

Thus surface element $dS$ is
$$
dS=gamma_1wedge gamma_2 dlambda_1dlambda_2=(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2
$$

So
begin{align}
intint curl F.dS&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1} underbrace{(-3z^2,-z^2,-x)circ t(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(-3,-1,-4lambda_2)} cdot underbrace{dS(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2} \
&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1}64lambda_2dlambda_1dlambda_2 \ &=64int_{lambda_1=0}^1frac{1}{2}(1-lambda_1)^2dlambda_1\&=frac{32}{3}
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer














The surface associated to your triangle is defined by: $lambda_1in[0,1], lambda_2in[0,1]$ such that $lambda_1+lambda_2le 1$
$$
t(lambda_1,lambda_2)=lambda_1(v_2-v_1)+lambda_2(v_3-v_1)+v1=(4lambda_2,4lambda_1,1)
$$

the Curvilinear abscissa are:
$$
gamma_1(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_1}}=(0,4,0)
$$

$$
gamma_2(lambda_1,lambda_2)=frac{partial t}{partial_{lambda_2}}=(4,0,0)
$$

Thus surface element $dS$ is
$$
dS=gamma_1wedge gamma_2 dlambda_1dlambda_2=(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2
$$

So
begin{align}
intint curl F.dS&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1} underbrace{(-3z^2,-z^2,-x)circ t(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(-3,-1,-4lambda_2)} cdot underbrace{dS(lambda_1,lambda_2)}_{(0,0,-16) dlambda_1dlambda_2} \
&=int_{lambda_1=0}^1int_{lambda_2=0}^{1-lambda_1}64lambda_2dlambda_1dlambda_2 \ &=64int_{lambda_1=0}^1frac{1}{2}(1-lambda_1)^2dlambda_1\&=frac{32}{3}
end{align}







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 4 '18 at 5:09

























answered Dec 3 '18 at 21:06









Picaud Vincent

1,21838




1,21838








  • 1




    Thanks - another way to do it I think. Problem with my original question is I think the limits on my integral were wrong. I have commented on the original question with the amendments.
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:16










  • @Ctrp thanks, the important thing is to understand what you are doing and get the right result :)
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:21
















  • 1




    Thanks - another way to do it I think. Problem with my original question is I think the limits on my integral were wrong. I have commented on the original question with the amendments.
    – Ctrp
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:16










  • @Ctrp thanks, the important thing is to understand what you are doing and get the right result :)
    – Picaud Vincent
    Dec 3 '18 at 21:21










1




1




Thanks - another way to do it I think. Problem with my original question is I think the limits on my integral were wrong. I have commented on the original question with the amendments.
– Ctrp
Dec 3 '18 at 21:16




Thanks - another way to do it I think. Problem with my original question is I think the limits on my integral were wrong. I have commented on the original question with the amendments.
– Ctrp
Dec 3 '18 at 21:16












@Ctrp thanks, the important thing is to understand what you are doing and get the right result :)
– Picaud Vincent
Dec 3 '18 at 21:21






@Ctrp thanks, the important thing is to understand what you are doing and get the right result :)
– Picaud Vincent
Dec 3 '18 at 21:21




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024606%2fstokes-theorem-vector-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Sphinx de Gizeh

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...