Trying to prove an equation
I would like to receive some help about the next problem.
The problem:
I'm trying to prove the next equation:
$$sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n - k)!} = 0 quad, n = 1, 2, ...$$
My work until now:
$$sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n - k)!} = sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{1}{(-1)^{k}k!(n - k)!} =$$
$$= frac{1}{(-1)^0 cdot n!} + frac{1}{(-1)^1 cdot (n - 1)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^2 cdot 2!(n - 2)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^3 cdot 3!(n - 3)!} + cdot cdot cdot + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 3} cdot (n - 3)!3!} + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 2} cdot (n - 2)!2!} + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 1} cdot (n - 1)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^n cdot n!} quad (1)$$
Because we have $n + 1$ summands i tried to see what happens when $n$ is even or odd number:
1) $n = 2k - 1$, $k in mathbb{N} Longrightarrow$ Now there is $2k$ summands
$$(1) iff
frac{1}{(2k - 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^0} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 1}}right) +
frac{1}{(2k - 2)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^1} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 2}}right) +
frac{1}{2!(2k - 3)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^2} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 3}}right) +
cdot cdot cdot +
frac{1}{(k - 1)!k!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^{k - 1}} + frac{1}{(-1)^k}right) = 0$$
This is equal $0$, because the difference in powers of number $-1$ is odd number, so one of them has to be $1$ and another has to be $-1$.
2) $n = 2k$, $k in mathbb{N} Longrightarrow$ Now there is $2k + 1$ summands
$$(1) iff
frac{1}{(2k)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^0} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k}}right) +
frac{1}{(2k - 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^1} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 1}}right) +
frac{1}{2!(2k - 2)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^2} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 2}}right) +
cdot cdot cdot +
frac{1}{(k - 1)!(k + 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^{k - 1}} + frac{1}{(-1)^{k + 1}}right) +
frac{1}{(-1)^k cdot k!k!} quad Longrightarrow quad ?$$
Here, i can't use the same princip as in the first case. Also, the last summand is the $k + 1$ -st summand, he is in the middle of this sum and doesn't have a pair.
My question:
Please, could you help me with some advice or a hint that i could use to finnish my proof of the given equation?
Thank you, for your time and your help!
summation exponentiation
add a comment |
I would like to receive some help about the next problem.
The problem:
I'm trying to prove the next equation:
$$sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n - k)!} = 0 quad, n = 1, 2, ...$$
My work until now:
$$sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n - k)!} = sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{1}{(-1)^{k}k!(n - k)!} =$$
$$= frac{1}{(-1)^0 cdot n!} + frac{1}{(-1)^1 cdot (n - 1)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^2 cdot 2!(n - 2)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^3 cdot 3!(n - 3)!} + cdot cdot cdot + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 3} cdot (n - 3)!3!} + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 2} cdot (n - 2)!2!} + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 1} cdot (n - 1)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^n cdot n!} quad (1)$$
Because we have $n + 1$ summands i tried to see what happens when $n$ is even or odd number:
1) $n = 2k - 1$, $k in mathbb{N} Longrightarrow$ Now there is $2k$ summands
$$(1) iff
frac{1}{(2k - 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^0} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 1}}right) +
frac{1}{(2k - 2)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^1} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 2}}right) +
frac{1}{2!(2k - 3)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^2} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 3}}right) +
cdot cdot cdot +
frac{1}{(k - 1)!k!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^{k - 1}} + frac{1}{(-1)^k}right) = 0$$
This is equal $0$, because the difference in powers of number $-1$ is odd number, so one of them has to be $1$ and another has to be $-1$.
2) $n = 2k$, $k in mathbb{N} Longrightarrow$ Now there is $2k + 1$ summands
$$(1) iff
frac{1}{(2k)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^0} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k}}right) +
frac{1}{(2k - 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^1} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 1}}right) +
frac{1}{2!(2k - 2)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^2} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 2}}right) +
cdot cdot cdot +
frac{1}{(k - 1)!(k + 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^{k - 1}} + frac{1}{(-1)^{k + 1}}right) +
frac{1}{(-1)^k cdot k!k!} quad Longrightarrow quad ?$$
Here, i can't use the same princip as in the first case. Also, the last summand is the $k + 1$ -st summand, he is in the middle of this sum and doesn't have a pair.
My question:
Please, could you help me with some advice or a hint that i could use to finnish my proof of the given equation?
Thank you, for your time and your help!
summation exponentiation
2
Why is the negative one raised to negative k?
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 20:27
@fleablood: It was left from $(-1)^{n - k}$, but i thought this would be enough, because this is the part of the bigger problem and i need to solve only this to complete solution. Now i see that it is the same as $(-1)^k$.
– Ognjen Mojovic
Dec 3 '18 at 20:33
add a comment |
I would like to receive some help about the next problem.
The problem:
I'm trying to prove the next equation:
$$sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n - k)!} = 0 quad, n = 1, 2, ...$$
My work until now:
$$sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n - k)!} = sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{1}{(-1)^{k}k!(n - k)!} =$$
$$= frac{1}{(-1)^0 cdot n!} + frac{1}{(-1)^1 cdot (n - 1)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^2 cdot 2!(n - 2)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^3 cdot 3!(n - 3)!} + cdot cdot cdot + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 3} cdot (n - 3)!3!} + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 2} cdot (n - 2)!2!} + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 1} cdot (n - 1)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^n cdot n!} quad (1)$$
Because we have $n + 1$ summands i tried to see what happens when $n$ is even or odd number:
1) $n = 2k - 1$, $k in mathbb{N} Longrightarrow$ Now there is $2k$ summands
$$(1) iff
frac{1}{(2k - 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^0} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 1}}right) +
frac{1}{(2k - 2)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^1} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 2}}right) +
frac{1}{2!(2k - 3)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^2} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 3}}right) +
cdot cdot cdot +
frac{1}{(k - 1)!k!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^{k - 1}} + frac{1}{(-1)^k}right) = 0$$
This is equal $0$, because the difference in powers of number $-1$ is odd number, so one of them has to be $1$ and another has to be $-1$.
2) $n = 2k$, $k in mathbb{N} Longrightarrow$ Now there is $2k + 1$ summands
$$(1) iff
frac{1}{(2k)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^0} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k}}right) +
frac{1}{(2k - 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^1} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 1}}right) +
frac{1}{2!(2k - 2)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^2} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 2}}right) +
cdot cdot cdot +
frac{1}{(k - 1)!(k + 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^{k - 1}} + frac{1}{(-1)^{k + 1}}right) +
frac{1}{(-1)^k cdot k!k!} quad Longrightarrow quad ?$$
Here, i can't use the same princip as in the first case. Also, the last summand is the $k + 1$ -st summand, he is in the middle of this sum and doesn't have a pair.
My question:
Please, could you help me with some advice or a hint that i could use to finnish my proof of the given equation?
Thank you, for your time and your help!
summation exponentiation
I would like to receive some help about the next problem.
The problem:
I'm trying to prove the next equation:
$$sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n - k)!} = 0 quad, n = 1, 2, ...$$
My work until now:
$$sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n - k)!} = sum_{k = 0}^{n} frac{1}{(-1)^{k}k!(n - k)!} =$$
$$= frac{1}{(-1)^0 cdot n!} + frac{1}{(-1)^1 cdot (n - 1)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^2 cdot 2!(n - 2)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^3 cdot 3!(n - 3)!} + cdot cdot cdot + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 3} cdot (n - 3)!3!} + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 2} cdot (n - 2)!2!} + frac{1}{(-1)^{n - 1} cdot (n - 1)!} + frac{1}{(-1)^n cdot n!} quad (1)$$
Because we have $n + 1$ summands i tried to see what happens when $n$ is even or odd number:
1) $n = 2k - 1$, $k in mathbb{N} Longrightarrow$ Now there is $2k$ summands
$$(1) iff
frac{1}{(2k - 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^0} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 1}}right) +
frac{1}{(2k - 2)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^1} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 2}}right) +
frac{1}{2!(2k - 3)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^2} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 3}}right) +
cdot cdot cdot +
frac{1}{(k - 1)!k!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^{k - 1}} + frac{1}{(-1)^k}right) = 0$$
This is equal $0$, because the difference in powers of number $-1$ is odd number, so one of them has to be $1$ and another has to be $-1$.
2) $n = 2k$, $k in mathbb{N} Longrightarrow$ Now there is $2k + 1$ summands
$$(1) iff
frac{1}{(2k)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^0} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k}}right) +
frac{1}{(2k - 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^1} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 1}}right) +
frac{1}{2!(2k - 2)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^2} + frac{1}{(-1)^{2k - 2}}right) +
cdot cdot cdot +
frac{1}{(k - 1)!(k + 1)!}left( frac{1}{(-1)^{k - 1}} + frac{1}{(-1)^{k + 1}}right) +
frac{1}{(-1)^k cdot k!k!} quad Longrightarrow quad ?$$
Here, i can't use the same princip as in the first case. Also, the last summand is the $k + 1$ -st summand, he is in the middle of this sum and doesn't have a pair.
My question:
Please, could you help me with some advice or a hint that i could use to finnish my proof of the given equation?
Thank you, for your time and your help!
summation exponentiation
summation exponentiation
asked Dec 3 '18 at 20:19
Ognjen Mojovic
1199
1199
2
Why is the negative one raised to negative k?
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 20:27
@fleablood: It was left from $(-1)^{n - k}$, but i thought this would be enough, because this is the part of the bigger problem and i need to solve only this to complete solution. Now i see that it is the same as $(-1)^k$.
– Ognjen Mojovic
Dec 3 '18 at 20:33
add a comment |
2
Why is the negative one raised to negative k?
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 20:27
@fleablood: It was left from $(-1)^{n - k}$, but i thought this would be enough, because this is the part of the bigger problem and i need to solve only this to complete solution. Now i see that it is the same as $(-1)^k$.
– Ognjen Mojovic
Dec 3 '18 at 20:33
2
2
Why is the negative one raised to negative k?
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 20:27
Why is the negative one raised to negative k?
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 20:27
@fleablood: It was left from $(-1)^{n - k}$, but i thought this would be enough, because this is the part of the bigger problem and i need to solve only this to complete solution. Now i see that it is the same as $(-1)^k$.
– Ognjen Mojovic
Dec 3 '18 at 20:33
@fleablood: It was left from $(-1)^{n - k}$, but i thought this would be enough, because this is the part of the bigger problem and i need to solve only this to complete solution. Now i see that it is the same as $(-1)^k$.
– Ognjen Mojovic
Dec 3 '18 at 20:33
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
HINT
Actually you were thinking a bit to complicated. Therefore consider the series expansion of $(1-x)^n$ which is due the Binomial Theorem given by
$$sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k(1)^{n-k}=sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k$$
Further notice that the binomial coefficient can be written as
$$binom nk = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$
Putting these two together yields to
$$sum_{k=0}^nfrac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}(-x)^k=n!sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x)^k}{k!(n-k)!}$$
For $x=1$ this equals your given formula. Now look at the original term we have expanded. Can you finish it from hereon?
add a comment |
$sum_{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n-k)!}=1/(n!)sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!(-1)^{k}}{k!(n-k)!}=frac{1}{n!}sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^{k}{nchoose k}=frac{1}{n!}(1-1)^n=0.$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024605%2ftrying-to-prove-an-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
HINT
Actually you were thinking a bit to complicated. Therefore consider the series expansion of $(1-x)^n$ which is due the Binomial Theorem given by
$$sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k(1)^{n-k}=sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k$$
Further notice that the binomial coefficient can be written as
$$binom nk = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$
Putting these two together yields to
$$sum_{k=0}^nfrac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}(-x)^k=n!sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x)^k}{k!(n-k)!}$$
For $x=1$ this equals your given formula. Now look at the original term we have expanded. Can you finish it from hereon?
add a comment |
HINT
Actually you were thinking a bit to complicated. Therefore consider the series expansion of $(1-x)^n$ which is due the Binomial Theorem given by
$$sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k(1)^{n-k}=sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k$$
Further notice that the binomial coefficient can be written as
$$binom nk = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$
Putting these two together yields to
$$sum_{k=0}^nfrac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}(-x)^k=n!sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x)^k}{k!(n-k)!}$$
For $x=1$ this equals your given formula. Now look at the original term we have expanded. Can you finish it from hereon?
add a comment |
HINT
Actually you were thinking a bit to complicated. Therefore consider the series expansion of $(1-x)^n$ which is due the Binomial Theorem given by
$$sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k(1)^{n-k}=sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k$$
Further notice that the binomial coefficient can be written as
$$binom nk = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$
Putting these two together yields to
$$sum_{k=0}^nfrac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}(-x)^k=n!sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x)^k}{k!(n-k)!}$$
For $x=1$ this equals your given formula. Now look at the original term we have expanded. Can you finish it from hereon?
HINT
Actually you were thinking a bit to complicated. Therefore consider the series expansion of $(1-x)^n$ which is due the Binomial Theorem given by
$$sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k(1)^{n-k}=sum_{k=0}^nbinom nk (-x)^k$$
Further notice that the binomial coefficient can be written as
$$binom nk = frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$$
Putting these two together yields to
$$sum_{k=0}^nfrac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}(-x)^k=n!sum_{k=0}^nfrac{(-x)^k}{k!(n-k)!}$$
For $x=1$ this equals your given formula. Now look at the original term we have expanded. Can you finish it from hereon?
answered Dec 3 '18 at 20:25
mrtaurho
3,77121133
3,77121133
add a comment |
add a comment |
$sum_{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n-k)!}=1/(n!)sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!(-1)^{k}}{k!(n-k)!}=frac{1}{n!}sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^{k}{nchoose k}=frac{1}{n!}(1-1)^n=0.$
add a comment |
$sum_{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n-k)!}=1/(n!)sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!(-1)^{k}}{k!(n-k)!}=frac{1}{n!}sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^{k}{nchoose k}=frac{1}{n!}(1-1)^n=0.$
add a comment |
$sum_{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n-k)!}=1/(n!)sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!(-1)^{k}}{k!(n-k)!}=frac{1}{n!}sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^{k}{nchoose k}=frac{1}{n!}(1-1)^n=0.$
$sum_{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{-k}}{k!(n-k)!}=1/(n!)sum_{k=0}^n frac{n!(-1)^{k}}{k!(n-k)!}=frac{1}{n!}sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^{k}{nchoose k}=frac{1}{n!}(1-1)^n=0.$
answered Dec 3 '18 at 20:23
John_Wick
1,381111
1,381111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024605%2ftrying-to-prove-an-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Why is the negative one raised to negative k?
– fleablood
Dec 3 '18 at 20:27
@fleablood: It was left from $(-1)^{n - k}$, but i thought this would be enough, because this is the part of the bigger problem and i need to solve only this to complete solution. Now i see that it is the same as $(-1)^k$.
– Ognjen Mojovic
Dec 3 '18 at 20:33