Why does a 1/x^2 graph decrease at a decreasing rate and not at an increasing rate.












1












$begingroup$


For



$y=1/x^2$



As $x$ increases, the denominator ($x^2$) increases at an increasing rate.




  • E.g. $1^2$ to $2^2$ is a difference of $3$, but $2^2$ to $3^2$ is a difference of $5$


So wouldn't it follow that $y$ decreases at an increasing rate, because:




  1. $y$ is inversely proportional to $x^2$ (i.e. $y$ decreases as $x^2$ increases)

  2. $x^2$ increases at an increasing rate


Hence, $y$ decreases at an increasing rate (as $x^2$ increases at an increasing rate)



Now I obviously know this isn't the case because the graph shows that $y$ decreases at a decreasing rate, so could you please spot the error in my thinking?



An actual graph of $y$ vs $1/x^2$ is shown below in blue (flatter over time), whereas I thought the shape (ignore the values) would as more like the red version (where it gets steeper over time):



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $frac{1}{1^2}$ to $frac{1}{2^2}$ is $frac{3}{4}$ but $frac{1}{2^2}$ to $frac{1}{3^2}$ is$frac{5}{36}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Francey
    Nov 11 '16 at 19:51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's some confusing use of terminology here, which I think is getting you lost. See Paul's answer. Otherwise, talking about "the rate of a rate" would mean taking a second derivative (in calculus terms), which is often interpreted as an acceleration. In this case the second derivative is strictly positive for positive $x$. Which means the function is decreasing at ever higher "velocity", which is what you expect it to be doing.
    $endgroup$
    – zibadawa timmy
    Nov 11 '16 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    To the person confused about what it means to decrease at a decreasing rate I want to let you know that I was recently confused too and I am an actuary and have a masters in math and taught calculus for 2 years. It simply comes down to terminology - if a sequence of y values is 3,2, and 1.5 corresponding to x values 1,2,and 3, than this means that y is decreasing at a decreasing rate over this interval, since the rate of decrease is decreasing, that is the rate of decrease is getting smaller. It's confusing because the rate of decrease is actually increasing, but we say it's decreasing at a de
    $endgroup$
    – George Dunlap
    Apr 10 '17 at 14:18










  • $begingroup$
    I would interpret "decreasing at a decreasing rate" as "decreasing, and the magnitude of decreasing is also decreasing".
    $endgroup$
    – Frenzy Li
    Apr 10 '17 at 15:22
















1












$begingroup$


For



$y=1/x^2$



As $x$ increases, the denominator ($x^2$) increases at an increasing rate.




  • E.g. $1^2$ to $2^2$ is a difference of $3$, but $2^2$ to $3^2$ is a difference of $5$


So wouldn't it follow that $y$ decreases at an increasing rate, because:




  1. $y$ is inversely proportional to $x^2$ (i.e. $y$ decreases as $x^2$ increases)

  2. $x^2$ increases at an increasing rate


Hence, $y$ decreases at an increasing rate (as $x^2$ increases at an increasing rate)



Now I obviously know this isn't the case because the graph shows that $y$ decreases at a decreasing rate, so could you please spot the error in my thinking?



An actual graph of $y$ vs $1/x^2$ is shown below in blue (flatter over time), whereas I thought the shape (ignore the values) would as more like the red version (where it gets steeper over time):



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $frac{1}{1^2}$ to $frac{1}{2^2}$ is $frac{3}{4}$ but $frac{1}{2^2}$ to $frac{1}{3^2}$ is$frac{5}{36}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Francey
    Nov 11 '16 at 19:51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's some confusing use of terminology here, which I think is getting you lost. See Paul's answer. Otherwise, talking about "the rate of a rate" would mean taking a second derivative (in calculus terms), which is often interpreted as an acceleration. In this case the second derivative is strictly positive for positive $x$. Which means the function is decreasing at ever higher "velocity", which is what you expect it to be doing.
    $endgroup$
    – zibadawa timmy
    Nov 11 '16 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    To the person confused about what it means to decrease at a decreasing rate I want to let you know that I was recently confused too and I am an actuary and have a masters in math and taught calculus for 2 years. It simply comes down to terminology - if a sequence of y values is 3,2, and 1.5 corresponding to x values 1,2,and 3, than this means that y is decreasing at a decreasing rate over this interval, since the rate of decrease is decreasing, that is the rate of decrease is getting smaller. It's confusing because the rate of decrease is actually increasing, but we say it's decreasing at a de
    $endgroup$
    – George Dunlap
    Apr 10 '17 at 14:18










  • $begingroup$
    I would interpret "decreasing at a decreasing rate" as "decreasing, and the magnitude of decreasing is also decreasing".
    $endgroup$
    – Frenzy Li
    Apr 10 '17 at 15:22














1












1








1





$begingroup$


For



$y=1/x^2$



As $x$ increases, the denominator ($x^2$) increases at an increasing rate.




  • E.g. $1^2$ to $2^2$ is a difference of $3$, but $2^2$ to $3^2$ is a difference of $5$


So wouldn't it follow that $y$ decreases at an increasing rate, because:




  1. $y$ is inversely proportional to $x^2$ (i.e. $y$ decreases as $x^2$ increases)

  2. $x^2$ increases at an increasing rate


Hence, $y$ decreases at an increasing rate (as $x^2$ increases at an increasing rate)



Now I obviously know this isn't the case because the graph shows that $y$ decreases at a decreasing rate, so could you please spot the error in my thinking?



An actual graph of $y$ vs $1/x^2$ is shown below in blue (flatter over time), whereas I thought the shape (ignore the values) would as more like the red version (where it gets steeper over time):



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For



$y=1/x^2$



As $x$ increases, the denominator ($x^2$) increases at an increasing rate.




  • E.g. $1^2$ to $2^2$ is a difference of $3$, but $2^2$ to $3^2$ is a difference of $5$


So wouldn't it follow that $y$ decreases at an increasing rate, because:




  1. $y$ is inversely proportional to $x^2$ (i.e. $y$ decreases as $x^2$ increases)

  2. $x^2$ increases at an increasing rate


Hence, $y$ decreases at an increasing rate (as $x^2$ increases at an increasing rate)



Now I obviously know this isn't the case because the graph shows that $y$ decreases at a decreasing rate, so could you please spot the error in my thinking?



An actual graph of $y$ vs $1/x^2$ is shown below in blue (flatter over time), whereas I thought the shape (ignore the values) would as more like the red version (where it gets steeper over time):



enter image description here







functions exponential-function graphing-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 11 '16 at 22:02







K-Feldspar

















asked Nov 11 '16 at 19:45









K-FeldsparK-Feldspar

202211




202211












  • $begingroup$
    $frac{1}{1^2}$ to $frac{1}{2^2}$ is $frac{3}{4}$ but $frac{1}{2^2}$ to $frac{1}{3^2}$ is$frac{5}{36}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Francey
    Nov 11 '16 at 19:51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's some confusing use of terminology here, which I think is getting you lost. See Paul's answer. Otherwise, talking about "the rate of a rate" would mean taking a second derivative (in calculus terms), which is often interpreted as an acceleration. In this case the second derivative is strictly positive for positive $x$. Which means the function is decreasing at ever higher "velocity", which is what you expect it to be doing.
    $endgroup$
    – zibadawa timmy
    Nov 11 '16 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    To the person confused about what it means to decrease at a decreasing rate I want to let you know that I was recently confused too and I am an actuary and have a masters in math and taught calculus for 2 years. It simply comes down to terminology - if a sequence of y values is 3,2, and 1.5 corresponding to x values 1,2,and 3, than this means that y is decreasing at a decreasing rate over this interval, since the rate of decrease is decreasing, that is the rate of decrease is getting smaller. It's confusing because the rate of decrease is actually increasing, but we say it's decreasing at a de
    $endgroup$
    – George Dunlap
    Apr 10 '17 at 14:18










  • $begingroup$
    I would interpret "decreasing at a decreasing rate" as "decreasing, and the magnitude of decreasing is also decreasing".
    $endgroup$
    – Frenzy Li
    Apr 10 '17 at 15:22


















  • $begingroup$
    $frac{1}{1^2}$ to $frac{1}{2^2}$ is $frac{3}{4}$ but $frac{1}{2^2}$ to $frac{1}{3^2}$ is$frac{5}{36}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Adam Francey
    Nov 11 '16 at 19:51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There's some confusing use of terminology here, which I think is getting you lost. See Paul's answer. Otherwise, talking about "the rate of a rate" would mean taking a second derivative (in calculus terms), which is often interpreted as an acceleration. In this case the second derivative is strictly positive for positive $x$. Which means the function is decreasing at ever higher "velocity", which is what you expect it to be doing.
    $endgroup$
    – zibadawa timmy
    Nov 11 '16 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    To the person confused about what it means to decrease at a decreasing rate I want to let you know that I was recently confused too and I am an actuary and have a masters in math and taught calculus for 2 years. It simply comes down to terminology - if a sequence of y values is 3,2, and 1.5 corresponding to x values 1,2,and 3, than this means that y is decreasing at a decreasing rate over this interval, since the rate of decrease is decreasing, that is the rate of decrease is getting smaller. It's confusing because the rate of decrease is actually increasing, but we say it's decreasing at a de
    $endgroup$
    – George Dunlap
    Apr 10 '17 at 14:18










  • $begingroup$
    I would interpret "decreasing at a decreasing rate" as "decreasing, and the magnitude of decreasing is also decreasing".
    $endgroup$
    – Frenzy Li
    Apr 10 '17 at 15:22
















$begingroup$
$frac{1}{1^2}$ to $frac{1}{2^2}$ is $frac{3}{4}$ but $frac{1}{2^2}$ to $frac{1}{3^2}$ is$frac{5}{36}$.
$endgroup$
– Adam Francey
Nov 11 '16 at 19:51






$begingroup$
$frac{1}{1^2}$ to $frac{1}{2^2}$ is $frac{3}{4}$ but $frac{1}{2^2}$ to $frac{1}{3^2}$ is$frac{5}{36}$.
$endgroup$
– Adam Francey
Nov 11 '16 at 19:51






1




1




$begingroup$
There's some confusing use of terminology here, which I think is getting you lost. See Paul's answer. Otherwise, talking about "the rate of a rate" would mean taking a second derivative (in calculus terms), which is often interpreted as an acceleration. In this case the second derivative is strictly positive for positive $x$. Which means the function is decreasing at ever higher "velocity", which is what you expect it to be doing.
$endgroup$
– zibadawa timmy
Nov 11 '16 at 20:04




$begingroup$
There's some confusing use of terminology here, which I think is getting you lost. See Paul's answer. Otherwise, talking about "the rate of a rate" would mean taking a second derivative (in calculus terms), which is often interpreted as an acceleration. In this case the second derivative is strictly positive for positive $x$. Which means the function is decreasing at ever higher "velocity", which is what you expect it to be doing.
$endgroup$
– zibadawa timmy
Nov 11 '16 at 20:04












$begingroup$
To the person confused about what it means to decrease at a decreasing rate I want to let you know that I was recently confused too and I am an actuary and have a masters in math and taught calculus for 2 years. It simply comes down to terminology - if a sequence of y values is 3,2, and 1.5 corresponding to x values 1,2,and 3, than this means that y is decreasing at a decreasing rate over this interval, since the rate of decrease is decreasing, that is the rate of decrease is getting smaller. It's confusing because the rate of decrease is actually increasing, but we say it's decreasing at a de
$endgroup$
– George Dunlap
Apr 10 '17 at 14:18




$begingroup$
To the person confused about what it means to decrease at a decreasing rate I want to let you know that I was recently confused too and I am an actuary and have a masters in math and taught calculus for 2 years. It simply comes down to terminology - if a sequence of y values is 3,2, and 1.5 corresponding to x values 1,2,and 3, than this means that y is decreasing at a decreasing rate over this interval, since the rate of decrease is decreasing, that is the rate of decrease is getting smaller. It's confusing because the rate of decrease is actually increasing, but we say it's decreasing at a de
$endgroup$
– George Dunlap
Apr 10 '17 at 14:18












$begingroup$
I would interpret "decreasing at a decreasing rate" as "decreasing, and the magnitude of decreasing is also decreasing".
$endgroup$
– Frenzy Li
Apr 10 '17 at 15:22




$begingroup$
I would interpret "decreasing at a decreasing rate" as "decreasing, and the magnitude of decreasing is also decreasing".
$endgroup$
– Frenzy Li
Apr 10 '17 at 15:22










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

There's a difference between absolute and relative decrease. The absolute decrease is the textbook definition; in this case, it is the change in $y$ divided by the change in $x$. What you are thinking about instead is the relative decrease, which is the decrease, relative to the size of $y$. This is given by the absolute decrease divided by $y$. So you are just comparing 2 different types of decrease here.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    As $x$ increases, the denominator does indeed increase at an increasing rate.



    However, the effect of a unit increase in denominator also drops as $y$ increases, and it does so faster than the denominator increases. SO on net, the rate of decrease of the function fals as $x$ gets larger.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I haven't 100% understood it yet, but this "effect of a unit increase in denominator drops as y increases" seems to be what I was missing. The thing still making it unclear for me is you said "as y increases". This means moving towards the left, yes? So as we move towards the left (y increases), but as we move towards the left there is a DECREASE, not INCREASE in the denominator. I can't seem to wrap my head around the difference.
      $endgroup$
      – K-Feldspar
      Nov 11 '16 at 22:06



















    1












    $begingroup$

    Based on the tags and the nature of the question, this answer may be slightly beyond your current level since it uses calculus. Normally I don't like answering questions in this way but it's such a natural calculus question that I can't resist.



    Let $f(x) = dfrac1{x^2}$.



    The rate of change of $f(x)$ is the same as what's called the derivative of $f(x)$, which is $f'(x) = -dfrac2{x^3}$ in this case. Note that $f'(x) < 0$ for all values of $x > 0$. Since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ is decreasing, as we can clearly see on the graph you posted.



    You're asking why the rate of the rate is decreasing. The rate of the rate is the derivative of the derivative, which is the second derivative of the original function, which is $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ in this case.



    Note that as $x$ gets larger and larger, we see that the value of $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ gets smaller and smaller. More specifically, the value of $f''(x)$ gets closer and closer to zero while always remaining positive. Since $f''(x) > 0$, then $f'(x)$ is increasing. But since $f''(x)$ itself is decreasing, then $f'(x)$ is changing more slowly. Since $f'(x)$ increases more slowly as $x$ gets larger, and since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ decreases more slowly.



    To summarize, for $x > 0$:




    • $f'(x) < 0$. This means $f(x)$ is decreasing as $x$ increases.

    • $f''(x) > 0$. This means $f'(x)$ is increasing as $x$ increases.

    • $f'(x) < 0$ and $f'(x)$ increasing means $f'(x)$ is getting closer to zero, which means the rate of change of $f$ gets smaller as $x$ gets larger. And since $f$ is decreasing, then "the rate of change" of $f$ really means "the rate of decrease" of $f$. Therefore, The rate of decrease of $f$ is getting smaller as $x$ gets larger. In other words, $f$ decreases more slowly as $x$ gets larger.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      For yet another perspective, consider the inequality (easy to prove with AM-GM for example): $$frac{1}{2}big(f(a)+f(b)big) = frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{a^2}+frac{1}{b^2}right) le left(frac{2}{a+b}right)^2 = fleft(frac{a+b}{2}right)$$



      (This is in fact equivalent to $f(x)=frac{1}{x^2}$ being midpoint convex and, since it's continuous, convex.)



      What the inequality says is that the graph of $f$ on an interval $[a,b]$ stays under the line segment between the endpoints $(a,f(a))$ and $(b,f(b))$ for $forall a,b$.



      But if the rate of decrease increased, that would roughly visualize as a steeper turn downwards, which would cause the graph to (locally) "jump" above the chord.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        1












        $begingroup$

        With the help of the 1-order and 2-order derivatives:



        ![![enter image description here






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Are these graphs of $f$? If so, the first and last both have $f''>0$ and yet one graph is concave down while the other is concave up.
          $endgroup$
          – JohnD
          Dec 9 '18 at 18:06










        • $begingroup$
          @JohnD, thank you, the signs of the second order derivatives in the first and second graphs were swapped and the examples were added.
          $endgroup$
          – farruhota
          Dec 9 '18 at 18:36











        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2009675%2fwhy-does-a-1-x2-graph-decrease-at-a-decreasing-rate-and-not-at-an-increasing-ra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        4












        $begingroup$

        There's a difference between absolute and relative decrease. The absolute decrease is the textbook definition; in this case, it is the change in $y$ divided by the change in $x$. What you are thinking about instead is the relative decrease, which is the decrease, relative to the size of $y$. This is given by the absolute decrease divided by $y$. So you are just comparing 2 different types of decrease here.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          4












          $begingroup$

          There's a difference between absolute and relative decrease. The absolute decrease is the textbook definition; in this case, it is the change in $y$ divided by the change in $x$. What you are thinking about instead is the relative decrease, which is the decrease, relative to the size of $y$. This is given by the absolute decrease divided by $y$. So you are just comparing 2 different types of decrease here.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            There's a difference between absolute and relative decrease. The absolute decrease is the textbook definition; in this case, it is the change in $y$ divided by the change in $x$. What you are thinking about instead is the relative decrease, which is the decrease, relative to the size of $y$. This is given by the absolute decrease divided by $y$. So you are just comparing 2 different types of decrease here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            There's a difference between absolute and relative decrease. The absolute decrease is the textbook definition; in this case, it is the change in $y$ divided by the change in $x$. What you are thinking about instead is the relative decrease, which is the decrease, relative to the size of $y$. This is given by the absolute decrease divided by $y$. So you are just comparing 2 different types of decrease here.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 11 '16 at 19:51









            PaulPaul

            6,18221022




            6,18221022























                1












                $begingroup$

                As $x$ increases, the denominator does indeed increase at an increasing rate.



                However, the effect of a unit increase in denominator also drops as $y$ increases, and it does so faster than the denominator increases. SO on net, the rate of decrease of the function fals as $x$ gets larger.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  I haven't 100% understood it yet, but this "effect of a unit increase in denominator drops as y increases" seems to be what I was missing. The thing still making it unclear for me is you said "as y increases". This means moving towards the left, yes? So as we move towards the left (y increases), but as we move towards the left there is a DECREASE, not INCREASE in the denominator. I can't seem to wrap my head around the difference.
                  $endgroup$
                  – K-Feldspar
                  Nov 11 '16 at 22:06
















                1












                $begingroup$

                As $x$ increases, the denominator does indeed increase at an increasing rate.



                However, the effect of a unit increase in denominator also drops as $y$ increases, and it does so faster than the denominator increases. SO on net, the rate of decrease of the function fals as $x$ gets larger.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  I haven't 100% understood it yet, but this "effect of a unit increase in denominator drops as y increases" seems to be what I was missing. The thing still making it unclear for me is you said "as y increases". This means moving towards the left, yes? So as we move towards the left (y increases), but as we move towards the left there is a DECREASE, not INCREASE in the denominator. I can't seem to wrap my head around the difference.
                  $endgroup$
                  – K-Feldspar
                  Nov 11 '16 at 22:06














                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                As $x$ increases, the denominator does indeed increase at an increasing rate.



                However, the effect of a unit increase in denominator also drops as $y$ increases, and it does so faster than the denominator increases. SO on net, the rate of decrease of the function fals as $x$ gets larger.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                As $x$ increases, the denominator does indeed increase at an increasing rate.



                However, the effect of a unit increase in denominator also drops as $y$ increases, and it does so faster than the denominator increases. SO on net, the rate of decrease of the function fals as $x$ gets larger.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 11 '16 at 19:54









                Mark FischlerMark Fischler

                32.4k12251




                32.4k12251












                • $begingroup$
                  I haven't 100% understood it yet, but this "effect of a unit increase in denominator drops as y increases" seems to be what I was missing. The thing still making it unclear for me is you said "as y increases". This means moving towards the left, yes? So as we move towards the left (y increases), but as we move towards the left there is a DECREASE, not INCREASE in the denominator. I can't seem to wrap my head around the difference.
                  $endgroup$
                  – K-Feldspar
                  Nov 11 '16 at 22:06


















                • $begingroup$
                  I haven't 100% understood it yet, but this "effect of a unit increase in denominator drops as y increases" seems to be what I was missing. The thing still making it unclear for me is you said "as y increases". This means moving towards the left, yes? So as we move towards the left (y increases), but as we move towards the left there is a DECREASE, not INCREASE in the denominator. I can't seem to wrap my head around the difference.
                  $endgroup$
                  – K-Feldspar
                  Nov 11 '16 at 22:06
















                $begingroup$
                I haven't 100% understood it yet, but this "effect of a unit increase in denominator drops as y increases" seems to be what I was missing. The thing still making it unclear for me is you said "as y increases". This means moving towards the left, yes? So as we move towards the left (y increases), but as we move towards the left there is a DECREASE, not INCREASE in the denominator. I can't seem to wrap my head around the difference.
                $endgroup$
                – K-Feldspar
                Nov 11 '16 at 22:06




                $begingroup$
                I haven't 100% understood it yet, but this "effect of a unit increase in denominator drops as y increases" seems to be what I was missing. The thing still making it unclear for me is you said "as y increases". This means moving towards the left, yes? So as we move towards the left (y increases), but as we move towards the left there is a DECREASE, not INCREASE in the denominator. I can't seem to wrap my head around the difference.
                $endgroup$
                – K-Feldspar
                Nov 11 '16 at 22:06











                1












                $begingroup$

                Based on the tags and the nature of the question, this answer may be slightly beyond your current level since it uses calculus. Normally I don't like answering questions in this way but it's such a natural calculus question that I can't resist.



                Let $f(x) = dfrac1{x^2}$.



                The rate of change of $f(x)$ is the same as what's called the derivative of $f(x)$, which is $f'(x) = -dfrac2{x^3}$ in this case. Note that $f'(x) < 0$ for all values of $x > 0$. Since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ is decreasing, as we can clearly see on the graph you posted.



                You're asking why the rate of the rate is decreasing. The rate of the rate is the derivative of the derivative, which is the second derivative of the original function, which is $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ in this case.



                Note that as $x$ gets larger and larger, we see that the value of $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ gets smaller and smaller. More specifically, the value of $f''(x)$ gets closer and closer to zero while always remaining positive. Since $f''(x) > 0$, then $f'(x)$ is increasing. But since $f''(x)$ itself is decreasing, then $f'(x)$ is changing more slowly. Since $f'(x)$ increases more slowly as $x$ gets larger, and since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ decreases more slowly.



                To summarize, for $x > 0$:




                • $f'(x) < 0$. This means $f(x)$ is decreasing as $x$ increases.

                • $f''(x) > 0$. This means $f'(x)$ is increasing as $x$ increases.

                • $f'(x) < 0$ and $f'(x)$ increasing means $f'(x)$ is getting closer to zero, which means the rate of change of $f$ gets smaller as $x$ gets larger. And since $f$ is decreasing, then "the rate of change" of $f$ really means "the rate of decrease" of $f$. Therefore, The rate of decrease of $f$ is getting smaller as $x$ gets larger. In other words, $f$ decreases more slowly as $x$ gets larger.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Based on the tags and the nature of the question, this answer may be slightly beyond your current level since it uses calculus. Normally I don't like answering questions in this way but it's such a natural calculus question that I can't resist.



                  Let $f(x) = dfrac1{x^2}$.



                  The rate of change of $f(x)$ is the same as what's called the derivative of $f(x)$, which is $f'(x) = -dfrac2{x^3}$ in this case. Note that $f'(x) < 0$ for all values of $x > 0$. Since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ is decreasing, as we can clearly see on the graph you posted.



                  You're asking why the rate of the rate is decreasing. The rate of the rate is the derivative of the derivative, which is the second derivative of the original function, which is $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ in this case.



                  Note that as $x$ gets larger and larger, we see that the value of $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ gets smaller and smaller. More specifically, the value of $f''(x)$ gets closer and closer to zero while always remaining positive. Since $f''(x) > 0$, then $f'(x)$ is increasing. But since $f''(x)$ itself is decreasing, then $f'(x)$ is changing more slowly. Since $f'(x)$ increases more slowly as $x$ gets larger, and since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ decreases more slowly.



                  To summarize, for $x > 0$:




                  • $f'(x) < 0$. This means $f(x)$ is decreasing as $x$ increases.

                  • $f''(x) > 0$. This means $f'(x)$ is increasing as $x$ increases.

                  • $f'(x) < 0$ and $f'(x)$ increasing means $f'(x)$ is getting closer to zero, which means the rate of change of $f$ gets smaller as $x$ gets larger. And since $f$ is decreasing, then "the rate of change" of $f$ really means "the rate of decrease" of $f$. Therefore, The rate of decrease of $f$ is getting smaller as $x$ gets larger. In other words, $f$ decreases more slowly as $x$ gets larger.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    Based on the tags and the nature of the question, this answer may be slightly beyond your current level since it uses calculus. Normally I don't like answering questions in this way but it's such a natural calculus question that I can't resist.



                    Let $f(x) = dfrac1{x^2}$.



                    The rate of change of $f(x)$ is the same as what's called the derivative of $f(x)$, which is $f'(x) = -dfrac2{x^3}$ in this case. Note that $f'(x) < 0$ for all values of $x > 0$. Since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ is decreasing, as we can clearly see on the graph you posted.



                    You're asking why the rate of the rate is decreasing. The rate of the rate is the derivative of the derivative, which is the second derivative of the original function, which is $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ in this case.



                    Note that as $x$ gets larger and larger, we see that the value of $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ gets smaller and smaller. More specifically, the value of $f''(x)$ gets closer and closer to zero while always remaining positive. Since $f''(x) > 0$, then $f'(x)$ is increasing. But since $f''(x)$ itself is decreasing, then $f'(x)$ is changing more slowly. Since $f'(x)$ increases more slowly as $x$ gets larger, and since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ decreases more slowly.



                    To summarize, for $x > 0$:




                    • $f'(x) < 0$. This means $f(x)$ is decreasing as $x$ increases.

                    • $f''(x) > 0$. This means $f'(x)$ is increasing as $x$ increases.

                    • $f'(x) < 0$ and $f'(x)$ increasing means $f'(x)$ is getting closer to zero, which means the rate of change of $f$ gets smaller as $x$ gets larger. And since $f$ is decreasing, then "the rate of change" of $f$ really means "the rate of decrease" of $f$. Therefore, The rate of decrease of $f$ is getting smaller as $x$ gets larger. In other words, $f$ decreases more slowly as $x$ gets larger.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Based on the tags and the nature of the question, this answer may be slightly beyond your current level since it uses calculus. Normally I don't like answering questions in this way but it's such a natural calculus question that I can't resist.



                    Let $f(x) = dfrac1{x^2}$.



                    The rate of change of $f(x)$ is the same as what's called the derivative of $f(x)$, which is $f'(x) = -dfrac2{x^3}$ in this case. Note that $f'(x) < 0$ for all values of $x > 0$. Since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ is decreasing, as we can clearly see on the graph you posted.



                    You're asking why the rate of the rate is decreasing. The rate of the rate is the derivative of the derivative, which is the second derivative of the original function, which is $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ in this case.



                    Note that as $x$ gets larger and larger, we see that the value of $f''(x) = dfrac6{x^4}$ gets smaller and smaller. More specifically, the value of $f''(x)$ gets closer and closer to zero while always remaining positive. Since $f''(x) > 0$, then $f'(x)$ is increasing. But since $f''(x)$ itself is decreasing, then $f'(x)$ is changing more slowly. Since $f'(x)$ increases more slowly as $x$ gets larger, and since $f'(x) < 0$, this means $f(x)$ decreases more slowly.



                    To summarize, for $x > 0$:




                    • $f'(x) < 0$. This means $f(x)$ is decreasing as $x$ increases.

                    • $f''(x) > 0$. This means $f'(x)$ is increasing as $x$ increases.

                    • $f'(x) < 0$ and $f'(x)$ increasing means $f'(x)$ is getting closer to zero, which means the rate of change of $f$ gets smaller as $x$ gets larger. And since $f$ is decreasing, then "the rate of change" of $f$ really means "the rate of decrease" of $f$. Therefore, The rate of decrease of $f$ is getting smaller as $x$ gets larger. In other words, $f$ decreases more slowly as $x$ gets larger.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 11 '16 at 20:14









                    tilpertilper

                    12.9k11145




                    12.9k11145























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        For yet another perspective, consider the inequality (easy to prove with AM-GM for example): $$frac{1}{2}big(f(a)+f(b)big) = frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{a^2}+frac{1}{b^2}right) le left(frac{2}{a+b}right)^2 = fleft(frac{a+b}{2}right)$$



                        (This is in fact equivalent to $f(x)=frac{1}{x^2}$ being midpoint convex and, since it's continuous, convex.)



                        What the inequality says is that the graph of $f$ on an interval $[a,b]$ stays under the line segment between the endpoints $(a,f(a))$ and $(b,f(b))$ for $forall a,b$.



                        But if the rate of decrease increased, that would roughly visualize as a steeper turn downwards, which would cause the graph to (locally) "jump" above the chord.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          For yet another perspective, consider the inequality (easy to prove with AM-GM for example): $$frac{1}{2}big(f(a)+f(b)big) = frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{a^2}+frac{1}{b^2}right) le left(frac{2}{a+b}right)^2 = fleft(frac{a+b}{2}right)$$



                          (This is in fact equivalent to $f(x)=frac{1}{x^2}$ being midpoint convex and, since it's continuous, convex.)



                          What the inequality says is that the graph of $f$ on an interval $[a,b]$ stays under the line segment between the endpoints $(a,f(a))$ and $(b,f(b))$ for $forall a,b$.



                          But if the rate of decrease increased, that would roughly visualize as a steeper turn downwards, which would cause the graph to (locally) "jump" above the chord.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            For yet another perspective, consider the inequality (easy to prove with AM-GM for example): $$frac{1}{2}big(f(a)+f(b)big) = frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{a^2}+frac{1}{b^2}right) le left(frac{2}{a+b}right)^2 = fleft(frac{a+b}{2}right)$$



                            (This is in fact equivalent to $f(x)=frac{1}{x^2}$ being midpoint convex and, since it's continuous, convex.)



                            What the inequality says is that the graph of $f$ on an interval $[a,b]$ stays under the line segment between the endpoints $(a,f(a))$ and $(b,f(b))$ for $forall a,b$.



                            But if the rate of decrease increased, that would roughly visualize as a steeper turn downwards, which would cause the graph to (locally) "jump" above the chord.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            For yet another perspective, consider the inequality (easy to prove with AM-GM for example): $$frac{1}{2}big(f(a)+f(b)big) = frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{a^2}+frac{1}{b^2}right) le left(frac{2}{a+b}right)^2 = fleft(frac{a+b}{2}right)$$



                            (This is in fact equivalent to $f(x)=frac{1}{x^2}$ being midpoint convex and, since it's continuous, convex.)



                            What the inequality says is that the graph of $f$ on an interval $[a,b]$ stays under the line segment between the endpoints $(a,f(a))$ and $(b,f(b))$ for $forall a,b$.



                            But if the rate of decrease increased, that would roughly visualize as a steeper turn downwards, which would cause the graph to (locally) "jump" above the chord.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 11 '16 at 21:08









                            dxivdxiv

                            57.8k648101




                            57.8k648101























                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                With the help of the 1-order and 2-order derivatives:



                                ![![enter image description here






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  Are these graphs of $f$? If so, the first and last both have $f''>0$ and yet one graph is concave down while the other is concave up.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JohnD
                                  Dec 9 '18 at 18:06










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @JohnD, thank you, the signs of the second order derivatives in the first and second graphs were swapped and the examples were added.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – farruhota
                                  Dec 9 '18 at 18:36
















                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                With the help of the 1-order and 2-order derivatives:



                                ![![enter image description here






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  Are these graphs of $f$? If so, the first and last both have $f''>0$ and yet one graph is concave down while the other is concave up.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JohnD
                                  Dec 9 '18 at 18:06










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @JohnD, thank you, the signs of the second order derivatives in the first and second graphs were swapped and the examples were added.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – farruhota
                                  Dec 9 '18 at 18:36














                                1












                                1








                                1





                                $begingroup$

                                With the help of the 1-order and 2-order derivatives:



                                ![![enter image description here






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$



                                With the help of the 1-order and 2-order derivatives:



                                ![![enter image description here







                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                edited Dec 9 '18 at 18:35

























                                answered Apr 15 '17 at 12:44









                                farruhotafarruhota

                                19.8k2738




                                19.8k2738












                                • $begingroup$
                                  Are these graphs of $f$? If so, the first and last both have $f''>0$ and yet one graph is concave down while the other is concave up.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JohnD
                                  Dec 9 '18 at 18:06










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @JohnD, thank you, the signs of the second order derivatives in the first and second graphs were swapped and the examples were added.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – farruhota
                                  Dec 9 '18 at 18:36


















                                • $begingroup$
                                  Are these graphs of $f$? If so, the first and last both have $f''>0$ and yet one graph is concave down while the other is concave up.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JohnD
                                  Dec 9 '18 at 18:06










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @JohnD, thank you, the signs of the second order derivatives in the first and second graphs were swapped and the examples were added.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – farruhota
                                  Dec 9 '18 at 18:36
















                                $begingroup$
                                Are these graphs of $f$? If so, the first and last both have $f''>0$ and yet one graph is concave down while the other is concave up.
                                $endgroup$
                                – JohnD
                                Dec 9 '18 at 18:06




                                $begingroup$
                                Are these graphs of $f$? If so, the first and last both have $f''>0$ and yet one graph is concave down while the other is concave up.
                                $endgroup$
                                – JohnD
                                Dec 9 '18 at 18:06












                                $begingroup$
                                @JohnD, thank you, the signs of the second order derivatives in the first and second graphs were swapped and the examples were added.
                                $endgroup$
                                – farruhota
                                Dec 9 '18 at 18:36




                                $begingroup$
                                @JohnD, thank you, the signs of the second order derivatives in the first and second graphs were swapped and the examples were added.
                                $endgroup$
                                – farruhota
                                Dec 9 '18 at 18:36


















                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2009675%2fwhy-does-a-1-x2-graph-decrease-at-a-decreasing-rate-and-not-at-an-increasing-ra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Berounka

                                Fiat S.p.A.

                                Type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'