Equality of derivation on prime ring
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $R$ is a prime ring and charR $neq2$.
$d_{1},d_{2}$ are derivations of $R$ such that for some non-zero ideal of $I$ of $R$ and some $cin C$ ($C$: extended centroid of $R$).
$d_{1}d_{2}(x)=cx$ for all $x in I$.
By computing in different ways $d_{1}d_{2}(xty)$ for $x,t,yin I$, making use of the facts that $d_{i}$'s are derivations and $d_{1}d_{2}(x)=cx$ for $xin I$ and some $cin C$, one can easily obtain $$0=d_{1}(x)td_{2}(y)+d_{2}(x)td_{1}(y)$$ My question is how can we show that $hspace{0.1cm}$ $0=d_{1}(x)td_{2}(y)+d_{2}(x)td_{1}(y)$?
$textbf{My attempt:}$
begin{align}
begin{aligned}
d_1d_2(xty) =& d_1[d_2(x)ty+xd_2(ty)]\
=& d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)[d_1(ty)]+d_1(x)[d_2(ty)]+xd_1[d_2(ty)]\
=& d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)[d_1(t)y+td_1(y)]+d_1(x)[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)]+xd_1[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)] \
=& d_1(x)td_2(y)+d_2(x)td_1(y)+d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)d_1(t)y +
x[d_1d_2(t)y+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+td_1d_2(y)] \
=& d_1(x)td_2(y)+d_2(x)td_1(y)+3cxyt+[d_2(x)d_1(t)+d_1(x)d_2(t)]y+x[d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)]
end{aligned}
end{align}
Now,$cty=d_1d_2(ty)=d_1[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)]=d_1d_2(t)y+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+td_1d_2(y)$.
By hypothesis $cty=cty+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+cty$
Hence, we obtain $d_2(t)d_1(y)=-cty-d_1(t)d_2(y)$ and $d_2(x)d_1(t)=-ctx-d_1(x)d_2(t)$.
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $R$ is a prime ring and charR $neq2$.
$d_{1},d_{2}$ are derivations of $R$ such that for some non-zero ideal of $I$ of $R$ and some $cin C$ ($C$: extended centroid of $R$).
$d_{1}d_{2}(x)=cx$ for all $x in I$.
By computing in different ways $d_{1}d_{2}(xty)$ for $x,t,yin I$, making use of the facts that $d_{i}$'s are derivations and $d_{1}d_{2}(x)=cx$ for $xin I$ and some $cin C$, one can easily obtain $$0=d_{1}(x)td_{2}(y)+d_{2}(x)td_{1}(y)$$ My question is how can we show that $hspace{0.1cm}$ $0=d_{1}(x)td_{2}(y)+d_{2}(x)td_{1}(y)$?
$textbf{My attempt:}$
begin{align}
begin{aligned}
d_1d_2(xty) =& d_1[d_2(x)ty+xd_2(ty)]\
=& d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)[d_1(ty)]+d_1(x)[d_2(ty)]+xd_1[d_2(ty)]\
=& d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)[d_1(t)y+td_1(y)]+d_1(x)[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)]+xd_1[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)] \
=& d_1(x)td_2(y)+d_2(x)td_1(y)+d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)d_1(t)y +
x[d_1d_2(t)y+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+td_1d_2(y)] \
=& d_1(x)td_2(y)+d_2(x)td_1(y)+3cxyt+[d_2(x)d_1(t)+d_1(x)d_2(t)]y+x[d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)]
end{aligned}
end{align}
Now,$cty=d_1d_2(ty)=d_1[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)]=d_1d_2(t)y+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+td_1d_2(y)$.
By hypothesis $cty=cty+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+cty$
Hence, we obtain $d_2(t)d_1(y)=-cty-d_1(t)d_2(y)$ and $d_2(x)d_1(t)=-ctx-d_1(x)d_2(t)$.
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $R$ is a prime ring and charR $neq2$.
$d_{1},d_{2}$ are derivations of $R$ such that for some non-zero ideal of $I$ of $R$ and some $cin C$ ($C$: extended centroid of $R$).
$d_{1}d_{2}(x)=cx$ for all $x in I$.
By computing in different ways $d_{1}d_{2}(xty)$ for $x,t,yin I$, making use of the facts that $d_{i}$'s are derivations and $d_{1}d_{2}(x)=cx$ for $xin I$ and some $cin C$, one can easily obtain $$0=d_{1}(x)td_{2}(y)+d_{2}(x)td_{1}(y)$$ My question is how can we show that $hspace{0.1cm}$ $0=d_{1}(x)td_{2}(y)+d_{2}(x)td_{1}(y)$?
$textbf{My attempt:}$
begin{align}
begin{aligned}
d_1d_2(xty) =& d_1[d_2(x)ty+xd_2(ty)]\
=& d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)[d_1(ty)]+d_1(x)[d_2(ty)]+xd_1[d_2(ty)]\
=& d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)[d_1(t)y+td_1(y)]+d_1(x)[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)]+xd_1[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)] \
=& d_1(x)td_2(y)+d_2(x)td_1(y)+d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)d_1(t)y +
x[d_1d_2(t)y+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+td_1d_2(y)] \
=& d_1(x)td_2(y)+d_2(x)td_1(y)+3cxyt+[d_2(x)d_1(t)+d_1(x)d_2(t)]y+x[d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)]
end{aligned}
end{align}
Now,$cty=d_1d_2(ty)=d_1[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)]=d_1d_2(t)y+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+td_1d_2(y)$.
By hypothesis $cty=cty+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+cty$
Hence, we obtain $d_2(t)d_1(y)=-cty-d_1(t)d_2(y)$ and $d_2(x)d_1(t)=-ctx-d_1(x)d_2(t)$.
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
Suppose that $R$ is a prime ring and charR $neq2$.
$d_{1},d_{2}$ are derivations of $R$ such that for some non-zero ideal of $I$ of $R$ and some $cin C$ ($C$: extended centroid of $R$).
$d_{1}d_{2}(x)=cx$ for all $x in I$.
By computing in different ways $d_{1}d_{2}(xty)$ for $x,t,yin I$, making use of the facts that $d_{i}$'s are derivations and $d_{1}d_{2}(x)=cx$ for $xin I$ and some $cin C$, one can easily obtain $$0=d_{1}(x)td_{2}(y)+d_{2}(x)td_{1}(y)$$ My question is how can we show that $hspace{0.1cm}$ $0=d_{1}(x)td_{2}(y)+d_{2}(x)td_{1}(y)$?
$textbf{My attempt:}$
begin{align}
begin{aligned}
d_1d_2(xty) =& d_1[d_2(x)ty+xd_2(ty)]\
=& d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)[d_1(ty)]+d_1(x)[d_2(ty)]+xd_1[d_2(ty)]\
=& d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)[d_1(t)y+td_1(y)]+d_1(x)[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)]+xd_1[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)] \
=& d_1(x)td_2(y)+d_2(x)td_1(y)+d_1d_2(x)ty+d_2(x)d_1(t)y +
x[d_1d_2(t)y+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+td_1d_2(y)] \
=& d_1(x)td_2(y)+d_2(x)td_1(y)+3cxyt+[d_2(x)d_1(t)+d_1(x)d_2(t)]y+x[d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)]
end{aligned}
end{align}
Now,$cty=d_1d_2(ty)=d_1[d_2(t)y+td_2(y)]=d_1d_2(t)y+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+td_1d_2(y)$.
By hypothesis $cty=cty+d_2(t)d_1(y)+d_1(t)d_2(y)+cty$
Hence, we obtain $d_2(t)d_1(y)=-cty-d_1(t)d_2(y)$ and $d_2(x)d_1(t)=-ctx-d_1(x)d_2(t)$.
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
ring-theory noncommutative-algebra
edited yesterday
asked Dec 2 '15 at 15:31
1ENİGMA1
942316
942316
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1556618%2fequality-of-derivation-on-prime-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown