Neumann problem for a circle.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
We consider the interior neumann problem : $$nabla^{2} u =0:::, ::r<R$$
$$ dfrac{partial u}{partial n}=dfrac{partial u}{partial r}=f(theta)::,::r=R::,:: 0<theta<2pi$$
We first establish the fact which as the solution says is the compatibility condition : $$int_B fds=0$$
which is established using Green's second formula. Now the solution proceeds as follows :
(1) The compatibility condition obtained above can be written as $$R int_0^{2pi} f(theta) dtheta=0$$
(2) In the case of the dirichlet problem of the circle , the solution of the laplace equation is given as : $$u(r,theta) = dfrac{a_0}{2} + sum_{k=1}^{infty}r^{k}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta)$$
(3) Differentiating with respect to r and applying the boundary conditions we obtain : $$dfrac{partial u}{partial r}(R,theta) = sum_{k=1}^{infty}kR^{k-1}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta) = f(theta)$$
(4) Now the expression of $f(theta)$ in a series of the form (3) is possible only by the virtue of the compatibility condition since : $$a_0 = dfrac{1}{pi} int_0^{2pi} f(tau) d tau = 0$$
The rest of the proof was okay , can anyone explain the points (1) and (4) ?
Like in (1) are we changing the variable into $theta$ ? If yes , then how is $R$ there ?
And I have no idea about (4). Kindly help !
Thanks in advance !
differential-equations
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
We consider the interior neumann problem : $$nabla^{2} u =0:::, ::r<R$$
$$ dfrac{partial u}{partial n}=dfrac{partial u}{partial r}=f(theta)::,::r=R::,:: 0<theta<2pi$$
We first establish the fact which as the solution says is the compatibility condition : $$int_B fds=0$$
which is established using Green's second formula. Now the solution proceeds as follows :
(1) The compatibility condition obtained above can be written as $$R int_0^{2pi} f(theta) dtheta=0$$
(2) In the case of the dirichlet problem of the circle , the solution of the laplace equation is given as : $$u(r,theta) = dfrac{a_0}{2} + sum_{k=1}^{infty}r^{k}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta)$$
(3) Differentiating with respect to r and applying the boundary conditions we obtain : $$dfrac{partial u}{partial r}(R,theta) = sum_{k=1}^{infty}kR^{k-1}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta) = f(theta)$$
(4) Now the expression of $f(theta)$ in a series of the form (3) is possible only by the virtue of the compatibility condition since : $$a_0 = dfrac{1}{pi} int_0^{2pi} f(tau) d tau = 0$$
The rest of the proof was okay , can anyone explain the points (1) and (4) ?
Like in (1) are we changing the variable into $theta$ ? If yes , then how is $R$ there ?
And I have no idea about (4). Kindly help !
Thanks in advance !
differential-equations
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
We consider the interior neumann problem : $$nabla^{2} u =0:::, ::r<R$$
$$ dfrac{partial u}{partial n}=dfrac{partial u}{partial r}=f(theta)::,::r=R::,:: 0<theta<2pi$$
We first establish the fact which as the solution says is the compatibility condition : $$int_B fds=0$$
which is established using Green's second formula. Now the solution proceeds as follows :
(1) The compatibility condition obtained above can be written as $$R int_0^{2pi} f(theta) dtheta=0$$
(2) In the case of the dirichlet problem of the circle , the solution of the laplace equation is given as : $$u(r,theta) = dfrac{a_0}{2} + sum_{k=1}^{infty}r^{k}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta)$$
(3) Differentiating with respect to r and applying the boundary conditions we obtain : $$dfrac{partial u}{partial r}(R,theta) = sum_{k=1}^{infty}kR^{k-1}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta) = f(theta)$$
(4) Now the expression of $f(theta)$ in a series of the form (3) is possible only by the virtue of the compatibility condition since : $$a_0 = dfrac{1}{pi} int_0^{2pi} f(tau) d tau = 0$$
The rest of the proof was okay , can anyone explain the points (1) and (4) ?
Like in (1) are we changing the variable into $theta$ ? If yes , then how is $R$ there ?
And I have no idea about (4). Kindly help !
Thanks in advance !
differential-equations
We consider the interior neumann problem : $$nabla^{2} u =0:::, ::r<R$$
$$ dfrac{partial u}{partial n}=dfrac{partial u}{partial r}=f(theta)::,::r=R::,:: 0<theta<2pi$$
We first establish the fact which as the solution says is the compatibility condition : $$int_B fds=0$$
which is established using Green's second formula. Now the solution proceeds as follows :
(1) The compatibility condition obtained above can be written as $$R int_0^{2pi} f(theta) dtheta=0$$
(2) In the case of the dirichlet problem of the circle , the solution of the laplace equation is given as : $$u(r,theta) = dfrac{a_0}{2} + sum_{k=1}^{infty}r^{k}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta)$$
(3) Differentiating with respect to r and applying the boundary conditions we obtain : $$dfrac{partial u}{partial r}(R,theta) = sum_{k=1}^{infty}kR^{k-1}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta) = f(theta)$$
(4) Now the expression of $f(theta)$ in a series of the form (3) is possible only by the virtue of the compatibility condition since : $$a_0 = dfrac{1}{pi} int_0^{2pi} f(tau) d tau = 0$$
The rest of the proof was okay , can anyone explain the points (1) and (4) ?
Like in (1) are we changing the variable into $theta$ ? If yes , then how is $R$ there ?
And I have no idea about (4). Kindly help !
Thanks in advance !
differential-equations
differential-equations
edited Mar 8 '16 at 12:20
asked Mar 7 '16 at 19:33
User9523
9551822
9551822
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.
(4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.
(4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.
(4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.
(4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.
The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.
(4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.
answered Mar 12 '16 at 10:03
User9523
9551822
9551822
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1687412%2fneumann-problem-for-a-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown