Analyzing group form given generator relation











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Given $G$ be any finite group and $a,bin G$ s.t $o(a)=7$ and $O(b)=49$ with the condition $aba^{-1}=b^8$ then consider the following statement :



a)$G$ must be an abelian group



b)If $a,b$ generate the group $G$ then order of $G$ is $7^3$



c)$7^3$ is the order of the proper subgroup of $G$



.-------------



Option a is not true by using contradiction but what about others option ???










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Some helpful suggestions: (1) Spelling matters. I think you meant "statements", rather than "statement" but what you wrote literally suggests we take (a), (b), and (c) together as a compound statement. (2) Don't use shorthand unless you know it is correct shorthand. Numbers aren't groups, but $7^3$ can't be used as shorthand for any group of order $7^3$ because by convention it refers specifically to the elementary abelian group of that order (the direct product three cyclic groups of order $7$). If that's not what you meant by it, then you asked a different question that you meant to ask.
    – C Monsour
    Nov 27 at 12:43

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Given $G$ be any finite group and $a,bin G$ s.t $o(a)=7$ and $O(b)=49$ with the condition $aba^{-1}=b^8$ then consider the following statement :



a)$G$ must be an abelian group



b)If $a,b$ generate the group $G$ then order of $G$ is $7^3$



c)$7^3$ is the order of the proper subgroup of $G$



.-------------



Option a is not true by using contradiction but what about others option ???










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Some helpful suggestions: (1) Spelling matters. I think you meant "statements", rather than "statement" but what you wrote literally suggests we take (a), (b), and (c) together as a compound statement. (2) Don't use shorthand unless you know it is correct shorthand. Numbers aren't groups, but $7^3$ can't be used as shorthand for any group of order $7^3$ because by convention it refers specifically to the elementary abelian group of that order (the direct product three cyclic groups of order $7$). If that's not what you meant by it, then you asked a different question that you meant to ask.
    – C Monsour
    Nov 27 at 12:43















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Given $G$ be any finite group and $a,bin G$ s.t $o(a)=7$ and $O(b)=49$ with the condition $aba^{-1}=b^8$ then consider the following statement :



a)$G$ must be an abelian group



b)If $a,b$ generate the group $G$ then order of $G$ is $7^3$



c)$7^3$ is the order of the proper subgroup of $G$



.-------------



Option a is not true by using contradiction but what about others option ???










share|cite|improve this question















Given $G$ be any finite group and $a,bin G$ s.t $o(a)=7$ and $O(b)=49$ with the condition $aba^{-1}=b^8$ then consider the following statement :



a)$G$ must be an abelian group



b)If $a,b$ generate the group $G$ then order of $G$ is $7^3$



c)$7^3$ is the order of the proper subgroup of $G$



.-------------



Option a is not true by using contradiction but what about others option ???







group-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 27 at 16:58









Shubham

1,5941519




1,5941519










asked Nov 27 at 12:30









G C R

265




265








  • 1




    Some helpful suggestions: (1) Spelling matters. I think you meant "statements", rather than "statement" but what you wrote literally suggests we take (a), (b), and (c) together as a compound statement. (2) Don't use shorthand unless you know it is correct shorthand. Numbers aren't groups, but $7^3$ can't be used as shorthand for any group of order $7^3$ because by convention it refers specifically to the elementary abelian group of that order (the direct product three cyclic groups of order $7$). If that's not what you meant by it, then you asked a different question that you meant to ask.
    – C Monsour
    Nov 27 at 12:43
















  • 1




    Some helpful suggestions: (1) Spelling matters. I think you meant "statements", rather than "statement" but what you wrote literally suggests we take (a), (b), and (c) together as a compound statement. (2) Don't use shorthand unless you know it is correct shorthand. Numbers aren't groups, but $7^3$ can't be used as shorthand for any group of order $7^3$ because by convention it refers specifically to the elementary abelian group of that order (the direct product three cyclic groups of order $7$). If that's not what you meant by it, then you asked a different question that you meant to ask.
    – C Monsour
    Nov 27 at 12:43










1




1




Some helpful suggestions: (1) Spelling matters. I think you meant "statements", rather than "statement" but what you wrote literally suggests we take (a), (b), and (c) together as a compound statement. (2) Don't use shorthand unless you know it is correct shorthand. Numbers aren't groups, but $7^3$ can't be used as shorthand for any group of order $7^3$ because by convention it refers specifically to the elementary abelian group of that order (the direct product three cyclic groups of order $7$). If that's not what you meant by it, then you asked a different question that you meant to ask.
– C Monsour
Nov 27 at 12:43






Some helpful suggestions: (1) Spelling matters. I think you meant "statements", rather than "statement" but what you wrote literally suggests we take (a), (b), and (c) together as a compound statement. (2) Don't use shorthand unless you know it is correct shorthand. Numbers aren't groups, but $7^3$ can't be used as shorthand for any group of order $7^3$ because by convention it refers specifically to the elementary abelian group of that order (the direct product three cyclic groups of order $7$). If that's not what you meant by it, then you asked a different question that you meant to ask.
– C Monsour
Nov 27 at 12:43












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










So $G= langle a,b| a^7,b^{49}, aba^{-1}b^{-8}rangle$.
The third relator says that any element in $G$ can be written in the form $a^kb^m$. So $|G|leq 7^{3}$. Further more $|G|>49$ as the order of $b$ is $49$, and therefore 49 divides $|G|$. So you have $7^3$ possible choices for the elements in $G$.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    The first relator should be $a^7$, not $a^8$. Your argument proves that $|G| le 7^3$ rather than $|G|=7^3$, although the assumptions about orders of $a$ and $b$ in the question suggests that we are allowed to assume that $|G|>49$, and hence $|G| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 12:48










  • Oh right Thank you! I edited it.
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 12:51












  • Sorry, I'm actually confused now, why can't the order of the group be $49*3$ for example? I know that The group could have at least $2$ left $langle b rangle$ cosets, namely $a<b>, <b>$. which gives $2*49$ elements. Why more?
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 22:29










  • We are told that $o(a)=7$ and $o(b)=49$. So $b ne b^8$, and hence $a$ does not centralize $b$. In fact no nontirival power of $a$ can centralize $b$, and so $langle a rangle cap langle b rangle = 1$ and hence $|langle a,b rangle| ge |langle a rangle||langle b rangle| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 23:02













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015711%2fanalyzing-group-form-given-generator-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










So $G= langle a,b| a^7,b^{49}, aba^{-1}b^{-8}rangle$.
The third relator says that any element in $G$ can be written in the form $a^kb^m$. So $|G|leq 7^{3}$. Further more $|G|>49$ as the order of $b$ is $49$, and therefore 49 divides $|G|$. So you have $7^3$ possible choices for the elements in $G$.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    The first relator should be $a^7$, not $a^8$. Your argument proves that $|G| le 7^3$ rather than $|G|=7^3$, although the assumptions about orders of $a$ and $b$ in the question suggests that we are allowed to assume that $|G|>49$, and hence $|G| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 12:48










  • Oh right Thank you! I edited it.
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 12:51












  • Sorry, I'm actually confused now, why can't the order of the group be $49*3$ for example? I know that The group could have at least $2$ left $langle b rangle$ cosets, namely $a<b>, <b>$. which gives $2*49$ elements. Why more?
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 22:29










  • We are told that $o(a)=7$ and $o(b)=49$. So $b ne b^8$, and hence $a$ does not centralize $b$. In fact no nontirival power of $a$ can centralize $b$, and so $langle a rangle cap langle b rangle = 1$ and hence $|langle a,b rangle| ge |langle a rangle||langle b rangle| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 23:02

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










So $G= langle a,b| a^7,b^{49}, aba^{-1}b^{-8}rangle$.
The third relator says that any element in $G$ can be written in the form $a^kb^m$. So $|G|leq 7^{3}$. Further more $|G|>49$ as the order of $b$ is $49$, and therefore 49 divides $|G|$. So you have $7^3$ possible choices for the elements in $G$.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    The first relator should be $a^7$, not $a^8$. Your argument proves that $|G| le 7^3$ rather than $|G|=7^3$, although the assumptions about orders of $a$ and $b$ in the question suggests that we are allowed to assume that $|G|>49$, and hence $|G| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 12:48










  • Oh right Thank you! I edited it.
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 12:51












  • Sorry, I'm actually confused now, why can't the order of the group be $49*3$ for example? I know that The group could have at least $2$ left $langle b rangle$ cosets, namely $a<b>, <b>$. which gives $2*49$ elements. Why more?
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 22:29










  • We are told that $o(a)=7$ and $o(b)=49$. So $b ne b^8$, and hence $a$ does not centralize $b$. In fact no nontirival power of $a$ can centralize $b$, and so $langle a rangle cap langle b rangle = 1$ and hence $|langle a,b rangle| ge |langle a rangle||langle b rangle| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 23:02















up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






So $G= langle a,b| a^7,b^{49}, aba^{-1}b^{-8}rangle$.
The third relator says that any element in $G$ can be written in the form $a^kb^m$. So $|G|leq 7^{3}$. Further more $|G|>49$ as the order of $b$ is $49$, and therefore 49 divides $|G|$. So you have $7^3$ possible choices for the elements in $G$.






share|cite|improve this answer














So $G= langle a,b| a^7,b^{49}, aba^{-1}b^{-8}rangle$.
The third relator says that any element in $G$ can be written in the form $a^kb^m$. So $|G|leq 7^{3}$. Further more $|G|>49$ as the order of $b$ is $49$, and therefore 49 divides $|G|$. So you have $7^3$ possible choices for the elements in $G$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 27 at 12:55

























answered Nov 27 at 12:38









mathnoob

1,646322




1,646322








  • 1




    The first relator should be $a^7$, not $a^8$. Your argument proves that $|G| le 7^3$ rather than $|G|=7^3$, although the assumptions about orders of $a$ and $b$ in the question suggests that we are allowed to assume that $|G|>49$, and hence $|G| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 12:48










  • Oh right Thank you! I edited it.
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 12:51












  • Sorry, I'm actually confused now, why can't the order of the group be $49*3$ for example? I know that The group could have at least $2$ left $langle b rangle$ cosets, namely $a<b>, <b>$. which gives $2*49$ elements. Why more?
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 22:29










  • We are told that $o(a)=7$ and $o(b)=49$. So $b ne b^8$, and hence $a$ does not centralize $b$. In fact no nontirival power of $a$ can centralize $b$, and so $langle a rangle cap langle b rangle = 1$ and hence $|langle a,b rangle| ge |langle a rangle||langle b rangle| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 23:02
















  • 1




    The first relator should be $a^7$, not $a^8$. Your argument proves that $|G| le 7^3$ rather than $|G|=7^3$, although the assumptions about orders of $a$ and $b$ in the question suggests that we are allowed to assume that $|G|>49$, and hence $|G| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 12:48










  • Oh right Thank you! I edited it.
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 12:51












  • Sorry, I'm actually confused now, why can't the order of the group be $49*3$ for example? I know that The group could have at least $2$ left $langle b rangle$ cosets, namely $a<b>, <b>$. which gives $2*49$ elements. Why more?
    – mathnoob
    Nov 27 at 22:29










  • We are told that $o(a)=7$ and $o(b)=49$. So $b ne b^8$, and hence $a$ does not centralize $b$. In fact no nontirival power of $a$ can centralize $b$, and so $langle a rangle cap langle b rangle = 1$ and hence $|langle a,b rangle| ge |langle a rangle||langle b rangle| = 7^3$.
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 27 at 23:02










1




1




The first relator should be $a^7$, not $a^8$. Your argument proves that $|G| le 7^3$ rather than $|G|=7^3$, although the assumptions about orders of $a$ and $b$ in the question suggests that we are allowed to assume that $|G|>49$, and hence $|G| = 7^3$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 27 at 12:48




The first relator should be $a^7$, not $a^8$. Your argument proves that $|G| le 7^3$ rather than $|G|=7^3$, although the assumptions about orders of $a$ and $b$ in the question suggests that we are allowed to assume that $|G|>49$, and hence $|G| = 7^3$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 27 at 12:48












Oh right Thank you! I edited it.
– mathnoob
Nov 27 at 12:51






Oh right Thank you! I edited it.
– mathnoob
Nov 27 at 12:51














Sorry, I'm actually confused now, why can't the order of the group be $49*3$ for example? I know that The group could have at least $2$ left $langle b rangle$ cosets, namely $a<b>, <b>$. which gives $2*49$ elements. Why more?
– mathnoob
Nov 27 at 22:29




Sorry, I'm actually confused now, why can't the order of the group be $49*3$ for example? I know that The group could have at least $2$ left $langle b rangle$ cosets, namely $a<b>, <b>$. which gives $2*49$ elements. Why more?
– mathnoob
Nov 27 at 22:29












We are told that $o(a)=7$ and $o(b)=49$. So $b ne b^8$, and hence $a$ does not centralize $b$. In fact no nontirival power of $a$ can centralize $b$, and so $langle a rangle cap langle b rangle = 1$ and hence $|langle a,b rangle| ge |langle a rangle||langle b rangle| = 7^3$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 27 at 23:02






We are told that $o(a)=7$ and $o(b)=49$. So $b ne b^8$, and hence $a$ does not centralize $b$. In fact no nontirival power of $a$ can centralize $b$, and so $langle a rangle cap langle b rangle = 1$ and hence $|langle a,b rangle| ge |langle a rangle||langle b rangle| = 7^3$.
– Derek Holt
Nov 27 at 23:02




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015711%2fanalyzing-group-form-given-generator-relation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Sphinx de Gizeh

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...