Singular Value Decomposition of Commuting Matrices
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
If two square matrices $M_1$ and $M_2$ commute, does it mean that the $U$ and $V^dagger$ appearing in their singular value decompositions are the same?
Specifically, does it imply that
$$M_1 = U Sigma_1 V^dagger$$
$$M_2 = U Sigma_2 V^dagger$$
for two possibly different $Sigma_{1,2}$?
As $M_1$ and $M_2$ commute, I know that they can be simultaneously diagonalized, which means there's an orthogonal transformation $mathcal{O}$ which can diagonalize both matrices. But does this have any bearing on $U$ and $V$ of the singular value decomposition?
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors matrix-decomposition
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
If two square matrices $M_1$ and $M_2$ commute, does it mean that the $U$ and $V^dagger$ appearing in their singular value decompositions are the same?
Specifically, does it imply that
$$M_1 = U Sigma_1 V^dagger$$
$$M_2 = U Sigma_2 V^dagger$$
for two possibly different $Sigma_{1,2}$?
As $M_1$ and $M_2$ commute, I know that they can be simultaneously diagonalized, which means there's an orthogonal transformation $mathcal{O}$ which can diagonalize both matrices. But does this have any bearing on $U$ and $V$ of the singular value decomposition?
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors matrix-decomposition
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
If two square matrices $M_1$ and $M_2$ commute, does it mean that the $U$ and $V^dagger$ appearing in their singular value decompositions are the same?
Specifically, does it imply that
$$M_1 = U Sigma_1 V^dagger$$
$$M_2 = U Sigma_2 V^dagger$$
for two possibly different $Sigma_{1,2}$?
As $M_1$ and $M_2$ commute, I know that they can be simultaneously diagonalized, which means there's an orthogonal transformation $mathcal{O}$ which can diagonalize both matrices. But does this have any bearing on $U$ and $V$ of the singular value decomposition?
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors matrix-decomposition
If two square matrices $M_1$ and $M_2$ commute, does it mean that the $U$ and $V^dagger$ appearing in their singular value decompositions are the same?
Specifically, does it imply that
$$M_1 = U Sigma_1 V^dagger$$
$$M_2 = U Sigma_2 V^dagger$$
for two possibly different $Sigma_{1,2}$?
As $M_1$ and $M_2$ commute, I know that they can be simultaneously diagonalized, which means there's an orthogonal transformation $mathcal{O}$ which can diagonalize both matrices. But does this have any bearing on $U$ and $V$ of the singular value decomposition?
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors matrix-decomposition
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors matrix-decomposition
asked Jul 26 '16 at 13:33
leastaction
278111
278111
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Counter-example: take $M_1 = I$, the identity matrix, and $M_2$ as any matrix of the same dimension (not a scalar multiple of the identity). You can see the above statement fails to hold.
Thanks. Is there any related statement for commuting matrices though?
– leastaction
Jul 26 '16 at 18:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1871645%2fsingular-value-decomposition-of-commuting-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Counter-example: take $M_1 = I$, the identity matrix, and $M_2$ as any matrix of the same dimension (not a scalar multiple of the identity). You can see the above statement fails to hold.
Thanks. Is there any related statement for commuting matrices though?
– leastaction
Jul 26 '16 at 18:51
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Counter-example: take $M_1 = I$, the identity matrix, and $M_2$ as any matrix of the same dimension (not a scalar multiple of the identity). You can see the above statement fails to hold.
Thanks. Is there any related statement for commuting matrices though?
– leastaction
Jul 26 '16 at 18:51
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Counter-example: take $M_1 = I$, the identity matrix, and $M_2$ as any matrix of the same dimension (not a scalar multiple of the identity). You can see the above statement fails to hold.
Counter-example: take $M_1 = I$, the identity matrix, and $M_2$ as any matrix of the same dimension (not a scalar multiple of the identity). You can see the above statement fails to hold.
answered Jul 26 '16 at 18:50
harvey
1455
1455
Thanks. Is there any related statement for commuting matrices though?
– leastaction
Jul 26 '16 at 18:51
add a comment |
Thanks. Is there any related statement for commuting matrices though?
– leastaction
Jul 26 '16 at 18:51
Thanks. Is there any related statement for commuting matrices though?
– leastaction
Jul 26 '16 at 18:51
Thanks. Is there any related statement for commuting matrices though?
– leastaction
Jul 26 '16 at 18:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1871645%2fsingular-value-decomposition-of-commuting-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown