Maximal ideal and invertible element











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I must be prove the following result: Let $R$ a commutative ring with unity, then
begin{equation}
bigg (ain R;text{is invertible}bigg) Longleftrightarrow bigg(ain I,text{when};Isubseteq R;text{is not maximal}bigg).
end{equation}



My attempt: ($Rightarrow$) Let $ain R$ invertible, then $R=(a)$. Indeed, if it were not $1notin(a)$, then $a$ would not be invertible. Therefore $R=(a)$, then $ain(a)$ which is not maximal. (Correct?)



$(Leftarrow)$ For this implication I know I must use the Krull-Zorn Lemma, which states that every proper ideal of $R$ is contained in a maximal ideal.
Could someone help me complete the proof? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • For $1^{st}$ part: If $ain R$ is invertible and $ain I$ then $1in Iimplies I=R$ is not maximal.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:05










  • Thanks for your anser, if $ain I$, then $a^{-1}in I$?
    – Jack J.
    Nov 27 at 14:10










  • Since $I$ is an ideal so we have for $ain I$ and $rin Rimplies arin I$. So take $a^{-1}=r$.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:12










  • Ok! Sorry! Could you help me too for the second implication?
    – Jack J.
    Nov 27 at 14:14








  • 1




    @JackJ.: if "$a$ is not contained in any maximal ideal " then $ain I=R implies 1in Iimplies :exists:bin R ::ab=1in I$.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:25

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I must be prove the following result: Let $R$ a commutative ring with unity, then
begin{equation}
bigg (ain R;text{is invertible}bigg) Longleftrightarrow bigg(ain I,text{when};Isubseteq R;text{is not maximal}bigg).
end{equation}



My attempt: ($Rightarrow$) Let $ain R$ invertible, then $R=(a)$. Indeed, if it were not $1notin(a)$, then $a$ would not be invertible. Therefore $R=(a)$, then $ain(a)$ which is not maximal. (Correct?)



$(Leftarrow)$ For this implication I know I must use the Krull-Zorn Lemma, which states that every proper ideal of $R$ is contained in a maximal ideal.
Could someone help me complete the proof? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • For $1^{st}$ part: If $ain R$ is invertible and $ain I$ then $1in Iimplies I=R$ is not maximal.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:05










  • Thanks for your anser, if $ain I$, then $a^{-1}in I$?
    – Jack J.
    Nov 27 at 14:10










  • Since $I$ is an ideal so we have for $ain I$ and $rin Rimplies arin I$. So take $a^{-1}=r$.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:12










  • Ok! Sorry! Could you help me too for the second implication?
    – Jack J.
    Nov 27 at 14:14








  • 1




    @JackJ.: if "$a$ is not contained in any maximal ideal " then $ain I=R implies 1in Iimplies :exists:bin R ::ab=1in I$.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:25















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I must be prove the following result: Let $R$ a commutative ring with unity, then
begin{equation}
bigg (ain R;text{is invertible}bigg) Longleftrightarrow bigg(ain I,text{when};Isubseteq R;text{is not maximal}bigg).
end{equation}



My attempt: ($Rightarrow$) Let $ain R$ invertible, then $R=(a)$. Indeed, if it were not $1notin(a)$, then $a$ would not be invertible. Therefore $R=(a)$, then $ain(a)$ which is not maximal. (Correct?)



$(Leftarrow)$ For this implication I know I must use the Krull-Zorn Lemma, which states that every proper ideal of $R$ is contained in a maximal ideal.
Could someone help me complete the proof? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question













I must be prove the following result: Let $R$ a commutative ring with unity, then
begin{equation}
bigg (ain R;text{is invertible}bigg) Longleftrightarrow bigg(ain I,text{when};Isubseteq R;text{is not maximal}bigg).
end{equation}



My attempt: ($Rightarrow$) Let $ain R$ invertible, then $R=(a)$. Indeed, if it were not $1notin(a)$, then $a$ would not be invertible. Therefore $R=(a)$, then $ain(a)$ which is not maximal. (Correct?)



$(Leftarrow)$ For this implication I know I must use the Krull-Zorn Lemma, which states that every proper ideal of $R$ is contained in a maximal ideal.
Could someone help me complete the proof? Thanks!







abstract-algebra proof-verification proof-writing proof-explanation






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 27 at 13:59









Jack J.

5711318




5711318












  • For $1^{st}$ part: If $ain R$ is invertible and $ain I$ then $1in Iimplies I=R$ is not maximal.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:05










  • Thanks for your anser, if $ain I$, then $a^{-1}in I$?
    – Jack J.
    Nov 27 at 14:10










  • Since $I$ is an ideal so we have for $ain I$ and $rin Rimplies arin I$. So take $a^{-1}=r$.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:12










  • Ok! Sorry! Could you help me too for the second implication?
    – Jack J.
    Nov 27 at 14:14








  • 1




    @JackJ.: if "$a$ is not contained in any maximal ideal " then $ain I=R implies 1in Iimplies :exists:bin R ::ab=1in I$.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:25




















  • For $1^{st}$ part: If $ain R$ is invertible and $ain I$ then $1in Iimplies I=R$ is not maximal.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:05










  • Thanks for your anser, if $ain I$, then $a^{-1}in I$?
    – Jack J.
    Nov 27 at 14:10










  • Since $I$ is an ideal so we have for $ain I$ and $rin Rimplies arin I$. So take $a^{-1}=r$.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:12










  • Ok! Sorry! Could you help me too for the second implication?
    – Jack J.
    Nov 27 at 14:14








  • 1




    @JackJ.: if "$a$ is not contained in any maximal ideal " then $ain I=R implies 1in Iimplies :exists:bin R ::ab=1in I$.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 27 at 14:25


















For $1^{st}$ part: If $ain R$ is invertible and $ain I$ then $1in Iimplies I=R$ is not maximal.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 27 at 14:05




For $1^{st}$ part: If $ain R$ is invertible and $ain I$ then $1in Iimplies I=R$ is not maximal.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 27 at 14:05












Thanks for your anser, if $ain I$, then $a^{-1}in I$?
– Jack J.
Nov 27 at 14:10




Thanks for your anser, if $ain I$, then $a^{-1}in I$?
– Jack J.
Nov 27 at 14:10












Since $I$ is an ideal so we have for $ain I$ and $rin Rimplies arin I$. So take $a^{-1}=r$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 27 at 14:12




Since $I$ is an ideal so we have for $ain I$ and $rin Rimplies arin I$. So take $a^{-1}=r$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 27 at 14:12












Ok! Sorry! Could you help me too for the second implication?
– Jack J.
Nov 27 at 14:14






Ok! Sorry! Could you help me too for the second implication?
– Jack J.
Nov 27 at 14:14






1




1




@JackJ.: if "$a$ is not contained in any maximal ideal " then $ain I=R implies 1in Iimplies :exists:bin R ::ab=1in I$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 27 at 14:25






@JackJ.: if "$a$ is not contained in any maximal ideal " then $ain I=R implies 1in Iimplies :exists:bin R ::ab=1in I$.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 27 at 14:25












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted
+50










The proof for $(Rightarrow)$ is correct. For the implication $(Leftarrow)$, suppose that for every ideal $I$ of $R$, if $a in I$ then $I$ is not maximal. Now, if $a$ is not invertible then the ideal generated by $a$ is a proper ideal of $R$ and hence, by Krull-Zorn Lemma, we have that $(a) subseteq mathfrak{m} $ for some maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}$ of $R$ which contradicts our hypothesis thus, $a$ is invetrible.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015802%2fmaximal-ideal-and-invertible-element%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted
    +50










    The proof for $(Rightarrow)$ is correct. For the implication $(Leftarrow)$, suppose that for every ideal $I$ of $R$, if $a in I$ then $I$ is not maximal. Now, if $a$ is not invertible then the ideal generated by $a$ is a proper ideal of $R$ and hence, by Krull-Zorn Lemma, we have that $(a) subseteq mathfrak{m} $ for some maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}$ of $R$ which contradicts our hypothesis thus, $a$ is invetrible.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted
      +50










      The proof for $(Rightarrow)$ is correct. For the implication $(Leftarrow)$, suppose that for every ideal $I$ of $R$, if $a in I$ then $I$ is not maximal. Now, if $a$ is not invertible then the ideal generated by $a$ is a proper ideal of $R$ and hence, by Krull-Zorn Lemma, we have that $(a) subseteq mathfrak{m} $ for some maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}$ of $R$ which contradicts our hypothesis thus, $a$ is invetrible.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted
        +50







        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted
        +50




        +50




        The proof for $(Rightarrow)$ is correct. For the implication $(Leftarrow)$, suppose that for every ideal $I$ of $R$, if $a in I$ then $I$ is not maximal. Now, if $a$ is not invertible then the ideal generated by $a$ is a proper ideal of $R$ and hence, by Krull-Zorn Lemma, we have that $(a) subseteq mathfrak{m} $ for some maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}$ of $R$ which contradicts our hypothesis thus, $a$ is invetrible.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The proof for $(Rightarrow)$ is correct. For the implication $(Leftarrow)$, suppose that for every ideal $I$ of $R$, if $a in I$ then $I$ is not maximal. Now, if $a$ is not invertible then the ideal generated by $a$ is a proper ideal of $R$ and hence, by Krull-Zorn Lemma, we have that $(a) subseteq mathfrak{m} $ for some maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}$ of $R$ which contradicts our hypothesis thus, $a$ is invetrible.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 3 at 14:09









        Cornelius

        1957




        1957






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015802%2fmaximal-ideal-and-invertible-element%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Berounka

            Sphinx de Gizeh

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...