Nested sequence of half open intervals with non-empty intersection
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider the sets $B_{2^n}^k = [frac{k}{2^n},frac{k+1}{2^n})$ with $n in mathbb{N}$ and $k in mathbb{Z}$.
Now we pick a sequence $(k_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ such that we get a nested sequence $B_{2^1}^{k_1} supset B_{2^2}^{k_2} supset dots$.
I suspect that the intersection $underset{{n in mathbb{N}}}{cap}B_{2^n}^{k_n} = {x }$, i.e. is a singleton.
As this sequence resembles the binary representation of a real number. For your intuition of this sequence: at each step we half the needle and pick either the right or the left part.
Problem is that I don't know how to prove it, as we cannot use the nested interval theorem (which only works for nested compact sets).
real-analysis general-topology real-numbers cantor-set
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider the sets $B_{2^n}^k = [frac{k}{2^n},frac{k+1}{2^n})$ with $n in mathbb{N}$ and $k in mathbb{Z}$.
Now we pick a sequence $(k_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ such that we get a nested sequence $B_{2^1}^{k_1} supset B_{2^2}^{k_2} supset dots$.
I suspect that the intersection $underset{{n in mathbb{N}}}{cap}B_{2^n}^{k_n} = {x }$, i.e. is a singleton.
As this sequence resembles the binary representation of a real number. For your intuition of this sequence: at each step we half the needle and pick either the right or the left part.
Problem is that I don't know how to prove it, as we cannot use the nested interval theorem (which only works for nested compact sets).
real-analysis general-topology real-numbers cantor-set
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Consider the sets $B_{2^n}^k = [frac{k}{2^n},frac{k+1}{2^n})$ with $n in mathbb{N}$ and $k in mathbb{Z}$.
Now we pick a sequence $(k_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ such that we get a nested sequence $B_{2^1}^{k_1} supset B_{2^2}^{k_2} supset dots$.
I suspect that the intersection $underset{{n in mathbb{N}}}{cap}B_{2^n}^{k_n} = {x }$, i.e. is a singleton.
As this sequence resembles the binary representation of a real number. For your intuition of this sequence: at each step we half the needle and pick either the right or the left part.
Problem is that I don't know how to prove it, as we cannot use the nested interval theorem (which only works for nested compact sets).
real-analysis general-topology real-numbers cantor-set
Consider the sets $B_{2^n}^k = [frac{k}{2^n},frac{k+1}{2^n})$ with $n in mathbb{N}$ and $k in mathbb{Z}$.
Now we pick a sequence $(k_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ such that we get a nested sequence $B_{2^1}^{k_1} supset B_{2^2}^{k_2} supset dots$.
I suspect that the intersection $underset{{n in mathbb{N}}}{cap}B_{2^n}^{k_n} = {x }$, i.e. is a singleton.
As this sequence resembles the binary representation of a real number. For your intuition of this sequence: at each step we half the needle and pick either the right or the left part.
Problem is that I don't know how to prove it, as we cannot use the nested interval theorem (which only works for nested compact sets).
real-analysis general-topology real-numbers cantor-set
real-analysis general-topology real-numbers cantor-set
edited Nov 27 at 12:48
asked Nov 27 at 12:45
Jens Wagemaker
526311
526311
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The intersection doesn't need to be a singleton. for example, taking $k_n=-1$ for all $ninmathbb N$, we see that:
$$B_{2^n}^{k_n} = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right) = left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)supsetleft[-frac{1}{2^{n+1}}, 0right) = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right)=B_{2^{n+1}}^{k_{n+1}}$$
so your condition is met, however the intersection
$$bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{2^n}^{k_n} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)=emptyset$$
is empty.
What you can prove is that the intersection contains at most one element. The idea of the proof is that if it contains two distinct elements, you can reach a contradiction since these two elements $a,b$ must be elements of an interval with an arbitrarily small length, e.g. with a length of $frac{a+b}{2}$, which is impossible.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This is not necessarily true, by the same argument as usual counterexamples to the nested interval theorem without closedness:
If you take $k := 2^n-1$, you get an empty intersection (intervals approach 1 from below, but it is not contained), corresponding to the binary representation $0.111... = 1$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015727%2fnested-sequence-of-half-open-intervals-with-non-empty-intersection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The intersection doesn't need to be a singleton. for example, taking $k_n=-1$ for all $ninmathbb N$, we see that:
$$B_{2^n}^{k_n} = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right) = left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)supsetleft[-frac{1}{2^{n+1}}, 0right) = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right)=B_{2^{n+1}}^{k_{n+1}}$$
so your condition is met, however the intersection
$$bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{2^n}^{k_n} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)=emptyset$$
is empty.
What you can prove is that the intersection contains at most one element. The idea of the proof is that if it contains two distinct elements, you can reach a contradiction since these two elements $a,b$ must be elements of an interval with an arbitrarily small length, e.g. with a length of $frac{a+b}{2}$, which is impossible.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The intersection doesn't need to be a singleton. for example, taking $k_n=-1$ for all $ninmathbb N$, we see that:
$$B_{2^n}^{k_n} = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right) = left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)supsetleft[-frac{1}{2^{n+1}}, 0right) = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right)=B_{2^{n+1}}^{k_{n+1}}$$
so your condition is met, however the intersection
$$bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{2^n}^{k_n} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)=emptyset$$
is empty.
What you can prove is that the intersection contains at most one element. The idea of the proof is that if it contains two distinct elements, you can reach a contradiction since these two elements $a,b$ must be elements of an interval with an arbitrarily small length, e.g. with a length of $frac{a+b}{2}$, which is impossible.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
The intersection doesn't need to be a singleton. for example, taking $k_n=-1$ for all $ninmathbb N$, we see that:
$$B_{2^n}^{k_n} = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right) = left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)supsetleft[-frac{1}{2^{n+1}}, 0right) = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right)=B_{2^{n+1}}^{k_{n+1}}$$
so your condition is met, however the intersection
$$bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{2^n}^{k_n} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)=emptyset$$
is empty.
What you can prove is that the intersection contains at most one element. The idea of the proof is that if it contains two distinct elements, you can reach a contradiction since these two elements $a,b$ must be elements of an interval with an arbitrarily small length, e.g. with a length of $frac{a+b}{2}$, which is impossible.
The intersection doesn't need to be a singleton. for example, taking $k_n=-1$ for all $ninmathbb N$, we see that:
$$B_{2^n}^{k_n} = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right) = left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)supsetleft[-frac{1}{2^{n+1}}, 0right) = left[frac{k_n}{2^n}, frac{k_n+1}{2^n}right)=B_{2^{n+1}}^{k_{n+1}}$$
so your condition is met, however the intersection
$$bigcap_{n=1}^infty B_{2^n}^{k_n} = bigcap_{n=1}^infty left[-frac{1}{2^n}, 0right)=emptyset$$
is empty.
What you can prove is that the intersection contains at most one element. The idea of the proof is that if it contains two distinct elements, you can reach a contradiction since these two elements $a,b$ must be elements of an interval with an arbitrarily small length, e.g. with a length of $frac{a+b}{2}$, which is impossible.
edited Nov 27 at 13:02
answered Nov 27 at 12:51
5xum
89.4k393161
89.4k393161
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This is not necessarily true, by the same argument as usual counterexamples to the nested interval theorem without closedness:
If you take $k := 2^n-1$, you get an empty intersection (intervals approach 1 from below, but it is not contained), corresponding to the binary representation $0.111... = 1$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
This is not necessarily true, by the same argument as usual counterexamples to the nested interval theorem without closedness:
If you take $k := 2^n-1$, you get an empty intersection (intervals approach 1 from below, but it is not contained), corresponding to the binary representation $0.111... = 1$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
This is not necessarily true, by the same argument as usual counterexamples to the nested interval theorem without closedness:
If you take $k := 2^n-1$, you get an empty intersection (intervals approach 1 from below, but it is not contained), corresponding to the binary representation $0.111... = 1$.
This is not necessarily true, by the same argument as usual counterexamples to the nested interval theorem without closedness:
If you take $k := 2^n-1$, you get an empty intersection (intervals approach 1 from below, but it is not contained), corresponding to the binary representation $0.111... = 1$.
answered Nov 27 at 12:53
Gnampfissimo
18011
18011
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015727%2fnested-sequence-of-half-open-intervals-with-non-empty-intersection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown