Help to understand that $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right) dxi $ is well defined
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $phi :Omega subset
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
rightarrow
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
$ holomorphic function. Define $x:Omega subset
rightarrow
mathbb{C}
$ by $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right)
dxi $.
The author states:
"It is not necessary that the domain $Omega$ is simply connected, but only that the periods (that is, that the integral along any closed curve) $phi_k$ are pure imaginary so that the functions $x_k$ are well defined."
Because for $x_k$ is well defined, just enough?
I can not understand. For me if the integral is pure imaginary, then the function $x_k$ will be identically zero.
Could someone help me to understand this better?
complex-analysis analysis differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $phi :Omega subset
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
rightarrow
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
$ holomorphic function. Define $x:Omega subset
rightarrow
mathbb{C}
$ by $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right)
dxi $.
The author states:
"It is not necessary that the domain $Omega$ is simply connected, but only that the periods (that is, that the integral along any closed curve) $phi_k$ are pure imaginary so that the functions $x_k$ are well defined."
Because for $x_k$ is well defined, just enough?
I can not understand. For me if the integral is pure imaginary, then the function $x_k$ will be identically zero.
Could someone help me to understand this better?
complex-analysis analysis differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $phi :Omega subset
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
rightarrow
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
$ holomorphic function. Define $x:Omega subset
rightarrow
mathbb{C}
$ by $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right)
dxi $.
The author states:
"It is not necessary that the domain $Omega$ is simply connected, but only that the periods (that is, that the integral along any closed curve) $phi_k$ are pure imaginary so that the functions $x_k$ are well defined."
Because for $x_k$ is well defined, just enough?
I can not understand. For me if the integral is pure imaginary, then the function $x_k$ will be identically zero.
Could someone help me to understand this better?
complex-analysis analysis differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
Let $phi :Omega subset
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
rightarrow
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
$ holomorphic function. Define $x:Omega subset
rightarrow
mathbb{C}
$ by $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right)
dxi $.
The author states:
"It is not necessary that the domain $Omega$ is simply connected, but only that the periods (that is, that the integral along any closed curve) $phi_k$ are pure imaginary so that the functions $x_k$ are well defined."
Because for $x_k$ is well defined, just enough?
I can not understand. For me if the integral is pure imaginary, then the function $x_k$ will be identically zero.
Could someone help me to understand this better?
complex-analysis analysis differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
complex-analysis analysis differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
asked Nov 26 at 1:35
Takashi
1946
1946
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.
This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.
This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.
This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.
This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.
It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.
This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.
answered Nov 26 at 1:44
Henning Makholm
236k16300534
236k16300534
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013687%2fhelp-to-understand-that-x-left-z-right-re-int-z-0z-phi-left-xi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown