$lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $c>1$ and $lambdainmathbb{C}$ with $Re(lambda)geq1 $. Show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$, where the path of integration is the straight line and $log$ denotes the principle branch of the logarithm.
I had the following idea: Closing the path with the semicircle $gamma(t)=c+re^{it}$ for $tin[-pi/2,pi/2]$. Then for a fixed $r$ the integral over this simple closed contour is $0$ by Cauchy's Theorem because the function is holomorphic inside and on the contour. So I am left to show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_gamma z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$. I think at this point I have to use the definition of a path integral using the parametrization of $gamma$ and then estimate the absolut value of the integral hoping that I get something like $1/r$, but I have difficulties with estimating the absolut value of $dfrac{1}{e^{lambdalog(c+re^{it})}log(c+re^{it})}$. The derivative of $gamma$ just gives me a factor $r$ and then I also have to multiply by the length of the curve which is $pi r$.
Am I on the right way? Can anyone help me with the estimate?
integration complex-analysis limits logarithms estimation
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $c>1$ and $lambdainmathbb{C}$ with $Re(lambda)geq1 $. Show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$, where the path of integration is the straight line and $log$ denotes the principle branch of the logarithm.
I had the following idea: Closing the path with the semicircle $gamma(t)=c+re^{it}$ for $tin[-pi/2,pi/2]$. Then for a fixed $r$ the integral over this simple closed contour is $0$ by Cauchy's Theorem because the function is holomorphic inside and on the contour. So I am left to show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_gamma z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$. I think at this point I have to use the definition of a path integral using the parametrization of $gamma$ and then estimate the absolut value of the integral hoping that I get something like $1/r$, but I have difficulties with estimating the absolut value of $dfrac{1}{e^{lambdalog(c+re^{it})}log(c+re^{it})}$. The derivative of $gamma$ just gives me a factor $r$ and then I also have to multiply by the length of the curve which is $pi r$.
Am I on the right way? Can anyone help me with the estimate?
integration complex-analysis limits logarithms estimation
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $c>1$ and $lambdainmathbb{C}$ with $Re(lambda)geq1 $. Show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$, where the path of integration is the straight line and $log$ denotes the principle branch of the logarithm.
I had the following idea: Closing the path with the semicircle $gamma(t)=c+re^{it}$ for $tin[-pi/2,pi/2]$. Then for a fixed $r$ the integral over this simple closed contour is $0$ by Cauchy's Theorem because the function is holomorphic inside and on the contour. So I am left to show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_gamma z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$. I think at this point I have to use the definition of a path integral using the parametrization of $gamma$ and then estimate the absolut value of the integral hoping that I get something like $1/r$, but I have difficulties with estimating the absolut value of $dfrac{1}{e^{lambdalog(c+re^{it})}log(c+re^{it})}$. The derivative of $gamma$ just gives me a factor $r$ and then I also have to multiply by the length of the curve which is $pi r$.
Am I on the right way? Can anyone help me with the estimate?
integration complex-analysis limits logarithms estimation
Let $c>1$ and $lambdainmathbb{C}$ with $Re(lambda)geq1 $. Show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_{c-ir}^{c+ir}z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$, where the path of integration is the straight line and $log$ denotes the principle branch of the logarithm.
I had the following idea: Closing the path with the semicircle $gamma(t)=c+re^{it}$ for $tin[-pi/2,pi/2]$. Then for a fixed $r$ the integral over this simple closed contour is $0$ by Cauchy's Theorem because the function is holomorphic inside and on the contour. So I am left to show that $lim_{rtoinfty}int_gamma z^{-lambda}(log(z))^{-1}dz=0$. I think at this point I have to use the definition of a path integral using the parametrization of $gamma$ and then estimate the absolut value of the integral hoping that I get something like $1/r$, but I have difficulties with estimating the absolut value of $dfrac{1}{e^{lambdalog(c+re^{it})}log(c+re^{it})}$. The derivative of $gamma$ just gives me a factor $r$ and then I also have to multiply by the length of the curve which is $pi r$.
Am I on the right way? Can anyone help me with the estimate?
integration complex-analysis limits logarithms estimation
integration complex-analysis limits logarithms estimation
asked Nov 26 at 1:55
mathstackuser
676112
676112
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).
You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-lambda}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-lambda}/logrho$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
$$frac{2phirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pi r^{1-lambda}}{log r}.$$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).
You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-lambda}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-lambda}/logrho$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
$$frac{2phirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pi r^{1-lambda}}{log r}.$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).
You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-lambda}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-lambda}/logrho$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
$$frac{2phirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pi r^{1-lambda}}{log r}.$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).
You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-lambda}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-lambda}/logrho$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
$$frac{2phirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pi r^{1-lambda}}{log r}.$$
Yes, you are (just keep in mind that even a rough estimate will do).
You can go even a simpler way: let $c+ir=rho e^{iphi}$, choose $gamma(t)=rho e^{it}$ for $tin[-phi,phi]$ instead, and see that $z=rho e^{it} implies |z^{-lambda}log^{-1}z|=rho^{-lambda}Big/sqrt{t^2+log^2rho}leqslantrho^{-lambda}/logrho$, so that the integral over $gamma$ is at most
$$frac{2phirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pirho^{1-lambda}}{logrho}<frac{pi r^{1-lambda}}{log r}.$$
edited Dec 1 at 22:39
answered Dec 1 at 22:34
metamorphy
2,9371517
2,9371517
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013703%2flim-r-to-infty-int-c-ircirz-lambda-logz-1dz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown