Homotopy groups $pi_{n+1}(S^{n})$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












In section $5.1$ of Hatcher's note about spectral sequences, he starts to compute stable homotopy group $pi_{n+k}(S^{n}),k leq 3$. Particularly for $pi_{n+1}(S^{n})$, by Freudenthal suspension theorem it's enough to compute $pi_{4}(S^{3})$. A part of Postnikov tower for $S^{3}$ is:
$$K(pi_{4}S^{3},4) to X_{4} to K(mathbb{Z},3)$$
We know the cohomology ring of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$ with coefficients in $mathbb{Z}/2$ is polynomial ring with generators $Sq^{I}imath_{3}$ where $imath_{3}$ is generator of $H^{3}(K(mathbb{Z},3),mathbb{Z}/2)$ and $I$ is amissible with excess strictly less than $3$. Using Bockstein homomorphism $beta = Sq^{1}$ associates with $0 to mathbb{Z}/2 to mathbb{Z}/4 to mathbb{Z}/2 to 0$ we have:
$$Sq^{1}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=Sq^{3}imath_{3}=imath_{3}^{2}$$
$$Sq^{1}(imath_{3}Sq^{2}imath_{3})=imath_{3}Sq^{1}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=imath_{3}^{3}$$
$$Sq^{1}Sq^{4}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=Sq^{5}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=(Sq^{2}imath_{3})^{2}$$
$textbf{First Question}$:Look at dimension of those above he concludes that $text{Ker}beta = text{Im}beta$ through dimension $5 to 9$ and $2$-torsion in these dimensions consist of elements of order $2$?



enter image description here



$textbf{Second question}$: The open circles in the diagram (page $E_{6}$) are $mathbb{Z}$ cohomology but have been reduced to $mathbb{Z}/2$ classes, the image of coefficient homomorphism $mathbb{Z} to mathbb{Z}/2$. Why this induced map is injective on $mathbb{Z}/2$ summands and the image is same as image of Bockstein homomorphism $beta = Sq^{1}$?



$textbf{Last question}:$ To finish, we look at the differential $d_{6}^{0,5}$ and conclude if it is not an isomorphism then something survives to $E_{infty}$ and nonzero torsion appears in $H^{5}(X_{4})$ or $H^{6}(X_{4})$. Why $H^{6}$ of $X_{4}$ here? I thought it must be $H^{6}$ of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Is your first 'question' actually a question?
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 12:25















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












In section $5.1$ of Hatcher's note about spectral sequences, he starts to compute stable homotopy group $pi_{n+k}(S^{n}),k leq 3$. Particularly for $pi_{n+1}(S^{n})$, by Freudenthal suspension theorem it's enough to compute $pi_{4}(S^{3})$. A part of Postnikov tower for $S^{3}$ is:
$$K(pi_{4}S^{3},4) to X_{4} to K(mathbb{Z},3)$$
We know the cohomology ring of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$ with coefficients in $mathbb{Z}/2$ is polynomial ring with generators $Sq^{I}imath_{3}$ where $imath_{3}$ is generator of $H^{3}(K(mathbb{Z},3),mathbb{Z}/2)$ and $I$ is amissible with excess strictly less than $3$. Using Bockstein homomorphism $beta = Sq^{1}$ associates with $0 to mathbb{Z}/2 to mathbb{Z}/4 to mathbb{Z}/2 to 0$ we have:
$$Sq^{1}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=Sq^{3}imath_{3}=imath_{3}^{2}$$
$$Sq^{1}(imath_{3}Sq^{2}imath_{3})=imath_{3}Sq^{1}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=imath_{3}^{3}$$
$$Sq^{1}Sq^{4}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=Sq^{5}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=(Sq^{2}imath_{3})^{2}$$
$textbf{First Question}$:Look at dimension of those above he concludes that $text{Ker}beta = text{Im}beta$ through dimension $5 to 9$ and $2$-torsion in these dimensions consist of elements of order $2$?



enter image description here



$textbf{Second question}$: The open circles in the diagram (page $E_{6}$) are $mathbb{Z}$ cohomology but have been reduced to $mathbb{Z}/2$ classes, the image of coefficient homomorphism $mathbb{Z} to mathbb{Z}/2$. Why this induced map is injective on $mathbb{Z}/2$ summands and the image is same as image of Bockstein homomorphism $beta = Sq^{1}$?



$textbf{Last question}:$ To finish, we look at the differential $d_{6}^{0,5}$ and conclude if it is not an isomorphism then something survives to $E_{infty}$ and nonzero torsion appears in $H^{5}(X_{4})$ or $H^{6}(X_{4})$. Why $H^{6}$ of $X_{4}$ here? I thought it must be $H^{6}$ of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Is your first 'question' actually a question?
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 12:25













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





In section $5.1$ of Hatcher's note about spectral sequences, he starts to compute stable homotopy group $pi_{n+k}(S^{n}),k leq 3$. Particularly for $pi_{n+1}(S^{n})$, by Freudenthal suspension theorem it's enough to compute $pi_{4}(S^{3})$. A part of Postnikov tower for $S^{3}$ is:
$$K(pi_{4}S^{3},4) to X_{4} to K(mathbb{Z},3)$$
We know the cohomology ring of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$ with coefficients in $mathbb{Z}/2$ is polynomial ring with generators $Sq^{I}imath_{3}$ where $imath_{3}$ is generator of $H^{3}(K(mathbb{Z},3),mathbb{Z}/2)$ and $I$ is amissible with excess strictly less than $3$. Using Bockstein homomorphism $beta = Sq^{1}$ associates with $0 to mathbb{Z}/2 to mathbb{Z}/4 to mathbb{Z}/2 to 0$ we have:
$$Sq^{1}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=Sq^{3}imath_{3}=imath_{3}^{2}$$
$$Sq^{1}(imath_{3}Sq^{2}imath_{3})=imath_{3}Sq^{1}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=imath_{3}^{3}$$
$$Sq^{1}Sq^{4}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=Sq^{5}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=(Sq^{2}imath_{3})^{2}$$
$textbf{First Question}$:Look at dimension of those above he concludes that $text{Ker}beta = text{Im}beta$ through dimension $5 to 9$ and $2$-torsion in these dimensions consist of elements of order $2$?



enter image description here



$textbf{Second question}$: The open circles in the diagram (page $E_{6}$) are $mathbb{Z}$ cohomology but have been reduced to $mathbb{Z}/2$ classes, the image of coefficient homomorphism $mathbb{Z} to mathbb{Z}/2$. Why this induced map is injective on $mathbb{Z}/2$ summands and the image is same as image of Bockstein homomorphism $beta = Sq^{1}$?



$textbf{Last question}:$ To finish, we look at the differential $d_{6}^{0,5}$ and conclude if it is not an isomorphism then something survives to $E_{infty}$ and nonzero torsion appears in $H^{5}(X_{4})$ or $H^{6}(X_{4})$. Why $H^{6}$ of $X_{4}$ here? I thought it must be $H^{6}$ of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$?










share|cite|improve this question















In section $5.1$ of Hatcher's note about spectral sequences, he starts to compute stable homotopy group $pi_{n+k}(S^{n}),k leq 3$. Particularly for $pi_{n+1}(S^{n})$, by Freudenthal suspension theorem it's enough to compute $pi_{4}(S^{3})$. A part of Postnikov tower for $S^{3}$ is:
$$K(pi_{4}S^{3},4) to X_{4} to K(mathbb{Z},3)$$
We know the cohomology ring of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$ with coefficients in $mathbb{Z}/2$ is polynomial ring with generators $Sq^{I}imath_{3}$ where $imath_{3}$ is generator of $H^{3}(K(mathbb{Z},3),mathbb{Z}/2)$ and $I$ is amissible with excess strictly less than $3$. Using Bockstein homomorphism $beta = Sq^{1}$ associates with $0 to mathbb{Z}/2 to mathbb{Z}/4 to mathbb{Z}/2 to 0$ we have:
$$Sq^{1}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=Sq^{3}imath_{3}=imath_{3}^{2}$$
$$Sq^{1}(imath_{3}Sq^{2}imath_{3})=imath_{3}Sq^{1}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=imath_{3}^{3}$$
$$Sq^{1}Sq^{4}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=Sq^{5}Sq^{2}imath_{3}=(Sq^{2}imath_{3})^{2}$$
$textbf{First Question}$:Look at dimension of those above he concludes that $text{Ker}beta = text{Im}beta$ through dimension $5 to 9$ and $2$-torsion in these dimensions consist of elements of order $2$?



enter image description here



$textbf{Second question}$: The open circles in the diagram (page $E_{6}$) are $mathbb{Z}$ cohomology but have been reduced to $mathbb{Z}/2$ classes, the image of coefficient homomorphism $mathbb{Z} to mathbb{Z}/2$. Why this induced map is injective on $mathbb{Z}/2$ summands and the image is same as image of Bockstein homomorphism $beta = Sq^{1}$?



$textbf{Last question}:$ To finish, we look at the differential $d_{6}^{0,5}$ and conclude if it is not an isomorphism then something survives to $E_{infty}$ and nonzero torsion appears in $H^{5}(X_{4})$ or $H^{6}(X_{4})$. Why $H^{6}$ of $X_{4}$ here? I thought it must be $H^{6}$ of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$?







algebraic-topology spectral-sequences






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 26 at 14:46

























asked Nov 25 at 4:38









bangbang1412

515




515








  • 1




    Is your first 'question' actually a question?
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 12:25














  • 1




    Is your first 'question' actually a question?
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 12:25








1




1




Is your first 'question' actually a question?
– Tyrone
Nov 25 at 12:25




Is your first 'question' actually a question?
– Tyrone
Nov 25 at 12:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













If I recall, Hatcher caclulates the integral cohomlogy of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$ up to degrees 11 or so at some point earlier in the notes. He also tells you at some point that the mod 2 cohomology ring of this space is a free commutative algebra on classes $sq^Iiota$ for admissible multi-indexes $I=(i_1,dots,i_n)$ satisfying certain 'excess' conditions. In particular, up to degree $10$ we have



$$H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2{iota,Sq^2iota,iota^2, iotacdot Sq^2iota,iota^3,Sq^4Sq^2iota,(Sq^2iota)^2dots}$$



where $|iota|=3$. Here $iota_3in H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3))$ is the fundamental class, and I have written $iota=rho_2iota_3in H^3(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ for its mod 2 reduction. Anyway, $|Sq^2iota|=5$, $|iota^2|=6$, $|iotacdot Sq^2iota|=8$, $|iota^3|=9$, $|Sq^4Sq^2iota|=9$ and $|(Sq^2iota)^2|=10$. Now using the Adem relations together with the ring structure we get



begin{align}
Sq^1iota&=0 \
Sq^1(Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1Sq^2)iota=Sq^3iota=iota^2\
Sq^1iota^2&=2(Sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1iota)(Sq^2iota)+iota(Sq^1Sq^2iota)=iota(Sq^3iota)=iota^3\
Sq^1iota^3&=3(sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(Sq^4Sq^2iota)&=Sq^5(Sq^2iota)=(Sq^2iota)^2.
end{align}



Thus in these dimensions $ker(Sq^1)$ is generated as a $mathbb{Z}_2$-vector space by ${iota,iota^2,iota^3}$, whist $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by ${Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2,Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3}$. We see that these agree in dimension $5-9$.



Now recall Hatcher's discussion of the Bockstein spectral sequence, which takes as input $E^*_1=H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ and converges to $E^*_infty= H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3))/(torsion)otimesmathbb{Z}_2$. The differential on the $E_1$-page of this spectral sequence is the Bockstein $beta$, which, in the case $p=2$ is exactly the Steenrod operators $Sq^1$. Moreover, the $E_r$-page can be identified with the subgroup $2^{r-1}cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$ of $H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$. The previous calculations tell us that $E_2^*=0$ for $*=5,dots,9$. Therefore $2cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_4)=0$ for $*=5,dots, 9$ so the 2-torsion of order at most $2$.



I'm not sure I quite understand your second question. If you can be a bit clearer I will be happy to fill in any further details later on. I think you need to consider this. The exact coefficient sequence $0rightarrowmathbb{Z}xrightarrow{times 2}mathbb{Z}rightarrowmathbb{Z}_2rightarrow 0$ induces a long exact sequence for any space $X$



$$dotsrightarrow H^n(X)xrightarrow{times 2}H^n(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)rightarrowdots$$



where $rho_2$ is the mod 2 reduction and $delta$ is the connecting map of the long exact sequence. Then the Bockstein $beta=Sq^1$ is the composite



$$beta=Sq^1=rho_2circdelta:H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^{n+1}(X;mathbb{Z}_2)$$



The point is that not only does it hold that $Sq^1Sq^1=(rho_2delta)(rho_2delta)=rho_2(deltarho_2)delta=rho_2(0)delta=0$, but also that $Sq^1rho_2=(rho_2delta)rho_2=(0)rho_2=0$ and $delta Sq^1=delta(rho_2delta)=(deltarho_2)delta=(0)delta=0$. Using what you know about the kernel and image of $Sq^1$ you should be able to use these equations to decide why certain mod 2 reductions are injective.



Third question: You are studying the Serre Spectral sequences of the fibration $K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$, where $X_4$ is obtained as the pullback of the path-space fibration of a map $k_3=Sq^2iota:K(mathbb{Z},3)rightarrow K(mathbb{Z}_2,5)$. This spectral sequence takes as input $E_2^{p,q}=H^p(K(mathbb{Z},3);H^q(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4))$ and converges to $E_infty^{p,q}=H^{p+q}(X_4)$. This is reason that you end up with classes in $H^6(X_4)$ rather than $H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3)$. It is the cohomology of the space $X_4$ that you are calculating with this spectral sequence.



With regards to the converges in low degrees of this spectral sequence, there are non non-trivial differentials until the $E_5$-page. The class $iotain E_4^{3,0}cong E_2^{3,0}cong H^3(Kmathbb{Z},3))$ clearly survives to $E_infty$. This gives a class in $H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3;mathbb{Z}_2)$, and the edge homomorphisms tell you that this is the class $p^*iota_3$, where $p:X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$ is the projection.



Moving onto the $E_5$-page, since $d_5(iota_4)=Sq^2iota_3$ by the construction of the fibration, we have $E_infty^{0,4}cong E_6^{0,4}cong ker(d_5)=0$, and since there are no other classes in $E_5$ with total degree $4$,we find that $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong oplus_{p+q=4}E_infty^{p,q}=0$. Here we are on the $E_5$-page.



Now we must work on the $E_6$-page. In total degree $5$ there is only one class, namely, $Sq^1iota_4in E_6^{0,5}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$. The class $Sq^2iota_3in E_5^{5,0}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the $E_5$-page so does no appear at $E_6$.



Now you should recall that the differentials of the spectral sequence commute with the action of the Steenrod algebra. This gives us $d_6(Sq^1iota_4)=Sq^1(d_6iota_4)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_3)=iota_3^2$. Therefore $E_infty^{0,5}cong E_7^{0,5}congker(d_6)=0$. Since no other classes of total degree 5 survive to $E_infty$ we have $H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0$.



In total degree $6$ we must move to the $E_7$-page. Tthere is again only a single class, $Sq^2iota_4in E_7^{0,6}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$, since $iota^3in E_6^{6,0}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3),mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the previous page. We have $d_6(Sq^2iota_4)=0$ since $E_6^{6,0}=0$.



Thus we see that $H^6(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong E_infty^{6,0}congmathbb{Z}_2$, and is generated by a class $x_6$ satisfying $i^*x_6=Sq^2iota_4$, where $i:K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4$ is the fibre inclusion. This class $x_6$ turns out to be the class that must be killed at the next stage of the Postnikov tower.



Summing up we have $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0=H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)$. The long exact Bockstein sequence tells us that if it is non-trivial then $H^4(X_4)$ must be odd torsion. However we know it cannot be odd torsion, so it must be trivial. Similarly for $H^5(X_4)$. Thus $H^4(X_4)= 0= H^5(X_4)$ (integral coefficients).



Now to sort out what is happening in $H^6(X_4)$ we look at the spectral sequence again. We have $d_8(Sq^3iota_4)=Sq^3Sq^2iota_3=Sq^4Sq^1iota_3=0$. Hence $Sq^3iota_4$ survives to $E_infty$ and represents a class $x_7$ satisfying $i^*x_7=Sq^3iota_4$. Now we have $i^*(Sq^1x_6)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_4)=Sq^3iota_4=i^*x_7$, so that $Sq^1x_6neq 0$.



In particular, since $Sq^1=rho_2delta$, the class $x_6$ cannot be the mod 2 reduction of an integral class - or in fact any $mathbb{Z}_{2^r}$, $rgeq 2$, class. Therefore $H^6(X_6)=0$ and so $x_6in H^6(X_6;mathbb{Z}_2)$ is indeed the class to kill to move to the next Postnikov stage.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • $text{Im}Sq^{1}$ is generated by $left { imath^{2},imath^{3} right } neq left { imath,imath^{2},imath^{3} right }$ and I haven't read Bockstein spectral sequence ( in Hatcher's note is also not yet written ) so I'm so thankful if you could interpret in another way. Lastly, maybe some latex mistakes between $X_{6}$ and $X_{4}$ ?
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 14:17












  • @DavidGeal, I apolgise for the typo. $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by the classes I have written. The class $iota$ is of degree $3$, and the statement is about the classes in degrees 5 to 9. Like I have written, these are $Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2$ and $Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3$.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:09










  • What I have already written about the Bockstein SS should be enough to help you understand Hatcher's calculations a little better. I shall try to write a little more.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:14










  • @DavidGeal, I've added some details to the bottom of my answer with regards to your last question.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 16:16










  • it's even true that $H_{i}(X_{4},mathbb{Z}) cong H_{i}(S^{3},mathbb{Z}) forall i leq 5$ since $X_{n}$ is obtained as $S^{3}$ after attached cells of dimension greater than $n+2$. Thanks for your answer, you're very enthusiastic.
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 16:29













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012447%2fhomotopy-groups-pi-n1sn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













If I recall, Hatcher caclulates the integral cohomlogy of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$ up to degrees 11 or so at some point earlier in the notes. He also tells you at some point that the mod 2 cohomology ring of this space is a free commutative algebra on classes $sq^Iiota$ for admissible multi-indexes $I=(i_1,dots,i_n)$ satisfying certain 'excess' conditions. In particular, up to degree $10$ we have



$$H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2{iota,Sq^2iota,iota^2, iotacdot Sq^2iota,iota^3,Sq^4Sq^2iota,(Sq^2iota)^2dots}$$



where $|iota|=3$. Here $iota_3in H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3))$ is the fundamental class, and I have written $iota=rho_2iota_3in H^3(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ for its mod 2 reduction. Anyway, $|Sq^2iota|=5$, $|iota^2|=6$, $|iotacdot Sq^2iota|=8$, $|iota^3|=9$, $|Sq^4Sq^2iota|=9$ and $|(Sq^2iota)^2|=10$. Now using the Adem relations together with the ring structure we get



begin{align}
Sq^1iota&=0 \
Sq^1(Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1Sq^2)iota=Sq^3iota=iota^2\
Sq^1iota^2&=2(Sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1iota)(Sq^2iota)+iota(Sq^1Sq^2iota)=iota(Sq^3iota)=iota^3\
Sq^1iota^3&=3(sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(Sq^4Sq^2iota)&=Sq^5(Sq^2iota)=(Sq^2iota)^2.
end{align}



Thus in these dimensions $ker(Sq^1)$ is generated as a $mathbb{Z}_2$-vector space by ${iota,iota^2,iota^3}$, whist $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by ${Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2,Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3}$. We see that these agree in dimension $5-9$.



Now recall Hatcher's discussion of the Bockstein spectral sequence, which takes as input $E^*_1=H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ and converges to $E^*_infty= H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3))/(torsion)otimesmathbb{Z}_2$. The differential on the $E_1$-page of this spectral sequence is the Bockstein $beta$, which, in the case $p=2$ is exactly the Steenrod operators $Sq^1$. Moreover, the $E_r$-page can be identified with the subgroup $2^{r-1}cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$ of $H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$. The previous calculations tell us that $E_2^*=0$ for $*=5,dots,9$. Therefore $2cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_4)=0$ for $*=5,dots, 9$ so the 2-torsion of order at most $2$.



I'm not sure I quite understand your second question. If you can be a bit clearer I will be happy to fill in any further details later on. I think you need to consider this. The exact coefficient sequence $0rightarrowmathbb{Z}xrightarrow{times 2}mathbb{Z}rightarrowmathbb{Z}_2rightarrow 0$ induces a long exact sequence for any space $X$



$$dotsrightarrow H^n(X)xrightarrow{times 2}H^n(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)rightarrowdots$$



where $rho_2$ is the mod 2 reduction and $delta$ is the connecting map of the long exact sequence. Then the Bockstein $beta=Sq^1$ is the composite



$$beta=Sq^1=rho_2circdelta:H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^{n+1}(X;mathbb{Z}_2)$$



The point is that not only does it hold that $Sq^1Sq^1=(rho_2delta)(rho_2delta)=rho_2(deltarho_2)delta=rho_2(0)delta=0$, but also that $Sq^1rho_2=(rho_2delta)rho_2=(0)rho_2=0$ and $delta Sq^1=delta(rho_2delta)=(deltarho_2)delta=(0)delta=0$. Using what you know about the kernel and image of $Sq^1$ you should be able to use these equations to decide why certain mod 2 reductions are injective.



Third question: You are studying the Serre Spectral sequences of the fibration $K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$, where $X_4$ is obtained as the pullback of the path-space fibration of a map $k_3=Sq^2iota:K(mathbb{Z},3)rightarrow K(mathbb{Z}_2,5)$. This spectral sequence takes as input $E_2^{p,q}=H^p(K(mathbb{Z},3);H^q(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4))$ and converges to $E_infty^{p,q}=H^{p+q}(X_4)$. This is reason that you end up with classes in $H^6(X_4)$ rather than $H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3)$. It is the cohomology of the space $X_4$ that you are calculating with this spectral sequence.



With regards to the converges in low degrees of this spectral sequence, there are non non-trivial differentials until the $E_5$-page. The class $iotain E_4^{3,0}cong E_2^{3,0}cong H^3(Kmathbb{Z},3))$ clearly survives to $E_infty$. This gives a class in $H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3;mathbb{Z}_2)$, and the edge homomorphisms tell you that this is the class $p^*iota_3$, where $p:X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$ is the projection.



Moving onto the $E_5$-page, since $d_5(iota_4)=Sq^2iota_3$ by the construction of the fibration, we have $E_infty^{0,4}cong E_6^{0,4}cong ker(d_5)=0$, and since there are no other classes in $E_5$ with total degree $4$,we find that $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong oplus_{p+q=4}E_infty^{p,q}=0$. Here we are on the $E_5$-page.



Now we must work on the $E_6$-page. In total degree $5$ there is only one class, namely, $Sq^1iota_4in E_6^{0,5}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$. The class $Sq^2iota_3in E_5^{5,0}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the $E_5$-page so does no appear at $E_6$.



Now you should recall that the differentials of the spectral sequence commute with the action of the Steenrod algebra. This gives us $d_6(Sq^1iota_4)=Sq^1(d_6iota_4)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_3)=iota_3^2$. Therefore $E_infty^{0,5}cong E_7^{0,5}congker(d_6)=0$. Since no other classes of total degree 5 survive to $E_infty$ we have $H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0$.



In total degree $6$ we must move to the $E_7$-page. Tthere is again only a single class, $Sq^2iota_4in E_7^{0,6}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$, since $iota^3in E_6^{6,0}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3),mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the previous page. We have $d_6(Sq^2iota_4)=0$ since $E_6^{6,0}=0$.



Thus we see that $H^6(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong E_infty^{6,0}congmathbb{Z}_2$, and is generated by a class $x_6$ satisfying $i^*x_6=Sq^2iota_4$, where $i:K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4$ is the fibre inclusion. This class $x_6$ turns out to be the class that must be killed at the next stage of the Postnikov tower.



Summing up we have $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0=H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)$. The long exact Bockstein sequence tells us that if it is non-trivial then $H^4(X_4)$ must be odd torsion. However we know it cannot be odd torsion, so it must be trivial. Similarly for $H^5(X_4)$. Thus $H^4(X_4)= 0= H^5(X_4)$ (integral coefficients).



Now to sort out what is happening in $H^6(X_4)$ we look at the spectral sequence again. We have $d_8(Sq^3iota_4)=Sq^3Sq^2iota_3=Sq^4Sq^1iota_3=0$. Hence $Sq^3iota_4$ survives to $E_infty$ and represents a class $x_7$ satisfying $i^*x_7=Sq^3iota_4$. Now we have $i^*(Sq^1x_6)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_4)=Sq^3iota_4=i^*x_7$, so that $Sq^1x_6neq 0$.



In particular, since $Sq^1=rho_2delta$, the class $x_6$ cannot be the mod 2 reduction of an integral class - or in fact any $mathbb{Z}_{2^r}$, $rgeq 2$, class. Therefore $H^6(X_6)=0$ and so $x_6in H^6(X_6;mathbb{Z}_2)$ is indeed the class to kill to move to the next Postnikov stage.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • $text{Im}Sq^{1}$ is generated by $left { imath^{2},imath^{3} right } neq left { imath,imath^{2},imath^{3} right }$ and I haven't read Bockstein spectral sequence ( in Hatcher's note is also not yet written ) so I'm so thankful if you could interpret in another way. Lastly, maybe some latex mistakes between $X_{6}$ and $X_{4}$ ?
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 14:17












  • @DavidGeal, I apolgise for the typo. $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by the classes I have written. The class $iota$ is of degree $3$, and the statement is about the classes in degrees 5 to 9. Like I have written, these are $Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2$ and $Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3$.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:09










  • What I have already written about the Bockstein SS should be enough to help you understand Hatcher's calculations a little better. I shall try to write a little more.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:14










  • @DavidGeal, I've added some details to the bottom of my answer with regards to your last question.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 16:16










  • it's even true that $H_{i}(X_{4},mathbb{Z}) cong H_{i}(S^{3},mathbb{Z}) forall i leq 5$ since $X_{n}$ is obtained as $S^{3}$ after attached cells of dimension greater than $n+2$. Thanks for your answer, you're very enthusiastic.
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 16:29

















up vote
1
down vote













If I recall, Hatcher caclulates the integral cohomlogy of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$ up to degrees 11 or so at some point earlier in the notes. He also tells you at some point that the mod 2 cohomology ring of this space is a free commutative algebra on classes $sq^Iiota$ for admissible multi-indexes $I=(i_1,dots,i_n)$ satisfying certain 'excess' conditions. In particular, up to degree $10$ we have



$$H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2{iota,Sq^2iota,iota^2, iotacdot Sq^2iota,iota^3,Sq^4Sq^2iota,(Sq^2iota)^2dots}$$



where $|iota|=3$. Here $iota_3in H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3))$ is the fundamental class, and I have written $iota=rho_2iota_3in H^3(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ for its mod 2 reduction. Anyway, $|Sq^2iota|=5$, $|iota^2|=6$, $|iotacdot Sq^2iota|=8$, $|iota^3|=9$, $|Sq^4Sq^2iota|=9$ and $|(Sq^2iota)^2|=10$. Now using the Adem relations together with the ring structure we get



begin{align}
Sq^1iota&=0 \
Sq^1(Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1Sq^2)iota=Sq^3iota=iota^2\
Sq^1iota^2&=2(Sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1iota)(Sq^2iota)+iota(Sq^1Sq^2iota)=iota(Sq^3iota)=iota^3\
Sq^1iota^3&=3(sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(Sq^4Sq^2iota)&=Sq^5(Sq^2iota)=(Sq^2iota)^2.
end{align}



Thus in these dimensions $ker(Sq^1)$ is generated as a $mathbb{Z}_2$-vector space by ${iota,iota^2,iota^3}$, whist $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by ${Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2,Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3}$. We see that these agree in dimension $5-9$.



Now recall Hatcher's discussion of the Bockstein spectral sequence, which takes as input $E^*_1=H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ and converges to $E^*_infty= H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3))/(torsion)otimesmathbb{Z}_2$. The differential on the $E_1$-page of this spectral sequence is the Bockstein $beta$, which, in the case $p=2$ is exactly the Steenrod operators $Sq^1$. Moreover, the $E_r$-page can be identified with the subgroup $2^{r-1}cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$ of $H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$. The previous calculations tell us that $E_2^*=0$ for $*=5,dots,9$. Therefore $2cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_4)=0$ for $*=5,dots, 9$ so the 2-torsion of order at most $2$.



I'm not sure I quite understand your second question. If you can be a bit clearer I will be happy to fill in any further details later on. I think you need to consider this. The exact coefficient sequence $0rightarrowmathbb{Z}xrightarrow{times 2}mathbb{Z}rightarrowmathbb{Z}_2rightarrow 0$ induces a long exact sequence for any space $X$



$$dotsrightarrow H^n(X)xrightarrow{times 2}H^n(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)rightarrowdots$$



where $rho_2$ is the mod 2 reduction and $delta$ is the connecting map of the long exact sequence. Then the Bockstein $beta=Sq^1$ is the composite



$$beta=Sq^1=rho_2circdelta:H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^{n+1}(X;mathbb{Z}_2)$$



The point is that not only does it hold that $Sq^1Sq^1=(rho_2delta)(rho_2delta)=rho_2(deltarho_2)delta=rho_2(0)delta=0$, but also that $Sq^1rho_2=(rho_2delta)rho_2=(0)rho_2=0$ and $delta Sq^1=delta(rho_2delta)=(deltarho_2)delta=(0)delta=0$. Using what you know about the kernel and image of $Sq^1$ you should be able to use these equations to decide why certain mod 2 reductions are injective.



Third question: You are studying the Serre Spectral sequences of the fibration $K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$, where $X_4$ is obtained as the pullback of the path-space fibration of a map $k_3=Sq^2iota:K(mathbb{Z},3)rightarrow K(mathbb{Z}_2,5)$. This spectral sequence takes as input $E_2^{p,q}=H^p(K(mathbb{Z},3);H^q(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4))$ and converges to $E_infty^{p,q}=H^{p+q}(X_4)$. This is reason that you end up with classes in $H^6(X_4)$ rather than $H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3)$. It is the cohomology of the space $X_4$ that you are calculating with this spectral sequence.



With regards to the converges in low degrees of this spectral sequence, there are non non-trivial differentials until the $E_5$-page. The class $iotain E_4^{3,0}cong E_2^{3,0}cong H^3(Kmathbb{Z},3))$ clearly survives to $E_infty$. This gives a class in $H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3;mathbb{Z}_2)$, and the edge homomorphisms tell you that this is the class $p^*iota_3$, where $p:X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$ is the projection.



Moving onto the $E_5$-page, since $d_5(iota_4)=Sq^2iota_3$ by the construction of the fibration, we have $E_infty^{0,4}cong E_6^{0,4}cong ker(d_5)=0$, and since there are no other classes in $E_5$ with total degree $4$,we find that $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong oplus_{p+q=4}E_infty^{p,q}=0$. Here we are on the $E_5$-page.



Now we must work on the $E_6$-page. In total degree $5$ there is only one class, namely, $Sq^1iota_4in E_6^{0,5}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$. The class $Sq^2iota_3in E_5^{5,0}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the $E_5$-page so does no appear at $E_6$.



Now you should recall that the differentials of the spectral sequence commute with the action of the Steenrod algebra. This gives us $d_6(Sq^1iota_4)=Sq^1(d_6iota_4)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_3)=iota_3^2$. Therefore $E_infty^{0,5}cong E_7^{0,5}congker(d_6)=0$. Since no other classes of total degree 5 survive to $E_infty$ we have $H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0$.



In total degree $6$ we must move to the $E_7$-page. Tthere is again only a single class, $Sq^2iota_4in E_7^{0,6}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$, since $iota^3in E_6^{6,0}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3),mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the previous page. We have $d_6(Sq^2iota_4)=0$ since $E_6^{6,0}=0$.



Thus we see that $H^6(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong E_infty^{6,0}congmathbb{Z}_2$, and is generated by a class $x_6$ satisfying $i^*x_6=Sq^2iota_4$, where $i:K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4$ is the fibre inclusion. This class $x_6$ turns out to be the class that must be killed at the next stage of the Postnikov tower.



Summing up we have $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0=H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)$. The long exact Bockstein sequence tells us that if it is non-trivial then $H^4(X_4)$ must be odd torsion. However we know it cannot be odd torsion, so it must be trivial. Similarly for $H^5(X_4)$. Thus $H^4(X_4)= 0= H^5(X_4)$ (integral coefficients).



Now to sort out what is happening in $H^6(X_4)$ we look at the spectral sequence again. We have $d_8(Sq^3iota_4)=Sq^3Sq^2iota_3=Sq^4Sq^1iota_3=0$. Hence $Sq^3iota_4$ survives to $E_infty$ and represents a class $x_7$ satisfying $i^*x_7=Sq^3iota_4$. Now we have $i^*(Sq^1x_6)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_4)=Sq^3iota_4=i^*x_7$, so that $Sq^1x_6neq 0$.



In particular, since $Sq^1=rho_2delta$, the class $x_6$ cannot be the mod 2 reduction of an integral class - or in fact any $mathbb{Z}_{2^r}$, $rgeq 2$, class. Therefore $H^6(X_6)=0$ and so $x_6in H^6(X_6;mathbb{Z}_2)$ is indeed the class to kill to move to the next Postnikov stage.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • $text{Im}Sq^{1}$ is generated by $left { imath^{2},imath^{3} right } neq left { imath,imath^{2},imath^{3} right }$ and I haven't read Bockstein spectral sequence ( in Hatcher's note is also not yet written ) so I'm so thankful if you could interpret in another way. Lastly, maybe some latex mistakes between $X_{6}$ and $X_{4}$ ?
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 14:17












  • @DavidGeal, I apolgise for the typo. $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by the classes I have written. The class $iota$ is of degree $3$, and the statement is about the classes in degrees 5 to 9. Like I have written, these are $Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2$ and $Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3$.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:09










  • What I have already written about the Bockstein SS should be enough to help you understand Hatcher's calculations a little better. I shall try to write a little more.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:14










  • @DavidGeal, I've added some details to the bottom of my answer with regards to your last question.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 16:16










  • it's even true that $H_{i}(X_{4},mathbb{Z}) cong H_{i}(S^{3},mathbb{Z}) forall i leq 5$ since $X_{n}$ is obtained as $S^{3}$ after attached cells of dimension greater than $n+2$. Thanks for your answer, you're very enthusiastic.
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 16:29















up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









If I recall, Hatcher caclulates the integral cohomlogy of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$ up to degrees 11 or so at some point earlier in the notes. He also tells you at some point that the mod 2 cohomology ring of this space is a free commutative algebra on classes $sq^Iiota$ for admissible multi-indexes $I=(i_1,dots,i_n)$ satisfying certain 'excess' conditions. In particular, up to degree $10$ we have



$$H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2{iota,Sq^2iota,iota^2, iotacdot Sq^2iota,iota^3,Sq^4Sq^2iota,(Sq^2iota)^2dots}$$



where $|iota|=3$. Here $iota_3in H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3))$ is the fundamental class, and I have written $iota=rho_2iota_3in H^3(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ for its mod 2 reduction. Anyway, $|Sq^2iota|=5$, $|iota^2|=6$, $|iotacdot Sq^2iota|=8$, $|iota^3|=9$, $|Sq^4Sq^2iota|=9$ and $|(Sq^2iota)^2|=10$. Now using the Adem relations together with the ring structure we get



begin{align}
Sq^1iota&=0 \
Sq^1(Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1Sq^2)iota=Sq^3iota=iota^2\
Sq^1iota^2&=2(Sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1iota)(Sq^2iota)+iota(Sq^1Sq^2iota)=iota(Sq^3iota)=iota^3\
Sq^1iota^3&=3(sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(Sq^4Sq^2iota)&=Sq^5(Sq^2iota)=(Sq^2iota)^2.
end{align}



Thus in these dimensions $ker(Sq^1)$ is generated as a $mathbb{Z}_2$-vector space by ${iota,iota^2,iota^3}$, whist $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by ${Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2,Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3}$. We see that these agree in dimension $5-9$.



Now recall Hatcher's discussion of the Bockstein spectral sequence, which takes as input $E^*_1=H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ and converges to $E^*_infty= H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3))/(torsion)otimesmathbb{Z}_2$. The differential on the $E_1$-page of this spectral sequence is the Bockstein $beta$, which, in the case $p=2$ is exactly the Steenrod operators $Sq^1$. Moreover, the $E_r$-page can be identified with the subgroup $2^{r-1}cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$ of $H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$. The previous calculations tell us that $E_2^*=0$ for $*=5,dots,9$. Therefore $2cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_4)=0$ for $*=5,dots, 9$ so the 2-torsion of order at most $2$.



I'm not sure I quite understand your second question. If you can be a bit clearer I will be happy to fill in any further details later on. I think you need to consider this. The exact coefficient sequence $0rightarrowmathbb{Z}xrightarrow{times 2}mathbb{Z}rightarrowmathbb{Z}_2rightarrow 0$ induces a long exact sequence for any space $X$



$$dotsrightarrow H^n(X)xrightarrow{times 2}H^n(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)rightarrowdots$$



where $rho_2$ is the mod 2 reduction and $delta$ is the connecting map of the long exact sequence. Then the Bockstein $beta=Sq^1$ is the composite



$$beta=Sq^1=rho_2circdelta:H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^{n+1}(X;mathbb{Z}_2)$$



The point is that not only does it hold that $Sq^1Sq^1=(rho_2delta)(rho_2delta)=rho_2(deltarho_2)delta=rho_2(0)delta=0$, but also that $Sq^1rho_2=(rho_2delta)rho_2=(0)rho_2=0$ and $delta Sq^1=delta(rho_2delta)=(deltarho_2)delta=(0)delta=0$. Using what you know about the kernel and image of $Sq^1$ you should be able to use these equations to decide why certain mod 2 reductions are injective.



Third question: You are studying the Serre Spectral sequences of the fibration $K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$, where $X_4$ is obtained as the pullback of the path-space fibration of a map $k_3=Sq^2iota:K(mathbb{Z},3)rightarrow K(mathbb{Z}_2,5)$. This spectral sequence takes as input $E_2^{p,q}=H^p(K(mathbb{Z},3);H^q(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4))$ and converges to $E_infty^{p,q}=H^{p+q}(X_4)$. This is reason that you end up with classes in $H^6(X_4)$ rather than $H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3)$. It is the cohomology of the space $X_4$ that you are calculating with this spectral sequence.



With regards to the converges in low degrees of this spectral sequence, there are non non-trivial differentials until the $E_5$-page. The class $iotain E_4^{3,0}cong E_2^{3,0}cong H^3(Kmathbb{Z},3))$ clearly survives to $E_infty$. This gives a class in $H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3;mathbb{Z}_2)$, and the edge homomorphisms tell you that this is the class $p^*iota_3$, where $p:X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$ is the projection.



Moving onto the $E_5$-page, since $d_5(iota_4)=Sq^2iota_3$ by the construction of the fibration, we have $E_infty^{0,4}cong E_6^{0,4}cong ker(d_5)=0$, and since there are no other classes in $E_5$ with total degree $4$,we find that $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong oplus_{p+q=4}E_infty^{p,q}=0$. Here we are on the $E_5$-page.



Now we must work on the $E_6$-page. In total degree $5$ there is only one class, namely, $Sq^1iota_4in E_6^{0,5}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$. The class $Sq^2iota_3in E_5^{5,0}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the $E_5$-page so does no appear at $E_6$.



Now you should recall that the differentials of the spectral sequence commute with the action of the Steenrod algebra. This gives us $d_6(Sq^1iota_4)=Sq^1(d_6iota_4)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_3)=iota_3^2$. Therefore $E_infty^{0,5}cong E_7^{0,5}congker(d_6)=0$. Since no other classes of total degree 5 survive to $E_infty$ we have $H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0$.



In total degree $6$ we must move to the $E_7$-page. Tthere is again only a single class, $Sq^2iota_4in E_7^{0,6}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$, since $iota^3in E_6^{6,0}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3),mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the previous page. We have $d_6(Sq^2iota_4)=0$ since $E_6^{6,0}=0$.



Thus we see that $H^6(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong E_infty^{6,0}congmathbb{Z}_2$, and is generated by a class $x_6$ satisfying $i^*x_6=Sq^2iota_4$, where $i:K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4$ is the fibre inclusion. This class $x_6$ turns out to be the class that must be killed at the next stage of the Postnikov tower.



Summing up we have $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0=H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)$. The long exact Bockstein sequence tells us that if it is non-trivial then $H^4(X_4)$ must be odd torsion. However we know it cannot be odd torsion, so it must be trivial. Similarly for $H^5(X_4)$. Thus $H^4(X_4)= 0= H^5(X_4)$ (integral coefficients).



Now to sort out what is happening in $H^6(X_4)$ we look at the spectral sequence again. We have $d_8(Sq^3iota_4)=Sq^3Sq^2iota_3=Sq^4Sq^1iota_3=0$. Hence $Sq^3iota_4$ survives to $E_infty$ and represents a class $x_7$ satisfying $i^*x_7=Sq^3iota_4$. Now we have $i^*(Sq^1x_6)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_4)=Sq^3iota_4=i^*x_7$, so that $Sq^1x_6neq 0$.



In particular, since $Sq^1=rho_2delta$, the class $x_6$ cannot be the mod 2 reduction of an integral class - or in fact any $mathbb{Z}_{2^r}$, $rgeq 2$, class. Therefore $H^6(X_6)=0$ and so $x_6in H^6(X_6;mathbb{Z}_2)$ is indeed the class to kill to move to the next Postnikov stage.






share|cite|improve this answer














If I recall, Hatcher caclulates the integral cohomlogy of $K(mathbb{Z},3)$ up to degrees 11 or so at some point earlier in the notes. He also tells you at some point that the mod 2 cohomology ring of this space is a free commutative algebra on classes $sq^Iiota$ for admissible multi-indexes $I=(i_1,dots,i_n)$ satisfying certain 'excess' conditions. In particular, up to degree $10$ we have



$$H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2{iota,Sq^2iota,iota^2, iotacdot Sq^2iota,iota^3,Sq^4Sq^2iota,(Sq^2iota)^2dots}$$



where $|iota|=3$. Here $iota_3in H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3))$ is the fundamental class, and I have written $iota=rho_2iota_3in H^3(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ for its mod 2 reduction. Anyway, $|Sq^2iota|=5$, $|iota^2|=6$, $|iotacdot Sq^2iota|=8$, $|iota^3|=9$, $|Sq^4Sq^2iota|=9$ and $|(Sq^2iota)^2|=10$. Now using the Adem relations together with the ring structure we get



begin{align}
Sq^1iota&=0 \
Sq^1(Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1Sq^2)iota=Sq^3iota=iota^2\
Sq^1iota^2&=2(Sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)&=(Sq^1iota)(Sq^2iota)+iota(Sq^1Sq^2iota)=iota(Sq^3iota)=iota^3\
Sq^1iota^3&=3(sq^1iota)iota=0\
Sq^1(Sq^4Sq^2iota)&=Sq^5(Sq^2iota)=(Sq^2iota)^2.
end{align}



Thus in these dimensions $ker(Sq^1)$ is generated as a $mathbb{Z}_2$-vector space by ${iota,iota^2,iota^3}$, whist $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by ${Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2,Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3}$. We see that these agree in dimension $5-9$.



Now recall Hatcher's discussion of the Bockstein spectral sequence, which takes as input $E^*_1=H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ and converges to $E^*_infty= H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3))/(torsion)otimesmathbb{Z}_2$. The differential on the $E_1$-page of this spectral sequence is the Bockstein $beta$, which, in the case $p=2$ is exactly the Steenrod operators $Sq^1$. Moreover, the $E_r$-page can be identified with the subgroup $2^{r-1}cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$ of $H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_{2^r})$. The previous calculations tell us that $E_2^*=0$ for $*=5,dots,9$. Therefore $2cdot H^*(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_4)=0$ for $*=5,dots, 9$ so the 2-torsion of order at most $2$.



I'm not sure I quite understand your second question. If you can be a bit clearer I will be happy to fill in any further details later on. I think you need to consider this. The exact coefficient sequence $0rightarrowmathbb{Z}xrightarrow{times 2}mathbb{Z}rightarrowmathbb{Z}_2rightarrow 0$ induces a long exact sequence for any space $X$



$$dotsrightarrow H^n(X)xrightarrow{times 2}H^n(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)rightarrowdots$$



where $rho_2$ is the mod 2 reduction and $delta$ is the connecting map of the long exact sequence. Then the Bockstein $beta=Sq^1$ is the composite



$$beta=Sq^1=rho_2circdelta:H^n(X;mathbb{Z}_2)xrightarrow{delta} H^{n+1}(X)xrightarrow{rho_2} H^{n+1}(X;mathbb{Z}_2)$$



The point is that not only does it hold that $Sq^1Sq^1=(rho_2delta)(rho_2delta)=rho_2(deltarho_2)delta=rho_2(0)delta=0$, but also that $Sq^1rho_2=(rho_2delta)rho_2=(0)rho_2=0$ and $delta Sq^1=delta(rho_2delta)=(deltarho_2)delta=(0)delta=0$. Using what you know about the kernel and image of $Sq^1$ you should be able to use these equations to decide why certain mod 2 reductions are injective.



Third question: You are studying the Serre Spectral sequences of the fibration $K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$, where $X_4$ is obtained as the pullback of the path-space fibration of a map $k_3=Sq^2iota:K(mathbb{Z},3)rightarrow K(mathbb{Z}_2,5)$. This spectral sequence takes as input $E_2^{p,q}=H^p(K(mathbb{Z},3);H^q(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4))$ and converges to $E_infty^{p,q}=H^{p+q}(X_4)$. This is reason that you end up with classes in $H^6(X_4)$ rather than $H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3)$. It is the cohomology of the space $X_4$ that you are calculating with this spectral sequence.



With regards to the converges in low degrees of this spectral sequence, there are non non-trivial differentials until the $E_5$-page. The class $iotain E_4^{3,0}cong E_2^{3,0}cong H^3(Kmathbb{Z},3))$ clearly survives to $E_infty$. This gives a class in $H^3(K(mathbb{Z},3;mathbb{Z}_2)$, and the edge homomorphisms tell you that this is the class $p^*iota_3$, where $p:X_4rightarrow K(mathbb{Z},3)$ is the projection.



Moving onto the $E_5$-page, since $d_5(iota_4)=Sq^2iota_3$ by the construction of the fibration, we have $E_infty^{0,4}cong E_6^{0,4}cong ker(d_5)=0$, and since there are no other classes in $E_5$ with total degree $4$,we find that $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong oplus_{p+q=4}E_infty^{p,q}=0$. Here we are on the $E_5$-page.



Now we must work on the $E_6$-page. In total degree $5$ there is only one class, namely, $Sq^1iota_4in E_6^{0,5}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$. The class $Sq^2iota_3in E_5^{5,0}cong H^5(K(mathbb{Z},3);mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the $E_5$-page so does no appear at $E_6$.



Now you should recall that the differentials of the spectral sequence commute with the action of the Steenrod algebra. This gives us $d_6(Sq^1iota_4)=Sq^1(d_6iota_4)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_3)=iota_3^2$. Therefore $E_infty^{0,5}cong E_7^{0,5}congker(d_6)=0$. Since no other classes of total degree 5 survive to $E_infty$ we have $H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0$.



In total degree $6$ we must move to the $E_7$-page. Tthere is again only a single class, $Sq^2iota_4in E_7^{0,6}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z}_2,4);mathbb{Z}_2)$, since $iota^3in E_6^{6,0}cong H^6(K(mathbb{Z},3),mathbb{Z}_2)$ was killed on the previous page. We have $d_6(Sq^2iota_4)=0$ since $E_6^{6,0}=0$.



Thus we see that $H^6(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)cong E_infty^{6,0}congmathbb{Z}_2$, and is generated by a class $x_6$ satisfying $i^*x_6=Sq^2iota_4$, where $i:K(mathbb{Z}_2,4)rightarrow X_4$ is the fibre inclusion. This class $x_6$ turns out to be the class that must be killed at the next stage of the Postnikov tower.



Summing up we have $H^4(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)=0=H^5(X_4;mathbb{Z}_2)$. The long exact Bockstein sequence tells us that if it is non-trivial then $H^4(X_4)$ must be odd torsion. However we know it cannot be odd torsion, so it must be trivial. Similarly for $H^5(X_4)$. Thus $H^4(X_4)= 0= H^5(X_4)$ (integral coefficients).



Now to sort out what is happening in $H^6(X_4)$ we look at the spectral sequence again. We have $d_8(Sq^3iota_4)=Sq^3Sq^2iota_3=Sq^4Sq^1iota_3=0$. Hence $Sq^3iota_4$ survives to $E_infty$ and represents a class $x_7$ satisfying $i^*x_7=Sq^3iota_4$. Now we have $i^*(Sq^1x_6)=Sq^1(Sq^2iota_4)=Sq^3iota_4=i^*x_7$, so that $Sq^1x_6neq 0$.



In particular, since $Sq^1=rho_2delta$, the class $x_6$ cannot be the mod 2 reduction of an integral class - or in fact any $mathbb{Z}_{2^r}$, $rgeq 2$, class. Therefore $H^6(X_6)=0$ and so $x_6in H^6(X_6;mathbb{Z}_2)$ is indeed the class to kill to move to the next Postnikov stage.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 25 at 16:16

























answered Nov 25 at 13:17









Tyrone

4,19011125




4,19011125












  • $text{Im}Sq^{1}$ is generated by $left { imath^{2},imath^{3} right } neq left { imath,imath^{2},imath^{3} right }$ and I haven't read Bockstein spectral sequence ( in Hatcher's note is also not yet written ) so I'm so thankful if you could interpret in another way. Lastly, maybe some latex mistakes between $X_{6}$ and $X_{4}$ ?
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 14:17












  • @DavidGeal, I apolgise for the typo. $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by the classes I have written. The class $iota$ is of degree $3$, and the statement is about the classes in degrees 5 to 9. Like I have written, these are $Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2$ and $Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3$.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:09










  • What I have already written about the Bockstein SS should be enough to help you understand Hatcher's calculations a little better. I shall try to write a little more.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:14










  • @DavidGeal, I've added some details to the bottom of my answer with regards to your last question.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 16:16










  • it's even true that $H_{i}(X_{4},mathbb{Z}) cong H_{i}(S^{3},mathbb{Z}) forall i leq 5$ since $X_{n}$ is obtained as $S^{3}$ after attached cells of dimension greater than $n+2$. Thanks for your answer, you're very enthusiastic.
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 16:29




















  • $text{Im}Sq^{1}$ is generated by $left { imath^{2},imath^{3} right } neq left { imath,imath^{2},imath^{3} right }$ and I haven't read Bockstein spectral sequence ( in Hatcher's note is also not yet written ) so I'm so thankful if you could interpret in another way. Lastly, maybe some latex mistakes between $X_{6}$ and $X_{4}$ ?
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 14:17












  • @DavidGeal, I apolgise for the typo. $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by the classes I have written. The class $iota$ is of degree $3$, and the statement is about the classes in degrees 5 to 9. Like I have written, these are $Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2$ and $Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3$.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:09










  • What I have already written about the Bockstein SS should be enough to help you understand Hatcher's calculations a little better. I shall try to write a little more.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 15:14










  • @DavidGeal, I've added some details to the bottom of my answer with regards to your last question.
    – Tyrone
    Nov 25 at 16:16










  • it's even true that $H_{i}(X_{4},mathbb{Z}) cong H_{i}(S^{3},mathbb{Z}) forall i leq 5$ since $X_{n}$ is obtained as $S^{3}$ after attached cells of dimension greater than $n+2$. Thanks for your answer, you're very enthusiastic.
    – bangbang1412
    Nov 25 at 16:29


















$text{Im}Sq^{1}$ is generated by $left { imath^{2},imath^{3} right } neq left { imath,imath^{2},imath^{3} right }$ and I haven't read Bockstein spectral sequence ( in Hatcher's note is also not yet written ) so I'm so thankful if you could interpret in another way. Lastly, maybe some latex mistakes between $X_{6}$ and $X_{4}$ ?
– bangbang1412
Nov 25 at 14:17






$text{Im}Sq^{1}$ is generated by $left { imath^{2},imath^{3} right } neq left { imath,imath^{2},imath^{3} right }$ and I haven't read Bockstein spectral sequence ( in Hatcher's note is also not yet written ) so I'm so thankful if you could interpret in another way. Lastly, maybe some latex mistakes between $X_{6}$ and $X_{4}$ ?
– bangbang1412
Nov 25 at 14:17














@DavidGeal, I apolgise for the typo. $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by the classes I have written. The class $iota$ is of degree $3$, and the statement is about the classes in degrees 5 to 9. Like I have written, these are $Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2$ and $Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3$.
– Tyrone
Nov 25 at 15:09




@DavidGeal, I apolgise for the typo. $im(Sq^1)$ is generated by the classes I have written. The class $iota$ is of degree $3$, and the statement is about the classes in degrees 5 to 9. Like I have written, these are $Sq^1(Sq^2iota)=iota^2$ and $Sq^1(iotacdot Sq^2iota)=iota^3$.
– Tyrone
Nov 25 at 15:09












What I have already written about the Bockstein SS should be enough to help you understand Hatcher's calculations a little better. I shall try to write a little more.
– Tyrone
Nov 25 at 15:14




What I have already written about the Bockstein SS should be enough to help you understand Hatcher's calculations a little better. I shall try to write a little more.
– Tyrone
Nov 25 at 15:14












@DavidGeal, I've added some details to the bottom of my answer with regards to your last question.
– Tyrone
Nov 25 at 16:16




@DavidGeal, I've added some details to the bottom of my answer with regards to your last question.
– Tyrone
Nov 25 at 16:16












it's even true that $H_{i}(X_{4},mathbb{Z}) cong H_{i}(S^{3},mathbb{Z}) forall i leq 5$ since $X_{n}$ is obtained as $S^{3}$ after attached cells of dimension greater than $n+2$. Thanks for your answer, you're very enthusiastic.
– bangbang1412
Nov 25 at 16:29






it's even true that $H_{i}(X_{4},mathbb{Z}) cong H_{i}(S^{3},mathbb{Z}) forall i leq 5$ since $X_{n}$ is obtained as $S^{3}$ after attached cells of dimension greater than $n+2$. Thanks for your answer, you're very enthusiastic.
– bangbang1412
Nov 25 at 16:29




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012447%2fhomotopy-groups-pi-n1sn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

Sphinx de Gizeh