Leibniz integration rule applied twice
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to apply the Leibniz integration rule twice to this integral:
$$
frac{textrm d^2}{textrm d^2 x}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)ds
$$
The first application gives:
$$
frac{textrm d}{textrm d x}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)ds = int_a^xfrac{partial}{partial x}left(g(s)(x-s)right)ds = int_a^x g(s)ds
$$
But the next one troubles me:
$$
frac{textrm d}{textrm d x}int_a^x g(s)ds = int_a^xfrac{partial}{partial x}g(s)ds =
$$
The result should be
$$
g(x)
$$
But I cannot see why $g(x)$ is the result.
Any ideas?
calculus integration derivatives
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to apply the Leibniz integration rule twice to this integral:
$$
frac{textrm d^2}{textrm d^2 x}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)ds
$$
The first application gives:
$$
frac{textrm d}{textrm d x}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)ds = int_a^xfrac{partial}{partial x}left(g(s)(x-s)right)ds = int_a^x g(s)ds
$$
But the next one troubles me:
$$
frac{textrm d}{textrm d x}int_a^x g(s)ds = int_a^xfrac{partial}{partial x}g(s)ds =
$$
The result should be
$$
g(x)
$$
But I cannot see why $g(x)$ is the result.
Any ideas?
calculus integration derivatives
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I want to apply the Leibniz integration rule twice to this integral:
$$
frac{textrm d^2}{textrm d^2 x}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)ds
$$
The first application gives:
$$
frac{textrm d}{textrm d x}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)ds = int_a^xfrac{partial}{partial x}left(g(s)(x-s)right)ds = int_a^x g(s)ds
$$
But the next one troubles me:
$$
frac{textrm d}{textrm d x}int_a^x g(s)ds = int_a^xfrac{partial}{partial x}g(s)ds =
$$
The result should be
$$
g(x)
$$
But I cannot see why $g(x)$ is the result.
Any ideas?
calculus integration derivatives
I want to apply the Leibniz integration rule twice to this integral:
$$
frac{textrm d^2}{textrm d^2 x}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)ds
$$
The first application gives:
$$
frac{textrm d}{textrm d x}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)ds = int_a^xfrac{partial}{partial x}left(g(s)(x-s)right)ds = int_a^x g(s)ds
$$
But the next one troubles me:
$$
frac{textrm d}{textrm d x}int_a^x g(s)ds = int_a^xfrac{partial}{partial x}g(s)ds =
$$
The result should be
$$
g(x)
$$
But I cannot see why $g(x)$ is the result.
Any ideas?
calculus integration derivatives
calculus integration derivatives
edited Nov 27 at 6:24
qbert
22k32459
22k32459
asked Nov 27 at 6:17
WolfgangP
1625
1625
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
What you wrote is not correct:
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s) mathrm dsneint_a^x frac{d}{dx}g(s)mathrm ds
$$
The result follows from the regular fundamental theorem of calculus
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^xg(s)mathrm ds=g(x)
$$
You may have gotten lucky in the first term and not been clear on how this rule works. In general,
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f(t,x)mathrm dt=f(b(x),x)b'(x)-f(a(x),x)a'(x)+int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f_x(t,x)mathrm dt
$$
So in the first differentiation, you have
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)mathrm ds=g(x)(x-x)+int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds=
int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds
$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015405%2fleibniz-integration-rule-applied-twice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
What you wrote is not correct:
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s) mathrm dsneint_a^x frac{d}{dx}g(s)mathrm ds
$$
The result follows from the regular fundamental theorem of calculus
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^xg(s)mathrm ds=g(x)
$$
You may have gotten lucky in the first term and not been clear on how this rule works. In general,
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f(t,x)mathrm dt=f(b(x),x)b'(x)-f(a(x),x)a'(x)+int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f_x(t,x)mathrm dt
$$
So in the first differentiation, you have
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)mathrm ds=g(x)(x-x)+int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds=
int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds
$$
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
What you wrote is not correct:
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s) mathrm dsneint_a^x frac{d}{dx}g(s)mathrm ds
$$
The result follows from the regular fundamental theorem of calculus
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^xg(s)mathrm ds=g(x)
$$
You may have gotten lucky in the first term and not been clear on how this rule works. In general,
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f(t,x)mathrm dt=f(b(x),x)b'(x)-f(a(x),x)a'(x)+int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f_x(t,x)mathrm dt
$$
So in the first differentiation, you have
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)mathrm ds=g(x)(x-x)+int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds=
int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds
$$
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
What you wrote is not correct:
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s) mathrm dsneint_a^x frac{d}{dx}g(s)mathrm ds
$$
The result follows from the regular fundamental theorem of calculus
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^xg(s)mathrm ds=g(x)
$$
You may have gotten lucky in the first term and not been clear on how this rule works. In general,
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f(t,x)mathrm dt=f(b(x),x)b'(x)-f(a(x),x)a'(x)+int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f_x(t,x)mathrm dt
$$
So in the first differentiation, you have
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)mathrm ds=g(x)(x-x)+int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds=
int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds
$$
What you wrote is not correct:
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s) mathrm dsneint_a^x frac{d}{dx}g(s)mathrm ds
$$
The result follows from the regular fundamental theorem of calculus
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^xg(s)mathrm ds=g(x)
$$
You may have gotten lucky in the first term and not been clear on how this rule works. In general,
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f(t,x)mathrm dt=f(b(x),x)b'(x)-f(a(x),x)a'(x)+int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f_x(t,x)mathrm dt
$$
So in the first differentiation, you have
$$
frac{d}{dx}int_a^x g(s)(x-s)mathrm ds=g(x)(x-x)+int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds=
int_a^x g(s)mathrm ds
$$
answered Nov 27 at 6:23
qbert
22k32459
22k32459
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015405%2fleibniz-integration-rule-applied-twice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown