Two sequences share a common (yet unknown) term. What is it?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Say you have two sequences which are given by a polynomial of some degree. Both of these sequences share a term. Is there a way to find the missing term, and what is the minimum number of values (or information in general, such as degree of the polynomial) for each sequence for a unique solution to be found?



To make this a little bit clearer, I have an example of sequences which I know share a term but I do not know what that term is. The sequences are:




  • 0, 6, 30, __

  • 0, 12, 40, __


I also know that both of these sequences are increasing and that they may be third degree polynomials (they definitely are the same degree).

From the information given by these two sequences, is it possible to find out what the forth term (which is common to both of them) is, and how do you go about solving such a problem?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Are the two polynomials the same degree. Not sure we can do this if we don't know the degree.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 at 5:21










  • In the case of the example, yes. In general, maybe. If it's not possible without knowledge of them being the same, then assume the question requires them to be the same degree. I'll update the question to make it a bit clearer.
    – JolonB
    Nov 27 at 5:27










  • I don't know but I don't think you can solve that. I might be wrong but I'm not sure. You know that $a_0=b_0=0$. You know $f(1)=6$ so the sum of the coefficients is $6$. and so on....If you replace $f(x)$ with $p(x)=f(x-1)$ we get that the first coeficient of $p$ is $64 and that thw sum of the coeficients of $p$ is $30$ but... I don't anticipate success.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 at 5:34















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Say you have two sequences which are given by a polynomial of some degree. Both of these sequences share a term. Is there a way to find the missing term, and what is the minimum number of values (or information in general, such as degree of the polynomial) for each sequence for a unique solution to be found?



To make this a little bit clearer, I have an example of sequences which I know share a term but I do not know what that term is. The sequences are:




  • 0, 6, 30, __

  • 0, 12, 40, __


I also know that both of these sequences are increasing and that they may be third degree polynomials (they definitely are the same degree).

From the information given by these two sequences, is it possible to find out what the forth term (which is common to both of them) is, and how do you go about solving such a problem?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Are the two polynomials the same degree. Not sure we can do this if we don't know the degree.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 at 5:21










  • In the case of the example, yes. In general, maybe. If it's not possible without knowledge of them being the same, then assume the question requires them to be the same degree. I'll update the question to make it a bit clearer.
    – JolonB
    Nov 27 at 5:27










  • I don't know but I don't think you can solve that. I might be wrong but I'm not sure. You know that $a_0=b_0=0$. You know $f(1)=6$ so the sum of the coefficients is $6$. and so on....If you replace $f(x)$ with $p(x)=f(x-1)$ we get that the first coeficient of $p$ is $64 and that thw sum of the coeficients of $p$ is $30$ but... I don't anticipate success.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 at 5:34













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Say you have two sequences which are given by a polynomial of some degree. Both of these sequences share a term. Is there a way to find the missing term, and what is the minimum number of values (or information in general, such as degree of the polynomial) for each sequence for a unique solution to be found?



To make this a little bit clearer, I have an example of sequences which I know share a term but I do not know what that term is. The sequences are:




  • 0, 6, 30, __

  • 0, 12, 40, __


I also know that both of these sequences are increasing and that they may be third degree polynomials (they definitely are the same degree).

From the information given by these two sequences, is it possible to find out what the forth term (which is common to both of them) is, and how do you go about solving such a problem?










share|cite|improve this question















Say you have two sequences which are given by a polynomial of some degree. Both of these sequences share a term. Is there a way to find the missing term, and what is the minimum number of values (or information in general, such as degree of the polynomial) for each sequence for a unique solution to be found?



To make this a little bit clearer, I have an example of sequences which I know share a term but I do not know what that term is. The sequences are:




  • 0, 6, 30, __

  • 0, 12, 40, __


I also know that both of these sequences are increasing and that they may be third degree polynomials (they definitely are the same degree).

From the information given by these two sequences, is it possible to find out what the forth term (which is common to both of them) is, and how do you go about solving such a problem?







sequences-and-series integers pattern-recognition






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 27 at 5:29

























asked Nov 27 at 5:05









JolonB

12




12












  • Are the two polynomials the same degree. Not sure we can do this if we don't know the degree.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 at 5:21










  • In the case of the example, yes. In general, maybe. If it's not possible without knowledge of them being the same, then assume the question requires them to be the same degree. I'll update the question to make it a bit clearer.
    – JolonB
    Nov 27 at 5:27










  • I don't know but I don't think you can solve that. I might be wrong but I'm not sure. You know that $a_0=b_0=0$. You know $f(1)=6$ so the sum of the coefficients is $6$. and so on....If you replace $f(x)$ with $p(x)=f(x-1)$ we get that the first coeficient of $p$ is $64 and that thw sum of the coeficients of $p$ is $30$ but... I don't anticipate success.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 at 5:34


















  • Are the two polynomials the same degree. Not sure we can do this if we don't know the degree.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 at 5:21










  • In the case of the example, yes. In general, maybe. If it's not possible without knowledge of them being the same, then assume the question requires them to be the same degree. I'll update the question to make it a bit clearer.
    – JolonB
    Nov 27 at 5:27










  • I don't know but I don't think you can solve that. I might be wrong but I'm not sure. You know that $a_0=b_0=0$. You know $f(1)=6$ so the sum of the coefficients is $6$. and so on....If you replace $f(x)$ with $p(x)=f(x-1)$ we get that the first coeficient of $p$ is $64 and that thw sum of the coeficients of $p$ is $30$ but... I don't anticipate success.
    – fleablood
    Nov 27 at 5:34
















Are the two polynomials the same degree. Not sure we can do this if we don't know the degree.
– fleablood
Nov 27 at 5:21




Are the two polynomials the same degree. Not sure we can do this if we don't know the degree.
– fleablood
Nov 27 at 5:21












In the case of the example, yes. In general, maybe. If it's not possible without knowledge of them being the same, then assume the question requires them to be the same degree. I'll update the question to make it a bit clearer.
– JolonB
Nov 27 at 5:27




In the case of the example, yes. In general, maybe. If it's not possible without knowledge of them being the same, then assume the question requires them to be the same degree. I'll update the question to make it a bit clearer.
– JolonB
Nov 27 at 5:27












I don't know but I don't think you can solve that. I might be wrong but I'm not sure. You know that $a_0=b_0=0$. You know $f(1)=6$ so the sum of the coefficients is $6$. and so on....If you replace $f(x)$ with $p(x)=f(x-1)$ we get that the first coeficient of $p$ is $64 and that thw sum of the coeficients of $p$ is $30$ but... I don't anticipate success.
– fleablood
Nov 27 at 5:34




I don't know but I don't think you can solve that. I might be wrong but I'm not sure. You know that $a_0=b_0=0$. You know $f(1)=6$ so the sum of the coefficients is $6$. and so on....If you replace $f(x)$ with $p(x)=f(x-1)$ we get that the first coeficient of $p$ is $64 and that thw sum of the coeficients of $p$ is $30$ but... I don't anticipate success.
– fleablood
Nov 27 at 5:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













I assume you mean that $$a_n=v_3 n^3+v_2 n^2+v_1 n+v_0\b_n=u_3 n^3+u_2 n^2+u_1 n+u_0$$which are also expressible as $$a_n=p_0(n-p_1)(n-p_2)(n-p_3)\b_n=q_0(n-q_1)(n-q_2)(n-q_3)$$while $a_1=b_1=0$ we have $p_1=q_1=1$. Also for the rest of the terms we have $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=6\p_0(3-p_1)(3-p_2)=30$$and $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=12\q_0(3-q_1)(3-q_2)=40$$but we can not go further since we have 4 equations and 6 unknown variables. An extra constraint may be $p_0=q_0=1$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015353%2ftwo-sequences-share-a-common-yet-unknown-term-what-is-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I assume you mean that $$a_n=v_3 n^3+v_2 n^2+v_1 n+v_0\b_n=u_3 n^3+u_2 n^2+u_1 n+u_0$$which are also expressible as $$a_n=p_0(n-p_1)(n-p_2)(n-p_3)\b_n=q_0(n-q_1)(n-q_2)(n-q_3)$$while $a_1=b_1=0$ we have $p_1=q_1=1$. Also for the rest of the terms we have $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=6\p_0(3-p_1)(3-p_2)=30$$and $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=12\q_0(3-q_1)(3-q_2)=40$$but we can not go further since we have 4 equations and 6 unknown variables. An extra constraint may be $p_0=q_0=1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      I assume you mean that $$a_n=v_3 n^3+v_2 n^2+v_1 n+v_0\b_n=u_3 n^3+u_2 n^2+u_1 n+u_0$$which are also expressible as $$a_n=p_0(n-p_1)(n-p_2)(n-p_3)\b_n=q_0(n-q_1)(n-q_2)(n-q_3)$$while $a_1=b_1=0$ we have $p_1=q_1=1$. Also for the rest of the terms we have $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=6\p_0(3-p_1)(3-p_2)=30$$and $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=12\q_0(3-q_1)(3-q_2)=40$$but we can not go further since we have 4 equations and 6 unknown variables. An extra constraint may be $p_0=q_0=1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        I assume you mean that $$a_n=v_3 n^3+v_2 n^2+v_1 n+v_0\b_n=u_3 n^3+u_2 n^2+u_1 n+u_0$$which are also expressible as $$a_n=p_0(n-p_1)(n-p_2)(n-p_3)\b_n=q_0(n-q_1)(n-q_2)(n-q_3)$$while $a_1=b_1=0$ we have $p_1=q_1=1$. Also for the rest of the terms we have $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=6\p_0(3-p_1)(3-p_2)=30$$and $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=12\q_0(3-q_1)(3-q_2)=40$$but we can not go further since we have 4 equations and 6 unknown variables. An extra constraint may be $p_0=q_0=1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        I assume you mean that $$a_n=v_3 n^3+v_2 n^2+v_1 n+v_0\b_n=u_3 n^3+u_2 n^2+u_1 n+u_0$$which are also expressible as $$a_n=p_0(n-p_1)(n-p_2)(n-p_3)\b_n=q_0(n-q_1)(n-q_2)(n-q_3)$$while $a_1=b_1=0$ we have $p_1=q_1=1$. Also for the rest of the terms we have $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=6\p_0(3-p_1)(3-p_2)=30$$and $$p_0(2-p_1)(2-p_2)=12\q_0(3-q_1)(3-q_2)=40$$but we can not go further since we have 4 equations and 6 unknown variables. An extra constraint may be $p_0=q_0=1$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 28 at 0:09









        Mostafa Ayaz

        13.5k3836




        13.5k3836






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015353%2ftwo-sequences-share-a-common-yet-unknown-term-what-is-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Berounka

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

            Sphinx de Gizeh