Crossfilter - Cannot get filtered records from other groups (NOT from associate groups)
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I'm working with "airplane" data set from this reference http://square.github.io/crossfilter/
date,delay,distance,origin,destination
01010001,14,405,MCI,MDW
01010530,-11,370,LAX,PHX
...
// Create the crossfilter for the relevant dimensions and groups.
var flight = crossfilter(flights),
all = flight.groupAll(),
date = flight.dimension(function(d) { return d.date; }),
dates = date.group(d3.time.day),
hour = flight.dimension(function(d) { return d.date.getHours() + d.date.getMinutes() / 60; }),
hours = hour.group(Math.floor),
delay = flight.dimension(function(d) { return Math.max(-60, Math.min(149, d.delay)); }),
delays = delay.group(function(d) { return Math.floor(d / 10) * 10; }),
distance = flight.dimension(function(d) { return Math.min(1999, d.distance); }),
distances = distance.group(function(d) { return Math.floor(d / 50) * 50; });
Following document of Crossfilter, "groups don't observe the filters on their own dimension" => we can get filtered records from groups that theirs dimension are not filtered at this moment, can't we?
I have performed some test but this is not correct:
console.dir(date.group().all()); // 50895 records
console.dir(distance.group().all()); // 297 records
date.filter([new Date(2001, 1, 1), new Date(2001, 2, 1)]);
console.dir(date.group().all()); // 50895 records => this number still the same because we are filtering on its dimension
console.dir(distance.group().all()); // 297 records => but this number still the same too. I don't know why
Could you please explain for me why number of "distance.group().all()" still the same as before we perform the filter? Am I missing something here?
If we really cannot get "filtered records" from "distance dimension" by this way, how can I achive this?
Thanks.
javascript crossfilter
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I'm working with "airplane" data set from this reference http://square.github.io/crossfilter/
date,delay,distance,origin,destination
01010001,14,405,MCI,MDW
01010530,-11,370,LAX,PHX
...
// Create the crossfilter for the relevant dimensions and groups.
var flight = crossfilter(flights),
all = flight.groupAll(),
date = flight.dimension(function(d) { return d.date; }),
dates = date.group(d3.time.day),
hour = flight.dimension(function(d) { return d.date.getHours() + d.date.getMinutes() / 60; }),
hours = hour.group(Math.floor),
delay = flight.dimension(function(d) { return Math.max(-60, Math.min(149, d.delay)); }),
delays = delay.group(function(d) { return Math.floor(d / 10) * 10; }),
distance = flight.dimension(function(d) { return Math.min(1999, d.distance); }),
distances = distance.group(function(d) { return Math.floor(d / 50) * 50; });
Following document of Crossfilter, "groups don't observe the filters on their own dimension" => we can get filtered records from groups that theirs dimension are not filtered at this moment, can't we?
I have performed some test but this is not correct:
console.dir(date.group().all()); // 50895 records
console.dir(distance.group().all()); // 297 records
date.filter([new Date(2001, 1, 1), new Date(2001, 2, 1)]);
console.dir(date.group().all()); // 50895 records => this number still the same because we are filtering on its dimension
console.dir(distance.group().all()); // 297 records => but this number still the same too. I don't know why
Could you please explain for me why number of "distance.group().all()" still the same as before we perform the filter? Am I missing something here?
If we really cannot get "filtered records" from "distance dimension" by this way, how can I achive this?
Thanks.
javascript crossfilter
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I'm working with "airplane" data set from this reference http://square.github.io/crossfilter/
date,delay,distance,origin,destination
01010001,14,405,MCI,MDW
01010530,-11,370,LAX,PHX
...
// Create the crossfilter for the relevant dimensions and groups.
var flight = crossfilter(flights),
all = flight.groupAll(),
date = flight.dimension(function(d) { return d.date; }),
dates = date.group(d3.time.day),
hour = flight.dimension(function(d) { return d.date.getHours() + d.date.getMinutes() / 60; }),
hours = hour.group(Math.floor),
delay = flight.dimension(function(d) { return Math.max(-60, Math.min(149, d.delay)); }),
delays = delay.group(function(d) { return Math.floor(d / 10) * 10; }),
distance = flight.dimension(function(d) { return Math.min(1999, d.distance); }),
distances = distance.group(function(d) { return Math.floor(d / 50) * 50; });
Following document of Crossfilter, "groups don't observe the filters on their own dimension" => we can get filtered records from groups that theirs dimension are not filtered at this moment, can't we?
I have performed some test but this is not correct:
console.dir(date.group().all()); // 50895 records
console.dir(distance.group().all()); // 297 records
date.filter([new Date(2001, 1, 1), new Date(2001, 2, 1)]);
console.dir(date.group().all()); // 50895 records => this number still the same because we are filtering on its dimension
console.dir(distance.group().all()); // 297 records => but this number still the same too. I don't know why
Could you please explain for me why number of "distance.group().all()" still the same as before we perform the filter? Am I missing something here?
If we really cannot get "filtered records" from "distance dimension" by this way, how can I achive this?
Thanks.
javascript crossfilter
I'm working with "airplane" data set from this reference http://square.github.io/crossfilter/
date,delay,distance,origin,destination
01010001,14,405,MCI,MDW
01010530,-11,370,LAX,PHX
...
// Create the crossfilter for the relevant dimensions and groups.
var flight = crossfilter(flights),
all = flight.groupAll(),
date = flight.dimension(function(d) { return d.date; }),
dates = date.group(d3.time.day),
hour = flight.dimension(function(d) { return d.date.getHours() + d.date.getMinutes() / 60; }),
hours = hour.group(Math.floor),
delay = flight.dimension(function(d) { return Math.max(-60, Math.min(149, d.delay)); }),
delays = delay.group(function(d) { return Math.floor(d / 10) * 10; }),
distance = flight.dimension(function(d) { return Math.min(1999, d.distance); }),
distances = distance.group(function(d) { return Math.floor(d / 50) * 50; });
Following document of Crossfilter, "groups don't observe the filters on their own dimension" => we can get filtered records from groups that theirs dimension are not filtered at this moment, can't we?
I have performed some test but this is not correct:
console.dir(date.group().all()); // 50895 records
console.dir(distance.group().all()); // 297 records
date.filter([new Date(2001, 1, 1), new Date(2001, 2, 1)]);
console.dir(date.group().all()); // 50895 records => this number still the same because we are filtering on its dimension
console.dir(distance.group().all()); // 297 records => but this number still the same too. I don't know why
Could you please explain for me why number of "distance.group().all()" still the same as before we perform the filter? Am I missing something here?
If we really cannot get "filtered records" from "distance dimension" by this way, how can I achive this?
Thanks.
javascript crossfilter
javascript crossfilter
edited Nov 22 at 11:25
asked Nov 22 at 6:29
Dung Ho
626
626
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
So, yes, this is the expected behavior.
Crossfilter will create a "bin" in the group for every value it finds by applying the dimension key and group key functions. Then when a filter is applied, it will apply the reduce-remove function, which by default subtracts the count of rows removed.
The result is that empty bins still exist, but they have a value of 0.
I should add this to the Crossfilter Gotchas page, since it's something everyone runs into when they start using the library. (I don't remember the rationale at the moment, but I think at one point I determined this is the only consistent way that crossfilter could be implemented.)
If you want to remove the zeros, you can use a "fake group" to do that.
function remove_empty_bins(source_group) {
return {
all:function () {
return source_group.all().filter(function(d) {
//return Math.abs(d.value) > 0.00001; // if using floating-point numbers
return d.value !== 0; // if integers only
});
}
};
}
https://github.com/dc-js/dc.js/wiki/FAQ#remove-empty-bins
This function wraps the group in an object which implements .all()
by calling source_group.all()
and then filters the result. So if you're using dc.js you could supply this fake group to your chart like so:
chart.group(remove_empty_bins(yourGroup));
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53425052%2fcrossfilter-cannot-get-filtered-records-from-other-groups-not-from-associate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
So, yes, this is the expected behavior.
Crossfilter will create a "bin" in the group for every value it finds by applying the dimension key and group key functions. Then when a filter is applied, it will apply the reduce-remove function, which by default subtracts the count of rows removed.
The result is that empty bins still exist, but they have a value of 0.
I should add this to the Crossfilter Gotchas page, since it's something everyone runs into when they start using the library. (I don't remember the rationale at the moment, but I think at one point I determined this is the only consistent way that crossfilter could be implemented.)
If you want to remove the zeros, you can use a "fake group" to do that.
function remove_empty_bins(source_group) {
return {
all:function () {
return source_group.all().filter(function(d) {
//return Math.abs(d.value) > 0.00001; // if using floating-point numbers
return d.value !== 0; // if integers only
});
}
};
}
https://github.com/dc-js/dc.js/wiki/FAQ#remove-empty-bins
This function wraps the group in an object which implements .all()
by calling source_group.all()
and then filters the result. So if you're using dc.js you could supply this fake group to your chart like so:
chart.group(remove_empty_bins(yourGroup));
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
So, yes, this is the expected behavior.
Crossfilter will create a "bin" in the group for every value it finds by applying the dimension key and group key functions. Then when a filter is applied, it will apply the reduce-remove function, which by default subtracts the count of rows removed.
The result is that empty bins still exist, but they have a value of 0.
I should add this to the Crossfilter Gotchas page, since it's something everyone runs into when they start using the library. (I don't remember the rationale at the moment, but I think at one point I determined this is the only consistent way that crossfilter could be implemented.)
If you want to remove the zeros, you can use a "fake group" to do that.
function remove_empty_bins(source_group) {
return {
all:function () {
return source_group.all().filter(function(d) {
//return Math.abs(d.value) > 0.00001; // if using floating-point numbers
return d.value !== 0; // if integers only
});
}
};
}
https://github.com/dc-js/dc.js/wiki/FAQ#remove-empty-bins
This function wraps the group in an object which implements .all()
by calling source_group.all()
and then filters the result. So if you're using dc.js you could supply this fake group to your chart like so:
chart.group(remove_empty_bins(yourGroup));
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
So, yes, this is the expected behavior.
Crossfilter will create a "bin" in the group for every value it finds by applying the dimension key and group key functions. Then when a filter is applied, it will apply the reduce-remove function, which by default subtracts the count of rows removed.
The result is that empty bins still exist, but they have a value of 0.
I should add this to the Crossfilter Gotchas page, since it's something everyone runs into when they start using the library. (I don't remember the rationale at the moment, but I think at one point I determined this is the only consistent way that crossfilter could be implemented.)
If you want to remove the zeros, you can use a "fake group" to do that.
function remove_empty_bins(source_group) {
return {
all:function () {
return source_group.all().filter(function(d) {
//return Math.abs(d.value) > 0.00001; // if using floating-point numbers
return d.value !== 0; // if integers only
});
}
};
}
https://github.com/dc-js/dc.js/wiki/FAQ#remove-empty-bins
This function wraps the group in an object which implements .all()
by calling source_group.all()
and then filters the result. So if you're using dc.js you could supply this fake group to your chart like so:
chart.group(remove_empty_bins(yourGroup));
So, yes, this is the expected behavior.
Crossfilter will create a "bin" in the group for every value it finds by applying the dimension key and group key functions. Then when a filter is applied, it will apply the reduce-remove function, which by default subtracts the count of rows removed.
The result is that empty bins still exist, but they have a value of 0.
I should add this to the Crossfilter Gotchas page, since it's something everyone runs into when they start using the library. (I don't remember the rationale at the moment, but I think at one point I determined this is the only consistent way that crossfilter could be implemented.)
If you want to remove the zeros, you can use a "fake group" to do that.
function remove_empty_bins(source_group) {
return {
all:function () {
return source_group.all().filter(function(d) {
//return Math.abs(d.value) > 0.00001; // if using floating-point numbers
return d.value !== 0; // if integers only
});
}
};
}
https://github.com/dc-js/dc.js/wiki/FAQ#remove-empty-bins
This function wraps the group in an object which implements .all()
by calling source_group.all()
and then filters the result. So if you're using dc.js you could supply this fake group to your chart like so:
chart.group(remove_empty_bins(yourGroup));
answered Nov 28 at 14:43
Gordon
12.8k32159
12.8k32159
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53425052%2fcrossfilter-cannot-get-filtered-records-from-other-groups-not-from-associate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown