Recipe for embedding $m$-fold product $X_m := S^1 times … times S^1$ onto a bounded subset of...
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am an undergraduate student doing a first course in topology. I am stuck with a conclusion that I feel like should be relatively straightforward after proving quite some statements. The assignment is relatively long (giving a "recipe") for the final conclusion, so please bear with me.
Let $S^1$ denote the unit circle in $mathbb{R}^2$. Consider for $n geq 2$ the mapping:
$R: S^1 rightarrow M_{n+1}$ given by $(u,v) mapsto$ $ begin{bmatrix}
u & 0 & -v \
0 & I_{n-1} & 0 \
v & 0 & u
end{bmatrix}$
I have proved the following things:
$(textbf{A})$ that $R(cos (phi), sin(phi))$ defines a rotation by an angle $phi$ in the $(x_{1}, x_{n+1})$-plane.
Now, letting $H:={x in mathbb{R}^n vert x_1 >0 }$
$(textbf{B})$ that the map $f:H times S^1 mapsto mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, $(x, u, v) mapsto $
$R(u,v)begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} \
x_{2} \
vdots \
x_{n}\
0
end{bmatrix}$
is a homeomorphism from
$H times$ $S^1$ (equipped with the topology induced from $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^2$)
onto an open subset of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
$(textbf{C})$ When $A subset H$ and $A times S^1 subset mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^2$ are equipped with the induced topology, then $f|_{A×S^1}$ is an embedding of $A times S^1$ onto $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
$(textbf{D})$Finally I showed that if $A$ is bounded in $mathbb{R}^n$ that $f(A times S^1)$ is bounded in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
Using these results I have to conclude the following:
For $m geq$ 1 let the $m$-fold product $X_m := S^1 times ... times S^1 subset (mathbb{R}^2)^m = mathbb{R}^{2m}$ be equipped with induced topology. Show for all $m geq 1$ there exists an embedding of $X_m$ onto a bounded subset of $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ .
I feel like one can picture the $(m-1)$-fold product of $S^1$ to sit in $H$, as the bounded subset $A$ from part $textbf{D}$. But I do not know how to realize this since $S^1$ is the unit circle and the first coordinate of elements of $H$ is greater than $0$.
Any help would be appreciated!
general-topology metric-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am an undergraduate student doing a first course in topology. I am stuck with a conclusion that I feel like should be relatively straightforward after proving quite some statements. The assignment is relatively long (giving a "recipe") for the final conclusion, so please bear with me.
Let $S^1$ denote the unit circle in $mathbb{R}^2$. Consider for $n geq 2$ the mapping:
$R: S^1 rightarrow M_{n+1}$ given by $(u,v) mapsto$ $ begin{bmatrix}
u & 0 & -v \
0 & I_{n-1} & 0 \
v & 0 & u
end{bmatrix}$
I have proved the following things:
$(textbf{A})$ that $R(cos (phi), sin(phi))$ defines a rotation by an angle $phi$ in the $(x_{1}, x_{n+1})$-plane.
Now, letting $H:={x in mathbb{R}^n vert x_1 >0 }$
$(textbf{B})$ that the map $f:H times S^1 mapsto mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, $(x, u, v) mapsto $
$R(u,v)begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} \
x_{2} \
vdots \
x_{n}\
0
end{bmatrix}$
is a homeomorphism from
$H times$ $S^1$ (equipped with the topology induced from $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^2$)
onto an open subset of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
$(textbf{C})$ When $A subset H$ and $A times S^1 subset mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^2$ are equipped with the induced topology, then $f|_{A×S^1}$ is an embedding of $A times S^1$ onto $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
$(textbf{D})$Finally I showed that if $A$ is bounded in $mathbb{R}^n$ that $f(A times S^1)$ is bounded in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
Using these results I have to conclude the following:
For $m geq$ 1 let the $m$-fold product $X_m := S^1 times ... times S^1 subset (mathbb{R}^2)^m = mathbb{R}^{2m}$ be equipped with induced topology. Show for all $m geq 1$ there exists an embedding of $X_m$ onto a bounded subset of $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ .
I feel like one can picture the $(m-1)$-fold product of $S^1$ to sit in $H$, as the bounded subset $A$ from part $textbf{D}$. But I do not know how to realize this since $S^1$ is the unit circle and the first coordinate of elements of $H$ is greater than $0$.
Any help would be appreciated!
general-topology metric-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am an undergraduate student doing a first course in topology. I am stuck with a conclusion that I feel like should be relatively straightforward after proving quite some statements. The assignment is relatively long (giving a "recipe") for the final conclusion, so please bear with me.
Let $S^1$ denote the unit circle in $mathbb{R}^2$. Consider for $n geq 2$ the mapping:
$R: S^1 rightarrow M_{n+1}$ given by $(u,v) mapsto$ $ begin{bmatrix}
u & 0 & -v \
0 & I_{n-1} & 0 \
v & 0 & u
end{bmatrix}$
I have proved the following things:
$(textbf{A})$ that $R(cos (phi), sin(phi))$ defines a rotation by an angle $phi$ in the $(x_{1}, x_{n+1})$-plane.
Now, letting $H:={x in mathbb{R}^n vert x_1 >0 }$
$(textbf{B})$ that the map $f:H times S^1 mapsto mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, $(x, u, v) mapsto $
$R(u,v)begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} \
x_{2} \
vdots \
x_{n}\
0
end{bmatrix}$
is a homeomorphism from
$H times$ $S^1$ (equipped with the topology induced from $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^2$)
onto an open subset of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
$(textbf{C})$ When $A subset H$ and $A times S^1 subset mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^2$ are equipped with the induced topology, then $f|_{A×S^1}$ is an embedding of $A times S^1$ onto $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
$(textbf{D})$Finally I showed that if $A$ is bounded in $mathbb{R}^n$ that $f(A times S^1)$ is bounded in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
Using these results I have to conclude the following:
For $m geq$ 1 let the $m$-fold product $X_m := S^1 times ... times S^1 subset (mathbb{R}^2)^m = mathbb{R}^{2m}$ be equipped with induced topology. Show for all $m geq 1$ there exists an embedding of $X_m$ onto a bounded subset of $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ .
I feel like one can picture the $(m-1)$-fold product of $S^1$ to sit in $H$, as the bounded subset $A$ from part $textbf{D}$. But I do not know how to realize this since $S^1$ is the unit circle and the first coordinate of elements of $H$ is greater than $0$.
Any help would be appreciated!
general-topology metric-spaces
I am an undergraduate student doing a first course in topology. I am stuck with a conclusion that I feel like should be relatively straightforward after proving quite some statements. The assignment is relatively long (giving a "recipe") for the final conclusion, so please bear with me.
Let $S^1$ denote the unit circle in $mathbb{R}^2$. Consider for $n geq 2$ the mapping:
$R: S^1 rightarrow M_{n+1}$ given by $(u,v) mapsto$ $ begin{bmatrix}
u & 0 & -v \
0 & I_{n-1} & 0 \
v & 0 & u
end{bmatrix}$
I have proved the following things:
$(textbf{A})$ that $R(cos (phi), sin(phi))$ defines a rotation by an angle $phi$ in the $(x_{1}, x_{n+1})$-plane.
Now, letting $H:={x in mathbb{R}^n vert x_1 >0 }$
$(textbf{B})$ that the map $f:H times S^1 mapsto mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, $(x, u, v) mapsto $
$R(u,v)begin{bmatrix}
x_{1} \
x_{2} \
vdots \
x_{n}\
0
end{bmatrix}$
is a homeomorphism from
$H times$ $S^1$ (equipped with the topology induced from $mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^2$)
onto an open subset of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
$(textbf{C})$ When $A subset H$ and $A times S^1 subset mathbb{R}^n times mathbb{R}^2$ are equipped with the induced topology, then $f|_{A×S^1}$ is an embedding of $A times S^1$ onto $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
$(textbf{D})$Finally I showed that if $A$ is bounded in $mathbb{R}^n$ that $f(A times S^1)$ is bounded in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
Using these results I have to conclude the following:
For $m geq$ 1 let the $m$-fold product $X_m := S^1 times ... times S^1 subset (mathbb{R}^2)^m = mathbb{R}^{2m}$ be equipped with induced topology. Show for all $m geq 1$ there exists an embedding of $X_m$ onto a bounded subset of $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ .
I feel like one can picture the $(m-1)$-fold product of $S^1$ to sit in $H$, as the bounded subset $A$ from part $textbf{D}$. But I do not know how to realize this since $S^1$ is the unit circle and the first coordinate of elements of $H$ is greater than $0$.
Any help would be appreciated!
general-topology metric-spaces
general-topology metric-spaces
asked Nov 28 at 16:59
HK4
133
133
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
We prove that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset by induction on $m$.
The base case $m=1$ is just the statement that $S^1subseteq mathbb{R}^2$ is bounded.
Now assume inductively that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset. Let $g:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ be such an embedding.
Because $g(X_m)$ is bounded it lies inside of some cube: $g(X_m)subseteq [a_1, b_1]times [a_2,b_2]times...times [a_{m+1}, b_{m+1}]$. Consider a new function $h:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ given by $h(x) = g(x) + (2|a_1|,0,...,0)$. I leave it to you to show that $h$ is also an embedding and that $h(X_m)subseteq H$.
Great. How does this give an embedding of $X_{m+1}$ into $mathbb{R}^{m+2}$? Well, now that we have $h(X_m)subseteq A$, part C can be used. Can you finish from here?
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017388%2frecipe-for-embedding-m-fold-product-x-m-s1-times-times-s1-ont%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
We prove that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset by induction on $m$.
The base case $m=1$ is just the statement that $S^1subseteq mathbb{R}^2$ is bounded.
Now assume inductively that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset. Let $g:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ be such an embedding.
Because $g(X_m)$ is bounded it lies inside of some cube: $g(X_m)subseteq [a_1, b_1]times [a_2,b_2]times...times [a_{m+1}, b_{m+1}]$. Consider a new function $h:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ given by $h(x) = g(x) + (2|a_1|,0,...,0)$. I leave it to you to show that $h$ is also an embedding and that $h(X_m)subseteq H$.
Great. How does this give an embedding of $X_{m+1}$ into $mathbb{R}^{m+2}$? Well, now that we have $h(X_m)subseteq A$, part C can be used. Can you finish from here?
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
We prove that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset by induction on $m$.
The base case $m=1$ is just the statement that $S^1subseteq mathbb{R}^2$ is bounded.
Now assume inductively that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset. Let $g:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ be such an embedding.
Because $g(X_m)$ is bounded it lies inside of some cube: $g(X_m)subseteq [a_1, b_1]times [a_2,b_2]times...times [a_{m+1}, b_{m+1}]$. Consider a new function $h:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ given by $h(x) = g(x) + (2|a_1|,0,...,0)$. I leave it to you to show that $h$ is also an embedding and that $h(X_m)subseteq H$.
Great. How does this give an embedding of $X_{m+1}$ into $mathbb{R}^{m+2}$? Well, now that we have $h(X_m)subseteq A$, part C can be used. Can you finish from here?
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
We prove that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset by induction on $m$.
The base case $m=1$ is just the statement that $S^1subseteq mathbb{R}^2$ is bounded.
Now assume inductively that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset. Let $g:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ be such an embedding.
Because $g(X_m)$ is bounded it lies inside of some cube: $g(X_m)subseteq [a_1, b_1]times [a_2,b_2]times...times [a_{m+1}, b_{m+1}]$. Consider a new function $h:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ given by $h(x) = g(x) + (2|a_1|,0,...,0)$. I leave it to you to show that $h$ is also an embedding and that $h(X_m)subseteq H$.
Great. How does this give an embedding of $X_{m+1}$ into $mathbb{R}^{m+2}$? Well, now that we have $h(X_m)subseteq A$, part C can be used. Can you finish from here?
We prove that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset by induction on $m$.
The base case $m=1$ is just the statement that $S^1subseteq mathbb{R}^2$ is bounded.
Now assume inductively that $X_m$ embeds into $mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ as a bounded subset. Let $g:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ be such an embedding.
Because $g(X_m)$ is bounded it lies inside of some cube: $g(X_m)subseteq [a_1, b_1]times [a_2,b_2]times...times [a_{m+1}, b_{m+1}]$. Consider a new function $h:X_mrightarrow mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ given by $h(x) = g(x) + (2|a_1|,0,...,0)$. I leave it to you to show that $h$ is also an embedding and that $h(X_m)subseteq H$.
Great. How does this give an embedding of $X_{m+1}$ into $mathbb{R}^{m+2}$? Well, now that we have $h(X_m)subseteq A$, part C can be used. Can you finish from here?
answered Nov 28 at 17:36
Jason DeVito
30.6k475135
30.6k475135
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017388%2frecipe-for-embedding-m-fold-product-x-m-s1-times-times-s1-ont%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown