Definition of sample mean
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I've seen two definitions of sample mean on the internet.
One definition defines it as the average of Random variable other defines it as the average of sample values of a sample.
I'm confused which one is correct.
Also if it is defined as the average of random variables why don't we just define it as the average of sample values?
statistics means sampling
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I've seen two definitions of sample mean on the internet.
One definition defines it as the average of Random variable other defines it as the average of sample values of a sample.
I'm confused which one is correct.
Also if it is defined as the average of random variables why don't we just define it as the average of sample values?
statistics means sampling
For a sample $X_1,X_2,ldots,X_n$ ($X_i$'s being random variables) of size $n$, the sample mean is the statistic $overline X=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n X_i$. If we denote the observed values of the sample by $x_1,ldots,x_n$, then the observed value of the sample mean is $bar x=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n x_i$. I think you are asking the same question as here.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 11 at 13:51
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I've seen two definitions of sample mean on the internet.
One definition defines it as the average of Random variable other defines it as the average of sample values of a sample.
I'm confused which one is correct.
Also if it is defined as the average of random variables why don't we just define it as the average of sample values?
statistics means sampling
I've seen two definitions of sample mean on the internet.
One definition defines it as the average of Random variable other defines it as the average of sample values of a sample.
I'm confused which one is correct.
Also if it is defined as the average of random variables why don't we just define it as the average of sample values?
statistics means sampling
statistics means sampling
asked Nov 11 at 13:27
falcon lover
11
11
For a sample $X_1,X_2,ldots,X_n$ ($X_i$'s being random variables) of size $n$, the sample mean is the statistic $overline X=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n X_i$. If we denote the observed values of the sample by $x_1,ldots,x_n$, then the observed value of the sample mean is $bar x=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n x_i$. I think you are asking the same question as here.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 11 at 13:51
add a comment |
For a sample $X_1,X_2,ldots,X_n$ ($X_i$'s being random variables) of size $n$, the sample mean is the statistic $overline X=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n X_i$. If we denote the observed values of the sample by $x_1,ldots,x_n$, then the observed value of the sample mean is $bar x=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n x_i$. I think you are asking the same question as here.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 11 at 13:51
For a sample $X_1,X_2,ldots,X_n$ ($X_i$'s being random variables) of size $n$, the sample mean is the statistic $overline X=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n X_i$. If we denote the observed values of the sample by $x_1,ldots,x_n$, then the observed value of the sample mean is $bar x=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n x_i$. I think you are asking the same question as here.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 11 at 13:51
For a sample $X_1,X_2,ldots,X_n$ ($X_i$'s being random variables) of size $n$, the sample mean is the statistic $overline X=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n X_i$. If we denote the observed values of the sample by $x_1,ldots,x_n$, then the observed value of the sample mean is $bar x=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n x_i$. I think you are asking the same question as here.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 11 at 13:51
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Given samples ${x_i}_{i=1}^n$ (presumed to be drawn from an underlying distribution $F$, density $f$), the sample mean $bar{x}$ defined as:
$bar{x} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n x_i$
is an estimate of the expected value $mathbb{E}[X]$ of that distribution.
On the other hand, given RVs ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$ (drawn independently from distribution $F$), their average $bar{X}$ defined as:
$bar{X} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n X_i$
is also a random variable with mean $mathbb{E}[bar{X}] = mathbb{E}[X]$ and distribution given by an n-fold convolution of $f$.
It is not meaningful to compare $bar{x}$ and $bar{X}$ directly.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In statistical probability, a single sampled value is a random variable.
If you have a sample consisting of $N$ values, then you have $N$ random variables.
The words "sample value" are just another name for one of these random variables.
So both methods of obtaining a "sample mean" do exactly the same thing.
The mean value of a random variable is a completely different thing.
Be careful not to write "variable" (singular) when the text you are getting your definitions from said "variables" (plural).
It changes the possible interpretation of what you write quite dramatically.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Given samples ${x_i}_{i=1}^n$ (presumed to be drawn from an underlying distribution $F$, density $f$), the sample mean $bar{x}$ defined as:
$bar{x} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n x_i$
is an estimate of the expected value $mathbb{E}[X]$ of that distribution.
On the other hand, given RVs ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$ (drawn independently from distribution $F$), their average $bar{X}$ defined as:
$bar{X} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n X_i$
is also a random variable with mean $mathbb{E}[bar{X}] = mathbb{E}[X]$ and distribution given by an n-fold convolution of $f$.
It is not meaningful to compare $bar{x}$ and $bar{X}$ directly.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Given samples ${x_i}_{i=1}^n$ (presumed to be drawn from an underlying distribution $F$, density $f$), the sample mean $bar{x}$ defined as:
$bar{x} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n x_i$
is an estimate of the expected value $mathbb{E}[X]$ of that distribution.
On the other hand, given RVs ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$ (drawn independently from distribution $F$), their average $bar{X}$ defined as:
$bar{X} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n X_i$
is also a random variable with mean $mathbb{E}[bar{X}] = mathbb{E}[X]$ and distribution given by an n-fold convolution of $f$.
It is not meaningful to compare $bar{x}$ and $bar{X}$ directly.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Given samples ${x_i}_{i=1}^n$ (presumed to be drawn from an underlying distribution $F$, density $f$), the sample mean $bar{x}$ defined as:
$bar{x} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n x_i$
is an estimate of the expected value $mathbb{E}[X]$ of that distribution.
On the other hand, given RVs ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$ (drawn independently from distribution $F$), their average $bar{X}$ defined as:
$bar{X} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n X_i$
is also a random variable with mean $mathbb{E}[bar{X}] = mathbb{E}[X]$ and distribution given by an n-fold convolution of $f$.
It is not meaningful to compare $bar{x}$ and $bar{X}$ directly.
Given samples ${x_i}_{i=1}^n$ (presumed to be drawn from an underlying distribution $F$, density $f$), the sample mean $bar{x}$ defined as:
$bar{x} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n x_i$
is an estimate of the expected value $mathbb{E}[X]$ of that distribution.
On the other hand, given RVs ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$ (drawn independently from distribution $F$), their average $bar{X}$ defined as:
$bar{X} = frac{1}{n} sum_{i=1}^n X_i$
is also a random variable with mean $mathbb{E}[bar{X}] = mathbb{E}[X]$ and distribution given by an n-fold convolution of $f$.
It is not meaningful to compare $bar{x}$ and $bar{X}$ directly.
answered yesterday
Aditya Dua
4906
4906
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In statistical probability, a single sampled value is a random variable.
If you have a sample consisting of $N$ values, then you have $N$ random variables.
The words "sample value" are just another name for one of these random variables.
So both methods of obtaining a "sample mean" do exactly the same thing.
The mean value of a random variable is a completely different thing.
Be careful not to write "variable" (singular) when the text you are getting your definitions from said "variables" (plural).
It changes the possible interpretation of what you write quite dramatically.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In statistical probability, a single sampled value is a random variable.
If you have a sample consisting of $N$ values, then you have $N$ random variables.
The words "sample value" are just another name for one of these random variables.
So both methods of obtaining a "sample mean" do exactly the same thing.
The mean value of a random variable is a completely different thing.
Be careful not to write "variable" (singular) when the text you are getting your definitions from said "variables" (plural).
It changes the possible interpretation of what you write quite dramatically.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
In statistical probability, a single sampled value is a random variable.
If you have a sample consisting of $N$ values, then you have $N$ random variables.
The words "sample value" are just another name for one of these random variables.
So both methods of obtaining a "sample mean" do exactly the same thing.
The mean value of a random variable is a completely different thing.
Be careful not to write "variable" (singular) when the text you are getting your definitions from said "variables" (plural).
It changes the possible interpretation of what you write quite dramatically.
In statistical probability, a single sampled value is a random variable.
If you have a sample consisting of $N$ values, then you have $N$ random variables.
The words "sample value" are just another name for one of these random variables.
So both methods of obtaining a "sample mean" do exactly the same thing.
The mean value of a random variable is a completely different thing.
Be careful not to write "variable" (singular) when the text you are getting your definitions from said "variables" (plural).
It changes the possible interpretation of what you write quite dramatically.
answered yesterday
David K
51.2k340113
51.2k340113
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2993870%2fdefinition-of-sample-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
For a sample $X_1,X_2,ldots,X_n$ ($X_i$'s being random variables) of size $n$, the sample mean is the statistic $overline X=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n X_i$. If we denote the observed values of the sample by $x_1,ldots,x_n$, then the observed value of the sample mean is $bar x=frac{1}{n}sum_{i=1}^n x_i$. I think you are asking the same question as here.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 11 at 13:51