Explanations about the volume of a regular simplex
I'm really sorry, this may sound ridiculous but I can't understand the Wikipedia explanation about the volume of regular n-dimensional simplices, here.
In particular, these two sentences make no sense to me:
If the coordinates of a point in a unit n-box are sorted, together
with 0 and 1, and successive differences are taken, then since the
results add to one, the result is a point in an n simplex spanned by
the origin and the closest n vertices of the box. The taking of
differences was a unimodular (volume-preserving) transformation, but
sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!.
I think this might relate to the section about increasing coordinates (although I can't exactly see how), which I mostly understood but then again this sentence about volume measurement is obscure to me as well:
Indeed, the ordered simplex is a (closed) fundamental domain for the
action of the symmetric group on the n-cube, meaning that the orbit of
the ordered simplex under the n! elements of the symmetric group
divides the n-cube into n! mostly disjoint simplices (disjoint except
for boundaries), showing that this simplex has volume 1/n!.
I'm trying to read about fundamental domains to shed some light on the previous sentence, but it's not the easiest subject.. Help would be muchly appreciated.
volume simplex
add a comment |
I'm really sorry, this may sound ridiculous but I can't understand the Wikipedia explanation about the volume of regular n-dimensional simplices, here.
In particular, these two sentences make no sense to me:
If the coordinates of a point in a unit n-box are sorted, together
with 0 and 1, and successive differences are taken, then since the
results add to one, the result is a point in an n simplex spanned by
the origin and the closest n vertices of the box. The taking of
differences was a unimodular (volume-preserving) transformation, but
sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!.
I think this might relate to the section about increasing coordinates (although I can't exactly see how), which I mostly understood but then again this sentence about volume measurement is obscure to me as well:
Indeed, the ordered simplex is a (closed) fundamental domain for the
action of the symmetric group on the n-cube, meaning that the orbit of
the ordered simplex under the n! elements of the symmetric group
divides the n-cube into n! mostly disjoint simplices (disjoint except
for boundaries), showing that this simplex has volume 1/n!.
I'm trying to read about fundamental domains to shed some light on the previous sentence, but it's not the easiest subject.. Help would be muchly appreciated.
volume simplex
Yes, that is a confusing first sentence, at least taken out of context. It begins by referring to one point in the "unit box" and somehow asserts $n$ or more "vertices of the box", used (together with the origin) to define (span) an $n$-simplex.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 11:43
I guess the point I find non-trivial issince the results add to one
. If this is true, then the point in question is indeed on the standard n-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ (which is a region of the hyperplane $sum_i x_i = 1$). But then I don't understandclosest n vertices on the box
either, since these vertices would always the same; they correspond to the canonical vectors. The n-box has $2^n$ vertices, why introduce such a great uncertainty in the choice of "closest vertices"? Finally, where doesbut sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!
come from?
– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 11:55
1
Taking a point $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)$ "in" the unit box means $0 le x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n le 1$. If the coordinates were sorted (ascending), so that $0 le x_1 le x_2 ;ldots le x_n le 1$, then taking differences $y_i = x_{i+1} - x_i$, where for convenience we take $x_0 = 0$, $x_{n+1} = 1$, we get $y_i in [0,1], i = 0,ldots,n$ such that $sum y_i = 1$.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 12:45
@hardmath You're right, it's just a telescopic sum. Thank you! Well, first point checked then :)
– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 13:31
It seems the idea is to present a map of the "unit box" in $mathbb{R}^n$ onto the standard simplex, and show that it has a nice interpretation as a $n!$ to $1$ mapping that preserves volume on portions where the coordinates are already sorted. I'll have to puzzle over how to present the idea more clearly.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 13:37
add a comment |
I'm really sorry, this may sound ridiculous but I can't understand the Wikipedia explanation about the volume of regular n-dimensional simplices, here.
In particular, these two sentences make no sense to me:
If the coordinates of a point in a unit n-box are sorted, together
with 0 and 1, and successive differences are taken, then since the
results add to one, the result is a point in an n simplex spanned by
the origin and the closest n vertices of the box. The taking of
differences was a unimodular (volume-preserving) transformation, but
sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!.
I think this might relate to the section about increasing coordinates (although I can't exactly see how), which I mostly understood but then again this sentence about volume measurement is obscure to me as well:
Indeed, the ordered simplex is a (closed) fundamental domain for the
action of the symmetric group on the n-cube, meaning that the orbit of
the ordered simplex under the n! elements of the symmetric group
divides the n-cube into n! mostly disjoint simplices (disjoint except
for boundaries), showing that this simplex has volume 1/n!.
I'm trying to read about fundamental domains to shed some light on the previous sentence, but it's not the easiest subject.. Help would be muchly appreciated.
volume simplex
I'm really sorry, this may sound ridiculous but I can't understand the Wikipedia explanation about the volume of regular n-dimensional simplices, here.
In particular, these two sentences make no sense to me:
If the coordinates of a point in a unit n-box are sorted, together
with 0 and 1, and successive differences are taken, then since the
results add to one, the result is a point in an n simplex spanned by
the origin and the closest n vertices of the box. The taking of
differences was a unimodular (volume-preserving) transformation, but
sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!.
I think this might relate to the section about increasing coordinates (although I can't exactly see how), which I mostly understood but then again this sentence about volume measurement is obscure to me as well:
Indeed, the ordered simplex is a (closed) fundamental domain for the
action of the symmetric group on the n-cube, meaning that the orbit of
the ordered simplex under the n! elements of the symmetric group
divides the n-cube into n! mostly disjoint simplices (disjoint except
for boundaries), showing that this simplex has volume 1/n!.
I'm trying to read about fundamental domains to shed some light on the previous sentence, but it's not the easiest subject.. Help would be muchly appreciated.
volume simplex
volume simplex
asked Nov 18 '14 at 11:28
Sheljohn
1,267722
1,267722
Yes, that is a confusing first sentence, at least taken out of context. It begins by referring to one point in the "unit box" and somehow asserts $n$ or more "vertices of the box", used (together with the origin) to define (span) an $n$-simplex.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 11:43
I guess the point I find non-trivial issince the results add to one
. If this is true, then the point in question is indeed on the standard n-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ (which is a region of the hyperplane $sum_i x_i = 1$). But then I don't understandclosest n vertices on the box
either, since these vertices would always the same; they correspond to the canonical vectors. The n-box has $2^n$ vertices, why introduce such a great uncertainty in the choice of "closest vertices"? Finally, where doesbut sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!
come from?
– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 11:55
1
Taking a point $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)$ "in" the unit box means $0 le x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n le 1$. If the coordinates were sorted (ascending), so that $0 le x_1 le x_2 ;ldots le x_n le 1$, then taking differences $y_i = x_{i+1} - x_i$, where for convenience we take $x_0 = 0$, $x_{n+1} = 1$, we get $y_i in [0,1], i = 0,ldots,n$ such that $sum y_i = 1$.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 12:45
@hardmath You're right, it's just a telescopic sum. Thank you! Well, first point checked then :)
– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 13:31
It seems the idea is to present a map of the "unit box" in $mathbb{R}^n$ onto the standard simplex, and show that it has a nice interpretation as a $n!$ to $1$ mapping that preserves volume on portions where the coordinates are already sorted. I'll have to puzzle over how to present the idea more clearly.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 13:37
add a comment |
Yes, that is a confusing first sentence, at least taken out of context. It begins by referring to one point in the "unit box" and somehow asserts $n$ or more "vertices of the box", used (together with the origin) to define (span) an $n$-simplex.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 11:43
I guess the point I find non-trivial issince the results add to one
. If this is true, then the point in question is indeed on the standard n-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ (which is a region of the hyperplane $sum_i x_i = 1$). But then I don't understandclosest n vertices on the box
either, since these vertices would always the same; they correspond to the canonical vectors. The n-box has $2^n$ vertices, why introduce such a great uncertainty in the choice of "closest vertices"? Finally, where doesbut sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!
come from?
– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 11:55
1
Taking a point $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)$ "in" the unit box means $0 le x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n le 1$. If the coordinates were sorted (ascending), so that $0 le x_1 le x_2 ;ldots le x_n le 1$, then taking differences $y_i = x_{i+1} - x_i$, where for convenience we take $x_0 = 0$, $x_{n+1} = 1$, we get $y_i in [0,1], i = 0,ldots,n$ such that $sum y_i = 1$.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 12:45
@hardmath You're right, it's just a telescopic sum. Thank you! Well, first point checked then :)
– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 13:31
It seems the idea is to present a map of the "unit box" in $mathbb{R}^n$ onto the standard simplex, and show that it has a nice interpretation as a $n!$ to $1$ mapping that preserves volume on portions where the coordinates are already sorted. I'll have to puzzle over how to present the idea more clearly.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 13:37
Yes, that is a confusing first sentence, at least taken out of context. It begins by referring to one point in the "unit box" and somehow asserts $n$ or more "vertices of the box", used (together with the origin) to define (span) an $n$-simplex.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 11:43
Yes, that is a confusing first sentence, at least taken out of context. It begins by referring to one point in the "unit box" and somehow asserts $n$ or more "vertices of the box", used (together with the origin) to define (span) an $n$-simplex.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 11:43
I guess the point I find non-trivial is
since the results add to one
. If this is true, then the point in question is indeed on the standard n-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ (which is a region of the hyperplane $sum_i x_i = 1$). But then I don't understand closest n vertices on the box
either, since these vertices would always the same; they correspond to the canonical vectors. The n-box has $2^n$ vertices, why introduce such a great uncertainty in the choice of "closest vertices"? Finally, where does but sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!
come from?– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 11:55
I guess the point I find non-trivial is
since the results add to one
. If this is true, then the point in question is indeed on the standard n-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ (which is a region of the hyperplane $sum_i x_i = 1$). But then I don't understand closest n vertices on the box
either, since these vertices would always the same; they correspond to the canonical vectors. The n-box has $2^n$ vertices, why introduce such a great uncertainty in the choice of "closest vertices"? Finally, where does but sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!
come from?– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 11:55
1
1
Taking a point $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)$ "in" the unit box means $0 le x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n le 1$. If the coordinates were sorted (ascending), so that $0 le x_1 le x_2 ;ldots le x_n le 1$, then taking differences $y_i = x_{i+1} - x_i$, where for convenience we take $x_0 = 0$, $x_{n+1} = 1$, we get $y_i in [0,1], i = 0,ldots,n$ such that $sum y_i = 1$.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 12:45
Taking a point $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)$ "in" the unit box means $0 le x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n le 1$. If the coordinates were sorted (ascending), so that $0 le x_1 le x_2 ;ldots le x_n le 1$, then taking differences $y_i = x_{i+1} - x_i$, where for convenience we take $x_0 = 0$, $x_{n+1} = 1$, we get $y_i in [0,1], i = 0,ldots,n$ such that $sum y_i = 1$.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 12:45
@hardmath You're right, it's just a telescopic sum. Thank you! Well, first point checked then :)
– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 13:31
@hardmath You're right, it's just a telescopic sum. Thank you! Well, first point checked then :)
– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 13:31
It seems the idea is to present a map of the "unit box" in $mathbb{R}^n$ onto the standard simplex, and show that it has a nice interpretation as a $n!$ to $1$ mapping that preserves volume on portions where the coordinates are already sorted. I'll have to puzzle over how to present the idea more clearly.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 13:37
It seems the idea is to present a map of the "unit box" in $mathbb{R}^n$ onto the standard simplex, and show that it has a nice interpretation as a $n!$ to $1$ mapping that preserves volume on portions where the coordinates are already sorted. I'll have to puzzle over how to present the idea more clearly.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 13:37
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You might check the proof of
Cartesian coordinates for vertices of a regular 16-simplex?
for a formula for the regular simplex volume.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1027441%2fexplanations-about-the-volume-of-a-regular-simplex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You might check the proof of
Cartesian coordinates for vertices of a regular 16-simplex?
for a formula for the regular simplex volume.
add a comment |
You might check the proof of
Cartesian coordinates for vertices of a regular 16-simplex?
for a formula for the regular simplex volume.
add a comment |
You might check the proof of
Cartesian coordinates for vertices of a regular 16-simplex?
for a formula for the regular simplex volume.
You might check the proof of
Cartesian coordinates for vertices of a regular 16-simplex?
for a formula for the regular simplex volume.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
1
answered Jul 27 '15 at 21:11
andre
1,262412
1,262412
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1027441%2fexplanations-about-the-volume-of-a-regular-simplex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Yes, that is a confusing first sentence, at least taken out of context. It begins by referring to one point in the "unit box" and somehow asserts $n$ or more "vertices of the box", used (together with the origin) to define (span) an $n$-simplex.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 11:43
I guess the point I find non-trivial is
since the results add to one
. If this is true, then the point in question is indeed on the standard n-simplex in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ (which is a region of the hyperplane $sum_i x_i = 1$). But then I don't understandclosest n vertices on the box
either, since these vertices would always the same; they correspond to the canonical vectors. The n-box has $2^n$ vertices, why introduce such a great uncertainty in the choice of "closest vertices"? Finally, where doesbut sorting compressed the space by a factor of n!
come from?– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 11:55
1
Taking a point $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)$ "in" the unit box means $0 le x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n le 1$. If the coordinates were sorted (ascending), so that $0 le x_1 le x_2 ;ldots le x_n le 1$, then taking differences $y_i = x_{i+1} - x_i$, where for convenience we take $x_0 = 0$, $x_{n+1} = 1$, we get $y_i in [0,1], i = 0,ldots,n$ such that $sum y_i = 1$.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 12:45
@hardmath You're right, it's just a telescopic sum. Thank you! Well, first point checked then :)
– Sheljohn
Nov 18 '14 at 13:31
It seems the idea is to present a map of the "unit box" in $mathbb{R}^n$ onto the standard simplex, and show that it has a nice interpretation as a $n!$ to $1$ mapping that preserves volume on portions where the coordinates are already sorted. I'll have to puzzle over how to present the idea more clearly.
– hardmath
Nov 18 '14 at 13:37