Riemann mapping theorem with pathological boundary
From wikipedia: In complex analysis, the Riemann mapping theorem states that if $U$ is a non-empty simply connected open subset of the complex number plane $mathbb{C}$ which is not all of $mathbb{C}$, then there exists a biholomorphic mapping $f$ (i.e. a bijective holomorphic mapping whose inverse is also holomorphic) from $U$ onto the open unit disk.
Is this also true for the boundary is not smooth? Even the boundary is a Jordan curve? Because we have to transform holomorphically from that to a smooth boundary which for me is not very possible. Or there are some condition omitted in the statement?
complex-analysis riemann-surfaces
asked Nov 30 at 23:26
CO2
1529
add a comment |
From wikipedia: In complex analysis, the Riemann mapping theorem states that if $U$ is a non-empty simply connected open subset of the complex number plane $mathbb{C}$ which is not all of $mathbb{C}$, then there exists a biholomorphic mapping $f$ (i.e. a bijective holomorphic mapping whose inverse is also holomorphic) from $U$ onto the open unit disk.
Is this also true for the boundary is not smooth? Even the boundary is a Jordan curve? Because we have to transform holomorphically from that to a smooth boundary which for me is not very possible. Or there are some condition omitted in the statement?
complex-analysis riemann-surfaces
asked Nov 30 at 23:26
CO2
1529
The wikipedia statement is true in all generality. Boundary smoothness has nothing to do with it.
– zhw.
Nov 30 at 23:54
add a comment |
From wikipedia: In complex analysis, the Riemann mapping theorem states that if $U$ is a non-empty simply connected open subset of the complex number plane $mathbb{C}$ which is not all of $mathbb{C}$, then there exists a biholomorphic mapping $f$ (i.e. a bijective holomorphic mapping whose inverse is also holomorphic) from $U$ onto the open unit disk.
Is this also true for the boundary is not smooth? Even the boundary is a Jordan curve? Because we have to transform holomorphically from that to a smooth boundary which for me is not very possible. Or there are some condition omitted in the statement?
complex-analysis riemann-surfaces
asked Nov 30 at 23:26
CO2
1529
From wikipedia: In complex analysis, the Riemann mapping theorem states that if $U$ is a non-empty simply connected open subset of the complex number plane $mathbb{C}$ which is not all of $mathbb{C}$, then there exists a biholomorphic mapping $f$ (i.e. a bijective holomorphic mapping whose inverse is also holomorphic) from $U$ onto the open unit disk.
Is this also true for the boundary is not smooth? Even the boundary is a Jordan curve? Because we have to transform holomorphically from that to a smooth boundary which for me is not very possible. Or there are some condition omitted in the statement?
complex-analysis riemann-surfaces
complex-analysis riemann-surfaces
asked Nov 30 at 23:26
CO2
1529
asked Nov 30 at 23:26
CO2
1529
asked Nov 30 at 23:26
CO2
1529
asked Nov 30 at 23:26
CO2
1529
asked Nov 30 at 23:26
CO2
1529
1529
The wikipedia statement is true in all generality. Boundary smoothness has nothing to do with it.
– zhw.
Nov 30 at 23:54
add a comment |
The wikipedia statement is true in all generality. Boundary smoothness has nothing to do with it.
– zhw.
Nov 30 at 23:54
The wikipedia statement is true in all generality. Boundary smoothness has nothing to do with it.
– zhw.
Nov 30 at 23:54
The wikipedia statement is true in all generality. Boundary smoothness has nothing to do with it.
– zhw.
Nov 30 at 23:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It is true without any assumption on the boundary. It is another question whether the biholomorphic $h : U to U_1(0)$ extends to homeomorphism $bar{h} : overline{U} to overline{U_1(0)}$. See for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.0439.pdf.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020805%2friemann-mapping-theorem-with-pathological-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is true without any assumption on the boundary. It is another question whether the biholomorphic $h : U to U_1(0)$ extends to homeomorphism $bar{h} : overline{U} to overline{U_1(0)}$. See for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.0439.pdf.
add a comment |
It is true without any assumption on the boundary. It is another question whether the biholomorphic $h : U to U_1(0)$ extends to homeomorphism $bar{h} : overline{U} to overline{U_1(0)}$. See for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.0439.pdf.
add a comment |
It is true without any assumption on the boundary. It is another question whether the biholomorphic $h : U to U_1(0)$ extends to homeomorphism $bar{h} : overline{U} to overline{U_1(0)}$. See for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.0439.pdf.
It is true without any assumption on the boundary. It is another question whether the biholomorphic $h : U to U_1(0)$ extends to homeomorphism $bar{h} : overline{U} to overline{U_1(0)}$. See for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.0439.pdf.
answered Nov 30 at 23:59
community wiki
Paul Frost
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020805%2friemann-mapping-theorem-with-pathological-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The wikipedia statement is true in all generality. Boundary smoothness has nothing to do with it.
– zhw.
Nov 30 at 23:54