$L^{infty}$ translation continuity
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $tau_h$ denote the the translation of $f$ by $h$, i.e $tau_h f(x) = f(x+h)$ . Let $f in L^infty$, then $f$ is not continuous under $h$, i.e $tau_h f$ does not converge to $f$ in the $infty$ norm as $h$ tends to $0$.
My proof: Consider the function given by $2xsin left(frac{1}{x}right) - cos (1/x)$ at $x neq 0$, and $0$ at $x = 0$, restricted to the interval $[-1,1]$. Then, we see that this function is bounded everywhere, but the translation operator is not continuous. Indeed, no matter how small we take $h$, we have at $x = 0$ that $|f_h - f|_infty = |f_h|_infty$ oscillates rapidly between $1$, $-1$, and thus we cannot have convergence under the supremum norm, as it will always bre greater than or equal to $2 -epsilon$ for some point.
real-analysis functional-analysis lp-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $tau_h$ denote the the translation of $f$ by $h$, i.e $tau_h f(x) = f(x+h)$ . Let $f in L^infty$, then $f$ is not continuous under $h$, i.e $tau_h f$ does not converge to $f$ in the $infty$ norm as $h$ tends to $0$.
My proof: Consider the function given by $2xsin left(frac{1}{x}right) - cos (1/x)$ at $x neq 0$, and $0$ at $x = 0$, restricted to the interval $[-1,1]$. Then, we see that this function is bounded everywhere, but the translation operator is not continuous. Indeed, no matter how small we take $h$, we have at $x = 0$ that $|f_h - f|_infty = |f_h|_infty$ oscillates rapidly between $1$, $-1$, and thus we cannot have convergence under the supremum norm, as it will always bre greater than or equal to $2 -epsilon$ for some point.
real-analysis functional-analysis lp-spaces
1
Did you consider first $f = mathbf{1}_{[0, 1]}$ (the indicator function of the interval $[0, 1]$)? (I did not downvote the question.)
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:12
1
Wow. I feel silly
– rubikscube09
Nov 28 at 1:14
2
My instructor, many years past now, used to make us feel silly by giving us counterexamples with the zero or identity matrix (we would always complicate the results too much).
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:16
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $tau_h$ denote the the translation of $f$ by $h$, i.e $tau_h f(x) = f(x+h)$ . Let $f in L^infty$, then $f$ is not continuous under $h$, i.e $tau_h f$ does not converge to $f$ in the $infty$ norm as $h$ tends to $0$.
My proof: Consider the function given by $2xsin left(frac{1}{x}right) - cos (1/x)$ at $x neq 0$, and $0$ at $x = 0$, restricted to the interval $[-1,1]$. Then, we see that this function is bounded everywhere, but the translation operator is not continuous. Indeed, no matter how small we take $h$, we have at $x = 0$ that $|f_h - f|_infty = |f_h|_infty$ oscillates rapidly between $1$, $-1$, and thus we cannot have convergence under the supremum norm, as it will always bre greater than or equal to $2 -epsilon$ for some point.
real-analysis functional-analysis lp-spaces
Let $tau_h$ denote the the translation of $f$ by $h$, i.e $tau_h f(x) = f(x+h)$ . Let $f in L^infty$, then $f$ is not continuous under $h$, i.e $tau_h f$ does not converge to $f$ in the $infty$ norm as $h$ tends to $0$.
My proof: Consider the function given by $2xsin left(frac{1}{x}right) - cos (1/x)$ at $x neq 0$, and $0$ at $x = 0$, restricted to the interval $[-1,1]$. Then, we see that this function is bounded everywhere, but the translation operator is not continuous. Indeed, no matter how small we take $h$, we have at $x = 0$ that $|f_h - f|_infty = |f_h|_infty$ oscillates rapidly between $1$, $-1$, and thus we cannot have convergence under the supremum norm, as it will always bre greater than or equal to $2 -epsilon$ for some point.
real-analysis functional-analysis lp-spaces
real-analysis functional-analysis lp-spaces
asked Nov 28 at 1:09
rubikscube09
1,167717
1,167717
1
Did you consider first $f = mathbf{1}_{[0, 1]}$ (the indicator function of the interval $[0, 1]$)? (I did not downvote the question.)
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:12
1
Wow. I feel silly
– rubikscube09
Nov 28 at 1:14
2
My instructor, many years past now, used to make us feel silly by giving us counterexamples with the zero or identity matrix (we would always complicate the results too much).
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:16
add a comment |
1
Did you consider first $f = mathbf{1}_{[0, 1]}$ (the indicator function of the interval $[0, 1]$)? (I did not downvote the question.)
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:12
1
Wow. I feel silly
– rubikscube09
Nov 28 at 1:14
2
My instructor, many years past now, used to make us feel silly by giving us counterexamples with the zero or identity matrix (we would always complicate the results too much).
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:16
1
1
Did you consider first $f = mathbf{1}_{[0, 1]}$ (the indicator function of the interval $[0, 1]$)? (I did not downvote the question.)
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:12
Did you consider first $f = mathbf{1}_{[0, 1]}$ (the indicator function of the interval $[0, 1]$)? (I did not downvote the question.)
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:12
1
1
Wow. I feel silly
– rubikscube09
Nov 28 at 1:14
Wow. I feel silly
– rubikscube09
Nov 28 at 1:14
2
2
My instructor, many years past now, used to make us feel silly by giving us counterexamples with the zero or identity matrix (we would always complicate the results too much).
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:16
My instructor, many years past now, used to make us feel silly by giving us counterexamples with the zero or identity matrix (we would always complicate the results too much).
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:16
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016567%2fl-infty-translation-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016567%2fl-infty-translation-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Did you consider first $f = mathbf{1}_{[0, 1]}$ (the indicator function of the interval $[0, 1]$)? (I did not downvote the question.)
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:12
1
Wow. I feel silly
– rubikscube09
Nov 28 at 1:14
2
My instructor, many years past now, used to make us feel silly by giving us counterexamples with the zero or identity matrix (we would always complicate the results too much).
– Will M.
Nov 28 at 1:16