Number of integer solutions to $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












What are the number of integer solutions to
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$$ where $x_1 ge 2, x_2, x_3 ge 1, x_4, x_5 ge 0$?



I understand how to do it if it was no "$2x_4$", but just "$x_4$", then its $C(72,4)$... what about with the 2x_4?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
    – RGS
    Nov 29 '16 at 17:53












  • @RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
    – Brian M. Scott
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:01












  • Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
    – Veesha Dawg
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:02










  • @BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
    – RGS
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:03












  • No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
    – Veesha Dawg
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:03















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












What are the number of integer solutions to
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$$ where $x_1 ge 2, x_2, x_3 ge 1, x_4, x_5 ge 0$?



I understand how to do it if it was no "$2x_4$", but just "$x_4$", then its $C(72,4)$... what about with the 2x_4?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
    – RGS
    Nov 29 '16 at 17:53












  • @RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
    – Brian M. Scott
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:01












  • Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
    – Veesha Dawg
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:02










  • @BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
    – RGS
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:03












  • No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
    – Veesha Dawg
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:03













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











What are the number of integer solutions to
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$$ where $x_1 ge 2, x_2, x_3 ge 1, x_4, x_5 ge 0$?



I understand how to do it if it was no "$2x_4$", but just "$x_4$", then its $C(72,4)$... what about with the 2x_4?










share|cite|improve this question















What are the number of integer solutions to
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$$ where $x_1 ge 2, x_2, x_3 ge 1, x_4, x_5 ge 0$?



I understand how to do it if it was no "$2x_4$", but just "$x_4$", then its $C(72,4)$... what about with the 2x_4?







combinatorics diophantine-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 '16 at 18:45









6005

35.6k751125




35.6k751125










asked Nov 29 '16 at 17:34









Veesha Dawg

1018




1018












  • Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
    – RGS
    Nov 29 '16 at 17:53












  • @RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
    – Brian M. Scott
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:01












  • Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
    – Veesha Dawg
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:02










  • @BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
    – RGS
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:03












  • No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
    – Veesha Dawg
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:03


















  • Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
    – RGS
    Nov 29 '16 at 17:53












  • @RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
    – Brian M. Scott
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:01












  • Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
    – Veesha Dawg
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:02










  • @BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
    – RGS
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:03












  • No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
    – Veesha Dawg
    Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
















Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53






Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53














@RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
– Brian M. Scott
Nov 29 '16 at 18:01






@RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
– Brian M. Scott
Nov 29 '16 at 18:01














Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:02




Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:02












@BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03






@BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03














No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03




No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to



$$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$



for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get



$$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$



This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that



$$begin{align*}
sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
&=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
&=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
&=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
end{align*}$$



This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.



    First up, the different conditions



    $$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$



    are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of



    $$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$



    Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve



    $$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$



    right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve



    $$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$



    right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:



    $$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
      – Veesha Dawg
      Nov 29 '16 at 17:50










    • I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
      – Veesha Dawg
      Nov 29 '16 at 17:53


















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    $newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
    newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
    newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
    newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
    newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
    newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
    newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
    newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
    newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
    newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
    newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
    newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
    $$
    bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
    color{#f00}{528,990}}}
    $$




    What are the number of integer solutions to
    begin{equation}
    x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
    x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
    label{1}tag{1}
    end{equation}




    That is given by
    begin{align}
    &sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
    sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
    bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
    \[5mm] = &
    sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
    sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
    bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
    bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
    \[5mm] = &
    bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
    end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2036049%2fnumber-of-integer-solutions-to-x-1-x-2-x-3-2x-4-x-5-72%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to



      $$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$



      for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get



      $$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$



      This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that



      $$begin{align*}
      sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
      &=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
      &=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
      &=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
      end{align*}$$



      This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted










        Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to



        $$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$



        for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get



        $$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$



        This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that



        $$begin{align*}
        sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
        &=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
        &=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
        &=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
        end{align*}$$



        This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted






          Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to



          $$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$



          for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get



          $$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$



          This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that



          $$begin{align*}
          sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
          &=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
          &=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
          &=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
          end{align*}$$



          This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to



          $$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$



          for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get



          $$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$



          This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that



          $$begin{align*}
          sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
          &=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
          &=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
          &=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
          end{align*}$$



          This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 29 '16 at 18:22

























          answered Nov 29 '16 at 17:55









          Brian M. Scott

          454k38505906




          454k38505906






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.



              First up, the different conditions



              $$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$



              are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of



              $$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$



              Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve



              $$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$



              right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve



              $$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$



              right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:



              $$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
                – Veesha Dawg
                Nov 29 '16 at 17:50










              • I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
                – Veesha Dawg
                Nov 29 '16 at 17:53















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.



              First up, the different conditions



              $$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$



              are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of



              $$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$



              Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve



              $$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$



              right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve



              $$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$



              right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:



              $$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
                – Veesha Dawg
                Nov 29 '16 at 17:50










              • I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
                – Veesha Dawg
                Nov 29 '16 at 17:53













              up vote
              1
              down vote










              up vote
              1
              down vote









              EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.



              First up, the different conditions



              $$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$



              are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of



              $$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$



              Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve



              $$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$



              right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve



              $$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$



              right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:



              $$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer














              EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.



              First up, the different conditions



              $$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$



              are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of



              $$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$



              Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve



              $$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$



              right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve



              $$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$



              right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:



              $$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Nov 29 '16 at 18:07

























              answered Nov 29 '16 at 17:44









              RGS

              8,86611129




              8,86611129












              • What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
                – Veesha Dawg
                Nov 29 '16 at 17:50










              • I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
                – Veesha Dawg
                Nov 29 '16 at 17:53


















              • What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
                – Veesha Dawg
                Nov 29 '16 at 17:50










              • I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
                – Veesha Dawg
                Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
















              What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
              – Veesha Dawg
              Nov 29 '16 at 17:50




              What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
              – Veesha Dawg
              Nov 29 '16 at 17:50












              I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
              – Veesha Dawg
              Nov 29 '16 at 17:53




              I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
              – Veesha Dawg
              Nov 29 '16 at 17:53










              up vote
              0
              down vote













              $newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
              newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
              newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
              newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
              newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
              newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
              newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
              newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
              newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
              newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
              newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
              newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
              newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
              newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
              $$
              bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
              color{#f00}{528,990}}}
              $$




              What are the number of integer solutions to
              begin{equation}
              x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
              x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
              label{1}tag{1}
              end{equation}




              That is given by
              begin{align}
              &sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
              sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
              bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
              \[5mm] = &
              sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
              sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
              bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
              bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
              \[5mm] = &
              bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
              end{align}






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                $newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
                newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
                newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
                newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
                newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
                newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
                newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
                newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
                newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
                newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
                newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
                newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
                $$
                bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
                color{#f00}{528,990}}}
                $$




                What are the number of integer solutions to
                begin{equation}
                x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
                x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
                label{1}tag{1}
                end{equation}




                That is given by
                begin{align}
                &sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
                sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
                bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
                \[5mm] = &
                sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
                sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
                bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
                bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
                \[5mm] = &
                bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
                end{align}






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  $newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
                  newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
                  newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
                  newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
                  newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                  newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
                  newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
                  newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
                  newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
                  newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
                  newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                  newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
                  newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
                  newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
                  $$
                  bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
                  color{#f00}{528,990}}}
                  $$




                  What are the number of integer solutions to
                  begin{equation}
                  x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
                  x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
                  label{1}tag{1}
                  end{equation}




                  That is given by
                  begin{align}
                  &sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
                  sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
                  bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
                  \[5mm] = &
                  sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
                  sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
                  bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
                  bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
                  \[5mm] = &
                  bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
                  end{align}






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  $newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
                  newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
                  newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
                  newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
                  newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                  newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
                  newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
                  newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
                  newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
                  newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
                  newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                  newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
                  newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
                  newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
                  $$
                  bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
                  color{#f00}{528,990}}}
                  $$




                  What are the number of integer solutions to
                  begin{equation}
                  x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
                  x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
                  label{1}tag{1}
                  end{equation}




                  That is given by
                  begin{align}
                  &sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
                  sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
                  bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
                  \[5mm] = &
                  sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
                  sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
                  bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
                  bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
                  \[5mm] = &
                  bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
                  end{align}







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 4 '16 at 17:37

























                  answered Nov 30 '16 at 1:23









                  Felix Marin

                  66.8k7107139




                  66.8k7107139






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2036049%2fnumber-of-integer-solutions-to-x-1-x-2-x-3-2x-4-x-5-72%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Berounka

                      Sphinx de Gizeh

                      Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...