Number of integer solutions to $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
What are the number of integer solutions to
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$$ where $x_1 ge 2, x_2, x_3 ge 1, x_4, x_5 ge 0$?
I understand how to do it if it was no "$2x_4$", but just "$x_4$", then its $C(72,4)$... what about with the 2x_4?
combinatorics diophantine-equations
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
What are the number of integer solutions to
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$$ where $x_1 ge 2, x_2, x_3 ge 1, x_4, x_5 ge 0$?
I understand how to do it if it was no "$2x_4$", but just "$x_4$", then its $C(72,4)$... what about with the 2x_4?
combinatorics diophantine-equations
Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
@RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
– Brian M. Scott
Nov 29 '16 at 18:01
Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:02
@BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
|
show 7 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
What are the number of integer solutions to
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$$ where $x_1 ge 2, x_2, x_3 ge 1, x_4, x_5 ge 0$?
I understand how to do it if it was no "$2x_4$", but just "$x_4$", then its $C(72,4)$... what about with the 2x_4?
combinatorics diophantine-equations
What are the number of integer solutions to
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + 2x_4 + x_5 = 72$$ where $x_1 ge 2, x_2, x_3 ge 1, x_4, x_5 ge 0$?
I understand how to do it if it was no "$2x_4$", but just "$x_4$", then its $C(72,4)$... what about with the 2x_4?
combinatorics diophantine-equations
combinatorics diophantine-equations
edited Nov 29 '16 at 18:45
6005
35.6k751125
35.6k751125
asked Nov 29 '16 at 17:34
Veesha Dawg
1018
1018
Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
@RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
– Brian M. Scott
Nov 29 '16 at 18:01
Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:02
@BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
|
show 7 more comments
Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
@RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
– Brian M. Scott
Nov 29 '16 at 18:01
Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:02
@BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
@RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
– Brian M. Scott
Nov 29 '16 at 18:01
@RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
– Brian M. Scott
Nov 29 '16 at 18:01
Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:02
Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:02
@BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
@BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
|
show 7 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to
$$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$
for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get
$$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$
This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that
$$begin{align*}
sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
&=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
&=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
&=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
end{align*}$$
This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.
First up, the different conditions
$$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$
are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of
$$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$
Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve
$$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$
right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve
$$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$
right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:
$$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$
What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:50
I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
$$
bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
color{#f00}{528,990}}}
$$
What are the number of integer solutions to
begin{equation}
x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
label{1}tag{1}
end{equation}
That is given by
begin{align}
&sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
\[5mm] = &
sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
\[5mm] = &
bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
end{align}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2036049%2fnumber-of-integer-solutions-to-x-1-x-2-x-3-2x-4-x-5-72%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to
$$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$
for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get
$$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$
This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that
$$begin{align*}
sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
&=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
&=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
&=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
end{align*}$$
This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to
$$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$
for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get
$$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$
This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that
$$begin{align*}
sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
&=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
&=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
&=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
end{align*}$$
This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to
$$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$
for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get
$$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$
This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that
$$begin{align*}
sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
&=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
&=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
&=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
end{align*}$$
This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.
Move $2x_4$ to the other side and solve a separate $4$-variable problem for each possible value of $x_4$. In other words, you’re counting non-negative solutions to
$$x_1+x_2+x_3+x_5=68-2k$$
for $k=0,ldots,34$, and you get
$$sum_{k=0}^{34}binom{71-2k}3=sum_{k=1}^{35}binom{2k+1}3;.$$
This actually isn’t quite as nasty as it may look. If we calculate the first few values of $$a_n=sum_{k=1}^nbinom{2k+1}3;,$$ we get $a_1=1$, $a_2=10$, $a_3=35$, and $a_4=84$, with first differences $9$, $25$, and $49$. That suggests that we’re looking at sums of odd squares, i.e., that
$$begin{align*}
sum_{k=1}^{n+1}binom{2k}3&=sum_{k=1}^n(2k-1)^2\
&=4sum_{k=1}^nk^2-4sum_{k=1}^nk+sum_{k=1}^n1\
&=frac23n(n+1)(2n+1)-2n(n+1)+n\
&=frac13n(4n^2-1);.
end{align*}$$
This can be straightforwardly proved by induction on $n$.
edited Nov 29 '16 at 18:22
answered Nov 29 '16 at 17:55
Brian M. Scott
454k38505906
454k38505906
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.
First up, the different conditions
$$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$
are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of
$$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$
Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve
$$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$
right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve
$$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$
right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:
$$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$
What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:50
I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.
First up, the different conditions
$$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$
are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of
$$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$
Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve
$$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$
right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve
$$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$
right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:
$$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$
What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:50
I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.
First up, the different conditions
$$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$
are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of
$$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$
Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve
$$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$
right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve
$$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$
right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:
$$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$
EDIT: Thanks @Brian M. Scott for enlightening me. I was confusing two different things.
First up, the different conditions
$$x_1 ge 2; x_2, x_3 ge 1; x_4, x_5 ge 0$$
are rather inconvenient. Let us change the problem to finding the solutions of
$$y_1 + y_2 + y_3 + 2y_4 + y_5 = 68$$ with $y_i ge 0 forall_{i le 5}$
Where we subtracted 2 from $x_1$ and subtracted 1 from each $x_2$ and $x_3$. But then again it is quite inconvenient to have the 2 factor in the middle of the expression. Let us move it to the beginning, shall we? Renaming the variables, we want to solve
$$2x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68, x_i ge 0$$
right? If you fix the value of $x_1 = 2k$, then you want to solve
$$x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 68 - 2k, x_i ge 0$$
right? But that is an easily solvable problem. Since the number of solutions of that equation is given by $C(68 - 2k, 4)$, your answer is just summing up through all values of $68 - 2k$:
$$sum_{i = 0}^{34} C(68 - 2k, 4)$$
edited Nov 29 '16 at 18:07
answered Nov 29 '16 at 17:44
RGS
8,86611129
8,86611129
What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:50
I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
add a comment |
What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:50
I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:50
What would the summation be in terms of combination, would it be C(68-2k,4)?
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:50
I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
I havent done any recurrence yet, how would i do use in combination
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
$$
bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
color{#f00}{528,990}}}
$$
What are the number of integer solutions to
begin{equation}
x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
label{1}tag{1}
end{equation}
That is given by
begin{align}
&sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
\[5mm] = &
sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
\[5mm] = &
bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
end{align}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
$$
bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
color{#f00}{528,990}}}
$$
What are the number of integer solutions to
begin{equation}
x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
label{1}tag{1}
end{equation}
That is given by
begin{align}
&sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
\[5mm] = &
sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
\[5mm] = &
bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
end{align}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
$$
bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
color{#f00}{528,990}}}
$$
What are the number of integer solutions to
begin{equation}
x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
label{1}tag{1}
end{equation}
That is given by
begin{align}
&sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
\[5mm] = &
sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
\[5mm] = &
bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
end{align}
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
$$
bbx{ds{mbox{This answer provides a} underline{numerical} mbox{result}:
color{#f00}{528,990}}}
$$
What are the number of integer solutions to
begin{equation}
x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72 ?quadmbox{where}quad
x_{1} geq 2,;quad x_{2},, x_{3} geq 1,;quad x_{4},, x_{5} geq 0
label{1}tag{1}
end{equation}
That is given by
begin{align}
&sum_{x_{1} = 2}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 1}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 1}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 72}
\[5mm] = &
sum_{x_{1} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{2} = 0}^{infty}
sum_{x_{3} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{4} = 0}^{infty} sum_{x_{5} = 0}^{infty}
bracks{x_{1} + x_{2} + x_{3} + 2x_{4} + x_{5} = 68} =
bracks{z^{68}}bracks{1 over pars{1 - z}^{5}pars{1 + z}}
\[5mm] = &
bbox[#ffe,15px,border:2px dotted navy]{ds{528,990}}
end{align}
edited Dec 4 '16 at 17:37
answered Nov 30 '16 at 1:23
Felix Marin
66.8k7107139
66.8k7107139
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2036049%2fnumber-of-integer-solutions-to-x-1-x-2-x-3-2x-4-x-5-72%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Please note that if you only had $x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 72$ the answer would not be $C(72, 4)$.
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 17:53
@RSerrao: Yes, it would: in effect you’re counting non-negative solutions to $x_1+ldots+x_5=68$.
– Brian M. Scott
Nov 29 '16 at 18:01
Yeah, the 2x4 confuses me.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:02
@BrianM.Scott what do you mean? Isn't the $C(72, 4) $ the same as ${72choose {4}} $?
– RGS
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03
No, it wouldnt, since you have 72 - 2 (for x1), - 1 (for x2) - 1 (for x3) = 68.
– Veesha Dawg
Nov 29 '16 at 18:03