Term by term integration.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
How do I go about proving this statement?
If $$sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$$is a series of nonnegative measurable functions and $$sum_{k=1}^infty left(int_Ef_k(x)dxright)$$ converges, then $$sum_
{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$$ converges almost everywhere and $$int_Eleft(sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)right)dx=sum_{k=1}^inftyleft(int_E f_k(x)dxright)$$
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
How do I go about proving this statement?
If $$sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$$is a series of nonnegative measurable functions and $$sum_{k=1}^infty left(int_Ef_k(x)dxright)$$ converges, then $$sum_
{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$$ converges almost everywhere and $$int_Eleft(sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)right)dx=sum_{k=1}^inftyleft(int_E f_k(x)dxright)$$
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
When asking questions here it is important to describe some of your effort in attacking the problem. I'll a partial answer and leave something for you to finish.
– RRL
Nov 28 at 7:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
How do I go about proving this statement?
If $$sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$$is a series of nonnegative measurable functions and $$sum_{k=1}^infty left(int_Ef_k(x)dxright)$$ converges, then $$sum_
{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$$ converges almost everywhere and $$int_Eleft(sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)right)dx=sum_{k=1}^inftyleft(int_E f_k(x)dxright)$$
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
How do I go about proving this statement?
If $$sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$$is a series of nonnegative measurable functions and $$sum_{k=1}^infty left(int_Ef_k(x)dxright)$$ converges, then $$sum_
{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$$ converges almost everywhere and $$int_Eleft(sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)right)dx=sum_{k=1}^inftyleft(int_E f_k(x)dxright)$$
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
asked Nov 28 at 0:39
ICanMakeYouHateME
154
154
When asking questions here it is important to describe some of your effort in attacking the problem. I'll a partial answer and leave something for you to finish.
– RRL
Nov 28 at 7:44
add a comment |
When asking questions here it is important to describe some of your effort in attacking the problem. I'll a partial answer and leave something for you to finish.
– RRL
Nov 28 at 7:44
When asking questions here it is important to describe some of your effort in attacking the problem. I'll a partial answer and leave something for you to finish.
– RRL
Nov 28 at 7:44
When asking questions here it is important to describe some of your effort in attacking the problem. I'll a partial answer and leave something for you to finish.
– RRL
Nov 28 at 7:44
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
We have for each $x in E$ the convergence of partial sums as $n to infty$ according to
$$sum_{k=1}^n f_k(x) uparrow sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x) leqslant +infty$$
Why is it true that the sequence of partial sums is non-decreasing and
must always converge to a possibly extended nonnegative real number?
By the monotone convergence theorem,
$$sum_{k=1}^inftyint_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty}sum_{k=1}^n int_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty} int_E sum_{k=1}^nf_k(x) , dx = int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx$$
We are given that the series on the LHS converges, and it follows that
$$int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx < +infty$$
What does this tell you about $ sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$?
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016536%2fterm-by-term-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
We have for each $x in E$ the convergence of partial sums as $n to infty$ according to
$$sum_{k=1}^n f_k(x) uparrow sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x) leqslant +infty$$
Why is it true that the sequence of partial sums is non-decreasing and
must always converge to a possibly extended nonnegative real number?
By the monotone convergence theorem,
$$sum_{k=1}^inftyint_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty}sum_{k=1}^n int_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty} int_E sum_{k=1}^nf_k(x) , dx = int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx$$
We are given that the series on the LHS converges, and it follows that
$$int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx < +infty$$
What does this tell you about $ sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$?
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
We have for each $x in E$ the convergence of partial sums as $n to infty$ according to
$$sum_{k=1}^n f_k(x) uparrow sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x) leqslant +infty$$
Why is it true that the sequence of partial sums is non-decreasing and
must always converge to a possibly extended nonnegative real number?
By the monotone convergence theorem,
$$sum_{k=1}^inftyint_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty}sum_{k=1}^n int_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty} int_E sum_{k=1}^nf_k(x) , dx = int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx$$
We are given that the series on the LHS converges, and it follows that
$$int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx < +infty$$
What does this tell you about $ sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$?
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
We have for each $x in E$ the convergence of partial sums as $n to infty$ according to
$$sum_{k=1}^n f_k(x) uparrow sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x) leqslant +infty$$
Why is it true that the sequence of partial sums is non-decreasing and
must always converge to a possibly extended nonnegative real number?
By the monotone convergence theorem,
$$sum_{k=1}^inftyint_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty}sum_{k=1}^n int_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty} int_E sum_{k=1}^nf_k(x) , dx = int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx$$
We are given that the series on the LHS converges, and it follows that
$$int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx < +infty$$
What does this tell you about $ sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$?
We have for each $x in E$ the convergence of partial sums as $n to infty$ according to
$$sum_{k=1}^n f_k(x) uparrow sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x) leqslant +infty$$
Why is it true that the sequence of partial sums is non-decreasing and
must always converge to a possibly extended nonnegative real number?
By the monotone convergence theorem,
$$sum_{k=1}^inftyint_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty}sum_{k=1}^n int_E f_k(x) , dx = lim_{n to infty} int_E sum_{k=1}^nf_k(x) , dx = int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx$$
We are given that the series on the LHS converges, and it follows that
$$int_E sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x), dx < +infty$$
What does this tell you about $ sum_{k=1}^infty f_k(x)$?
edited Nov 28 at 7:50
answered Nov 28 at 7:41
RRL
48.3k42573
48.3k42573
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016536%2fterm-by-term-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
When asking questions here it is important to describe some of your effort in attacking the problem. I'll a partial answer and leave something for you to finish.
– RRL
Nov 28 at 7:44