Method of Moments estimation of a Poisson($theta$)











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $X_1,ldots,X_n$ ~ Poi($theta$). Calculate the estimatorios of moments for $theta$ in the next cases:
Remember that $E(X_1)=Var(X_1)=theta$



(a) $hat{theta}_1$ by equating the first non-central theoretical moment with the first non-central empirical moment.



(b) $hat{theta}_2$ by equating the theoretical variance with the empirical variance.



(c) $hat{theta}_3$ by equating the second non-central theoretical moment with the second non-central empirical moment.



I just want to know if i did it correctly. It seems too easy.



(a) $hat{theta}_1=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i$



(b) $hat{theta}_2=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}(x_i-overline{x}_1)^2$



(c) $hat{theta}_3^2+hat{theta}_3=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i^2$










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $X_1,ldots,X_n$ ~ Poi($theta$). Calculate the estimatorios of moments for $theta$ in the next cases:
    Remember that $E(X_1)=Var(X_1)=theta$



    (a) $hat{theta}_1$ by equating the first non-central theoretical moment with the first non-central empirical moment.



    (b) $hat{theta}_2$ by equating the theoretical variance with the empirical variance.



    (c) $hat{theta}_3$ by equating the second non-central theoretical moment with the second non-central empirical moment.



    I just want to know if i did it correctly. It seems too easy.



    (a) $hat{theta}_1=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i$



    (b) $hat{theta}_2=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}(x_i-overline{x}_1)^2$



    (c) $hat{theta}_3^2+hat{theta}_3=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i^2$










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $X_1,ldots,X_n$ ~ Poi($theta$). Calculate the estimatorios of moments for $theta$ in the next cases:
      Remember that $E(X_1)=Var(X_1)=theta$



      (a) $hat{theta}_1$ by equating the first non-central theoretical moment with the first non-central empirical moment.



      (b) $hat{theta}_2$ by equating the theoretical variance with the empirical variance.



      (c) $hat{theta}_3$ by equating the second non-central theoretical moment with the second non-central empirical moment.



      I just want to know if i did it correctly. It seems too easy.



      (a) $hat{theta}_1=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i$



      (b) $hat{theta}_2=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}(x_i-overline{x}_1)^2$



      (c) $hat{theta}_3^2+hat{theta}_3=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i^2$










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $X_1,ldots,X_n$ ~ Poi($theta$). Calculate the estimatorios of moments for $theta$ in the next cases:
      Remember that $E(X_1)=Var(X_1)=theta$



      (a) $hat{theta}_1$ by equating the first non-central theoretical moment with the first non-central empirical moment.



      (b) $hat{theta}_2$ by equating the theoretical variance with the empirical variance.



      (c) $hat{theta}_3$ by equating the second non-central theoretical moment with the second non-central empirical moment.



      I just want to know if i did it correctly. It seems too easy.



      (a) $hat{theta}_1=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i$



      (b) $hat{theta}_2=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}(x_i-overline{x}_1)^2$



      (c) $hat{theta}_3^2+hat{theta}_3=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i^2$







      statistics statistical-inference






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 28 at 3:45

























      asked Nov 28 at 0:30









      pin_r

      124




      124






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
          $$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
          instead.



          As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
            – pin_r
            Nov 28 at 3:51












          • Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
            – Alejandro Nasif Salum
            Nov 28 at 4:44











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016527%2fmethod-of-moments-estimation-of-a-poisson-theta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
          $$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
          instead.



          As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
            – pin_r
            Nov 28 at 3:51












          • Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
            – Alejandro Nasif Salum
            Nov 28 at 4:44















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
          $$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
          instead.



          As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
            – pin_r
            Nov 28 at 3:51












          • Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
            – Alejandro Nasif Salum
            Nov 28 at 4:44













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
          $$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
          instead.



          As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
          $$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
          instead.



          As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 28 at 4:45

























          answered Nov 28 at 0:38









          Alejandro Nasif Salum

          3,989117




          3,989117












          • My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
            – pin_r
            Nov 28 at 3:51












          • Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
            – Alejandro Nasif Salum
            Nov 28 at 4:44


















          • My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
            – pin_r
            Nov 28 at 3:51












          • Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
            – Alejandro Nasif Salum
            Nov 28 at 4:44
















          My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
          – pin_r
          Nov 28 at 3:51






          My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
          – pin_r
          Nov 28 at 3:51














          Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
          – Alejandro Nasif Salum
          Nov 28 at 4:44




          Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
          – Alejandro Nasif Salum
          Nov 28 at 4:44


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016527%2fmethod-of-moments-estimation-of-a-poisson-theta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Berounka

          Sphinx de Gizeh

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...