Method of Moments estimation of a Poisson($theta$)
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $X_1,ldots,X_n$ ~ Poi($theta$). Calculate the estimatorios of moments for $theta$ in the next cases:
Remember that $E(X_1)=Var(X_1)=theta$
(a) $hat{theta}_1$ by equating the first non-central theoretical moment with the first non-central empirical moment.
(b) $hat{theta}_2$ by equating the theoretical variance with the empirical variance.
(c) $hat{theta}_3$ by equating the second non-central theoretical moment with the second non-central empirical moment.
I just want to know if i did it correctly. It seems too easy.
(a) $hat{theta}_1=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i$
(b) $hat{theta}_2=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}(x_i-overline{x}_1)^2$
(c) $hat{theta}_3^2+hat{theta}_3=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i^2$
statistics statistical-inference
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $X_1,ldots,X_n$ ~ Poi($theta$). Calculate the estimatorios of moments for $theta$ in the next cases:
Remember that $E(X_1)=Var(X_1)=theta$
(a) $hat{theta}_1$ by equating the first non-central theoretical moment with the first non-central empirical moment.
(b) $hat{theta}_2$ by equating the theoretical variance with the empirical variance.
(c) $hat{theta}_3$ by equating the second non-central theoretical moment with the second non-central empirical moment.
I just want to know if i did it correctly. It seems too easy.
(a) $hat{theta}_1=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i$
(b) $hat{theta}_2=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}(x_i-overline{x}_1)^2$
(c) $hat{theta}_3^2+hat{theta}_3=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i^2$
statistics statistical-inference
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $X_1,ldots,X_n$ ~ Poi($theta$). Calculate the estimatorios of moments for $theta$ in the next cases:
Remember that $E(X_1)=Var(X_1)=theta$
(a) $hat{theta}_1$ by equating the first non-central theoretical moment with the first non-central empirical moment.
(b) $hat{theta}_2$ by equating the theoretical variance with the empirical variance.
(c) $hat{theta}_3$ by equating the second non-central theoretical moment with the second non-central empirical moment.
I just want to know if i did it correctly. It seems too easy.
(a) $hat{theta}_1=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i$
(b) $hat{theta}_2=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}(x_i-overline{x}_1)^2$
(c) $hat{theta}_3^2+hat{theta}_3=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i^2$
statistics statistical-inference
Let $X_1,ldots,X_n$ ~ Poi($theta$). Calculate the estimatorios of moments for $theta$ in the next cases:
Remember that $E(X_1)=Var(X_1)=theta$
(a) $hat{theta}_1$ by equating the first non-central theoretical moment with the first non-central empirical moment.
(b) $hat{theta}_2$ by equating the theoretical variance with the empirical variance.
(c) $hat{theta}_3$ by equating the second non-central theoretical moment with the second non-central empirical moment.
I just want to know if i did it correctly. It seems too easy.
(a) $hat{theta}_1=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i$
(b) $hat{theta}_2=overline{x}=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}(x_i-overline{x}_1)^2$
(c) $hat{theta}_3^2+hat{theta}_3=frac{1}{n}sum^{n}_{i=1}x_i^2$
statistics statistical-inference
statistics statistical-inference
edited Nov 28 at 3:45
asked Nov 28 at 0:30
pin_r
124
124
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
$$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
instead.
As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.
My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
– pin_r
Nov 28 at 3:51
Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
– Alejandro Nasif Salum
Nov 28 at 4:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016527%2fmethod-of-moments-estimation-of-a-poisson-theta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
$$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
instead.
As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.
My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
– pin_r
Nov 28 at 3:51
Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
– Alejandro Nasif Salum
Nov 28 at 4:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
$$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
instead.
As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.
My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
– pin_r
Nov 28 at 3:51
Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
– Alejandro Nasif Salum
Nov 28 at 4:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
$$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
instead.
As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.
As for the empirical variance, $mu_1$ cannot be part of the formula, since actually $mu_1=theta$, and then it is not an estimator for $theta$. You should use
$$hat theta_2=frac1n sum(x_i-bar x)^2,$$
instead.
As for $hat theta_3$, that's just how you start; now solve for $hat theta_3$ (it is a quadratic equation), and then you'll have the estimator.
edited Nov 28 at 4:45
answered Nov 28 at 0:38
Alejandro Nasif Salum
3,989117
3,989117
My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
– pin_r
Nov 28 at 3:51
Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
– Alejandro Nasif Salum
Nov 28 at 4:44
add a comment |
My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
– pin_r
Nov 28 at 3:51
Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
– Alejandro Nasif Salum
Nov 28 at 4:44
My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
– pin_r
Nov 28 at 3:51
My translate mistake, so.. $hat{theta}_{1,2}=frac{-1+-sqrt{1-2sum x_i^2}}{2}$
– pin_r
Nov 28 at 3:51
Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
– Alejandro Nasif Salum
Nov 28 at 4:44
Is not $-2$ but $+4$, and you have to choose from both solutions the one that gives a positive value (since $theta >0$). That is $$hattheta_3=frac{-1+sqrt{1+frac4n sum x_i^2}}2.$$
– Alejandro Nasif Salum
Nov 28 at 4:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016527%2fmethod-of-moments-estimation-of-a-poisson-theta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown