Maven conflict in Java app with google-cloud-core-grpc dependency











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2













(I've also raised a GitHub issue for this -
https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/4095)




I have the latest versions of the following 2 dependencies for Apache Beam:



Dependency 1 - google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all



(A distribution of Apache Beam designed to simplify usage of Apache Beam on Google Cloud Dataflow service - https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.cloud.dataflow/google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all)



<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud.dataflow</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all</artifactId>
<version>2.5.0</version>
</dependency>


Dependency 2 - beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



(I'm guessing that this allows the actual running of a Beam pipeline inside a Google Cloud Dataflow)



https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
<artifactId>beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java</artifactId>
<version>2.8.0</version>
</dependency>


The Maven install works fine with these 2 dependencies. I need to add the following (3rd) dependency for independently subscribing to a Google Cloud pub/sub outside of an Apache Beam pipeline:



google-cloud-pubsub



https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.cloud/google-cloud-pubsub



<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-pubsub</artifactId>
<version>1.53.0</version>
</dependency>


(This is the latest version). After this is added I get the following conflict after I do mvn clean install:



Could not resolve version conflict among [com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> com.google.cloud:google-cloud-core-grpc:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> com.google.cloud:google-cloud-core-grpc:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf-lite:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.16.1,1.16.1], com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-stub:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-auth:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.16.1,1.16.1], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.2.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-netty:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-protos:jar:1.0.0-pre3 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.5.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-client-core:jar:1.0.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.7.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-client-core:jar:1.0.0 -> io.opencensus:opencensus-contrib-grpc-util:jar:0.7.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.6.1, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-okhttp:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf-nano:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.2.0


I don't get any Maven install conflict if I remove the Apache Beam dependencies and keep the google-cloud-pubsub dependency.



There's a separate Google 'BOM' (Bill of Materials) dependency manager that's supposed to manage sub-dependencies of Google Cloud dependencies, but this doesn't solve the conflict for me:



  <dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-bom</artifactId>
<version>0.71.0-alpha</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>


I followed the answer to this question -



How do I resolve a dependency conflict in Maven?



and I identified that






  • com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0


has a sub-dependency on:



io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1






  • com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0


has sub-dependencies on various versions of:



io.grpc:grpc-core:jar





(GRPC is A high performance, open-source universal RPC framework)



If I add io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.6.1 as an explicit dependency to my POM file, it doesn't 'pin' the dependency as it still gets pulled in as a sub-dependency by com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0.



On the following GitHub issue, garrettjonesgoogle confirms on 21 Feb that google-cloud-bom doesn't pin the version for io.grpc:grpc-core:



https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/2890



It seems that the Apache Beam dependency manages the varying versions of io.grpc:grpc-core:jar internally, however this conflicts with the (consistent) version used by the Google pub/sub dependency.



Is there anything I can do to work around this? Can I maybe isolate sub-dependencies somehow using Maven?










share|improve this question
























  • Any luck? I'm having the exact same issue at this moment.
    – Iso
    Nov 22 at 19:40










  • @Iso I've added more info but still haven't solved my issue. You can look at the answer to this question which may help you identify what the problem dependency is - stackoverflow.com/questions/37594922/…. If you follow the directions, you should get a text file showing dependencies, comma separated by package. Look for different version numbers of the same sub-dependency across 2 or more different packages. Any package you can see duplicated with different version numbers may be your problem package.
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 23 at 0:41












  • @Iso you could also try this to identify your conflicting dependency, although it didn't work for me it just gave me the same error output that I'm already getting - maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/examples/…
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 23 at 2:32






  • 1




    @Iso I've added an 'answer'. It's not an actual solution but it identifies the cause of my problem. I'm working around this for now. Can you do the same by pollling instead of using pub/sub?
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 25 at 22:30

















up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2













(I've also raised a GitHub issue for this -
https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/4095)




I have the latest versions of the following 2 dependencies for Apache Beam:



Dependency 1 - google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all



(A distribution of Apache Beam designed to simplify usage of Apache Beam on Google Cloud Dataflow service - https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.cloud.dataflow/google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all)



<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud.dataflow</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all</artifactId>
<version>2.5.0</version>
</dependency>


Dependency 2 - beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



(I'm guessing that this allows the actual running of a Beam pipeline inside a Google Cloud Dataflow)



https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
<artifactId>beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java</artifactId>
<version>2.8.0</version>
</dependency>


The Maven install works fine with these 2 dependencies. I need to add the following (3rd) dependency for independently subscribing to a Google Cloud pub/sub outside of an Apache Beam pipeline:



google-cloud-pubsub



https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.cloud/google-cloud-pubsub



<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-pubsub</artifactId>
<version>1.53.0</version>
</dependency>


(This is the latest version). After this is added I get the following conflict after I do mvn clean install:



Could not resolve version conflict among [com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> com.google.cloud:google-cloud-core-grpc:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> com.google.cloud:google-cloud-core-grpc:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf-lite:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.16.1,1.16.1], com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-stub:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-auth:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.16.1,1.16.1], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.2.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-netty:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-protos:jar:1.0.0-pre3 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.5.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-client-core:jar:1.0.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.7.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-client-core:jar:1.0.0 -> io.opencensus:opencensus-contrib-grpc-util:jar:0.7.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.6.1, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-okhttp:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf-nano:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.2.0


I don't get any Maven install conflict if I remove the Apache Beam dependencies and keep the google-cloud-pubsub dependency.



There's a separate Google 'BOM' (Bill of Materials) dependency manager that's supposed to manage sub-dependencies of Google Cloud dependencies, but this doesn't solve the conflict for me:



  <dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-bom</artifactId>
<version>0.71.0-alpha</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>


I followed the answer to this question -



How do I resolve a dependency conflict in Maven?



and I identified that






  • com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0


has a sub-dependency on:



io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1






  • com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0


has sub-dependencies on various versions of:



io.grpc:grpc-core:jar





(GRPC is A high performance, open-source universal RPC framework)



If I add io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.6.1 as an explicit dependency to my POM file, it doesn't 'pin' the dependency as it still gets pulled in as a sub-dependency by com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0.



On the following GitHub issue, garrettjonesgoogle confirms on 21 Feb that google-cloud-bom doesn't pin the version for io.grpc:grpc-core:



https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/2890



It seems that the Apache Beam dependency manages the varying versions of io.grpc:grpc-core:jar internally, however this conflicts with the (consistent) version used by the Google pub/sub dependency.



Is there anything I can do to work around this? Can I maybe isolate sub-dependencies somehow using Maven?










share|improve this question
























  • Any luck? I'm having the exact same issue at this moment.
    – Iso
    Nov 22 at 19:40










  • @Iso I've added more info but still haven't solved my issue. You can look at the answer to this question which may help you identify what the problem dependency is - stackoverflow.com/questions/37594922/…. If you follow the directions, you should get a text file showing dependencies, comma separated by package. Look for different version numbers of the same sub-dependency across 2 or more different packages. Any package you can see duplicated with different version numbers may be your problem package.
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 23 at 0:41












  • @Iso you could also try this to identify your conflicting dependency, although it didn't work for me it just gave me the same error output that I'm already getting - maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/examples/…
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 23 at 2:32






  • 1




    @Iso I've added an 'answer'. It's not an actual solution but it identifies the cause of my problem. I'm working around this for now. Can you do the same by pollling instead of using pub/sub?
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 25 at 22:30















up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2






2






(I've also raised a GitHub issue for this -
https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/4095)




I have the latest versions of the following 2 dependencies for Apache Beam:



Dependency 1 - google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all



(A distribution of Apache Beam designed to simplify usage of Apache Beam on Google Cloud Dataflow service - https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.cloud.dataflow/google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all)



<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud.dataflow</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all</artifactId>
<version>2.5.0</version>
</dependency>


Dependency 2 - beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



(I'm guessing that this allows the actual running of a Beam pipeline inside a Google Cloud Dataflow)



https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
<artifactId>beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java</artifactId>
<version>2.8.0</version>
</dependency>


The Maven install works fine with these 2 dependencies. I need to add the following (3rd) dependency for independently subscribing to a Google Cloud pub/sub outside of an Apache Beam pipeline:



google-cloud-pubsub



https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.cloud/google-cloud-pubsub



<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-pubsub</artifactId>
<version>1.53.0</version>
</dependency>


(This is the latest version). After this is added I get the following conflict after I do mvn clean install:



Could not resolve version conflict among [com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> com.google.cloud:google-cloud-core-grpc:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> com.google.cloud:google-cloud-core-grpc:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf-lite:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.16.1,1.16.1], com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-stub:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-auth:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.16.1,1.16.1], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.2.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-netty:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-protos:jar:1.0.0-pre3 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.5.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-client-core:jar:1.0.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.7.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-client-core:jar:1.0.0 -> io.opencensus:opencensus-contrib-grpc-util:jar:0.7.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.6.1, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-okhttp:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf-nano:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.2.0


I don't get any Maven install conflict if I remove the Apache Beam dependencies and keep the google-cloud-pubsub dependency.



There's a separate Google 'BOM' (Bill of Materials) dependency manager that's supposed to manage sub-dependencies of Google Cloud dependencies, but this doesn't solve the conflict for me:



  <dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-bom</artifactId>
<version>0.71.0-alpha</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>


I followed the answer to this question -



How do I resolve a dependency conflict in Maven?



and I identified that






  • com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0


has a sub-dependency on:



io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1






  • com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0


has sub-dependencies on various versions of:



io.grpc:grpc-core:jar





(GRPC is A high performance, open-source universal RPC framework)



If I add io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.6.1 as an explicit dependency to my POM file, it doesn't 'pin' the dependency as it still gets pulled in as a sub-dependency by com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0.



On the following GitHub issue, garrettjonesgoogle confirms on 21 Feb that google-cloud-bom doesn't pin the version for io.grpc:grpc-core:



https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/2890



It seems that the Apache Beam dependency manages the varying versions of io.grpc:grpc-core:jar internally, however this conflicts with the (consistent) version used by the Google pub/sub dependency.



Is there anything I can do to work around this? Can I maybe isolate sub-dependencies somehow using Maven?










share|improve this question
















(I've also raised a GitHub issue for this -
https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/4095)




I have the latest versions of the following 2 dependencies for Apache Beam:



Dependency 1 - google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all



(A distribution of Apache Beam designed to simplify usage of Apache Beam on Google Cloud Dataflow service - https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.cloud.dataflow/google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all)



<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud.dataflow</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all</artifactId>
<version>2.5.0</version>
</dependency>


Dependency 2 - beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



(I'm guessing that this allows the actual running of a Beam pipeline inside a Google Cloud Dataflow)



https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
<artifactId>beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java</artifactId>
<version>2.8.0</version>
</dependency>


The Maven install works fine with these 2 dependencies. I need to add the following (3rd) dependency for independently subscribing to a Google Cloud pub/sub outside of an Apache Beam pipeline:



google-cloud-pubsub



https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.cloud/google-cloud-pubsub



<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-pubsub</artifactId>
<version>1.53.0</version>
</dependency>


(This is the latest version). After this is added I get the following conflict after I do mvn clean install:



Could not resolve version conflict among [com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> com.google.cloud:google-cloud-core-grpc:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> com.google.cloud:google-cloud-core-grpc:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf-lite:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.16.1,1.16.1], com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-stub:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1, com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-auth:jar:1.16.1 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.16.1,1.16.1], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.2.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-netty:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-protos:jar:1.0.0-pre3 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.5.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-client-core:jar:1.0.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.7.0, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> com.google.cloud.bigtable:bigtable-client-core:jar:1.0.0 -> io.opencensus:opencensus-contrib-grpc-util:jar:0.7.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.6.1, com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-okhttp:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:[1.2.0,1.2.0], com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0 -> org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-google-cloud-platform:jar:2.5.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-all:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-protobuf-nano:jar:1.2.0 -> io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.2.0


I don't get any Maven install conflict if I remove the Apache Beam dependencies and keep the google-cloud-pubsub dependency.



There's a separate Google 'BOM' (Bill of Materials) dependency manager that's supposed to manage sub-dependencies of Google Cloud dependencies, but this doesn't solve the conflict for me:



  <dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-bom</artifactId>
<version>0.71.0-alpha</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>


I followed the answer to this question -



How do I resolve a dependency conflict in Maven?



and I identified that






  • com.google.cloud:google-cloud-pubsub:jar:1.53.0


has a sub-dependency on:



io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.16.1






  • com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0


has sub-dependencies on various versions of:



io.grpc:grpc-core:jar





(GRPC is A high performance, open-source universal RPC framework)



If I add io.grpc:grpc-core:jar:1.6.1 as an explicit dependency to my POM file, it doesn't 'pin' the dependency as it still gets pulled in as a sub-dependency by com.google.cloud.dataflow:google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all:jar:2.5.0.



On the following GitHub issue, garrettjonesgoogle confirms on 21 Feb that google-cloud-bom doesn't pin the version for io.grpc:grpc-core:



https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/2890



It seems that the Apache Beam dependency manages the varying versions of io.grpc:grpc-core:jar internally, however this conflicts with the (consistent) version used by the Google pub/sub dependency.



Is there anything I can do to work around this? Can I maybe isolate sub-dependencies somehow using Maven?







java maven google-cloud-platform google-cloud-dataflow apache-beam






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 25 at 23:28

























asked Nov 22 at 5:15









Chris Halcrow

10.2k46186




10.2k46186












  • Any luck? I'm having the exact same issue at this moment.
    – Iso
    Nov 22 at 19:40










  • @Iso I've added more info but still haven't solved my issue. You can look at the answer to this question which may help you identify what the problem dependency is - stackoverflow.com/questions/37594922/…. If you follow the directions, you should get a text file showing dependencies, comma separated by package. Look for different version numbers of the same sub-dependency across 2 or more different packages. Any package you can see duplicated with different version numbers may be your problem package.
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 23 at 0:41












  • @Iso you could also try this to identify your conflicting dependency, although it didn't work for me it just gave me the same error output that I'm already getting - maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/examples/…
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 23 at 2:32






  • 1




    @Iso I've added an 'answer'. It's not an actual solution but it identifies the cause of my problem. I'm working around this for now. Can you do the same by pollling instead of using pub/sub?
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 25 at 22:30




















  • Any luck? I'm having the exact same issue at this moment.
    – Iso
    Nov 22 at 19:40










  • @Iso I've added more info but still haven't solved my issue. You can look at the answer to this question which may help you identify what the problem dependency is - stackoverflow.com/questions/37594922/…. If you follow the directions, you should get a text file showing dependencies, comma separated by package. Look for different version numbers of the same sub-dependency across 2 or more different packages. Any package you can see duplicated with different version numbers may be your problem package.
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 23 at 0:41












  • @Iso you could also try this to identify your conflicting dependency, although it didn't work for me it just gave me the same error output that I'm already getting - maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/examples/…
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 23 at 2:32






  • 1




    @Iso I've added an 'answer'. It's not an actual solution but it identifies the cause of my problem. I'm working around this for now. Can you do the same by pollling instead of using pub/sub?
    – Chris Halcrow
    Nov 25 at 22:30


















Any luck? I'm having the exact same issue at this moment.
– Iso
Nov 22 at 19:40




Any luck? I'm having the exact same issue at this moment.
– Iso
Nov 22 at 19:40












@Iso I've added more info but still haven't solved my issue. You can look at the answer to this question which may help you identify what the problem dependency is - stackoverflow.com/questions/37594922/…. If you follow the directions, you should get a text file showing dependencies, comma separated by package. Look for different version numbers of the same sub-dependency across 2 or more different packages. Any package you can see duplicated with different version numbers may be your problem package.
– Chris Halcrow
Nov 23 at 0:41






@Iso I've added more info but still haven't solved my issue. You can look at the answer to this question which may help you identify what the problem dependency is - stackoverflow.com/questions/37594922/…. If you follow the directions, you should get a text file showing dependencies, comma separated by package. Look for different version numbers of the same sub-dependency across 2 or more different packages. Any package you can see duplicated with different version numbers may be your problem package.
– Chris Halcrow
Nov 23 at 0:41














@Iso you could also try this to identify your conflicting dependency, although it didn't work for me it just gave me the same error output that I'm already getting - maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/examples/…
– Chris Halcrow
Nov 23 at 2:32




@Iso you could also try this to identify your conflicting dependency, although it didn't work for me it just gave me the same error output that I'm already getting - maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/examples/…
– Chris Halcrow
Nov 23 at 2:32




1




1




@Iso I've added an 'answer'. It's not an actual solution but it identifies the cause of my problem. I'm working around this for now. Can you do the same by pollling instead of using pub/sub?
– Chris Halcrow
Nov 25 at 22:30






@Iso I've added an 'answer'. It's not an actual solution but it identifies the cause of my problem. I'm working around this for now. Can you do the same by pollling instead of using pub/sub?
– Chris Halcrow
Nov 25 at 22:30














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













I was able to workaround this issue buy just excluding grpc-core from google-cloud-pubsub artifact. It gets incorporated in the dependency tree afterwards with the same version 1.13.1 as a dependency of beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



This is the exceprt of the pom.xml which worked for me.



<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>google-cloud-pubsub</artifactId>
<version>1.53.0</version>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>io.grpc</groupId>
<artifactId>grpc-core</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
<artifactId>beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java</artifactId>
<version>2.8.0</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>





share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    This isn't really a solution however I did identify that the issue is mainly with this dependency:



    <dependency>
    <groupId>com.google.cloud.dataflow</groupId>
    <artifactId>google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all</artifactId>
    <version>2.5.0</version>
    </dependency>


    This artifact has a number of inconsistent dependencies on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar and isolation between the Apache Beam and Google pub sub artifacts aren't really working properly. Whatever version of google-cloud-pubsub is being used, its own dependency on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar will conflict with one of the versions of of io.grpc:grpc-core:jar.



    I've raised the following Git issue against the Google artifact:



    https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/4095


    And I've raised the following against the Apache Beam artifact (it points back to the Google issue I raised):



    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6118



    I'm addressing the issue by working around it. I can poll the data I need instead of consuming it from a subscription to the pub/sub however this isn't optimal and will lead to significant increased costs on Google Cloud.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Hey Chris. Excuse me for ignoring your earlier reply. I've got this over-simplified setup for a masterthesis proof-of-concept. I worked around the conflict by separating the projects (as in my case, I was dealing with a bundled Pub/Sub publisher and Dataflow project). This is indeed not optimal, but it will do for the moment being. Thanks for the heads up, i'll keep an eye on the issue.
      – Iso
      Nov 25 at 22:56













    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53424272%2fmaven-conflict-in-java-app-with-google-cloud-core-grpc-dependency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I was able to workaround this issue buy just excluding grpc-core from google-cloud-pubsub artifact. It gets incorporated in the dependency tree afterwards with the same version 1.13.1 as a dependency of beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



    This is the exceprt of the pom.xml which worked for me.



    <dependencies>
    <dependency>
    <groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
    <artifactId>google-cloud-pubsub</artifactId>
    <version>1.53.0</version>
    <exclusions>
    <exclusion>
    <groupId>io.grpc</groupId>
    <artifactId>grpc-core</artifactId>
    </exclusion>
    </exclusions>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
    <groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
    <artifactId>beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java</artifactId>
    <version>2.8.0</version>
    </dependency>
    </dependencies>





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      I was able to workaround this issue buy just excluding grpc-core from google-cloud-pubsub artifact. It gets incorporated in the dependency tree afterwards with the same version 1.13.1 as a dependency of beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



      This is the exceprt of the pom.xml which worked for me.



      <dependencies>
      <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
      <artifactId>google-cloud-pubsub</artifactId>
      <version>1.53.0</version>
      <exclusions>
      <exclusion>
      <groupId>io.grpc</groupId>
      <artifactId>grpc-core</artifactId>
      </exclusion>
      </exclusions>
      </dependency>
      <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
      <artifactId>beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java</artifactId>
      <version>2.8.0</version>
      </dependency>
      </dependencies>





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        I was able to workaround this issue buy just excluding grpc-core from google-cloud-pubsub artifact. It gets incorporated in the dependency tree afterwards with the same version 1.13.1 as a dependency of beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



        This is the exceprt of the pom.xml which worked for me.



        <dependencies>
        <dependency>
        <groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
        <artifactId>google-cloud-pubsub</artifactId>
        <version>1.53.0</version>
        <exclusions>
        <exclusion>
        <groupId>io.grpc</groupId>
        <artifactId>grpc-core</artifactId>
        </exclusion>
        </exclusions>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
        <groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
        <artifactId>beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java</artifactId>
        <version>2.8.0</version>
        </dependency>
        </dependencies>





        share|improve this answer












        I was able to workaround this issue buy just excluding grpc-core from google-cloud-pubsub artifact. It gets incorporated in the dependency tree afterwards with the same version 1.13.1 as a dependency of beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java



        This is the exceprt of the pom.xml which worked for me.



        <dependencies>
        <dependency>
        <groupId>com.google.cloud</groupId>
        <artifactId>google-cloud-pubsub</artifactId>
        <version>1.53.0</version>
        <exclusions>
        <exclusion>
        <groupId>io.grpc</groupId>
        <artifactId>grpc-core</artifactId>
        </exclusion>
        </exclusions>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
        <groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
        <artifactId>beam-runners-google-cloud-dataflow-java</artifactId>
        <version>2.8.0</version>
        </dependency>
        </dependencies>






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 30 at 13:40









        Serg M Ten

        3,36011432




        3,36011432
























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            This isn't really a solution however I did identify that the issue is mainly with this dependency:



            <dependency>
            <groupId>com.google.cloud.dataflow</groupId>
            <artifactId>google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all</artifactId>
            <version>2.5.0</version>
            </dependency>


            This artifact has a number of inconsistent dependencies on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar and isolation between the Apache Beam and Google pub sub artifacts aren't really working properly. Whatever version of google-cloud-pubsub is being used, its own dependency on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar will conflict with one of the versions of of io.grpc:grpc-core:jar.



            I've raised the following Git issue against the Google artifact:



            https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/4095


            And I've raised the following against the Apache Beam artifact (it points back to the Google issue I raised):



            https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6118



            I'm addressing the issue by working around it. I can poll the data I need instead of consuming it from a subscription to the pub/sub however this isn't optimal and will lead to significant increased costs on Google Cloud.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Hey Chris. Excuse me for ignoring your earlier reply. I've got this over-simplified setup for a masterthesis proof-of-concept. I worked around the conflict by separating the projects (as in my case, I was dealing with a bundled Pub/Sub publisher and Dataflow project). This is indeed not optimal, but it will do for the moment being. Thanks for the heads up, i'll keep an eye on the issue.
              – Iso
              Nov 25 at 22:56

















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            This isn't really a solution however I did identify that the issue is mainly with this dependency:



            <dependency>
            <groupId>com.google.cloud.dataflow</groupId>
            <artifactId>google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all</artifactId>
            <version>2.5.0</version>
            </dependency>


            This artifact has a number of inconsistent dependencies on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar and isolation between the Apache Beam and Google pub sub artifacts aren't really working properly. Whatever version of google-cloud-pubsub is being used, its own dependency on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar will conflict with one of the versions of of io.grpc:grpc-core:jar.



            I've raised the following Git issue against the Google artifact:



            https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/4095


            And I've raised the following against the Apache Beam artifact (it points back to the Google issue I raised):



            https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6118



            I'm addressing the issue by working around it. I can poll the data I need instead of consuming it from a subscription to the pub/sub however this isn't optimal and will lead to significant increased costs on Google Cloud.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Hey Chris. Excuse me for ignoring your earlier reply. I've got this over-simplified setup for a masterthesis proof-of-concept. I worked around the conflict by separating the projects (as in my case, I was dealing with a bundled Pub/Sub publisher and Dataflow project). This is indeed not optimal, but it will do for the moment being. Thanks for the heads up, i'll keep an eye on the issue.
              – Iso
              Nov 25 at 22:56















            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            This isn't really a solution however I did identify that the issue is mainly with this dependency:



            <dependency>
            <groupId>com.google.cloud.dataflow</groupId>
            <artifactId>google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all</artifactId>
            <version>2.5.0</version>
            </dependency>


            This artifact has a number of inconsistent dependencies on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar and isolation between the Apache Beam and Google pub sub artifacts aren't really working properly. Whatever version of google-cloud-pubsub is being used, its own dependency on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar will conflict with one of the versions of of io.grpc:grpc-core:jar.



            I've raised the following Git issue against the Google artifact:



            https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/4095


            And I've raised the following against the Apache Beam artifact (it points back to the Google issue I raised):



            https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6118



            I'm addressing the issue by working around it. I can poll the data I need instead of consuming it from a subscription to the pub/sub however this isn't optimal and will lead to significant increased costs on Google Cloud.






            share|improve this answer














            This isn't really a solution however I did identify that the issue is mainly with this dependency:



            <dependency>
            <groupId>com.google.cloud.dataflow</groupId>
            <artifactId>google-cloud-dataflow-java-sdk-all</artifactId>
            <version>2.5.0</version>
            </dependency>


            This artifact has a number of inconsistent dependencies on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar and isolation between the Apache Beam and Google pub sub artifacts aren't really working properly. Whatever version of google-cloud-pubsub is being used, its own dependency on io.grpc:grpc-core:jar will conflict with one of the versions of of io.grpc:grpc-core:jar.



            I've raised the following Git issue against the Google artifact:



            https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-java/issues/4095


            And I've raised the following against the Apache Beam artifact (it points back to the Google issue I raised):



            https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6118



            I'm addressing the issue by working around it. I can poll the data I need instead of consuming it from a subscription to the pub/sub however this isn't optimal and will lead to significant increased costs on Google Cloud.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 25 at 23:10

























            answered Nov 25 at 22:30









            Chris Halcrow

            10.2k46186




            10.2k46186








            • 1




              Hey Chris. Excuse me for ignoring your earlier reply. I've got this over-simplified setup for a masterthesis proof-of-concept. I worked around the conflict by separating the projects (as in my case, I was dealing with a bundled Pub/Sub publisher and Dataflow project). This is indeed not optimal, but it will do for the moment being. Thanks for the heads up, i'll keep an eye on the issue.
              – Iso
              Nov 25 at 22:56
















            • 1




              Hey Chris. Excuse me for ignoring your earlier reply. I've got this over-simplified setup for a masterthesis proof-of-concept. I worked around the conflict by separating the projects (as in my case, I was dealing with a bundled Pub/Sub publisher and Dataflow project). This is indeed not optimal, but it will do for the moment being. Thanks for the heads up, i'll keep an eye on the issue.
              – Iso
              Nov 25 at 22:56










            1




            1




            Hey Chris. Excuse me for ignoring your earlier reply. I've got this over-simplified setup for a masterthesis proof-of-concept. I worked around the conflict by separating the projects (as in my case, I was dealing with a bundled Pub/Sub publisher and Dataflow project). This is indeed not optimal, but it will do for the moment being. Thanks for the heads up, i'll keep an eye on the issue.
            – Iso
            Nov 25 at 22:56






            Hey Chris. Excuse me for ignoring your earlier reply. I've got this over-simplified setup for a masterthesis proof-of-concept. I worked around the conflict by separating the projects (as in my case, I was dealing with a bundled Pub/Sub publisher and Dataflow project). This is indeed not optimal, but it will do for the moment being. Thanks for the heads up, i'll keep an eye on the issue.
            – Iso
            Nov 25 at 22:56




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53424272%2fmaven-conflict-in-java-app-with-google-cloud-core-grpc-dependency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Berounka

            Fiat S.p.A.

            Type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'