Find the residues at the singularities of $frac{z^2 - z}{1-sin{z}}$.
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I've been set a question where I'm asked to classify all of the singularities of
$$f(z) = frac{z^2 - z}{1-sin{z}}$$
and then calculate the residue of each of its singularities. I've found the singularities, all of which are of the form $ z_k =(2k + frac{1}{2})pi$, where $k$ is an integer, and shown each of these to be double poles.
I have the formula for the residue of $f$ at $z_k$ as
$$limlimits_{z to z_k} (frac{d}{dz}((z-z_k)^2f(z))$$
(since $z_k$ is a pole of order 2) but it ends up being really complicated and I can't seem to make it work. Is there a better way to do it?
complex-analysis limits analysis derivatives residue-calculus
New contributor
pixuj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I've been set a question where I'm asked to classify all of the singularities of
$$f(z) = frac{z^2 - z}{1-sin{z}}$$
and then calculate the residue of each of its singularities. I've found the singularities, all of which are of the form $ z_k =(2k + frac{1}{2})pi$, where $k$ is an integer, and shown each of these to be double poles.
I have the formula for the residue of $f$ at $z_k$ as
$$limlimits_{z to z_k} (frac{d}{dz}((z-z_k)^2f(z))$$
(since $z_k$ is a pole of order 2) but it ends up being really complicated and I can't seem to make it work. Is there a better way to do it?
complex-analysis limits analysis derivatives residue-calculus
New contributor
pixuj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The formula you have only works for poles of order 2. It might be a better idea to find the coefficient of $z^{-1}$ on the Laurent series of $f$ around $z_k$. You can do it by finding the Taylor series of $z^2 -z$ and $1-sin(z)$ around $z_k$ and then chasing the wanted coefficient by performing “long division”.
– Alonso Delfín
2 days ago
1
@Alonso I've given it a go but I couldn't do it - would you be able to walk me through (at least the start)?
– pixuj
2 days ago
I just posted an answer with some computations for the pole $pi/2$. I'm sure you'll be able to generalize to all the other poles. Let me know if it helps.
– Alonso Delfín
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I've been set a question where I'm asked to classify all of the singularities of
$$f(z) = frac{z^2 - z}{1-sin{z}}$$
and then calculate the residue of each of its singularities. I've found the singularities, all of which are of the form $ z_k =(2k + frac{1}{2})pi$, where $k$ is an integer, and shown each of these to be double poles.
I have the formula for the residue of $f$ at $z_k$ as
$$limlimits_{z to z_k} (frac{d}{dz}((z-z_k)^2f(z))$$
(since $z_k$ is a pole of order 2) but it ends up being really complicated and I can't seem to make it work. Is there a better way to do it?
complex-analysis limits analysis derivatives residue-calculus
New contributor
pixuj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I've been set a question where I'm asked to classify all of the singularities of
$$f(z) = frac{z^2 - z}{1-sin{z}}$$
and then calculate the residue of each of its singularities. I've found the singularities, all of which are of the form $ z_k =(2k + frac{1}{2})pi$, where $k$ is an integer, and shown each of these to be double poles.
I have the formula for the residue of $f$ at $z_k$ as
$$limlimits_{z to z_k} (frac{d}{dz}((z-z_k)^2f(z))$$
(since $z_k$ is a pole of order 2) but it ends up being really complicated and I can't seem to make it work. Is there a better way to do it?
complex-analysis limits analysis derivatives residue-calculus
complex-analysis limits analysis derivatives residue-calculus
New contributor
pixuj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
pixuj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
New contributor
pixuj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
pixuj
62
62
New contributor
pixuj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
pixuj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
pixuj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The formula you have only works for poles of order 2. It might be a better idea to find the coefficient of $z^{-1}$ on the Laurent series of $f$ around $z_k$. You can do it by finding the Taylor series of $z^2 -z$ and $1-sin(z)$ around $z_k$ and then chasing the wanted coefficient by performing “long division”.
– Alonso Delfín
2 days ago
1
@Alonso I've given it a go but I couldn't do it - would you be able to walk me through (at least the start)?
– pixuj
2 days ago
I just posted an answer with some computations for the pole $pi/2$. I'm sure you'll be able to generalize to all the other poles. Let me know if it helps.
– Alonso Delfín
yesterday
add a comment |
The formula you have only works for poles of order 2. It might be a better idea to find the coefficient of $z^{-1}$ on the Laurent series of $f$ around $z_k$. You can do it by finding the Taylor series of $z^2 -z$ and $1-sin(z)$ around $z_k$ and then chasing the wanted coefficient by performing “long division”.
– Alonso Delfín
2 days ago
1
@Alonso I've given it a go but I couldn't do it - would you be able to walk me through (at least the start)?
– pixuj
2 days ago
I just posted an answer with some computations for the pole $pi/2$. I'm sure you'll be able to generalize to all the other poles. Let me know if it helps.
– Alonso Delfín
yesterday
The formula you have only works for poles of order 2. It might be a better idea to find the coefficient of $z^{-1}$ on the Laurent series of $f$ around $z_k$. You can do it by finding the Taylor series of $z^2 -z$ and $1-sin(z)$ around $z_k$ and then chasing the wanted coefficient by performing “long division”.
– Alonso Delfín
2 days ago
The formula you have only works for poles of order 2. It might be a better idea to find the coefficient of $z^{-1}$ on the Laurent series of $f$ around $z_k$. You can do it by finding the Taylor series of $z^2 -z$ and $1-sin(z)$ around $z_k$ and then chasing the wanted coefficient by performing “long division”.
– Alonso Delfín
2 days ago
1
1
@Alonso I've given it a go but I couldn't do it - would you be able to walk me through (at least the start)?
– pixuj
2 days ago
@Alonso I've given it a go but I couldn't do it - would you be able to walk me through (at least the start)?
– pixuj
2 days ago
I just posted an answer with some computations for the pole $pi/2$. I'm sure you'll be able to generalize to all the other poles. Let me know if it helps.
– Alonso Delfín
yesterday
I just posted an answer with some computations for the pole $pi/2$. I'm sure you'll be able to generalize to all the other poles. Let me know if it helps.
– Alonso Delfín
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I'm going to write the computation for the pole $z_0:=frac{pi}{2}$. You should be able to generalize it for all the other poles. First of all we need to check that indeed $f$ has a pole of order $2$ around $z_0$. To do this let $g(z):=z^2-z$ and $h(z):=1-sin(z)$. Then, notice that near $z_0$ one has
$$
f(z)=frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}(z-z_0)^2+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^4 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^6 + cdots}
$$
Thus,
$$
(z-z_0)^2 f(z)= frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots},
$$
and therefore
$$
lim_{z to z_0} (z-z_0)^2 f(z) = 2frac{g(z_0)}{h''(z_0)}=frac{pi^2-2pi}{2}
$$
This shows that $f$ has indeed a pole of order $2$ around $z_0.$ Now if we let
$$
k(z):=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots,
$$
we have that $(z-z_0)^2 f(z)=frac{g(z)}{k(z)}$, and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) = frac{g'(z)k(z)-g(z)k'(z)}{(k(z))^2}
$$
Note that $k(z_0)=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}=frac{1}{2}$, $k'(z_0)=0$ and that $g'(z_0)=pi-1$. Hence, the residue at $z_0$ is
$$
lim_{z to z_0} left( frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) right) = frac{g'(z_0)frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}}{left( frac{h''(z_0)}{2!} right)^2}=frac{frac{pi-1}{2}}{left( frac{1}{2} right)^2} = 2(pi-1)
$$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I'm going to write the computation for the pole $z_0:=frac{pi}{2}$. You should be able to generalize it for all the other poles. First of all we need to check that indeed $f$ has a pole of order $2$ around $z_0$. To do this let $g(z):=z^2-z$ and $h(z):=1-sin(z)$. Then, notice that near $z_0$ one has
$$
f(z)=frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}(z-z_0)^2+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^4 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^6 + cdots}
$$
Thus,
$$
(z-z_0)^2 f(z)= frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots},
$$
and therefore
$$
lim_{z to z_0} (z-z_0)^2 f(z) = 2frac{g(z_0)}{h''(z_0)}=frac{pi^2-2pi}{2}
$$
This shows that $f$ has indeed a pole of order $2$ around $z_0.$ Now if we let
$$
k(z):=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots,
$$
we have that $(z-z_0)^2 f(z)=frac{g(z)}{k(z)}$, and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) = frac{g'(z)k(z)-g(z)k'(z)}{(k(z))^2}
$$
Note that $k(z_0)=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}=frac{1}{2}$, $k'(z_0)=0$ and that $g'(z_0)=pi-1$. Hence, the residue at $z_0$ is
$$
lim_{z to z_0} left( frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) right) = frac{g'(z_0)frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}}{left( frac{h''(z_0)}{2!} right)^2}=frac{frac{pi-1}{2}}{left( frac{1}{2} right)^2} = 2(pi-1)
$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I'm going to write the computation for the pole $z_0:=frac{pi}{2}$. You should be able to generalize it for all the other poles. First of all we need to check that indeed $f$ has a pole of order $2$ around $z_0$. To do this let $g(z):=z^2-z$ and $h(z):=1-sin(z)$. Then, notice that near $z_0$ one has
$$
f(z)=frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}(z-z_0)^2+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^4 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^6 + cdots}
$$
Thus,
$$
(z-z_0)^2 f(z)= frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots},
$$
and therefore
$$
lim_{z to z_0} (z-z_0)^2 f(z) = 2frac{g(z_0)}{h''(z_0)}=frac{pi^2-2pi}{2}
$$
This shows that $f$ has indeed a pole of order $2$ around $z_0.$ Now if we let
$$
k(z):=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots,
$$
we have that $(z-z_0)^2 f(z)=frac{g(z)}{k(z)}$, and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) = frac{g'(z)k(z)-g(z)k'(z)}{(k(z))^2}
$$
Note that $k(z_0)=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}=frac{1}{2}$, $k'(z_0)=0$ and that $g'(z_0)=pi-1$. Hence, the residue at $z_0$ is
$$
lim_{z to z_0} left( frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) right) = frac{g'(z_0)frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}}{left( frac{h''(z_0)}{2!} right)^2}=frac{frac{pi-1}{2}}{left( frac{1}{2} right)^2} = 2(pi-1)
$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I'm going to write the computation for the pole $z_0:=frac{pi}{2}$. You should be able to generalize it for all the other poles. First of all we need to check that indeed $f$ has a pole of order $2$ around $z_0$. To do this let $g(z):=z^2-z$ and $h(z):=1-sin(z)$. Then, notice that near $z_0$ one has
$$
f(z)=frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}(z-z_0)^2+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^4 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^6 + cdots}
$$
Thus,
$$
(z-z_0)^2 f(z)= frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots},
$$
and therefore
$$
lim_{z to z_0} (z-z_0)^2 f(z) = 2frac{g(z_0)}{h''(z_0)}=frac{pi^2-2pi}{2}
$$
This shows that $f$ has indeed a pole of order $2$ around $z_0.$ Now if we let
$$
k(z):=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots,
$$
we have that $(z-z_0)^2 f(z)=frac{g(z)}{k(z)}$, and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) = frac{g'(z)k(z)-g(z)k'(z)}{(k(z))^2}
$$
Note that $k(z_0)=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}=frac{1}{2}$, $k'(z_0)=0$ and that $g'(z_0)=pi-1$. Hence, the residue at $z_0$ is
$$
lim_{z to z_0} left( frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) right) = frac{g'(z_0)frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}}{left( frac{h''(z_0)}{2!} right)^2}=frac{frac{pi-1}{2}}{left( frac{1}{2} right)^2} = 2(pi-1)
$$
I'm going to write the computation for the pole $z_0:=frac{pi}{2}$. You should be able to generalize it for all the other poles. First of all we need to check that indeed $f$ has a pole of order $2$ around $z_0$. To do this let $g(z):=z^2-z$ and $h(z):=1-sin(z)$. Then, notice that near $z_0$ one has
$$
f(z)=frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}(z-z_0)^2+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^4 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^6 + cdots}
$$
Thus,
$$
(z-z_0)^2 f(z)= frac{g(z)}{frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots},
$$
and therefore
$$
lim_{z to z_0} (z-z_0)^2 f(z) = 2frac{g(z_0)}{h''(z_0)}=frac{pi^2-2pi}{2}
$$
This shows that $f$ has indeed a pole of order $2$ around $z_0.$ Now if we let
$$
k(z):=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}+frac{h^{(4)}(z_0)}{4!}(z-z_0)^2 + frac{h^{(6)}(z_0)}{6!}(z-z_0)^4 + cdots,
$$
we have that $(z-z_0)^2 f(z)=frac{g(z)}{k(z)}$, and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) = frac{g'(z)k(z)-g(z)k'(z)}{(k(z))^2}
$$
Note that $k(z_0)=frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}=frac{1}{2}$, $k'(z_0)=0$ and that $g'(z_0)=pi-1$. Hence, the residue at $z_0$ is
$$
lim_{z to z_0} left( frac{d}{dz}(z-z_0)^2 f(z) right) = frac{g'(z_0)frac{h''(z_0)}{2!}}{left( frac{h''(z_0)}{2!} right)^2}=frac{frac{pi-1}{2}}{left( frac{1}{2} right)^2} = 2(pi-1)
$$
answered yesterday
Alonso Delfín
3,6691932
3,6691932
add a comment |
add a comment |
pixuj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
pixuj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
pixuj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
pixuj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004314%2ffind-the-residues-at-the-singularities-of-fracz2-z1-sinz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The formula you have only works for poles of order 2. It might be a better idea to find the coefficient of $z^{-1}$ on the Laurent series of $f$ around $z_k$. You can do it by finding the Taylor series of $z^2 -z$ and $1-sin(z)$ around $z_k$ and then chasing the wanted coefficient by performing “long division”.
– Alonso Delfín
2 days ago
1
@Alonso I've given it a go but I couldn't do it - would you be able to walk me through (at least the start)?
– pixuj
2 days ago
I just posted an answer with some computations for the pole $pi/2$. I'm sure you'll be able to generalize to all the other poles. Let me know if it helps.
– Alonso Delfín
yesterday