Why is $ab(frac1a)b^2cb^{-3} = c$?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm working through some textbook exercise and am unable to solve the following exercise:




Use the basic rules of algebra to simplify the following expression:
$$abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$$




Within the chapter of the book in question the author has covered:




  • Associative, commutative and distributive properties of an equation

  • Expanding brackets

  • Factoring

  • Quadratic factoring

  • Completing the square


The solution in the answers section is simply "$c$". The equation simplifies to $c$. I cannot for the life of me see how. The solution provided does not give the steps in between, only the final solution $c$.



How can one arrive at $c$ with all the steps in between?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    My +1 for good presentation of the context.
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday










  • The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday






  • 1




    Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
    – Robert Howard
    yesterday















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm working through some textbook exercise and am unable to solve the following exercise:




Use the basic rules of algebra to simplify the following expression:
$$abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$$




Within the chapter of the book in question the author has covered:




  • Associative, commutative and distributive properties of an equation

  • Expanding brackets

  • Factoring

  • Quadratic factoring

  • Completing the square


The solution in the answers section is simply "$c$". The equation simplifies to $c$. I cannot for the life of me see how. The solution provided does not give the steps in between, only the final solution $c$.



How can one arrive at $c$ with all the steps in between?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    My +1 for good presentation of the context.
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday










  • The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday






  • 1




    Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
    – Robert Howard
    yesterday













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm working through some textbook exercise and am unable to solve the following exercise:




Use the basic rules of algebra to simplify the following expression:
$$abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$$




Within the chapter of the book in question the author has covered:




  • Associative, commutative and distributive properties of an equation

  • Expanding brackets

  • Factoring

  • Quadratic factoring

  • Completing the square


The solution in the answers section is simply "$c$". The equation simplifies to $c$. I cannot for the life of me see how. The solution provided does not give the steps in between, only the final solution $c$.



How can one arrive at $c$ with all the steps in between?










share|cite|improve this question















I'm working through some textbook exercise and am unable to solve the following exercise:




Use the basic rules of algebra to simplify the following expression:
$$abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$$




Within the chapter of the book in question the author has covered:




  • Associative, commutative and distributive properties of an equation

  • Expanding brackets

  • Factoring

  • Quadratic factoring

  • Completing the square


The solution in the answers section is simply "$c$". The equation simplifies to $c$. I cannot for the life of me see how. The solution provided does not give the steps in between, only the final solution $c$.



How can one arrive at $c$ with all the steps in between?







algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Robert Howard

1,612622




1,612622










asked yesterday









Doug Fir

1696




1696








  • 1




    My +1 for good presentation of the context.
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday










  • The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday






  • 1




    Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
    – Robert Howard
    yesterday














  • 1




    My +1 for good presentation of the context.
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday










  • The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
    – Yves Daoust
    yesterday






  • 1




    Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
    – Robert Howard
    yesterday








1




1




My +1 for good presentation of the context.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday




My +1 for good presentation of the context.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday












The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday




The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday




1




1




Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
– Robert Howard
yesterday




Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
– Robert Howard
yesterday










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
$$
abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
$$

Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
$$
afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
$$

The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
$$
1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
$$

And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
    – Doug Fir
    yesterday






  • 1




    @DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
    – Decaf-Math
    yesterday










  • I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
    – DreamConspiracy
    14 hours ago


















up vote
1
down vote













First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
    $$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
    the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
    $$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006536%2fwhy-is-ab-frac1ab2cb-3-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted










        First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
        $$
        abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
        $$

        Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
        $$
        afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
        $$

        The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
        $$
        1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
        $$

        And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.






        share|cite|improve this answer





















        • Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
          – Doug Fir
          yesterday






        • 1




          @DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
          – Decaf-Math
          yesterday










        • I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
          – DreamConspiracy
          14 hours ago















        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted










        First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
        $$
        abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
        $$

        Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
        $$
        afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
        $$

        The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
        $$
        1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
        $$

        And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.






        share|cite|improve this answer





















        • Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
          – Doug Fir
          yesterday






        • 1




          @DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
          – Decaf-Math
          yesterday










        • I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
          – DreamConspiracy
          14 hours ago













        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
        $$
        abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
        $$

        Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
        $$
        afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
        $$

        The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
        $$
        1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
        $$

        And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
        $$
        abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
        $$

        Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
        $$
        afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
        $$

        The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
        $$
        1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
        $$

        And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Arthur

        108k7103186




        108k7103186












        • Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
          – Doug Fir
          yesterday






        • 1




          @DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
          – Decaf-Math
          yesterday










        • I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
          – DreamConspiracy
          14 hours ago


















        • Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
          – Doug Fir
          yesterday






        • 1




          @DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
          – Decaf-Math
          yesterday










        • I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
          – DreamConspiracy
          14 hours ago
















        Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
        – Doug Fir
        yesterday




        Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
        – Doug Fir
        yesterday




        1




        1




        @DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
        – Decaf-Math
        yesterday




        @DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
        – Decaf-Math
        yesterday












        I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
        – DreamConspiracy
        14 hours ago




        I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
        – DreamConspiracy
        14 hours ago










        up vote
        1
        down vote













        First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          1
          down vote













          First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            CyclotomicField

            2,0091312




            2,0091312






















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
                $$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
                the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
                $$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
                  $$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
                  the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
                  $$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
                    $$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
                    the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
                    $$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
                    $$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
                    the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
                    $$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    b00n heT

                    10.2k12134




                    10.2k12134






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer






                            New contributor




                            Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered yesterday









                            Valborg

                            111




                            111




                            New contributor




                            Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded



















































                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006536%2fwhy-is-ab-frac1ab2cb-3-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Sphinx de Gizeh

                                Dijon

                                Guerrita