Why is $ab(frac1a)b^2cb^{-3} = c$?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm working through some textbook exercise and am unable to solve the following exercise:
Use the basic rules of algebra to simplify the following expression:
$$abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$$
Within the chapter of the book in question the author has covered:
- Associative, commutative and distributive properties of an equation
- Expanding brackets
- Factoring
- Quadratic factoring
- Completing the square
The solution in the answers section is simply "$c$". The equation simplifies to $c$. I cannot for the life of me see how. The solution provided does not give the steps in between, only the final solution $c$.
How can one arrive at $c$ with all the steps in between?
algebra-precalculus
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm working through some textbook exercise and am unable to solve the following exercise:
Use the basic rules of algebra to simplify the following expression:
$$abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$$
Within the chapter of the book in question the author has covered:
- Associative, commutative and distributive properties of an equation
- Expanding brackets
- Factoring
- Quadratic factoring
- Completing the square
The solution in the answers section is simply "$c$". The equation simplifies to $c$. I cannot for the life of me see how. The solution provided does not give the steps in between, only the final solution $c$.
How can one arrive at $c$ with all the steps in between?
algebra-precalculus
1
My +1 for good presentation of the context.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
1
Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
– Robert Howard
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm working through some textbook exercise and am unable to solve the following exercise:
Use the basic rules of algebra to simplify the following expression:
$$abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$$
Within the chapter of the book in question the author has covered:
- Associative, commutative and distributive properties of an equation
- Expanding brackets
- Factoring
- Quadratic factoring
- Completing the square
The solution in the answers section is simply "$c$". The equation simplifies to $c$. I cannot for the life of me see how. The solution provided does not give the steps in between, only the final solution $c$.
How can one arrive at $c$ with all the steps in between?
algebra-precalculus
I'm working through some textbook exercise and am unable to solve the following exercise:
Use the basic rules of algebra to simplify the following expression:
$$abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$$
Within the chapter of the book in question the author has covered:
- Associative, commutative and distributive properties of an equation
- Expanding brackets
- Factoring
- Quadratic factoring
- Completing the square
The solution in the answers section is simply "$c$". The equation simplifies to $c$. I cannot for the life of me see how. The solution provided does not give the steps in between, only the final solution $c$.
How can one arrive at $c$ with all the steps in between?
algebra-precalculus
algebra-precalculus
edited yesterday
Robert Howard
1,612622
1,612622
asked yesterday
Doug Fir
1696
1696
1
My +1 for good presentation of the context.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
1
Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
– Robert Howard
yesterday
add a comment |
1
My +1 for good presentation of the context.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
1
Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
– Robert Howard
yesterday
1
1
My +1 for good presentation of the context.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
My +1 for good presentation of the context.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
1
1
Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
– Robert Howard
yesterday
Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
– Robert Howard
yesterday
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
$$
abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
$$
Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
$$
afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
$$
The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
$$
1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
$$
And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.
Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
– Doug Fir
yesterday
1
@DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
– Decaf-Math
yesterday
I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
– DreamConspiracy
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
$$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
$$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.
New contributor
Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
$$
abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
$$
Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
$$
afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
$$
The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
$$
1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
$$
And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.
Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
– Doug Fir
yesterday
1
@DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
– Decaf-Math
yesterday
I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
– DreamConspiracy
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
$$
abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
$$
Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
$$
afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
$$
The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
$$
1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
$$
And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.
Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
– Doug Fir
yesterday
1
@DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
– Decaf-Math
yesterday
I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
– DreamConspiracy
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
$$
abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
$$
Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
$$
afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
$$
The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
$$
1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
$$
And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.
First off, associativity means we don't need parentheses, which is good, because there are none given to us. Now, let's use the definition of exponents to get
$$
abfrac1abbcfrac1bfrac1bfrac1b
$$
Then we use commutativity to arrange things alphabetically. This gives us
$$
afrac1abbbfrac1bfrac1bfrac1bc
$$
The definition of fraction gives $afrac1a=1$ (and similarly for $b$). We get
$$
1cdot1cdot1cdot1cdot c
$$
And finally, by definition of $1$, this simplifies to $c$.
answered yesterday
Arthur
108k7103186
108k7103186
Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
– Doug Fir
yesterday
1
@DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
– Decaf-Math
yesterday
I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
– DreamConspiracy
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
– Doug Fir
yesterday
1
@DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
– Decaf-Math
yesterday
I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
– DreamConspiracy
14 hours ago
Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
– Doug Fir
yesterday
Thank you for the crystal clear answer. Deleting this comment in a few minutes...
– Doug Fir
yesterday
1
1
@DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
– Decaf-Math
yesterday
@DougFir, it's fine to leave your comment.
– Decaf-Math
yesterday
I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
– DreamConspiracy
14 hours ago
I find the use of "alphabetically" in a mathematical context weirdly funny. +1
– DreamConspiracy
14 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.
First, note that $ab frac{1}{a} = b$ and then substituting that into the equation we get $bb^2cb^{-3}$ so now we collect all the $b$ terms and the cancel leaving us with $c$ as the simplified expression.
answered yesterday
CyclotomicField
2,0091312
2,0091312
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
$$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
$$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
$$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
$$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
$$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
$$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$
By commutativity and associativity we can rearrange the expression as
$$left(afrac1aright)cdot(bb^2b^{-3})cdot c$$
the first term is clearly $1$. The second term is also $1$ because of how you add powers in a product: indeed
$$bb^2b^{-3}=b^{1+2-3}=b^0=1$$ So all you are left with is $c$
answered yesterday
b00n heT
10.2k12134
10.2k12134
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.
New contributor
Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.
New contributor
Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.
New contributor
Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
All that is needed here from the chapter in question are the associative and commutative properties of multiplication. The expression $abfrac{1}{a}b^2cb^{-3}$ can be re-arranged with commutativity to $afrac{1}{a}bb^2b^{-3}c$, and then this expression can be grouped into $(afrac{1}{a})(bb^2b^{-3})(c)$ with associativity. Those first two groups are both equal to $1$ (assuming of course none of the variables are $0$), and so you will be left with $c$. If this symbolic manipulation is still confusing, try substituting some values in for those variables! Try $a=2$, $b=3$, and $c=5$.
New contributor
Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered yesterday
Valborg
111
111
New contributor
Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Valborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006536%2fwhy-is-ab-frac1ab2cb-3-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
My +1 for good presentation of the context.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
The global exponent of $a$ is $1-1$, that of $b$, $1+2-3$ and that of $c$ is $1$.
– Yves Daoust
yesterday
1
Here's a really helpful tutorial for MathJax formatting: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. It's pretty easy to pick up!
– Robert Howard
yesterday