Banach space with subset whose elements are at least $dgt 0$ far from each other is not separable
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be a Banach space, and $Asubseteq X$ subgroup, where $A$ is not countable, and there is some $d gt 0$ such that for all $x,y in A$: $||x-y||>d$. Prove that $X$ is not separable.
My attempt -
Let's assume that $X$ is separable, and let $B$ be the dense countable subset of $X$. Than $Asubseteq overline B$. Meaning that every element of $A$, is a limit point of some sequence in $B$.
So if I could find a Cauchy sequence in $B$, such that it's limit is in $A$ (that Cauchy sequence has a limit since $X$ is Banach), the property of elements in $A$(that every two elements are at least of distance $d$), would contradict the propeties of Cauchy sequences, and hence $X$ cannot be separable.
Two things that I havn't used are that $B$ is countable and that $A$ is not countable. How can I prove that there is at least one Cauchy sequence in $B$ that converges to some point in $A$?
In fact, how can I know at all that there is Cauchy sequence in $B$?
Or perhaps, is there any other way?
banach-spaces normed-spaces cauchy-sequences separable-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be a Banach space, and $Asubseteq X$ subgroup, where $A$ is not countable, and there is some $d gt 0$ such that for all $x,y in A$: $||x-y||>d$. Prove that $X$ is not separable.
My attempt -
Let's assume that $X$ is separable, and let $B$ be the dense countable subset of $X$. Than $Asubseteq overline B$. Meaning that every element of $A$, is a limit point of some sequence in $B$.
So if I could find a Cauchy sequence in $B$, such that it's limit is in $A$ (that Cauchy sequence has a limit since $X$ is Banach), the property of elements in $A$(that every two elements are at least of distance $d$), would contradict the propeties of Cauchy sequences, and hence $X$ cannot be separable.
Two things that I havn't used are that $B$ is countable and that $A$ is not countable. How can I prove that there is at least one Cauchy sequence in $B$ that converges to some point in $A$?
In fact, how can I know at all that there is Cauchy sequence in $B$?
Or perhaps, is there any other way?
banach-spaces normed-spaces cauchy-sequences separable-spaces
Any help? I'm really stuck here...
– ChikChak
Nov 24 at 17:39
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $X$ be a Banach space, and $Asubseteq X$ subgroup, where $A$ is not countable, and there is some $d gt 0$ such that for all $x,y in A$: $||x-y||>d$. Prove that $X$ is not separable.
My attempt -
Let's assume that $X$ is separable, and let $B$ be the dense countable subset of $X$. Than $Asubseteq overline B$. Meaning that every element of $A$, is a limit point of some sequence in $B$.
So if I could find a Cauchy sequence in $B$, such that it's limit is in $A$ (that Cauchy sequence has a limit since $X$ is Banach), the property of elements in $A$(that every two elements are at least of distance $d$), would contradict the propeties of Cauchy sequences, and hence $X$ cannot be separable.
Two things that I havn't used are that $B$ is countable and that $A$ is not countable. How can I prove that there is at least one Cauchy sequence in $B$ that converges to some point in $A$?
In fact, how can I know at all that there is Cauchy sequence in $B$?
Or perhaps, is there any other way?
banach-spaces normed-spaces cauchy-sequences separable-spaces
Let $X$ be a Banach space, and $Asubseteq X$ subgroup, where $A$ is not countable, and there is some $d gt 0$ such that for all $x,y in A$: $||x-y||>d$. Prove that $X$ is not separable.
My attempt -
Let's assume that $X$ is separable, and let $B$ be the dense countable subset of $X$. Than $Asubseteq overline B$. Meaning that every element of $A$, is a limit point of some sequence in $B$.
So if I could find a Cauchy sequence in $B$, such that it's limit is in $A$ (that Cauchy sequence has a limit since $X$ is Banach), the property of elements in $A$(that every two elements are at least of distance $d$), would contradict the propeties of Cauchy sequences, and hence $X$ cannot be separable.
Two things that I havn't used are that $B$ is countable and that $A$ is not countable. How can I prove that there is at least one Cauchy sequence in $B$ that converges to some point in $A$?
In fact, how can I know at all that there is Cauchy sequence in $B$?
Or perhaps, is there any other way?
banach-spaces normed-spaces cauchy-sequences separable-spaces
banach-spaces normed-spaces cauchy-sequences separable-spaces
edited Nov 25 at 14:37
Ethan Bolker
40.2k545106
40.2k545106
asked Nov 23 at 17:04
ChikChak
769418
769418
Any help? I'm really stuck here...
– ChikChak
Nov 24 at 17:39
add a comment |
Any help? I'm really stuck here...
– ChikChak
Nov 24 at 17:39
Any help? I'm really stuck here...
– ChikChak
Nov 24 at 17:39
Any help? I'm really stuck here...
– ChikChak
Nov 24 at 17:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$X$ is separable iff it contains a dense countable subset. If $A$ if an additive subgroup with points separated more than $d$, then the open sets $(U_a)_{a in A}$ given by
$$
U_a = B_a(d/3),
$$
Form an uncountable family of disjoint open sets. Any dense set must intersect each of them, but by disjointedness this would imply that the dense set has uncountable cardinality.
Nice. So the assumption that $X$ is Banach is not necessary?
– ChikChak
Nov 25 at 14:32
1
I think this works for general topological spaces. If your space admits an uncountable family of nonempty open sets it can not be separable. No need if metrics or completion.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 25 at 14:36
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$X$ is separable iff it contains a dense countable subset. If $A$ if an additive subgroup with points separated more than $d$, then the open sets $(U_a)_{a in A}$ given by
$$
U_a = B_a(d/3),
$$
Form an uncountable family of disjoint open sets. Any dense set must intersect each of them, but by disjointedness this would imply that the dense set has uncountable cardinality.
Nice. So the assumption that $X$ is Banach is not necessary?
– ChikChak
Nov 25 at 14:32
1
I think this works for general topological spaces. If your space admits an uncountable family of nonempty open sets it can not be separable. No need if metrics or completion.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 25 at 14:36
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$X$ is separable iff it contains a dense countable subset. If $A$ if an additive subgroup with points separated more than $d$, then the open sets $(U_a)_{a in A}$ given by
$$
U_a = B_a(d/3),
$$
Form an uncountable family of disjoint open sets. Any dense set must intersect each of them, but by disjointedness this would imply that the dense set has uncountable cardinality.
Nice. So the assumption that $X$ is Banach is not necessary?
– ChikChak
Nov 25 at 14:32
1
I think this works for general topological spaces. If your space admits an uncountable family of nonempty open sets it can not be separable. No need if metrics or completion.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 25 at 14:36
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
$X$ is separable iff it contains a dense countable subset. If $A$ if an additive subgroup with points separated more than $d$, then the open sets $(U_a)_{a in A}$ given by
$$
U_a = B_a(d/3),
$$
Form an uncountable family of disjoint open sets. Any dense set must intersect each of them, but by disjointedness this would imply that the dense set has uncountable cardinality.
$X$ is separable iff it contains a dense countable subset. If $A$ if an additive subgroup with points separated more than $d$, then the open sets $(U_a)_{a in A}$ given by
$$
U_a = B_a(d/3),
$$
Form an uncountable family of disjoint open sets. Any dense set must intersect each of them, but by disjointedness this would imply that the dense set has uncountable cardinality.
answered Nov 25 at 14:30
Adrián González-Pérez
866138
866138
Nice. So the assumption that $X$ is Banach is not necessary?
– ChikChak
Nov 25 at 14:32
1
I think this works for general topological spaces. If your space admits an uncountable family of nonempty open sets it can not be separable. No need if metrics or completion.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 25 at 14:36
add a comment |
Nice. So the assumption that $X$ is Banach is not necessary?
– ChikChak
Nov 25 at 14:32
1
I think this works for general topological spaces. If your space admits an uncountable family of nonempty open sets it can not be separable. No need if metrics or completion.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 25 at 14:36
Nice. So the assumption that $X$ is Banach is not necessary?
– ChikChak
Nov 25 at 14:32
Nice. So the assumption that $X$ is Banach is not necessary?
– ChikChak
Nov 25 at 14:32
1
1
I think this works for general topological spaces. If your space admits an uncountable family of nonempty open sets it can not be separable. No need if metrics or completion.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 25 at 14:36
I think this works for general topological spaces. If your space admits an uncountable family of nonempty open sets it can not be separable. No need if metrics or completion.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 25 at 14:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010594%2fbanach-space-with-subset-whose-elements-are-at-least-d-gt-0-far-from-each-othe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Any help? I'm really stuck here...
– ChikChak
Nov 24 at 17:39