Question about characters ( Section : The Rationality of the Zeta Function associated to...
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am currently reading " A Classic Introduction to Modern Number Theory " by Kenneth Ireland and Michael Rosen. In the 11th chapter they consider the zeta function. In the third section of this chapter they want to show that the Zeta Function is associated to $a_0x_0^m+a_1x_1^m+...+a_nx_n^m$. And I have a lot of questions to this chapter. In this question I will start with an easy question. Let us start with:
My question : So I don't understand (a) and (b). Like you can see we need Proposition 11.2.2. So here:
Like I said: can you proof (a) and (b)? ( not the (a) and (b) from the Proposition. I mean the (a) and (b) of the first picture. ) It is not clear to me. I solved (c) by my own, I think:
$ chi^{'}(a) = chi(N_{F_s/F}(a)) = chi(a^s * N_{F_s/F}(1)) = chi(a^s) = (chi(a))^s $ I used Proposition 11.2.2 (c) for the second equation.
So if you need more information let me know.
number-theory finite-fields characters zeta-functions
asked Nov 23 at 21:22
RukiaKuchiki
297211
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am currently reading " A Classic Introduction to Modern Number Theory " by Kenneth Ireland and Michael Rosen. In the 11th chapter they consider the zeta function. In the third section of this chapter they want to show that the Zeta Function is associated to $a_0x_0^m+a_1x_1^m+...+a_nx_n^m$. And I have a lot of questions to this chapter. In this question I will start with an easy question. Let us start with:
My question : So I don't understand (a) and (b). Like you can see we need Proposition 11.2.2. So here:
Like I said: can you proof (a) and (b)? ( not the (a) and (b) from the Proposition. I mean the (a) and (b) of the first picture. ) It is not clear to me. I solved (c) by my own, I think:
$ chi^{'}(a) = chi(N_{F_s/F}(a)) = chi(a^s * N_{F_s/F}(1)) = chi(a^s) = (chi(a))^s $ I used Proposition 11.2.2 (c) for the second equation.
So if you need more information let me know.
number-theory finite-fields characters zeta-functions
asked Nov 23 at 21:22
RukiaKuchiki
297211
For $F = mathbf{F}_q,E= mathbf{F}_{q^s}$ then $N_{E/F}(a) =prod_{l=1}^s a^{q^l}= a^{(q^s-1)/(q-1)} $ is a root of $y^q-y$ so is in $F$
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:30
Then for $m | q-1$ pick some $g in F^times$ of order $q-1$. Then $chi(0) = 0,chi(g^n) = e^{2i pi n /m}$ is a character of order $m$ and for $gcd(s,m)=1$, $chi_E(a) = chi(N_{E/F}(a))$ is a character of order $m$ of $E^times$ and $exists b in E^times, a = b^m$ iff $chi_E(a) = 1$ iff $sum_{l=1}^m chi(a)^l = m$, the last sum being over the characters of order $| m $.
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:45
Pardon. Am I wrong or do you proof some parts of Proposition 11.2.2? My question was (a) $chi neq rho $ implies $chi^{'} neq rho^{'} $ and (b) $chi^m = varepsilon$ implies $chi^{'m} = varepsilon$. If I misunderstood something, I'm sorry.
– RukiaKuchiki
Nov 23 at 21:51
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am currently reading " A Classic Introduction to Modern Number Theory " by Kenneth Ireland and Michael Rosen. In the 11th chapter they consider the zeta function. In the third section of this chapter they want to show that the Zeta Function is associated to $a_0x_0^m+a_1x_1^m+...+a_nx_n^m$. And I have a lot of questions to this chapter. In this question I will start with an easy question. Let us start with:
My question : So I don't understand (a) and (b). Like you can see we need Proposition 11.2.2. So here:
Like I said: can you proof (a) and (b)? ( not the (a) and (b) from the Proposition. I mean the (a) and (b) of the first picture. ) It is not clear to me. I solved (c) by my own, I think:
$ chi^{'}(a) = chi(N_{F_s/F}(a)) = chi(a^s * N_{F_s/F}(1)) = chi(a^s) = (chi(a))^s $ I used Proposition 11.2.2 (c) for the second equation.
So if you need more information let me know.
number-theory finite-fields characters zeta-functions
asked Nov 23 at 21:22
RukiaKuchiki
297211
I am currently reading " A Classic Introduction to Modern Number Theory " by Kenneth Ireland and Michael Rosen. In the 11th chapter they consider the zeta function. In the third section of this chapter they want to show that the Zeta Function is associated to $a_0x_0^m+a_1x_1^m+...+a_nx_n^m$. And I have a lot of questions to this chapter. In this question I will start with an easy question. Let us start with:
My question : So I don't understand (a) and (b). Like you can see we need Proposition 11.2.2. So here:
Like I said: can you proof (a) and (b)? ( not the (a) and (b) from the Proposition. I mean the (a) and (b) of the first picture. ) It is not clear to me. I solved (c) by my own, I think:
$ chi^{'}(a) = chi(N_{F_s/F}(a)) = chi(a^s * N_{F_s/F}(1)) = chi(a^s) = (chi(a))^s $ I used Proposition 11.2.2 (c) for the second equation.
So if you need more information let me know.
number-theory finite-fields characters zeta-functions
number-theory finite-fields characters zeta-functions
asked Nov 23 at 21:22
RukiaKuchiki
297211
asked Nov 23 at 21:22
RukiaKuchiki
297211
edited Nov 25 at 14:25
asked Nov 23 at 21:22
RukiaKuchiki
297211
asked Nov 23 at 21:22
RukiaKuchiki
297211
asked Nov 23 at 21:22
RukiaKuchiki
297211
297211
For $F = mathbf{F}_q,E= mathbf{F}_{q^s}$ then $N_{E/F}(a) =prod_{l=1}^s a^{q^l}= a^{(q^s-1)/(q-1)} $ is a root of $y^q-y$ so is in $F$
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:30
Then for $m | q-1$ pick some $g in F^times$ of order $q-1$. Then $chi(0) = 0,chi(g^n) = e^{2i pi n /m}$ is a character of order $m$ and for $gcd(s,m)=1$, $chi_E(a) = chi(N_{E/F}(a))$ is a character of order $m$ of $E^times$ and $exists b in E^times, a = b^m$ iff $chi_E(a) = 1$ iff $sum_{l=1}^m chi(a)^l = m$, the last sum being over the characters of order $| m $.
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:45
Pardon. Am I wrong or do you proof some parts of Proposition 11.2.2? My question was (a) $chi neq rho $ implies $chi^{'} neq rho^{'} $ and (b) $chi^m = varepsilon$ implies $chi^{'m} = varepsilon$. If I misunderstood something, I'm sorry.
– RukiaKuchiki
Nov 23 at 21:51
add a comment |
For $F = mathbf{F}_q,E= mathbf{F}_{q^s}$ then $N_{E/F}(a) =prod_{l=1}^s a^{q^l}= a^{(q^s-1)/(q-1)} $ is a root of $y^q-y$ so is in $F$
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:30
Then for $m | q-1$ pick some $g in F^times$ of order $q-1$. Then $chi(0) = 0,chi(g^n) = e^{2i pi n /m}$ is a character of order $m$ and for $gcd(s,m)=1$, $chi_E(a) = chi(N_{E/F}(a))$ is a character of order $m$ of $E^times$ and $exists b in E^times, a = b^m$ iff $chi_E(a) = 1$ iff $sum_{l=1}^m chi(a)^l = m$, the last sum being over the characters of order $| m $.
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:45
Pardon. Am I wrong or do you proof some parts of Proposition 11.2.2? My question was (a) $chi neq rho $ implies $chi^{'} neq rho^{'} $ and (b) $chi^m = varepsilon$ implies $chi^{'m} = varepsilon$. If I misunderstood something, I'm sorry.
– RukiaKuchiki
Nov 23 at 21:51
For $F = mathbf{F}_q,E= mathbf{F}_{q^s}$ then $N_{E/F}(a) =prod_{l=1}^s a^{q^l}= a^{(q^s-1)/(q-1)} $ is a root of $y^q-y$ so is in $F$
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:30
For $F = mathbf{F}_q,E= mathbf{F}_{q^s}$ then $N_{E/F}(a) =prod_{l=1}^s a^{q^l}= a^{(q^s-1)/(q-1)} $ is a root of $y^q-y$ so is in $F$
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:30
Then for $m | q-1$ pick some $g in F^times$ of order $q-1$. Then $chi(0) = 0,chi(g^n) = e^{2i pi n /m}$ is a character of order $m$ and for $gcd(s,m)=1$, $chi_E(a) = chi(N_{E/F}(a))$ is a character of order $m$ of $E^times$ and $exists b in E^times, a = b^m$ iff $chi_E(a) = 1$ iff $sum_{l=1}^m chi(a)^l = m$, the last sum being over the characters of order $| m $.
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:45
Then for $m | q-1$ pick some $g in F^times$ of order $q-1$. Then $chi(0) = 0,chi(g^n) = e^{2i pi n /m}$ is a character of order $m$ and for $gcd(s,m)=1$, $chi_E(a) = chi(N_{E/F}(a))$ is a character of order $m$ of $E^times$ and $exists b in E^times, a = b^m$ iff $chi_E(a) = 1$ iff $sum_{l=1}^m chi(a)^l = m$, the last sum being over the characters of order $| m $.
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:45
Pardon. Am I wrong or do you proof some parts of Proposition 11.2.2? My question was (a) $chi neq rho $ implies $chi^{'} neq rho^{'} $ and (b) $chi^m = varepsilon$ implies $chi^{'m} = varepsilon$. If I misunderstood something, I'm sorry.
– RukiaKuchiki
Nov 23 at 21:51
Pardon. Am I wrong or do you proof some parts of Proposition 11.2.2? My question was (a) $chi neq rho $ implies $chi^{'} neq rho^{'} $ and (b) $chi^m = varepsilon$ implies $chi^{'m} = varepsilon$. If I misunderstood something, I'm sorry.
– RukiaKuchiki
Nov 23 at 21:51
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010853%2fquestion-about-characters-section-the-rationality-of-the-zeta-function-assoc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
For $F = mathbf{F}_q,E= mathbf{F}_{q^s}$ then $N_{E/F}(a) =prod_{l=1}^s a^{q^l}= a^{(q^s-1)/(q-1)} $ is a root of $y^q-y$ so is in $F$
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:30
Then for $m | q-1$ pick some $g in F^times$ of order $q-1$. Then $chi(0) = 0,chi(g^n) = e^{2i pi n /m}$ is a character of order $m$ and for $gcd(s,m)=1$, $chi_E(a) = chi(N_{E/F}(a))$ is a character of order $m$ of $E^times$ and $exists b in E^times, a = b^m$ iff $chi_E(a) = 1$ iff $sum_{l=1}^m chi(a)^l = m$, the last sum being over the characters of order $| m $.
– reuns
Nov 23 at 21:45
Pardon. Am I wrong or do you proof some parts of Proposition 11.2.2? My question was (a) $chi neq rho $ implies $chi^{'} neq rho^{'} $ and (b) $chi^m = varepsilon$ implies $chi^{'m} = varepsilon$. If I misunderstood something, I'm sorry.
– RukiaKuchiki
Nov 23 at 21:51