Show that inverse of this continuous function is continuous
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question is from baby Rudin, Ch 5, exer 2:
Suppose $f'(x)>0$ in $(a,b)$. Hence $f$ is strictly increasing in $(a,b)$. Let $g=f^{-1}$. Prove $g'(f(x))=frac1{f'(x)}$.
The solution I have uses the fact thaty $g$, the inverse of $f$, is continuous. But Rudin, in Th 4.17 says that 'Suppose $f$ is continuous bijection from compact metric space $X$ to metric space $Y$, then $f^{-1}$ continuous from $Y$ to $X$.'
Since domain I have is not compact, I can't apply th 4.17 directly. So, I tried looking at $[c,d]subset(a,b)$ and noting $$g|_{f([c,d])}:f([c,d])to [c,d]$$ continuous by th 4.17. Now, I tried to apply pasting lemma, but realized that pasting lemma may not hold for infinitely many closed subsets of domain.
So, how to show that $g$ indeed continuous on $(a,b)$?
real-analysis derivatives continuity
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question is from baby Rudin, Ch 5, exer 2:
Suppose $f'(x)>0$ in $(a,b)$. Hence $f$ is strictly increasing in $(a,b)$. Let $g=f^{-1}$. Prove $g'(f(x))=frac1{f'(x)}$.
The solution I have uses the fact thaty $g$, the inverse of $f$, is continuous. But Rudin, in Th 4.17 says that 'Suppose $f$ is continuous bijection from compact metric space $X$ to metric space $Y$, then $f^{-1}$ continuous from $Y$ to $X$.'
Since domain I have is not compact, I can't apply th 4.17 directly. So, I tried looking at $[c,d]subset(a,b)$ and noting $$g|_{f([c,d])}:f([c,d])to [c,d]$$ continuous by th 4.17. Now, I tried to apply pasting lemma, but realized that pasting lemma may not hold for infinitely many closed subsets of domain.
So, how to show that $g$ indeed continuous on $(a,b)$?
real-analysis derivatives continuity
Continuity is a local notion. We say $f$ is continuous on $(a,b)$ iff $f$ is continuous at each $x in (a,b)$. For your question, I think you do not need the pasting lemma. Your attempts actually completely showed the continuity of $g$ on $f(a,b)$.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 13:58
As an alternative, just prove the continuity by definition. Make use of the assumption that $f$ is continuous and strictly increasing. Maybe first prove the monotonicity of $g$, then the continuity.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 14:05
@xbh, thanks for reply. But, if we take function $f$ from $[0,1)cup[2,3]to[0,2]$ defined by $f(x)=x$ if $xin[0,1)$ and $f(x)=x-1$ if $xin[2,3]$, and consider $[c,d]subset[0,1)$ and $[c,d]subset[2,3]$, then $f^{-1}$ seems continuous by my above argument, but it is not!
– Silent
Nov 25 at 14:18
@Silent: but $f^{-1}$ is continuous on any compact subset of $f([0,1)cup[2,3])$ and that is all you need.
– Matematleta
Nov 25 at 14:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question is from baby Rudin, Ch 5, exer 2:
Suppose $f'(x)>0$ in $(a,b)$. Hence $f$ is strictly increasing in $(a,b)$. Let $g=f^{-1}$. Prove $g'(f(x))=frac1{f'(x)}$.
The solution I have uses the fact thaty $g$, the inverse of $f$, is continuous. But Rudin, in Th 4.17 says that 'Suppose $f$ is continuous bijection from compact metric space $X$ to metric space $Y$, then $f^{-1}$ continuous from $Y$ to $X$.'
Since domain I have is not compact, I can't apply th 4.17 directly. So, I tried looking at $[c,d]subset(a,b)$ and noting $$g|_{f([c,d])}:f([c,d])to [c,d]$$ continuous by th 4.17. Now, I tried to apply pasting lemma, but realized that pasting lemma may not hold for infinitely many closed subsets of domain.
So, how to show that $g$ indeed continuous on $(a,b)$?
real-analysis derivatives continuity
This question is from baby Rudin, Ch 5, exer 2:
Suppose $f'(x)>0$ in $(a,b)$. Hence $f$ is strictly increasing in $(a,b)$. Let $g=f^{-1}$. Prove $g'(f(x))=frac1{f'(x)}$.
The solution I have uses the fact thaty $g$, the inverse of $f$, is continuous. But Rudin, in Th 4.17 says that 'Suppose $f$ is continuous bijection from compact metric space $X$ to metric space $Y$, then $f^{-1}$ continuous from $Y$ to $X$.'
Since domain I have is not compact, I can't apply th 4.17 directly. So, I tried looking at $[c,d]subset(a,b)$ and noting $$g|_{f([c,d])}:f([c,d])to [c,d]$$ continuous by th 4.17. Now, I tried to apply pasting lemma, but realized that pasting lemma may not hold for infinitely many closed subsets of domain.
So, how to show that $g$ indeed continuous on $(a,b)$?
real-analysis derivatives continuity
real-analysis derivatives continuity
asked Nov 25 at 13:45
Silent
2,63732050
2,63732050
Continuity is a local notion. We say $f$ is continuous on $(a,b)$ iff $f$ is continuous at each $x in (a,b)$. For your question, I think you do not need the pasting lemma. Your attempts actually completely showed the continuity of $g$ on $f(a,b)$.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 13:58
As an alternative, just prove the continuity by definition. Make use of the assumption that $f$ is continuous and strictly increasing. Maybe first prove the monotonicity of $g$, then the continuity.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 14:05
@xbh, thanks for reply. But, if we take function $f$ from $[0,1)cup[2,3]to[0,2]$ defined by $f(x)=x$ if $xin[0,1)$ and $f(x)=x-1$ if $xin[2,3]$, and consider $[c,d]subset[0,1)$ and $[c,d]subset[2,3]$, then $f^{-1}$ seems continuous by my above argument, but it is not!
– Silent
Nov 25 at 14:18
@Silent: but $f^{-1}$ is continuous on any compact subset of $f([0,1)cup[2,3])$ and that is all you need.
– Matematleta
Nov 25 at 14:44
add a comment |
Continuity is a local notion. We say $f$ is continuous on $(a,b)$ iff $f$ is continuous at each $x in (a,b)$. For your question, I think you do not need the pasting lemma. Your attempts actually completely showed the continuity of $g$ on $f(a,b)$.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 13:58
As an alternative, just prove the continuity by definition. Make use of the assumption that $f$ is continuous and strictly increasing. Maybe first prove the monotonicity of $g$, then the continuity.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 14:05
@xbh, thanks for reply. But, if we take function $f$ from $[0,1)cup[2,3]to[0,2]$ defined by $f(x)=x$ if $xin[0,1)$ and $f(x)=x-1$ if $xin[2,3]$, and consider $[c,d]subset[0,1)$ and $[c,d]subset[2,3]$, then $f^{-1}$ seems continuous by my above argument, but it is not!
– Silent
Nov 25 at 14:18
@Silent: but $f^{-1}$ is continuous on any compact subset of $f([0,1)cup[2,3])$ and that is all you need.
– Matematleta
Nov 25 at 14:44
Continuity is a local notion. We say $f$ is continuous on $(a,b)$ iff $f$ is continuous at each $x in (a,b)$. For your question, I think you do not need the pasting lemma. Your attempts actually completely showed the continuity of $g$ on $f(a,b)$.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 13:58
Continuity is a local notion. We say $f$ is continuous on $(a,b)$ iff $f$ is continuous at each $x in (a,b)$. For your question, I think you do not need the pasting lemma. Your attempts actually completely showed the continuity of $g$ on $f(a,b)$.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 13:58
As an alternative, just prove the continuity by definition. Make use of the assumption that $f$ is continuous and strictly increasing. Maybe first prove the monotonicity of $g$, then the continuity.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 14:05
As an alternative, just prove the continuity by definition. Make use of the assumption that $f$ is continuous and strictly increasing. Maybe first prove the monotonicity of $g$, then the continuity.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 14:05
@xbh, thanks for reply. But, if we take function $f$ from $[0,1)cup[2,3]to[0,2]$ defined by $f(x)=x$ if $xin[0,1)$ and $f(x)=x-1$ if $xin[2,3]$, and consider $[c,d]subset[0,1)$ and $[c,d]subset[2,3]$, then $f^{-1}$ seems continuous by my above argument, but it is not!
– Silent
Nov 25 at 14:18
@xbh, thanks for reply. But, if we take function $f$ from $[0,1)cup[2,3]to[0,2]$ defined by $f(x)=x$ if $xin[0,1)$ and $f(x)=x-1$ if $xin[2,3]$, and consider $[c,d]subset[0,1)$ and $[c,d]subset[2,3]$, then $f^{-1}$ seems continuous by my above argument, but it is not!
– Silent
Nov 25 at 14:18
@Silent: but $f^{-1}$ is continuous on any compact subset of $f([0,1)cup[2,3])$ and that is all you need.
– Matematleta
Nov 25 at 14:44
@Silent: but $f^{-1}$ is continuous on any compact subset of $f([0,1)cup[2,3])$ and that is all you need.
– Matematleta
Nov 25 at 14:44
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
It is sufficient to show that $f$ is an open map. So for any $(c,d)subset (a,b)$, observe that $f((c,d))=(f(c),f(d))$ since $f$ is a stricly increasing function. Hence $f$ maps any open set into an open set.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
It is sufficient to show that $f$ is an open map. So for any $(c,d)subset (a,b)$, observe that $f((c,d))=(f(c),f(d))$ since $f$ is a stricly increasing function. Hence $f$ maps any open set into an open set.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
It is sufficient to show that $f$ is an open map. So for any $(c,d)subset (a,b)$, observe that $f((c,d))=(f(c),f(d))$ since $f$ is a stricly increasing function. Hence $f$ maps any open set into an open set.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
It is sufficient to show that $f$ is an open map. So for any $(c,d)subset (a,b)$, observe that $f((c,d))=(f(c),f(d))$ since $f$ is a stricly increasing function. Hence $f$ maps any open set into an open set.
It is sufficient to show that $f$ is an open map. So for any $(c,d)subset (a,b)$, observe that $f((c,d))=(f(c),f(d))$ since $f$ is a stricly increasing function. Hence $f$ maps any open set into an open set.
answered Nov 25 at 16:03
KnobbyWan
187110
187110
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012855%2fshow-that-inverse-of-this-continuous-function-is-continuous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Continuity is a local notion. We say $f$ is continuous on $(a,b)$ iff $f$ is continuous at each $x in (a,b)$. For your question, I think you do not need the pasting lemma. Your attempts actually completely showed the continuity of $g$ on $f(a,b)$.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 13:58
As an alternative, just prove the continuity by definition. Make use of the assumption that $f$ is continuous and strictly increasing. Maybe first prove the monotonicity of $g$, then the continuity.
– xbh
Nov 25 at 14:05
@xbh, thanks for reply. But, if we take function $f$ from $[0,1)cup[2,3]to[0,2]$ defined by $f(x)=x$ if $xin[0,1)$ and $f(x)=x-1$ if $xin[2,3]$, and consider $[c,d]subset[0,1)$ and $[c,d]subset[2,3]$, then $f^{-1}$ seems continuous by my above argument, but it is not!
– Silent
Nov 25 at 14:18
@Silent: but $f^{-1}$ is continuous on any compact subset of $f([0,1)cup[2,3])$ and that is all you need.
– Matematleta
Nov 25 at 14:44