Formula for nearest prime $p_x$ less than a number $k$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In my attempts to get around Brocard's problem, I've come up with the following formula for the prime factorization of $k!$:
$$prod_{n=1}^xleft(prod_{s=1}^{lfloorlog_{p_n}krfloor}left(p_n^{lfloorfrac{k}{p_n^s}rfloor}right)right).$$
My problem: $x$ needs to be the greatest value for which $frac{k}{p_x}$ is greater than or equal to $1$. I'm currently too busy to think about it, so: does anyone know of a formula to find $x$?
prime-numbers diophantine-equations
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In my attempts to get around Brocard's problem, I've come up with the following formula for the prime factorization of $k!$:
$$prod_{n=1}^xleft(prod_{s=1}^{lfloorlog_{p_n}krfloor}left(p_n^{lfloorfrac{k}{p_n^s}rfloor}right)right).$$
My problem: $x$ needs to be the greatest value for which $frac{k}{p_x}$ is greater than or equal to $1$. I'm currently too busy to think about it, so: does anyone know of a formula to find $x$?
prime-numbers diophantine-equations
1
Yes $p_{pi(k)}$, since $p_{pi(k)} leq k<p_{pi(k)+1}$ ... if you find a better one, let us now :)
– rtybase
Jan 28 at 17:03
I found $sum_{n=2}^klfloorfrac{2}{sigma_0left(nright)}rfloor$ for $kgeq2$, but it feels impractical for this situation.
– weatherman115
Jan 28 at 19:14
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In my attempts to get around Brocard's problem, I've come up with the following formula for the prime factorization of $k!$:
$$prod_{n=1}^xleft(prod_{s=1}^{lfloorlog_{p_n}krfloor}left(p_n^{lfloorfrac{k}{p_n^s}rfloor}right)right).$$
My problem: $x$ needs to be the greatest value for which $frac{k}{p_x}$ is greater than or equal to $1$. I'm currently too busy to think about it, so: does anyone know of a formula to find $x$?
prime-numbers diophantine-equations
In my attempts to get around Brocard's problem, I've come up with the following formula for the prime factorization of $k!$:
$$prod_{n=1}^xleft(prod_{s=1}^{lfloorlog_{p_n}krfloor}left(p_n^{lfloorfrac{k}{p_n^s}rfloor}right)right).$$
My problem: $x$ needs to be the greatest value for which $frac{k}{p_x}$ is greater than or equal to $1$. I'm currently too busy to think about it, so: does anyone know of a formula to find $x$?
prime-numbers diophantine-equations
prime-numbers diophantine-equations
edited 2 days ago
Flermat
1,28311129
1,28311129
asked Jan 28 at 16:55
weatherman115
1447
1447
1
Yes $p_{pi(k)}$, since $p_{pi(k)} leq k<p_{pi(k)+1}$ ... if you find a better one, let us now :)
– rtybase
Jan 28 at 17:03
I found $sum_{n=2}^klfloorfrac{2}{sigma_0left(nright)}rfloor$ for $kgeq2$, but it feels impractical for this situation.
– weatherman115
Jan 28 at 19:14
add a comment |
1
Yes $p_{pi(k)}$, since $p_{pi(k)} leq k<p_{pi(k)+1}$ ... if you find a better one, let us now :)
– rtybase
Jan 28 at 17:03
I found $sum_{n=2}^klfloorfrac{2}{sigma_0left(nright)}rfloor$ for $kgeq2$, but it feels impractical for this situation.
– weatherman115
Jan 28 at 19:14
1
1
Yes $p_{pi(k)}$, since $p_{pi(k)} leq k<p_{pi(k)+1}$ ... if you find a better one, let us now :)
– rtybase
Jan 28 at 17:03
Yes $p_{pi(k)}$, since $p_{pi(k)} leq k<p_{pi(k)+1}$ ... if you find a better one, let us now :)
– rtybase
Jan 28 at 17:03
I found $sum_{n=2}^klfloorfrac{2}{sigma_0left(nright)}rfloor$ for $kgeq2$, but it feels impractical for this situation.
– weatherman115
Jan 28 at 19:14
I found $sum_{n=2}^klfloorfrac{2}{sigma_0left(nright)}rfloor$ for $kgeq2$, but it feels impractical for this situation.
– weatherman115
Jan 28 at 19:14
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2625214%2fformula-for-nearest-prime-p-x-less-than-a-number-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Yes $p_{pi(k)}$, since $p_{pi(k)} leq k<p_{pi(k)+1}$ ... if you find a better one, let us now :)
– rtybase
Jan 28 at 17:03
I found $sum_{n=2}^klfloorfrac{2}{sigma_0left(nright)}rfloor$ for $kgeq2$, but it feels impractical for this situation.
– weatherman115
Jan 28 at 19:14