Identity regarding integral $frac{e^{iz}}{z}$











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












Both R and r are real numbers. The path 1 is from -R to -r, the path 2 is from r to R. Why is this an identity when integral 1 is taken on path nr 1 and integral 2 on path nr 2 and integral 3 on path nr 2
$$intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}+ intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}=2iintfrac{sinz}{z}$$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:27










  • Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
    – ryszard eggink
    Nov 22 at 16:29






  • 1




    I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:31












  • why the harsh dislike mate?
    – Aayush Paurana
    Nov 22 at 16:32










  • @AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:35















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












Both R and r are real numbers. The path 1 is from -R to -r, the path 2 is from r to R. Why is this an identity when integral 1 is taken on path nr 1 and integral 2 on path nr 2 and integral 3 on path nr 2
$$intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}+ intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}=2iintfrac{sinz}{z}$$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:27










  • Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
    – ryszard eggink
    Nov 22 at 16:29






  • 1




    I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:31












  • why the harsh dislike mate?
    – Aayush Paurana
    Nov 22 at 16:32










  • @AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:35













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











Both R and r are real numbers. The path 1 is from -R to -r, the path 2 is from r to R. Why is this an identity when integral 1 is taken on path nr 1 and integral 2 on path nr 2 and integral 3 on path nr 2
$$intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}+ intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}=2iintfrac{sinz}{z}$$










share|cite|improve this question















Both R and r are real numbers. The path 1 is from -R to -r, the path 2 is from r to R. Why is this an identity when integral 1 is taken on path nr 1 and integral 2 on path nr 2 and integral 3 on path nr 2
$$intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}+ intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}=2iintfrac{sinz}{z}$$







complex-analysis complex-integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 16:29

























asked Nov 22 at 16:24









ryszard eggink

1209




1209












  • The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:27










  • Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
    – ryszard eggink
    Nov 22 at 16:29






  • 1




    I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:31












  • why the harsh dislike mate?
    – Aayush Paurana
    Nov 22 at 16:32










  • @AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:35


















  • The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:27










  • Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
    – ryszard eggink
    Nov 22 at 16:29






  • 1




    I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:31












  • why the harsh dislike mate?
    – Aayush Paurana
    Nov 22 at 16:32










  • @AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 22 at 16:35
















The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:27




The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:27












Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
– ryszard eggink
Nov 22 at 16:29




Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
– ryszard eggink
Nov 22 at 16:29




1




1




I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:31






I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:31














why the harsh dislike mate?
– Aayush Paurana
Nov 22 at 16:32




why the harsh dislike mate?
– Aayush Paurana
Nov 22 at 16:32












@AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:35




@AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:35















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009320%2fidentity-regarding-integral-fraceizz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009320%2fidentity-regarding-integral-fraceizz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Sphinx de Gizeh

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...