Identity regarding integral $frac{e^{iz}}{z}$
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Both R and r are real numbers. The path 1 is from -R to -r, the path 2 is from r to R. Why is this an identity when integral 1 is taken on path nr 1 and integral 2 on path nr 2 and integral 3 on path nr 2
$$intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}+ intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}=2iintfrac{sinz}{z}$$
complex-analysis complex-integration
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Both R and r are real numbers. The path 1 is from -R to -r, the path 2 is from r to R. Why is this an identity when integral 1 is taken on path nr 1 and integral 2 on path nr 2 and integral 3 on path nr 2
$$intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}+ intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}=2iintfrac{sinz}{z}$$
complex-analysis complex-integration
The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:27
Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
– ryszard eggink
Nov 22 at 16:29
1
I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:31
why the harsh dislike mate?
– Aayush Paurana
Nov 22 at 16:32
@AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:35
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
Both R and r are real numbers. The path 1 is from -R to -r, the path 2 is from r to R. Why is this an identity when integral 1 is taken on path nr 1 and integral 2 on path nr 2 and integral 3 on path nr 2
$$intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}+ intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}=2iintfrac{sinz}{z}$$
complex-analysis complex-integration
Both R and r are real numbers. The path 1 is from -R to -r, the path 2 is from r to R. Why is this an identity when integral 1 is taken on path nr 1 and integral 2 on path nr 2 and integral 3 on path nr 2
$$intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}+ intfrac{e^{iz}}{z}=2iintfrac{sinz}{z}$$
complex-analysis complex-integration
complex-analysis complex-integration
edited Nov 22 at 16:29
asked Nov 22 at 16:24
ryszard eggink
1209
1209
The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:27
Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
– ryszard eggink
Nov 22 at 16:29
1
I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:31
why the harsh dislike mate?
– Aayush Paurana
Nov 22 at 16:32
@AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:35
add a comment |
The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:27
Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
– ryszard eggink
Nov 22 at 16:29
1
I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:31
why the harsh dislike mate?
– Aayush Paurana
Nov 22 at 16:32
@AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:35
The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:27
The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:27
Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
– ryszard eggink
Nov 22 at 16:29
Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
– ryszard eggink
Nov 22 at 16:29
1
1
I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:31
I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:31
why the harsh dislike mate?
– Aayush Paurana
Nov 22 at 16:32
why the harsh dislike mate?
– Aayush Paurana
Nov 22 at 16:32
@AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:35
@AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:35
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009320%2fidentity-regarding-integral-fraceizz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The identity is wrong. You may want to look up the Euler's formula for complex numbers.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:27
Sorry i was posting in on the phone , i missed the minus sign, i know the euler formula cosz+isinz , but how the cosine is reduced?
– ryszard eggink
Nov 22 at 16:29
1
I'm also commenting on phone. That doesn't stop you from adding dollar sign. Consider the formula for exp(-iz) and eliminate cos(z) from these two formulae. Make sin(z) the subject of the formula to conclude.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:31
why the harsh dislike mate?
– Aayush Paurana
Nov 22 at 16:32
@AayushPaurana The layout of this question is unclear. That's one of the reasons present in the tooltip text of the downvote button.
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 22 at 16:35