Complex Equilibrium Points in Dynamical Systems?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Why do we not study the behavior of a system of ODEs around complex equilibrium points? How does their existence influence the flow?



I have studied the stability and bifurcation analysis for small systems. Perhaps the "Ghosts" in bifurcation diagrams from Strogatz's book may give some context.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    You've said that you've studied bifurcation analysis. But bifurcation theory is the theory that answers what happens first at bifurcation point and how you can transform this picture if you perturb the flow. Maybe I've misunderstood your question?
    – Evgeny
    Sep 18 '15 at 16:55










  • If you define your dynamical systems to live in real space (say $R^n$), you cannot talk about complex equilibrium points. On the other hand, in the domain of complex dynamical systems, we do study complex equilibrium points.
    – nonlinearism
    Sep 18 '15 at 22:50










  • @nonlinearism No-no-no, I think he meant equilibria that can split or disappear after perturbation, i.e. ones with null eigenvalues. I still can't remember the right term for them.
    – Evgeny
    Sep 19 '15 at 7:01












  • @nonlinearism I wanted to know why we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like "Ghosts" exist. From what little I understand it seems like complex equilibrium affect the flow for when the equilibrium becomes complex, it vanishes from the picture and yet the phase diagram doesn't change as if it had some latent effect. In brief, if we do talk of complex equilibria for complex valued dynamical systems what information do we miss out when we don't consider them?
    – squeak
    Sep 19 '15 at 18:39












  • It's not clear what exactly are you asking. What do you mean by "we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like 'Ghosts' exist" ? And phase diagram of course changes. Bottleneck has different effect than equilibrium.
    – Evgeny
    Sep 19 '15 at 19:15















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Why do we not study the behavior of a system of ODEs around complex equilibrium points? How does their existence influence the flow?



I have studied the stability and bifurcation analysis for small systems. Perhaps the "Ghosts" in bifurcation diagrams from Strogatz's book may give some context.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    You've said that you've studied bifurcation analysis. But bifurcation theory is the theory that answers what happens first at bifurcation point and how you can transform this picture if you perturb the flow. Maybe I've misunderstood your question?
    – Evgeny
    Sep 18 '15 at 16:55










  • If you define your dynamical systems to live in real space (say $R^n$), you cannot talk about complex equilibrium points. On the other hand, in the domain of complex dynamical systems, we do study complex equilibrium points.
    – nonlinearism
    Sep 18 '15 at 22:50










  • @nonlinearism No-no-no, I think he meant equilibria that can split or disappear after perturbation, i.e. ones with null eigenvalues. I still can't remember the right term for them.
    – Evgeny
    Sep 19 '15 at 7:01












  • @nonlinearism I wanted to know why we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like "Ghosts" exist. From what little I understand it seems like complex equilibrium affect the flow for when the equilibrium becomes complex, it vanishes from the picture and yet the phase diagram doesn't change as if it had some latent effect. In brief, if we do talk of complex equilibria for complex valued dynamical systems what information do we miss out when we don't consider them?
    – squeak
    Sep 19 '15 at 18:39












  • It's not clear what exactly are you asking. What do you mean by "we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like 'Ghosts' exist" ? And phase diagram of course changes. Bottleneck has different effect than equilibrium.
    – Evgeny
    Sep 19 '15 at 19:15













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Why do we not study the behavior of a system of ODEs around complex equilibrium points? How does their existence influence the flow?



I have studied the stability and bifurcation analysis for small systems. Perhaps the "Ghosts" in bifurcation diagrams from Strogatz's book may give some context.










share|cite|improve this question













Why do we not study the behavior of a system of ODEs around complex equilibrium points? How does their existence influence the flow?



I have studied the stability and bifurcation analysis for small systems. Perhaps the "Ghosts" in bifurcation diagrams from Strogatz's book may give some context.







dynamical-systems systems-of-equations stability-in-odes






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 18 '15 at 16:02









squeak

196




196








  • 1




    You've said that you've studied bifurcation analysis. But bifurcation theory is the theory that answers what happens first at bifurcation point and how you can transform this picture if you perturb the flow. Maybe I've misunderstood your question?
    – Evgeny
    Sep 18 '15 at 16:55










  • If you define your dynamical systems to live in real space (say $R^n$), you cannot talk about complex equilibrium points. On the other hand, in the domain of complex dynamical systems, we do study complex equilibrium points.
    – nonlinearism
    Sep 18 '15 at 22:50










  • @nonlinearism No-no-no, I think he meant equilibria that can split or disappear after perturbation, i.e. ones with null eigenvalues. I still can't remember the right term for them.
    – Evgeny
    Sep 19 '15 at 7:01












  • @nonlinearism I wanted to know why we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like "Ghosts" exist. From what little I understand it seems like complex equilibrium affect the flow for when the equilibrium becomes complex, it vanishes from the picture and yet the phase diagram doesn't change as if it had some latent effect. In brief, if we do talk of complex equilibria for complex valued dynamical systems what information do we miss out when we don't consider them?
    – squeak
    Sep 19 '15 at 18:39












  • It's not clear what exactly are you asking. What do you mean by "we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like 'Ghosts' exist" ? And phase diagram of course changes. Bottleneck has different effect than equilibrium.
    – Evgeny
    Sep 19 '15 at 19:15














  • 1




    You've said that you've studied bifurcation analysis. But bifurcation theory is the theory that answers what happens first at bifurcation point and how you can transform this picture if you perturb the flow. Maybe I've misunderstood your question?
    – Evgeny
    Sep 18 '15 at 16:55










  • If you define your dynamical systems to live in real space (say $R^n$), you cannot talk about complex equilibrium points. On the other hand, in the domain of complex dynamical systems, we do study complex equilibrium points.
    – nonlinearism
    Sep 18 '15 at 22:50










  • @nonlinearism No-no-no, I think he meant equilibria that can split or disappear after perturbation, i.e. ones with null eigenvalues. I still can't remember the right term for them.
    – Evgeny
    Sep 19 '15 at 7:01












  • @nonlinearism I wanted to know why we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like "Ghosts" exist. From what little I understand it seems like complex equilibrium affect the flow for when the equilibrium becomes complex, it vanishes from the picture and yet the phase diagram doesn't change as if it had some latent effect. In brief, if we do talk of complex equilibria for complex valued dynamical systems what information do we miss out when we don't consider them?
    – squeak
    Sep 19 '15 at 18:39












  • It's not clear what exactly are you asking. What do you mean by "we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like 'Ghosts' exist" ? And phase diagram of course changes. Bottleneck has different effect than equilibrium.
    – Evgeny
    Sep 19 '15 at 19:15








1




1




You've said that you've studied bifurcation analysis. But bifurcation theory is the theory that answers what happens first at bifurcation point and how you can transform this picture if you perturb the flow. Maybe I've misunderstood your question?
– Evgeny
Sep 18 '15 at 16:55




You've said that you've studied bifurcation analysis. But bifurcation theory is the theory that answers what happens first at bifurcation point and how you can transform this picture if you perturb the flow. Maybe I've misunderstood your question?
– Evgeny
Sep 18 '15 at 16:55












If you define your dynamical systems to live in real space (say $R^n$), you cannot talk about complex equilibrium points. On the other hand, in the domain of complex dynamical systems, we do study complex equilibrium points.
– nonlinearism
Sep 18 '15 at 22:50




If you define your dynamical systems to live in real space (say $R^n$), you cannot talk about complex equilibrium points. On the other hand, in the domain of complex dynamical systems, we do study complex equilibrium points.
– nonlinearism
Sep 18 '15 at 22:50












@nonlinearism No-no-no, I think he meant equilibria that can split or disappear after perturbation, i.e. ones with null eigenvalues. I still can't remember the right term for them.
– Evgeny
Sep 19 '15 at 7:01






@nonlinearism No-no-no, I think he meant equilibria that can split or disappear after perturbation, i.e. ones with null eigenvalues. I still can't remember the right term for them.
– Evgeny
Sep 19 '15 at 7:01














@nonlinearism I wanted to know why we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like "Ghosts" exist. From what little I understand it seems like complex equilibrium affect the flow for when the equilibrium becomes complex, it vanishes from the picture and yet the phase diagram doesn't change as if it had some latent effect. In brief, if we do talk of complex equilibria for complex valued dynamical systems what information do we miss out when we don't consider them?
– squeak
Sep 19 '15 at 18:39






@nonlinearism I wanted to know why we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like "Ghosts" exist. From what little I understand it seems like complex equilibrium affect the flow for when the equilibrium becomes complex, it vanishes from the picture and yet the phase diagram doesn't change as if it had some latent effect. In brief, if we do talk of complex equilibria for complex valued dynamical systems what information do we miss out when we don't consider them?
– squeak
Sep 19 '15 at 18:39














It's not clear what exactly are you asking. What do you mean by "we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like 'Ghosts' exist" ? And phase diagram of course changes. Bottleneck has different effect than equilibrium.
– Evgeny
Sep 19 '15 at 19:15




It's not clear what exactly are you asking. What do you mean by "we can't talk about complex equilibria when things like 'Ghosts' exist" ? And phase diagram of course changes. Bottleneck has different effect than equilibrium.
– Evgeny
Sep 19 '15 at 19:15










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Practically speaking, we don't care about the existence of complex equilibrium points because all the realizable models have real signals or states which means that the states can not reach these equilibrium points if they are not real. There are no any kind of complex signals despite of the fact that we represent some concepts in electrical analysis using imaginary number as the reactive power but this still be a representation of a concept that is not a signal or a state of the model.



Also there is a big difference between the existence of the complex eigenvalues of the state matrix and the equilibrium because the eigenvalues are used to analyse the behavior of the dynamical system and they are not values of the states in the system. So, the usage of complex analysis is just to analyze systems.



On the other hand; from the definition of the equilibrium point: it is the point that if the states at that point stay forever, so the states must be complex and this is impossible in practice.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1441229%2fcomplex-equilibrium-points-in-dynamical-systems%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Practically speaking, we don't care about the existence of complex equilibrium points because all the realizable models have real signals or states which means that the states can not reach these equilibrium points if they are not real. There are no any kind of complex signals despite of the fact that we represent some concepts in electrical analysis using imaginary number as the reactive power but this still be a representation of a concept that is not a signal or a state of the model.



    Also there is a big difference between the existence of the complex eigenvalues of the state matrix and the equilibrium because the eigenvalues are used to analyse the behavior of the dynamical system and they are not values of the states in the system. So, the usage of complex analysis is just to analyze systems.



    On the other hand; from the definition of the equilibrium point: it is the point that if the states at that point stay forever, so the states must be complex and this is impossible in practice.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Practically speaking, we don't care about the existence of complex equilibrium points because all the realizable models have real signals or states which means that the states can not reach these equilibrium points if they are not real. There are no any kind of complex signals despite of the fact that we represent some concepts in electrical analysis using imaginary number as the reactive power but this still be a representation of a concept that is not a signal or a state of the model.



      Also there is a big difference between the existence of the complex eigenvalues of the state matrix and the equilibrium because the eigenvalues are used to analyse the behavior of the dynamical system and they are not values of the states in the system. So, the usage of complex analysis is just to analyze systems.



      On the other hand; from the definition of the equilibrium point: it is the point that if the states at that point stay forever, so the states must be complex and this is impossible in practice.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Practically speaking, we don't care about the existence of complex equilibrium points because all the realizable models have real signals or states which means that the states can not reach these equilibrium points if they are not real. There are no any kind of complex signals despite of the fact that we represent some concepts in electrical analysis using imaginary number as the reactive power but this still be a representation of a concept that is not a signal or a state of the model.



        Also there is a big difference between the existence of the complex eigenvalues of the state matrix and the equilibrium because the eigenvalues are used to analyse the behavior of the dynamical system and they are not values of the states in the system. So, the usage of complex analysis is just to analyze systems.



        On the other hand; from the definition of the equilibrium point: it is the point that if the states at that point stay forever, so the states must be complex and this is impossible in practice.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Practically speaking, we don't care about the existence of complex equilibrium points because all the realizable models have real signals or states which means that the states can not reach these equilibrium points if they are not real. There are no any kind of complex signals despite of the fact that we represent some concepts in electrical analysis using imaginary number as the reactive power but this still be a representation of a concept that is not a signal or a state of the model.



        Also there is a big difference between the existence of the complex eigenvalues of the state matrix and the equilibrium because the eigenvalues are used to analyse the behavior of the dynamical system and they are not values of the states in the system. So, the usage of complex analysis is just to analyze systems.



        On the other hand; from the definition of the equilibrium point: it is the point that if the states at that point stay forever, so the states must be complex and this is impossible in practice.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 4 '16 at 22:03

























        answered Feb 9 '16 at 22:34









        Bilal Jafar Karaki

        253112




        253112






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1441229%2fcomplex-equilibrium-points-in-dynamical-systems%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sphinx de Gizeh

            Dijon

            Équipe cycliste