Direct Product cancellation in Hopfian rings
$begingroup$
A ring $R$ is called to be 'Hopfian' if every ring homomorphism of $R$ onto $R$ is an automorphism of $R$
Question:
Given $R$, $S$, $T$, Hopfian rings and
$$R times S cong T times S$$
implies that there exists an isomorphism
$$R cong T$$
My approach:
Let $X1, X2, Y in C$.
According to product rule in Category theory for every object Y and pair of morphisms
$$f1 : Y to X1, spacespace f2 : Y → X2$$
there exists a unique morphism $$f : Y → X1 × X2$$ where $f = <f_1, f_2>$
Given $f: R times S to T times S$, therefore $f = <f_1, f_2>$ where $f_1: R times S to T$ and $f_2: R times S to S$. Since $S$ is Hopfian, therefore $f_2$ is an isomorphic function. I wonder if isomorphism of $f$ does implies isomorphism of $f_1$ and $f_2$. Also please let me know if this is the correct approach or should I look at it in some other way.
P.S: This is my first question on mathexchange, please help me correct any mistakes which I might have made over here.
abstract-algebra ring-theory direct-product
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A ring $R$ is called to be 'Hopfian' if every ring homomorphism of $R$ onto $R$ is an automorphism of $R$
Question:
Given $R$, $S$, $T$, Hopfian rings and
$$R times S cong T times S$$
implies that there exists an isomorphism
$$R cong T$$
My approach:
Let $X1, X2, Y in C$.
According to product rule in Category theory for every object Y and pair of morphisms
$$f1 : Y to X1, spacespace f2 : Y → X2$$
there exists a unique morphism $$f : Y → X1 × X2$$ where $f = <f_1, f_2>$
Given $f: R times S to T times S$, therefore $f = <f_1, f_2>$ where $f_1: R times S to T$ and $f_2: R times S to S$. Since $S$ is Hopfian, therefore $f_2$ is an isomorphic function. I wonder if isomorphism of $f$ does implies isomorphism of $f_1$ and $f_2$. Also please let me know if this is the correct approach or should I look at it in some other way.
P.S: This is my first question on mathexchange, please help me correct any mistakes which I might have made over here.
abstract-algebra ring-theory direct-product
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 10 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
$endgroup$
– forcehandler
Dec 10 '18 at 8:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A ring $R$ is called to be 'Hopfian' if every ring homomorphism of $R$ onto $R$ is an automorphism of $R$
Question:
Given $R$, $S$, $T$, Hopfian rings and
$$R times S cong T times S$$
implies that there exists an isomorphism
$$R cong T$$
My approach:
Let $X1, X2, Y in C$.
According to product rule in Category theory for every object Y and pair of morphisms
$$f1 : Y to X1, spacespace f2 : Y → X2$$
there exists a unique morphism $$f : Y → X1 × X2$$ where $f = <f_1, f_2>$
Given $f: R times S to T times S$, therefore $f = <f_1, f_2>$ where $f_1: R times S to T$ and $f_2: R times S to S$. Since $S$ is Hopfian, therefore $f_2$ is an isomorphic function. I wonder if isomorphism of $f$ does implies isomorphism of $f_1$ and $f_2$. Also please let me know if this is the correct approach or should I look at it in some other way.
P.S: This is my first question on mathexchange, please help me correct any mistakes which I might have made over here.
abstract-algebra ring-theory direct-product
$endgroup$
A ring $R$ is called to be 'Hopfian' if every ring homomorphism of $R$ onto $R$ is an automorphism of $R$
Question:
Given $R$, $S$, $T$, Hopfian rings and
$$R times S cong T times S$$
implies that there exists an isomorphism
$$R cong T$$
My approach:
Let $X1, X2, Y in C$.
According to product rule in Category theory for every object Y and pair of morphisms
$$f1 : Y to X1, spacespace f2 : Y → X2$$
there exists a unique morphism $$f : Y → X1 × X2$$ where $f = <f_1, f_2>$
Given $f: R times S to T times S$, therefore $f = <f_1, f_2>$ where $f_1: R times S to T$ and $f_2: R times S to S$. Since $S$ is Hopfian, therefore $f_2$ is an isomorphic function. I wonder if isomorphism of $f$ does implies isomorphism of $f_1$ and $f_2$. Also please let me know if this is the correct approach or should I look at it in some other way.
P.S: This is my first question on mathexchange, please help me correct any mistakes which I might have made over here.
abstract-algebra ring-theory direct-product
abstract-algebra ring-theory direct-product
asked Dec 10 '18 at 7:49
forcehandlerforcehandler
61
61
$begingroup$
Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 10 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
$endgroup$
– forcehandler
Dec 10 '18 at 8:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 10 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
$endgroup$
– forcehandler
Dec 10 '18 at 8:50
$begingroup$
Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 10 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 10 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
$endgroup$
– forcehandler
Dec 10 '18 at 8:50
$begingroup$
Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
$endgroup$
– forcehandler
Dec 10 '18 at 8:50
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033603%2fdirect-product-cancellation-in-hopfian-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033603%2fdirect-product-cancellation-in-hopfian-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 10 '18 at 8:27
$begingroup$
Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
$endgroup$
– forcehandler
Dec 10 '18 at 8:50