Direct Product cancellation in Hopfian rings












1












$begingroup$


A ring $R$ is called to be 'Hopfian' if every ring homomorphism of $R$ onto $R$ is an automorphism of $R$



Question:
Given $R$, $S$, $T$, Hopfian rings and
$$R times S cong T times S$$
implies that there exists an isomorphism
$$R cong T$$



My approach:



Let $X1, X2, Y in C$.
According to product rule in Category theory for every object Y and pair of morphisms



$$f1 : Y to X1, spacespace f2 : Y → X2$$



there exists a unique morphism $$f : Y → X1 × X2$$ where $f = <f_1, f_2>$



Given $f: R times S to T times S$, therefore $f = <f_1, f_2>$ where $f_1: R times S to T$ and $f_2: R times S to S$. Since $S$ is Hopfian, therefore $f_2$ is an isomorphic function. I wonder if isomorphism of $f$ does implies isomorphism of $f_1$ and $f_2$. Also please let me know if this is the correct approach or should I look at it in some other way.



P.S: This is my first question on mathexchange, please help me correct any mistakes which I might have made over here.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:27










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
    $endgroup$
    – forcehandler
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:50
















1












$begingroup$


A ring $R$ is called to be 'Hopfian' if every ring homomorphism of $R$ onto $R$ is an automorphism of $R$



Question:
Given $R$, $S$, $T$, Hopfian rings and
$$R times S cong T times S$$
implies that there exists an isomorphism
$$R cong T$$



My approach:



Let $X1, X2, Y in C$.
According to product rule in Category theory for every object Y and pair of morphisms



$$f1 : Y to X1, spacespace f2 : Y → X2$$



there exists a unique morphism $$f : Y → X1 × X2$$ where $f = <f_1, f_2>$



Given $f: R times S to T times S$, therefore $f = <f_1, f_2>$ where $f_1: R times S to T$ and $f_2: R times S to S$. Since $S$ is Hopfian, therefore $f_2$ is an isomorphic function. I wonder if isomorphism of $f$ does implies isomorphism of $f_1$ and $f_2$. Also please let me know if this is the correct approach or should I look at it in some other way.



P.S: This is my first question on mathexchange, please help me correct any mistakes which I might have made over here.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:27










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
    $endgroup$
    – forcehandler
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:50














1












1








1





$begingroup$


A ring $R$ is called to be 'Hopfian' if every ring homomorphism of $R$ onto $R$ is an automorphism of $R$



Question:
Given $R$, $S$, $T$, Hopfian rings and
$$R times S cong T times S$$
implies that there exists an isomorphism
$$R cong T$$



My approach:



Let $X1, X2, Y in C$.
According to product rule in Category theory for every object Y and pair of morphisms



$$f1 : Y to X1, spacespace f2 : Y → X2$$



there exists a unique morphism $$f : Y → X1 × X2$$ where $f = <f_1, f_2>$



Given $f: R times S to T times S$, therefore $f = <f_1, f_2>$ where $f_1: R times S to T$ and $f_2: R times S to S$. Since $S$ is Hopfian, therefore $f_2$ is an isomorphic function. I wonder if isomorphism of $f$ does implies isomorphism of $f_1$ and $f_2$. Also please let me know if this is the correct approach or should I look at it in some other way.



P.S: This is my first question on mathexchange, please help me correct any mistakes which I might have made over here.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




A ring $R$ is called to be 'Hopfian' if every ring homomorphism of $R$ onto $R$ is an automorphism of $R$



Question:
Given $R$, $S$, $T$, Hopfian rings and
$$R times S cong T times S$$
implies that there exists an isomorphism
$$R cong T$$



My approach:



Let $X1, X2, Y in C$.
According to product rule in Category theory for every object Y and pair of morphisms



$$f1 : Y to X1, spacespace f2 : Y → X2$$



there exists a unique morphism $$f : Y → X1 × X2$$ where $f = <f_1, f_2>$



Given $f: R times S to T times S$, therefore $f = <f_1, f_2>$ where $f_1: R times S to T$ and $f_2: R times S to S$. Since $S$ is Hopfian, therefore $f_2$ is an isomorphic function. I wonder if isomorphism of $f$ does implies isomorphism of $f_1$ and $f_2$. Also please let me know if this is the correct approach or should I look at it in some other way.



P.S: This is my first question on mathexchange, please help me correct any mistakes which I might have made over here.







abstract-algebra ring-theory direct-product






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 10 '18 at 7:49









forcehandlerforcehandler

61




61












  • $begingroup$
    Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:27










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
    $endgroup$
    – forcehandler
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:50


















  • $begingroup$
    Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:27










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
    $endgroup$
    – forcehandler
    Dec 10 '18 at 8:50
















$begingroup$
Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 10 '18 at 8:27




$begingroup$
Do we consider ring homomorphisms to preserve the multiplicative identity? How is $f_2:Rtimes Sto S$ an iso?
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 10 '18 at 8:27












$begingroup$
Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
$endgroup$
– forcehandler
Dec 10 '18 at 8:50




$begingroup$
Yes, ring homomorphism preserves multiplicative identity in this case. $f_2: R times S to S$ where $f_2(r,s) to s$ is a bijective mapping since S is given to be hopfian object.
$endgroup$
– forcehandler
Dec 10 '18 at 8:50










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033603%2fdirect-product-cancellation-in-hopfian-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033603%2fdirect-product-cancellation-in-hopfian-rings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Fiat S.p.A.

Type 'String' is not a subtype of type 'int' of 'index'