How to decompose a bivector into a sum of _orthogonal_ blades?












4












$begingroup$


In Geometric Algebra, any bivector $BinLambda^2mathbb R^n$ is a sum of blades:
$$B = B_1 + B_2 + cdots$$
$$= vec v_1wedgevec w_1 + vec v_2wedgevec w_2 + cdots$$
Each blade's component vectors $vec v$ and $vec w$, if they're not already orthogonal to each other, can easily be made so by the Gram-Schmidt process:
$$B_1 = vec v_1wedgevec w_1 = vec v_1wedgeleft(vec w_1-Big(frac{vec w_1cdotvec v_1}{vec v_1cdotvec v_1}Big)vec v_1right) = vec v_1wedgevec w_1'$$
$$vec v_1cdotvec w_1' = 0$$
(This can even be generalized to pseudo-Euclidean space where $vec v$ may square to zero: project $vec v$ away from $vec w$ instead of vice-versa, or if they both square to zero, take $vec v'=frac{vec v+vec w}{sqrt2}$ , $vec w'=frac{vec w-vec v}{sqrt2}$. Then $vec vwedgevec w=vec v'wedgevec w'$, and $vec v'cdotvec w'=0$.)



But I don't know how to make each blade orthogonal to the other blades. Orthogonal means that their geometric product is their (grade 4) wedge product; all lower-grade parts are zero.
$$B_1 + B_2 = B_1' + B_2'$$
$$B_1'B_2' = (B_1'cdot B_2')+(B_1'times B_2')+(B_1'wedge B_2') = B_1'wedge B_2'$$
$$B_1'cdot B_2' = 0 = B_1'times B_2'$$



From Wikipedia: In $Lambda^2mathbb R^4$,




"every bivector can be written as the sum of two simple bivectors. It is useful to choose two orthogonal bivectors for this, and this is always possible to do."






Here's a simple example, with $n = 4$:
$$B_1 = e_1wedge e_2 = e_1e_2$$
$$B_2 = (e_1 + e_3)wedge e_4 = e_1e_4 + e_3e_4$$
$$B = B_1 + B_2 = e_1e_2 + e_1e_4 + e_3e_4$$
$$B_1B_2 = -e_2e_4 + e_1e_2e_3e_4$$
$$B_1cdot B_2 = 0 neq B_1times B_2 = -e_2e_4$$



How can I rewrite $B = B_1' + B_2'$ with $B_1'cdot B_2' = 0 = B_1'times B_2'$ ?





EDIT1



After doing some algebra, I arrived at these equations:



$$B_1' = frac{B+Q}{2}$$



$$B_2' = frac{B-Q}{2}$$



$$Q^2 = Bcdot B - Bwedge B$$



$$B^2 = Qcdot Q - Qwedge Q$$



$$Btimes Q = 0$$



$$Bwedge Q = 0$$



We only need to solve for $Q$ in terms of $B$. I was able to take a square root of the third equation (by guessing that $Q = xe_1e_2+ye_3e_4$) but I didn't find the specific root that satisfies the other equations.





EDIT2



After doing some more algebra, I find that, if $Q$ is defined as the reflection of $B$ along some unknown vector $vneq0$,



$$Q=v^{-1}Bv$$



$$B_1=frac{v^{-1}vB+v^{-1}Bv}{2}=v^{-1}(vwedge B)$$



$$B_2=frac{v^{-1}vB-v^{-1}Bv}{2}=v^{-1}(vcdot B)$$



then $B_1$ and $B_2$ are blades, and $B_1cdot B_2=0$ regardless of $v$, and $B_1times B_2=0$ if and only if $vwedgebig((vcdot B)cdot Bbig)=0$. This means that $(vcdot B)cdot B$ must be parallel to $v$; in other words, $v$ is an eigenvector of the operator $(B,cdot)^2$. It follows that $vcdot B=w$ is also an eigenvector with the same eigenvalue, and $vcdot w=0$.



Generalizing, it looks like we want to find an orthogonal set of eigenvectors $v_1,v_2,v_3,cdots$ of $(B,cdot)^2$, so that



$$B_1=v_1^{-1}(v_1cdot B),quad B_2=v_2^{-1}(v_2cdot B),quad B_3=v_3^{-1}(v_3cdot B),quadcdots$$



Of course, all vectors $v$ must also be orthogonal to all $w=vcdot B$.













share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    In Geometric Algebra, any bivector $BinLambda^2mathbb R^n$ is a sum of blades:
    $$B = B_1 + B_2 + cdots$$
    $$= vec v_1wedgevec w_1 + vec v_2wedgevec w_2 + cdots$$
    Each blade's component vectors $vec v$ and $vec w$, if they're not already orthogonal to each other, can easily be made so by the Gram-Schmidt process:
    $$B_1 = vec v_1wedgevec w_1 = vec v_1wedgeleft(vec w_1-Big(frac{vec w_1cdotvec v_1}{vec v_1cdotvec v_1}Big)vec v_1right) = vec v_1wedgevec w_1'$$
    $$vec v_1cdotvec w_1' = 0$$
    (This can even be generalized to pseudo-Euclidean space where $vec v$ may square to zero: project $vec v$ away from $vec w$ instead of vice-versa, or if they both square to zero, take $vec v'=frac{vec v+vec w}{sqrt2}$ , $vec w'=frac{vec w-vec v}{sqrt2}$. Then $vec vwedgevec w=vec v'wedgevec w'$, and $vec v'cdotvec w'=0$.)



    But I don't know how to make each blade orthogonal to the other blades. Orthogonal means that their geometric product is their (grade 4) wedge product; all lower-grade parts are zero.
    $$B_1 + B_2 = B_1' + B_2'$$
    $$B_1'B_2' = (B_1'cdot B_2')+(B_1'times B_2')+(B_1'wedge B_2') = B_1'wedge B_2'$$
    $$B_1'cdot B_2' = 0 = B_1'times B_2'$$



    From Wikipedia: In $Lambda^2mathbb R^4$,




    "every bivector can be written as the sum of two simple bivectors. It is useful to choose two orthogonal bivectors for this, and this is always possible to do."






    Here's a simple example, with $n = 4$:
    $$B_1 = e_1wedge e_2 = e_1e_2$$
    $$B_2 = (e_1 + e_3)wedge e_4 = e_1e_4 + e_3e_4$$
    $$B = B_1 + B_2 = e_1e_2 + e_1e_4 + e_3e_4$$
    $$B_1B_2 = -e_2e_4 + e_1e_2e_3e_4$$
    $$B_1cdot B_2 = 0 neq B_1times B_2 = -e_2e_4$$



    How can I rewrite $B = B_1' + B_2'$ with $B_1'cdot B_2' = 0 = B_1'times B_2'$ ?





    EDIT1



    After doing some algebra, I arrived at these equations:



    $$B_1' = frac{B+Q}{2}$$



    $$B_2' = frac{B-Q}{2}$$



    $$Q^2 = Bcdot B - Bwedge B$$



    $$B^2 = Qcdot Q - Qwedge Q$$



    $$Btimes Q = 0$$



    $$Bwedge Q = 0$$



    We only need to solve for $Q$ in terms of $B$. I was able to take a square root of the third equation (by guessing that $Q = xe_1e_2+ye_3e_4$) but I didn't find the specific root that satisfies the other equations.





    EDIT2



    After doing some more algebra, I find that, if $Q$ is defined as the reflection of $B$ along some unknown vector $vneq0$,



    $$Q=v^{-1}Bv$$



    $$B_1=frac{v^{-1}vB+v^{-1}Bv}{2}=v^{-1}(vwedge B)$$



    $$B_2=frac{v^{-1}vB-v^{-1}Bv}{2}=v^{-1}(vcdot B)$$



    then $B_1$ and $B_2$ are blades, and $B_1cdot B_2=0$ regardless of $v$, and $B_1times B_2=0$ if and only if $vwedgebig((vcdot B)cdot Bbig)=0$. This means that $(vcdot B)cdot B$ must be parallel to $v$; in other words, $v$ is an eigenvector of the operator $(B,cdot)^2$. It follows that $vcdot B=w$ is also an eigenvector with the same eigenvalue, and $vcdot w=0$.



    Generalizing, it looks like we want to find an orthogonal set of eigenvectors $v_1,v_2,v_3,cdots$ of $(B,cdot)^2$, so that



    $$B_1=v_1^{-1}(v_1cdot B),quad B_2=v_2^{-1}(v_2cdot B),quad B_3=v_3^{-1}(v_3cdot B),quadcdots$$



    Of course, all vectors $v$ must also be orthogonal to all $w=vcdot B$.













    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      In Geometric Algebra, any bivector $BinLambda^2mathbb R^n$ is a sum of blades:
      $$B = B_1 + B_2 + cdots$$
      $$= vec v_1wedgevec w_1 + vec v_2wedgevec w_2 + cdots$$
      Each blade's component vectors $vec v$ and $vec w$, if they're not already orthogonal to each other, can easily be made so by the Gram-Schmidt process:
      $$B_1 = vec v_1wedgevec w_1 = vec v_1wedgeleft(vec w_1-Big(frac{vec w_1cdotvec v_1}{vec v_1cdotvec v_1}Big)vec v_1right) = vec v_1wedgevec w_1'$$
      $$vec v_1cdotvec w_1' = 0$$
      (This can even be generalized to pseudo-Euclidean space where $vec v$ may square to zero: project $vec v$ away from $vec w$ instead of vice-versa, or if they both square to zero, take $vec v'=frac{vec v+vec w}{sqrt2}$ , $vec w'=frac{vec w-vec v}{sqrt2}$. Then $vec vwedgevec w=vec v'wedgevec w'$, and $vec v'cdotvec w'=0$.)



      But I don't know how to make each blade orthogonal to the other blades. Orthogonal means that their geometric product is their (grade 4) wedge product; all lower-grade parts are zero.
      $$B_1 + B_2 = B_1' + B_2'$$
      $$B_1'B_2' = (B_1'cdot B_2')+(B_1'times B_2')+(B_1'wedge B_2') = B_1'wedge B_2'$$
      $$B_1'cdot B_2' = 0 = B_1'times B_2'$$



      From Wikipedia: In $Lambda^2mathbb R^4$,




      "every bivector can be written as the sum of two simple bivectors. It is useful to choose two orthogonal bivectors for this, and this is always possible to do."






      Here's a simple example, with $n = 4$:
      $$B_1 = e_1wedge e_2 = e_1e_2$$
      $$B_2 = (e_1 + e_3)wedge e_4 = e_1e_4 + e_3e_4$$
      $$B = B_1 + B_2 = e_1e_2 + e_1e_4 + e_3e_4$$
      $$B_1B_2 = -e_2e_4 + e_1e_2e_3e_4$$
      $$B_1cdot B_2 = 0 neq B_1times B_2 = -e_2e_4$$



      How can I rewrite $B = B_1' + B_2'$ with $B_1'cdot B_2' = 0 = B_1'times B_2'$ ?





      EDIT1



      After doing some algebra, I arrived at these equations:



      $$B_1' = frac{B+Q}{2}$$



      $$B_2' = frac{B-Q}{2}$$



      $$Q^2 = Bcdot B - Bwedge B$$



      $$B^2 = Qcdot Q - Qwedge Q$$



      $$Btimes Q = 0$$



      $$Bwedge Q = 0$$



      We only need to solve for $Q$ in terms of $B$. I was able to take a square root of the third equation (by guessing that $Q = xe_1e_2+ye_3e_4$) but I didn't find the specific root that satisfies the other equations.





      EDIT2



      After doing some more algebra, I find that, if $Q$ is defined as the reflection of $B$ along some unknown vector $vneq0$,



      $$Q=v^{-1}Bv$$



      $$B_1=frac{v^{-1}vB+v^{-1}Bv}{2}=v^{-1}(vwedge B)$$



      $$B_2=frac{v^{-1}vB-v^{-1}Bv}{2}=v^{-1}(vcdot B)$$



      then $B_1$ and $B_2$ are blades, and $B_1cdot B_2=0$ regardless of $v$, and $B_1times B_2=0$ if and only if $vwedgebig((vcdot B)cdot Bbig)=0$. This means that $(vcdot B)cdot B$ must be parallel to $v$; in other words, $v$ is an eigenvector of the operator $(B,cdot)^2$. It follows that $vcdot B=w$ is also an eigenvector with the same eigenvalue, and $vcdot w=0$.



      Generalizing, it looks like we want to find an orthogonal set of eigenvectors $v_1,v_2,v_3,cdots$ of $(B,cdot)^2$, so that



      $$B_1=v_1^{-1}(v_1cdot B),quad B_2=v_2^{-1}(v_2cdot B),quad B_3=v_3^{-1}(v_3cdot B),quadcdots$$



      Of course, all vectors $v$ must also be orthogonal to all $w=vcdot B$.













      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In Geometric Algebra, any bivector $BinLambda^2mathbb R^n$ is a sum of blades:
      $$B = B_1 + B_2 + cdots$$
      $$= vec v_1wedgevec w_1 + vec v_2wedgevec w_2 + cdots$$
      Each blade's component vectors $vec v$ and $vec w$, if they're not already orthogonal to each other, can easily be made so by the Gram-Schmidt process:
      $$B_1 = vec v_1wedgevec w_1 = vec v_1wedgeleft(vec w_1-Big(frac{vec w_1cdotvec v_1}{vec v_1cdotvec v_1}Big)vec v_1right) = vec v_1wedgevec w_1'$$
      $$vec v_1cdotvec w_1' = 0$$
      (This can even be generalized to pseudo-Euclidean space where $vec v$ may square to zero: project $vec v$ away from $vec w$ instead of vice-versa, or if they both square to zero, take $vec v'=frac{vec v+vec w}{sqrt2}$ , $vec w'=frac{vec w-vec v}{sqrt2}$. Then $vec vwedgevec w=vec v'wedgevec w'$, and $vec v'cdotvec w'=0$.)



      But I don't know how to make each blade orthogonal to the other blades. Orthogonal means that their geometric product is their (grade 4) wedge product; all lower-grade parts are zero.
      $$B_1 + B_2 = B_1' + B_2'$$
      $$B_1'B_2' = (B_1'cdot B_2')+(B_1'times B_2')+(B_1'wedge B_2') = B_1'wedge B_2'$$
      $$B_1'cdot B_2' = 0 = B_1'times B_2'$$



      From Wikipedia: In $Lambda^2mathbb R^4$,




      "every bivector can be written as the sum of two simple bivectors. It is useful to choose two orthogonal bivectors for this, and this is always possible to do."






      Here's a simple example, with $n = 4$:
      $$B_1 = e_1wedge e_2 = e_1e_2$$
      $$B_2 = (e_1 + e_3)wedge e_4 = e_1e_4 + e_3e_4$$
      $$B = B_1 + B_2 = e_1e_2 + e_1e_4 + e_3e_4$$
      $$B_1B_2 = -e_2e_4 + e_1e_2e_3e_4$$
      $$B_1cdot B_2 = 0 neq B_1times B_2 = -e_2e_4$$



      How can I rewrite $B = B_1' + B_2'$ with $B_1'cdot B_2' = 0 = B_1'times B_2'$ ?





      EDIT1



      After doing some algebra, I arrived at these equations:



      $$B_1' = frac{B+Q}{2}$$



      $$B_2' = frac{B-Q}{2}$$



      $$Q^2 = Bcdot B - Bwedge B$$



      $$B^2 = Qcdot Q - Qwedge Q$$



      $$Btimes Q = 0$$



      $$Bwedge Q = 0$$



      We only need to solve for $Q$ in terms of $B$. I was able to take a square root of the third equation (by guessing that $Q = xe_1e_2+ye_3e_4$) but I didn't find the specific root that satisfies the other equations.





      EDIT2



      After doing some more algebra, I find that, if $Q$ is defined as the reflection of $B$ along some unknown vector $vneq0$,



      $$Q=v^{-1}Bv$$



      $$B_1=frac{v^{-1}vB+v^{-1}Bv}{2}=v^{-1}(vwedge B)$$



      $$B_2=frac{v^{-1}vB-v^{-1}Bv}{2}=v^{-1}(vcdot B)$$



      then $B_1$ and $B_2$ are blades, and $B_1cdot B_2=0$ regardless of $v$, and $B_1times B_2=0$ if and only if $vwedgebig((vcdot B)cdot Bbig)=0$. This means that $(vcdot B)cdot B$ must be parallel to $v$; in other words, $v$ is an eigenvector of the operator $(B,cdot)^2$. It follows that $vcdot B=w$ is also an eigenvector with the same eigenvalue, and $vcdot w=0$.



      Generalizing, it looks like we want to find an orthogonal set of eigenvectors $v_1,v_2,v_3,cdots$ of $(B,cdot)^2$, so that



      $$B_1=v_1^{-1}(v_1cdot B),quad B_2=v_2^{-1}(v_2cdot B),quad B_3=v_3^{-1}(v_3cdot B),quadcdots$$



      Of course, all vectors $v$ must also be orthogonal to all $w=vcdot B$.










      eigenvalues-eigenvectors orthogonality clifford-algebras geometric-algebras gram-schmidt






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 10 '18 at 7:04







      mr_e_man

















      asked May 19 '18 at 0:55









      mr_e_manmr_e_man

      1,1251424




      1,1251424






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          By using one of Doran's methods involving the exponential function (link, section 2.1.1), I found a formula for bivectors in 4D:



          $$B_1 = left(frac{|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}+Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



          $$B_2 = left(frac{-|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}-Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



          (Obviously, this is undefined if $|Bcdot B|=lVert Bwedge BrVert$. That corresponds to an isoclinic rotation, where the two planes of rotation are not unique.)





          Applying this to the example problem,



          $$B = e_1e_2+e_1e_4+e_3e_4$$



          $$B^2 = -3 + 2e_1e_2e_3e_4;quad Bcdot B = -3,quad Bwedge B = 2e_1e_2e_3e_4$$



          $$B_1 = frac{(1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(3+sqrt5)e_1e_4-2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



          $$B_2 = frac{(-1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(-3+sqrt5)e_1e_4+2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



          $$B_1wedge B_1 = 0 = B_2wedge B_2$$



          (The vanishing wedge product means that they are actually blades, though we don't know what vectors they're made of.)



          $$B_1cdot B_2 = 0 = B_1times B_2$$



          $$B_1 + B_2 = B$$





          This is only a partial answer; it doesn't work when $|Bcdot B| = lVert Bwedge BrVert$, and I still don't know what to do in higher dimensions.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2786995%2fhow-to-decompose-a-bivector-into-a-sum-of-orthogonal-blades%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            By using one of Doran's methods involving the exponential function (link, section 2.1.1), I found a formula for bivectors in 4D:



            $$B_1 = left(frac{|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}+Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



            $$B_2 = left(frac{-|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}-Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



            (Obviously, this is undefined if $|Bcdot B|=lVert Bwedge BrVert$. That corresponds to an isoclinic rotation, where the two planes of rotation are not unique.)





            Applying this to the example problem,



            $$B = e_1e_2+e_1e_4+e_3e_4$$



            $$B^2 = -3 + 2e_1e_2e_3e_4;quad Bcdot B = -3,quad Bwedge B = 2e_1e_2e_3e_4$$



            $$B_1 = frac{(1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(3+sqrt5)e_1e_4-2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



            $$B_2 = frac{(-1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(-3+sqrt5)e_1e_4+2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



            $$B_1wedge B_1 = 0 = B_2wedge B_2$$



            (The vanishing wedge product means that they are actually blades, though we don't know what vectors they're made of.)



            $$B_1cdot B_2 = 0 = B_1times B_2$$



            $$B_1 + B_2 = B$$





            This is only a partial answer; it doesn't work when $|Bcdot B| = lVert Bwedge BrVert$, and I still don't know what to do in higher dimensions.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              By using one of Doran's methods involving the exponential function (link, section 2.1.1), I found a formula for bivectors in 4D:



              $$B_1 = left(frac{|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}+Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



              $$B_2 = left(frac{-|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}-Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



              (Obviously, this is undefined if $|Bcdot B|=lVert Bwedge BrVert$. That corresponds to an isoclinic rotation, where the two planes of rotation are not unique.)





              Applying this to the example problem,



              $$B = e_1e_2+e_1e_4+e_3e_4$$



              $$B^2 = -3 + 2e_1e_2e_3e_4;quad Bcdot B = -3,quad Bwedge B = 2e_1e_2e_3e_4$$



              $$B_1 = frac{(1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(3+sqrt5)e_1e_4-2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



              $$B_2 = frac{(-1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(-3+sqrt5)e_1e_4+2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



              $$B_1wedge B_1 = 0 = B_2wedge B_2$$



              (The vanishing wedge product means that they are actually blades, though we don't know what vectors they're made of.)



              $$B_1cdot B_2 = 0 = B_1times B_2$$



              $$B_1 + B_2 = B$$





              This is only a partial answer; it doesn't work when $|Bcdot B| = lVert Bwedge BrVert$, and I still don't know what to do in higher dimensions.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                By using one of Doran's methods involving the exponential function (link, section 2.1.1), I found a formula for bivectors in 4D:



                $$B_1 = left(frac{|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}+Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



                $$B_2 = left(frac{-|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}-Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



                (Obviously, this is undefined if $|Bcdot B|=lVert Bwedge BrVert$. That corresponds to an isoclinic rotation, where the two planes of rotation are not unique.)





                Applying this to the example problem,



                $$B = e_1e_2+e_1e_4+e_3e_4$$



                $$B^2 = -3 + 2e_1e_2e_3e_4;quad Bcdot B = -3,quad Bwedge B = 2e_1e_2e_3e_4$$



                $$B_1 = frac{(1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(3+sqrt5)e_1e_4-2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



                $$B_2 = frac{(-1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(-3+sqrt5)e_1e_4+2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



                $$B_1wedge B_1 = 0 = B_2wedge B_2$$



                (The vanishing wedge product means that they are actually blades, though we don't know what vectors they're made of.)



                $$B_1cdot B_2 = 0 = B_1times B_2$$



                $$B_1 + B_2 = B$$





                This is only a partial answer; it doesn't work when $|Bcdot B| = lVert Bwedge BrVert$, and I still don't know what to do in higher dimensions.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                By using one of Doran's methods involving the exponential function (link, section 2.1.1), I found a formula for bivectors in 4D:



                $$B_1 = left(frac{|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}+Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



                $$B_2 = left(frac{-|Bcdot B|+sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}-Bwedge B}{2sqrt{|Bcdot B|^2-lVert Bwedge BrVert^2}}right)B$$



                (Obviously, this is undefined if $|Bcdot B|=lVert Bwedge BrVert$. That corresponds to an isoclinic rotation, where the two planes of rotation are not unique.)





                Applying this to the example problem,



                $$B = e_1e_2+e_1e_4+e_3e_4$$



                $$B^2 = -3 + 2e_1e_2e_3e_4;quad Bcdot B = -3,quad Bwedge B = 2e_1e_2e_3e_4$$



                $$B_1 = frac{(1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(3+sqrt5)e_1e_4-2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



                $$B_2 = frac{(-1+sqrt5)(e_1e_2+e_3e_4)+(-3+sqrt5)e_1e_4+2e_2e_3}{2sqrt5}$$



                $$B_1wedge B_1 = 0 = B_2wedge B_2$$



                (The vanishing wedge product means that they are actually blades, though we don't know what vectors they're made of.)



                $$B_1cdot B_2 = 0 = B_1times B_2$$



                $$B_1 + B_2 = B$$





                This is only a partial answer; it doesn't work when $|Bcdot B| = lVert Bwedge BrVert$, and I still don't know what to do in higher dimensions.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jun 14 '18 at 5:13

























                answered Jun 11 '18 at 8:49









                mr_e_manmr_e_man

                1,1251424




                1,1251424






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2786995%2fhow-to-decompose-a-bivector-into-a-sum-of-orthogonal-blades%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

                    Berounka

                    I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...