Question on Vertex Labeling (Related to Lucky Labeling of Graphs)
$begingroup$
Suppose that for any bipartite planar graph $G=(V,E)$, we can find a vertex labeling $c:Vto {1,2,3}$ such that for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$:
$$c(u)-sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)neq c(w)-sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)$$ where $N(v)$ denotes the neighborhood of the vertex $vin V$. My question is: is it true that there also must exist a labeling of $G$ with labels ${1,2,3}$ such that for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$, we have:
$$sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)neq sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)?$$
It is possible for two adjacent vertices to satisfy the first equation, but not the second in some labeling $c$. My idea was to modify the initial labeling in a way that makes the second inequality hold. That is, for some adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$ satisfying the first equation, if $sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)=sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)$ holds then $c(u)neq c(w)$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $c(u)<c(w)$. Then, change the label of $u$ to $c(w)$ thus obtaining the new labeling $c'$. However, this may affect the relationship of $u$ with its other neighbors and my attempts to analyze those weren't successful. I would really appreciate some help.
This question comes from reading the paper of Lason where he seems to claim that the second result is a consequence of the first (if I understand correctly what he means by the "special case").
combinatorics graph-theory algebraic-combinatorics
asked Dec 10 '18 at 5:55
owlowl
596
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that for any bipartite planar graph $G=(V,E)$, we can find a vertex labeling $c:Vto {1,2,3}$ such that for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$:
$$c(u)-sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)neq c(w)-sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)$$ where $N(v)$ denotes the neighborhood of the vertex $vin V$. My question is: is it true that there also must exist a labeling of $G$ with labels ${1,2,3}$ such that for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$, we have:
$$sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)neq sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)?$$
It is possible for two adjacent vertices to satisfy the first equation, but not the second in some labeling $c$. My idea was to modify the initial labeling in a way that makes the second inequality hold. That is, for some adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$ satisfying the first equation, if $sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)=sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)$ holds then $c(u)neq c(w)$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $c(u)<c(w)$. Then, change the label of $u$ to $c(w)$ thus obtaining the new labeling $c'$. However, this may affect the relationship of $u$ with its other neighbors and my attempts to analyze those weren't successful. I would really appreciate some help.
This question comes from reading the paper of Lason where he seems to claim that the second result is a consequence of the first (if I understand correctly what he means by the "special case").
combinatorics graph-theory algebraic-combinatorics
asked Dec 10 '18 at 5:55
owlowl
596
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose that for any bipartite planar graph $G=(V,E)$, we can find a vertex labeling $c:Vto {1,2,3}$ such that for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$:
$$c(u)-sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)neq c(w)-sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)$$ where $N(v)$ denotes the neighborhood of the vertex $vin V$. My question is: is it true that there also must exist a labeling of $G$ with labels ${1,2,3}$ such that for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$, we have:
$$sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)neq sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)?$$
It is possible for two adjacent vertices to satisfy the first equation, but not the second in some labeling $c$. My idea was to modify the initial labeling in a way that makes the second inequality hold. That is, for some adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$ satisfying the first equation, if $sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)=sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)$ holds then $c(u)neq c(w)$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $c(u)<c(w)$. Then, change the label of $u$ to $c(w)$ thus obtaining the new labeling $c'$. However, this may affect the relationship of $u$ with its other neighbors and my attempts to analyze those weren't successful. I would really appreciate some help.
This question comes from reading the paper of Lason where he seems to claim that the second result is a consequence of the first (if I understand correctly what he means by the "special case").
combinatorics graph-theory algebraic-combinatorics
asked Dec 10 '18 at 5:55
owlowl
596
$endgroup$
Suppose that for any bipartite planar graph $G=(V,E)$, we can find a vertex labeling $c:Vto {1,2,3}$ such that for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$:
$$c(u)-sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)neq c(w)-sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)$$ where $N(v)$ denotes the neighborhood of the vertex $vin V$. My question is: is it true that there also must exist a labeling of $G$ with labels ${1,2,3}$ such that for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$, we have:
$$sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)neq sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)?$$
It is possible for two adjacent vertices to satisfy the first equation, but not the second in some labeling $c$. My idea was to modify the initial labeling in a way that makes the second inequality hold. That is, for some adjacent vertices $u$ and $w$ satisfying the first equation, if $sum_{vin N(u)}c(v)=sum_{vin N(w)}c(v)$ holds then $c(u)neq c(w)$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $c(u)<c(w)$. Then, change the label of $u$ to $c(w)$ thus obtaining the new labeling $c'$. However, this may affect the relationship of $u$ with its other neighbors and my attempts to analyze those weren't successful. I would really appreciate some help.
This question comes from reading the paper of Lason where he seems to claim that the second result is a consequence of the first (if I understand correctly what he means by the "special case").
combinatorics graph-theory algebraic-combinatorics
combinatorics graph-theory algebraic-combinatorics
asked Dec 10 '18 at 5:55
owlowl
596
asked Dec 10 '18 at 5:55
owlowl
596
edited Dec 10 '18 at 6:36
owl
asked Dec 10 '18 at 5:55
owlowl
596
asked Dec 10 '18 at 5:55
owlowl
596
asked Dec 10 '18 at 5:55
owlowl
596
596
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033516%2fquestion-on-vertex-labeling-related-to-lucky-labeling-of-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033516%2fquestion-on-vertex-labeling-related-to-lucky-labeling-of-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
