Lebesgue integral (measure zero)
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(X, mathcal{A},mu)$ be a measure space and $h:X to mathbb{R}, h geq0$ a measurable function.
Define a map $mu_h:mathcal{A} to mathbb{R}, mu_h(E):= int_E h dmu$ for $E in mathcal{A}$.
How can it be shown that if $mu(E)=0 Rightarrow mu_h(E)=0$?
To prove this implication I tried:
$int_E h dmu=int_E h_+ dmu-int_E h_- dmu$
So $int_E h_+ dmu=int h_+1_E dmu=$sup$int e dmu$, with $e$ is a simple function.
Here I don't know how to continue to show this implication. Or is there another way to prove it?
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(X, mathcal{A},mu)$ be a measure space and $h:X to mathbb{R}, h geq0$ a measurable function.
Define a map $mu_h:mathcal{A} to mathbb{R}, mu_h(E):= int_E h dmu$ for $E in mathcal{A}$.
How can it be shown that if $mu(E)=0 Rightarrow mu_h(E)=0$?
To prove this implication I tried:
$int_E h dmu=int_E h_+ dmu-int_E h_- dmu$
So $int_E h_+ dmu=int h_+1_E dmu=$sup$int e dmu$, with $e$ is a simple function.
Here I don't know how to continue to show this implication. Or is there another way to prove it?
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
$int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 22 at 15:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(X, mathcal{A},mu)$ be a measure space and $h:X to mathbb{R}, h geq0$ a measurable function.
Define a map $mu_h:mathcal{A} to mathbb{R}, mu_h(E):= int_E h dmu$ for $E in mathcal{A}$.
How can it be shown that if $mu(E)=0 Rightarrow mu_h(E)=0$?
To prove this implication I tried:
$int_E h dmu=int_E h_+ dmu-int_E h_- dmu$
So $int_E h_+ dmu=int h_+1_E dmu=$sup$int e dmu$, with $e$ is a simple function.
Here I don't know how to continue to show this implication. Or is there another way to prove it?
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
Let $(X, mathcal{A},mu)$ be a measure space and $h:X to mathbb{R}, h geq0$ a measurable function.
Define a map $mu_h:mathcal{A} to mathbb{R}, mu_h(E):= int_E h dmu$ for $E in mathcal{A}$.
How can it be shown that if $mu(E)=0 Rightarrow mu_h(E)=0$?
To prove this implication I tried:
$int_E h dmu=int_E h_+ dmu-int_E h_- dmu$
So $int_E h_+ dmu=int h_+1_E dmu=$sup$int e dmu$, with $e$ is a simple function.
Here I don't know how to continue to show this implication. Or is there another way to prove it?
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
measure-theory lebesgue-integral
asked Nov 22 at 15:01
Olsgur
384
384
$int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 22 at 15:16
add a comment |
$int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 22 at 15:16
$int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 22 at 15:16
$int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 22 at 15:16
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$
So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.
Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.
So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.
So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.
New contributor
John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$
So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.
Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.
So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$
So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.
Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.
So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$
So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.
Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.
So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.
By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$
So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.
Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.
So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.
answered Nov 22 at 15:42
drhab
94.8k543125
94.8k543125
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.
So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.
New contributor
John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.
So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.
New contributor
John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.
So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.
New contributor
John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.
So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.
New contributor
John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Nov 22 at 15:20
John_Wick
72919
72919
New contributor
John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009247%2flebesgue-integral-measure-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 22 at 15:16