Lebesgue integral (measure zero)











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $(X, mathcal{A},mu)$ be a measure space and $h:X to mathbb{R}, h geq0$ a measurable function.



Define a map $mu_h:mathcal{A} to mathbb{R}, mu_h(E):= int_E h dmu$ for $E in mathcal{A}$.



How can it be shown that if $mu(E)=0 Rightarrow mu_h(E)=0$?



To prove this implication I tried:



$int_E h dmu=int_E h_+ dmu-int_E h_- dmu$



So $int_E h_+ dmu=int h_+1_E dmu=$sup$int e dmu$, with $e$ is a simple function.



Here I don't know how to continue to show this implication. Or is there another way to prove it?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 22 at 15:16

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $(X, mathcal{A},mu)$ be a measure space and $h:X to mathbb{R}, h geq0$ a measurable function.



Define a map $mu_h:mathcal{A} to mathbb{R}, mu_h(E):= int_E h dmu$ for $E in mathcal{A}$.



How can it be shown that if $mu(E)=0 Rightarrow mu_h(E)=0$?



To prove this implication I tried:



$int_E h dmu=int_E h_+ dmu-int_E h_- dmu$



So $int_E h_+ dmu=int h_+1_E dmu=$sup$int e dmu$, with $e$ is a simple function.



Here I don't know how to continue to show this implication. Or is there another way to prove it?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 22 at 15:16















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $(X, mathcal{A},mu)$ be a measure space and $h:X to mathbb{R}, h geq0$ a measurable function.



Define a map $mu_h:mathcal{A} to mathbb{R}, mu_h(E):= int_E h dmu$ for $E in mathcal{A}$.



How can it be shown that if $mu(E)=0 Rightarrow mu_h(E)=0$?



To prove this implication I tried:



$int_E h dmu=int_E h_+ dmu-int_E h_- dmu$



So $int_E h_+ dmu=int h_+1_E dmu=$sup$int e dmu$, with $e$ is a simple function.



Here I don't know how to continue to show this implication. Or is there another way to prove it?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $(X, mathcal{A},mu)$ be a measure space and $h:X to mathbb{R}, h geq0$ a measurable function.



Define a map $mu_h:mathcal{A} to mathbb{R}, mu_h(E):= int_E h dmu$ for $E in mathcal{A}$.



How can it be shown that if $mu(E)=0 Rightarrow mu_h(E)=0$?



To prove this implication I tried:



$int_E h dmu=int_E h_+ dmu-int_E h_- dmu$



So $int_E h_+ dmu=int h_+1_E dmu=$sup$int e dmu$, with $e$ is a simple function.



Here I don't know how to continue to show this implication. Or is there another way to prove it?







measure-theory lebesgue-integral






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 22 at 15:01









Olsgur

384




384












  • $int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 22 at 15:16




















  • $int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
    – Calvin Khor
    Nov 22 at 15:16


















$int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 22 at 15:16






$int _E h dmu := int h mathbf 1_E dmu $ and $h mathbf 1_E = 0 $ $mu$-a.e.
– Calvin Khor
Nov 22 at 15:16












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$



So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.



Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.



So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.



    So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009247%2flebesgue-integral-measure-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$



      So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.



      Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.



      So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted










        By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$



        So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.



        Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.



        So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$



          So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.



          Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.



          So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          By definition $mu_h(E)=int hmathbf1_E dmu=sup{int sdmumid stext{ is a measurable simple function with } 0leq sleq hmathbf1_E}$



          So it is enough to prove that $mu(E)=0$ implies that $int sdmu=0$ for every measurable simple function $s$ that satisfies $0leq sleq hmathbf1_E$.



          Such function $s$ can be written as a finite sum $sum_{i=1}^n a_imathbf1_{A_i}$ where the $a_i$ are nonnegative and the $A_i$ are measurable subsets of $E$.



          So we have $int sdmu=sum_{i=1}^n a_imu(A_i)=0$ because $0leqmu(A_i)leqmu(E)=0$ for every $iin{1,dots,n}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 22 at 15:42









          drhab

          94.8k543125




          94.8k543125






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.



              So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer








              New contributor




              John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                up vote
                0
                down vote













                The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.



                So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor




                John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.



                  So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  The function $g=h1_E$ is approximated below by $f_n(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n2^n-1}i/(n2^n)1_{{i/(n2^n)leq g(x)<(i+1)/(n2^n)}}$ and $int f_ndmu=0$ for all $n$.



                  So, $mu_h(E)=int gdmu=sup{int sdmu|0leq sleq g, s text{ is a simple function}}=lim int f_ndmu=0$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered Nov 22 at 15:20









                  John_Wick

                  72919




                  72919




                  New contributor




                  John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  John_Wick is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded



















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009247%2flebesgue-integral-measure-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Sphinx de Gizeh

                      Dijon

                      Guerrita