Positive semidefinite block matrix is PSD with negated off-diagonal blocks?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am trying to follow some notes that imply
$$
M=
begin{bmatrix}
A&B^T\B&C
end{bmatrix}
succeq 0
Longleftrightarrow
M'=
begin{bmatrix}
A&-B^T\-B&C
end{bmatrix}
succeq 0$$

and I want to prove this to myself (just the $Rightarrow$ direction because it's trivial to go the other way once one direction is proven).



So far I have that $A,Csucceq0$ by computing $x^TMx$ (for certain $x$) which is $geq0 forall x$ by definition. Therefore,



$$
begin{bmatrix}
x1&x2
end{bmatrix}
M
begin{bmatrix}
x1\x2
end{bmatrix}
=
underbrace{x_1^TAx_1}_{geq0}
+
underbrace{x_2^TCx_2}_{geq0}
+2x_2^TBx_1geq2x_2^TBx_1
$$



and



$$
begin{bmatrix}
x1&x2
end{bmatrix}
M'
begin{bmatrix}
x1\x2
end{bmatrix}
=x_1^TAx_1+x_2^TCx_2-2x_2^TBx_1geq-2x_2^TBx_1.
$$



Then I get stuck, but I feel like I'm very close to the conclusion










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I am trying to follow some notes that imply
    $$
    M=
    begin{bmatrix}
    A&B^T\B&C
    end{bmatrix}
    succeq 0
    Longleftrightarrow
    M'=
    begin{bmatrix}
    A&-B^T\-B&C
    end{bmatrix}
    succeq 0$$

    and I want to prove this to myself (just the $Rightarrow$ direction because it's trivial to go the other way once one direction is proven).



    So far I have that $A,Csucceq0$ by computing $x^TMx$ (for certain $x$) which is $geq0 forall x$ by definition. Therefore,



    $$
    begin{bmatrix}
    x1&x2
    end{bmatrix}
    M
    begin{bmatrix}
    x1\x2
    end{bmatrix}
    =
    underbrace{x_1^TAx_1}_{geq0}
    +
    underbrace{x_2^TCx_2}_{geq0}
    +2x_2^TBx_1geq2x_2^TBx_1
    $$



    and



    $$
    begin{bmatrix}
    x1&x2
    end{bmatrix}
    M'
    begin{bmatrix}
    x1\x2
    end{bmatrix}
    =x_1^TAx_1+x_2^TCx_2-2x_2^TBx_1geq-2x_2^TBx_1.
    $$



    Then I get stuck, but I feel like I'm very close to the conclusion










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I am trying to follow some notes that imply
      $$
      M=
      begin{bmatrix}
      A&B^T\B&C
      end{bmatrix}
      succeq 0
      Longleftrightarrow
      M'=
      begin{bmatrix}
      A&-B^T\-B&C
      end{bmatrix}
      succeq 0$$

      and I want to prove this to myself (just the $Rightarrow$ direction because it's trivial to go the other way once one direction is proven).



      So far I have that $A,Csucceq0$ by computing $x^TMx$ (for certain $x$) which is $geq0 forall x$ by definition. Therefore,



      $$
      begin{bmatrix}
      x1&x2
      end{bmatrix}
      M
      begin{bmatrix}
      x1\x2
      end{bmatrix}
      =
      underbrace{x_1^TAx_1}_{geq0}
      +
      underbrace{x_2^TCx_2}_{geq0}
      +2x_2^TBx_1geq2x_2^TBx_1
      $$



      and



      $$
      begin{bmatrix}
      x1&x2
      end{bmatrix}
      M'
      begin{bmatrix}
      x1\x2
      end{bmatrix}
      =x_1^TAx_1+x_2^TCx_2-2x_2^TBx_1geq-2x_2^TBx_1.
      $$



      Then I get stuck, but I feel like I'm very close to the conclusion










      share|cite|improve this question















      I am trying to follow some notes that imply
      $$
      M=
      begin{bmatrix}
      A&B^T\B&C
      end{bmatrix}
      succeq 0
      Longleftrightarrow
      M'=
      begin{bmatrix}
      A&-B^T\-B&C
      end{bmatrix}
      succeq 0$$

      and I want to prove this to myself (just the $Rightarrow$ direction because it's trivial to go the other way once one direction is proven).



      So far I have that $A,Csucceq0$ by computing $x^TMx$ (for certain $x$) which is $geq0 forall x$ by definition. Therefore,



      $$
      begin{bmatrix}
      x1&x2
      end{bmatrix}
      M
      begin{bmatrix}
      x1\x2
      end{bmatrix}
      =
      underbrace{x_1^TAx_1}_{geq0}
      +
      underbrace{x_2^TCx_2}_{geq0}
      +2x_2^TBx_1geq2x_2^TBx_1
      $$



      and



      $$
      begin{bmatrix}
      x1&x2
      end{bmatrix}
      M'
      begin{bmatrix}
      x1\x2
      end{bmatrix}
      =x_1^TAx_1+x_2^TCx_2-2x_2^TBx_1geq-2x_2^TBx_1.
      $$



      Then I get stuck, but I feel like I'm very close to the conclusion







      positive-semidefinite block-matrices






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 23 at 17:59

























      asked Nov 23 at 15:45









      Dan

      154




      154



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010510%2fpositive-semidefinite-block-matrix-is-psd-with-negated-off-diagonal-blocks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010510%2fpositive-semidefinite-block-matrix-is-psd-with-negated-off-diagonal-blocks%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

          Berounka

          I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...