How do I show a linear operator is bounded?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Let $ A:L_2[0,pi] to L_2[0,pi] $ is a linear operator such that
$$(Ax)(t)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}[int_{0}^{pi}x(s)sin(ns)ds]cos(nt)$$



How do I work out that $A$ is a bounded linear operator for this specific example?



My Attempt:



I must show $ |Ax|leq M.|x| $ there exists some $ M geq 0 $ .



$$|Ax|^{2} =int_{0}^{pi}|sum_{n=1}^{infty}[int_{0}^{pi}x(s)sin(ns)ds]cos(nt)|^{2}dt\ =int_{0}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}|cos(nt)|^{2}|int_{0}^{pi}|x(s)sin(ns)ds|^{2}dt\ < int_{0}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}|cos(nt)|^{2}[underbrace{ int_{0}^{pi}|x(s)|^{2}ds}_{=|x|^{2}}int_{0}^{pi}|sin(ns)|^{2}ds]dt$$










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Let $ A:L_2[0,pi] to L_2[0,pi] $ is a linear operator such that
    $$(Ax)(t)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}[int_{0}^{pi}x(s)sin(ns)ds]cos(nt)$$



    How do I work out that $A$ is a bounded linear operator for this specific example?



    My Attempt:



    I must show $ |Ax|leq M.|x| $ there exists some $ M geq 0 $ .



    $$|Ax|^{2} =int_{0}^{pi}|sum_{n=1}^{infty}[int_{0}^{pi}x(s)sin(ns)ds]cos(nt)|^{2}dt\ =int_{0}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}|cos(nt)|^{2}|int_{0}^{pi}|x(s)sin(ns)ds|^{2}dt\ < int_{0}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}|cos(nt)|^{2}[underbrace{ int_{0}^{pi}|x(s)|^{2}ds}_{=|x|^{2}}int_{0}^{pi}|sin(ns)|^{2}ds]dt$$










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Let $ A:L_2[0,pi] to L_2[0,pi] $ is a linear operator such that
      $$(Ax)(t)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}[int_{0}^{pi}x(s)sin(ns)ds]cos(nt)$$



      How do I work out that $A$ is a bounded linear operator for this specific example?



      My Attempt:



      I must show $ |Ax|leq M.|x| $ there exists some $ M geq 0 $ .



      $$|Ax|^{2} =int_{0}^{pi}|sum_{n=1}^{infty}[int_{0}^{pi}x(s)sin(ns)ds]cos(nt)|^{2}dt\ =int_{0}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}|cos(nt)|^{2}|int_{0}^{pi}|x(s)sin(ns)ds|^{2}dt\ < int_{0}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}|cos(nt)|^{2}[underbrace{ int_{0}^{pi}|x(s)|^{2}ds}_{=|x|^{2}}int_{0}^{pi}|sin(ns)|^{2}ds]dt$$










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $ A:L_2[0,pi] to L_2[0,pi] $ is a linear operator such that
      $$(Ax)(t)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}[int_{0}^{pi}x(s)sin(ns)ds]cos(nt)$$



      How do I work out that $A$ is a bounded linear operator for this specific example?



      My Attempt:



      I must show $ |Ax|leq M.|x| $ there exists some $ M geq 0 $ .



      $$|Ax|^{2} =int_{0}^{pi}|sum_{n=1}^{infty}[int_{0}^{pi}x(s)sin(ns)ds]cos(nt)|^{2}dt\ =int_{0}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}|cos(nt)|^{2}|int_{0}^{pi}|x(s)sin(ns)ds|^{2}dt\ < int_{0}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}|cos(nt)|^{2}[underbrace{ int_{0}^{pi}|x(s)|^{2}ds}_{=|x|^{2}}int_{0}^{pi}|sin(ns)|^{2}ds]dt$$







      functional-analysis operator-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 28 at 22:03









      Davide Giraudo

      124k16150259




      124k16150259










      asked Nov 28 at 21:57









      os.

      183




      183






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          It's a bit easier to do the problem in abstract. Suppose that ${e_n}$ and ${f_n}$ are orthonormal sets in a Hilbert space $H$. Define
          $$tag1
          Ax=sum_n langle x,e_nrangle,f_n.
          $$

          This is well-defined because for any finite sum we have, since ${f_n}$ is orthonormal,
          $$tag2
          left|sum_{n=1}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=1}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2leq|x|^2,
          $$

          where the inequality is Bessel's inequality. Similarly,
          $$
          left|sum_{n=M}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=M}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2,
          $$

          showing that the sequence of partial sums is Cauchy. So the series in $(1)$ exists in $H$, and by $(2)$ we have $|Ax|leq|x|$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017778%2fhow-do-i-show-a-linear-operator-is-bounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            It's a bit easier to do the problem in abstract. Suppose that ${e_n}$ and ${f_n}$ are orthonormal sets in a Hilbert space $H$. Define
            $$tag1
            Ax=sum_n langle x,e_nrangle,f_n.
            $$

            This is well-defined because for any finite sum we have, since ${f_n}$ is orthonormal,
            $$tag2
            left|sum_{n=1}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=1}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2leq|x|^2,
            $$

            where the inequality is Bessel's inequality. Similarly,
            $$
            left|sum_{n=M}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=M}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2,
            $$

            showing that the sequence of partial sums is Cauchy. So the series in $(1)$ exists in $H$, and by $(2)$ we have $|Ax|leq|x|$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              It's a bit easier to do the problem in abstract. Suppose that ${e_n}$ and ${f_n}$ are orthonormal sets in a Hilbert space $H$. Define
              $$tag1
              Ax=sum_n langle x,e_nrangle,f_n.
              $$

              This is well-defined because for any finite sum we have, since ${f_n}$ is orthonormal,
              $$tag2
              left|sum_{n=1}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=1}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2leq|x|^2,
              $$

              where the inequality is Bessel's inequality. Similarly,
              $$
              left|sum_{n=M}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=M}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2,
              $$

              showing that the sequence of partial sums is Cauchy. So the series in $(1)$ exists in $H$, and by $(2)$ we have $|Ax|leq|x|$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                It's a bit easier to do the problem in abstract. Suppose that ${e_n}$ and ${f_n}$ are orthonormal sets in a Hilbert space $H$. Define
                $$tag1
                Ax=sum_n langle x,e_nrangle,f_n.
                $$

                This is well-defined because for any finite sum we have, since ${f_n}$ is orthonormal,
                $$tag2
                left|sum_{n=1}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=1}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2leq|x|^2,
                $$

                where the inequality is Bessel's inequality. Similarly,
                $$
                left|sum_{n=M}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=M}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2,
                $$

                showing that the sequence of partial sums is Cauchy. So the series in $(1)$ exists in $H$, and by $(2)$ we have $|Ax|leq|x|$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                It's a bit easier to do the problem in abstract. Suppose that ${e_n}$ and ${f_n}$ are orthonormal sets in a Hilbert space $H$. Define
                $$tag1
                Ax=sum_n langle x,e_nrangle,f_n.
                $$

                This is well-defined because for any finite sum we have, since ${f_n}$ is orthonormal,
                $$tag2
                left|sum_{n=1}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=1}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2leq|x|^2,
                $$

                where the inequality is Bessel's inequality. Similarly,
                $$
                left|sum_{n=M}^Nlangle x,e_nrangle,f_nright|^2=sum_{n=M}^N|langle x,e_nrangle|^2,
                $$

                showing that the sequence of partial sums is Cauchy. So the series in $(1)$ exists in $H$, and by $(2)$ we have $|Ax|leq|x|$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 28 at 23:43









                Martin Argerami

                123k1176174




                123k1176174






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017778%2fhow-do-i-show-a-linear-operator-is-bounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Berounka

                    Sphinx de Gizeh

                    Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...