What would SPARQL return












-2














Assuming there are 4 RDF triplestores and RDF prefixes have already been defined:



ex:Tom foaf:knows ex:Jerry

ex:Jerry foaf:interest “cheese”

ex:Tom foaf:interest “traps”

ex:Jerry rdfs:subClassOf dbo:animal


What would the SPARQL query below return (assuming these are in table format)?



PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>

SELECT ?x

{?x foaf:interest ?interest}









share|improve this question
























  • well, you should learn the terminology: "4 RDF triple stores" - clearly, not - this are 4 RDF triples. And did you read a SPARQL tutorial? Or even more obvious, did you try the query on the data? It's by the way trivial if you already know that SPARQL is all about pattern matching. I mean, even without knowing SPARQL, one would think that the variables are just placeholders and we search for RDF triples matching the pattern
    – AKSW
    Nov 22 at 17:38










  • I think I know but I just want to make sure. Is it cheese and trap
    – Study Diary
    Nov 23 at 8:07










  • well, no...you do SELECT ?x, so what is returned? Obviously, all bindings of ?x matching triples in the RDF data.
    – AKSW
    Nov 23 at 8:27
















-2














Assuming there are 4 RDF triplestores and RDF prefixes have already been defined:



ex:Tom foaf:knows ex:Jerry

ex:Jerry foaf:interest “cheese”

ex:Tom foaf:interest “traps”

ex:Jerry rdfs:subClassOf dbo:animal


What would the SPARQL query below return (assuming these are in table format)?



PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>

SELECT ?x

{?x foaf:interest ?interest}









share|improve this question
























  • well, you should learn the terminology: "4 RDF triple stores" - clearly, not - this are 4 RDF triples. And did you read a SPARQL tutorial? Or even more obvious, did you try the query on the data? It's by the way trivial if you already know that SPARQL is all about pattern matching. I mean, even without knowing SPARQL, one would think that the variables are just placeholders and we search for RDF triples matching the pattern
    – AKSW
    Nov 22 at 17:38










  • I think I know but I just want to make sure. Is it cheese and trap
    – Study Diary
    Nov 23 at 8:07










  • well, no...you do SELECT ?x, so what is returned? Obviously, all bindings of ?x matching triples in the RDF data.
    – AKSW
    Nov 23 at 8:27














-2












-2








-2







Assuming there are 4 RDF triplestores and RDF prefixes have already been defined:



ex:Tom foaf:knows ex:Jerry

ex:Jerry foaf:interest “cheese”

ex:Tom foaf:interest “traps”

ex:Jerry rdfs:subClassOf dbo:animal


What would the SPARQL query below return (assuming these are in table format)?



PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>

SELECT ?x

{?x foaf:interest ?interest}









share|improve this question















Assuming there are 4 RDF triplestores and RDF prefixes have already been defined:



ex:Tom foaf:knows ex:Jerry

ex:Jerry foaf:interest “cheese”

ex:Tom foaf:interest “traps”

ex:Jerry rdfs:subClassOf dbo:animal


What would the SPARQL query below return (assuming these are in table format)?



PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>

SELECT ?x

{?x foaf:interest ?interest}






sparql rdf






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 17:39









AKSW

7,0641820




7,0641820










asked Nov 22 at 13:27









Study Diary

13




13












  • well, you should learn the terminology: "4 RDF triple stores" - clearly, not - this are 4 RDF triples. And did you read a SPARQL tutorial? Or even more obvious, did you try the query on the data? It's by the way trivial if you already know that SPARQL is all about pattern matching. I mean, even without knowing SPARQL, one would think that the variables are just placeholders and we search for RDF triples matching the pattern
    – AKSW
    Nov 22 at 17:38










  • I think I know but I just want to make sure. Is it cheese and trap
    – Study Diary
    Nov 23 at 8:07










  • well, no...you do SELECT ?x, so what is returned? Obviously, all bindings of ?x matching triples in the RDF data.
    – AKSW
    Nov 23 at 8:27


















  • well, you should learn the terminology: "4 RDF triple stores" - clearly, not - this are 4 RDF triples. And did you read a SPARQL tutorial? Or even more obvious, did you try the query on the data? It's by the way trivial if you already know that SPARQL is all about pattern matching. I mean, even without knowing SPARQL, one would think that the variables are just placeholders and we search for RDF triples matching the pattern
    – AKSW
    Nov 22 at 17:38










  • I think I know but I just want to make sure. Is it cheese and trap
    – Study Diary
    Nov 23 at 8:07










  • well, no...you do SELECT ?x, so what is returned? Obviously, all bindings of ?x matching triples in the RDF data.
    – AKSW
    Nov 23 at 8:27
















well, you should learn the terminology: "4 RDF triple stores" - clearly, not - this are 4 RDF triples. And did you read a SPARQL tutorial? Or even more obvious, did you try the query on the data? It's by the way trivial if you already know that SPARQL is all about pattern matching. I mean, even without knowing SPARQL, one would think that the variables are just placeholders and we search for RDF triples matching the pattern
– AKSW
Nov 22 at 17:38




well, you should learn the terminology: "4 RDF triple stores" - clearly, not - this are 4 RDF triples. And did you read a SPARQL tutorial? Or even more obvious, did you try the query on the data? It's by the way trivial if you already know that SPARQL is all about pattern matching. I mean, even without knowing SPARQL, one would think that the variables are just placeholders and we search for RDF triples matching the pattern
– AKSW
Nov 22 at 17:38












I think I know but I just want to make sure. Is it cheese and trap
– Study Diary
Nov 23 at 8:07




I think I know but I just want to make sure. Is it cheese and trap
– Study Diary
Nov 23 at 8:07












well, no...you do SELECT ?x, so what is returned? Obviously, all bindings of ?x matching triples in the RDF data.
– AKSW
Nov 23 at 8:27




well, no...you do SELECT ?x, so what is returned? Obviously, all bindings of ?x matching triples in the RDF data.
– AKSW
Nov 23 at 8:27

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53432044%2fwhat-would-sparql-return%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53432044%2fwhat-would-sparql-return%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Berounka

Sphinx de Gizeh

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...