Constants for a solution to the Laplace equation











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider one of the solutions to the Laplace equation
$$u(x,t)=sum_{n=1}^{infty} C_{n}e^{-alpha _{n}^2kt}left [ frac{-alpha_{n} }{h}cos(alpha _{n}x) + B_{n}sin(alpha _{n}x) right ],$$
where
$alpha _{n}^2$ is a positive eigenvalue. An initial condition is given as
$$u(x,0)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}C_{n}left [ frac{-alpha_{n} }{h}cos(alpha _{n}x) + B_{n}sin(alpha _{n}x) right ].$$



I am not showing my work that got me to this solution, because that would be a bit of time waster, both for me and whoever is reading.



My question is:




From this information, what would be the constants(usually given as an expression with an integral) of $C_{n}$ and $B_{n}$?




I usually do not have trouble with this, but the $C_{n}$ seems to be where I am confused. I understand that this would be a full Fourier seires, but I am not too sure how to continue. Could anyone provide me some feedback?



Thanks in advance!



Edit: The boundary conditions are:
$$u_{x}(0,t) +hu(0,t)=0 text{and} u_{x}(1,t)=0, t>0.$$
Also, I am just showing the solution for the positive eigenvalues, since I do not need help finding the constants for the negative one.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What are your boundary conditions?
    – carsandpulsars
    Nov 29 at 4:56










  • @carsandpulsars Added!
    – MathIsLife12
    Nov 29 at 5:01










  • For determining the coefficients, the boundary of $x$ is important from the orthogonality relations, is it $[0,1]$?
    – DaveNine
    Nov 29 at 9:46










  • Yes. Sorry for not including that.
    – MathIsLife12
    Nov 29 at 13:41















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider one of the solutions to the Laplace equation
$$u(x,t)=sum_{n=1}^{infty} C_{n}e^{-alpha _{n}^2kt}left [ frac{-alpha_{n} }{h}cos(alpha _{n}x) + B_{n}sin(alpha _{n}x) right ],$$
where
$alpha _{n}^2$ is a positive eigenvalue. An initial condition is given as
$$u(x,0)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}C_{n}left [ frac{-alpha_{n} }{h}cos(alpha _{n}x) + B_{n}sin(alpha _{n}x) right ].$$



I am not showing my work that got me to this solution, because that would be a bit of time waster, both for me and whoever is reading.



My question is:




From this information, what would be the constants(usually given as an expression with an integral) of $C_{n}$ and $B_{n}$?




I usually do not have trouble with this, but the $C_{n}$ seems to be where I am confused. I understand that this would be a full Fourier seires, but I am not too sure how to continue. Could anyone provide me some feedback?



Thanks in advance!



Edit: The boundary conditions are:
$$u_{x}(0,t) +hu(0,t)=0 text{and} u_{x}(1,t)=0, t>0.$$
Also, I am just showing the solution for the positive eigenvalues, since I do not need help finding the constants for the negative one.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What are your boundary conditions?
    – carsandpulsars
    Nov 29 at 4:56










  • @carsandpulsars Added!
    – MathIsLife12
    Nov 29 at 5:01










  • For determining the coefficients, the boundary of $x$ is important from the orthogonality relations, is it $[0,1]$?
    – DaveNine
    Nov 29 at 9:46










  • Yes. Sorry for not including that.
    – MathIsLife12
    Nov 29 at 13:41













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Consider one of the solutions to the Laplace equation
$$u(x,t)=sum_{n=1}^{infty} C_{n}e^{-alpha _{n}^2kt}left [ frac{-alpha_{n} }{h}cos(alpha _{n}x) + B_{n}sin(alpha _{n}x) right ],$$
where
$alpha _{n}^2$ is a positive eigenvalue. An initial condition is given as
$$u(x,0)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}C_{n}left [ frac{-alpha_{n} }{h}cos(alpha _{n}x) + B_{n}sin(alpha _{n}x) right ].$$



I am not showing my work that got me to this solution, because that would be a bit of time waster, both for me and whoever is reading.



My question is:




From this information, what would be the constants(usually given as an expression with an integral) of $C_{n}$ and $B_{n}$?




I usually do not have trouble with this, but the $C_{n}$ seems to be where I am confused. I understand that this would be a full Fourier seires, but I am not too sure how to continue. Could anyone provide me some feedback?



Thanks in advance!



Edit: The boundary conditions are:
$$u_{x}(0,t) +hu(0,t)=0 text{and} u_{x}(1,t)=0, t>0.$$
Also, I am just showing the solution for the positive eigenvalues, since I do not need help finding the constants for the negative one.










share|cite|improve this question















Consider one of the solutions to the Laplace equation
$$u(x,t)=sum_{n=1}^{infty} C_{n}e^{-alpha _{n}^2kt}left [ frac{-alpha_{n} }{h}cos(alpha _{n}x) + B_{n}sin(alpha _{n}x) right ],$$
where
$alpha _{n}^2$ is a positive eigenvalue. An initial condition is given as
$$u(x,0)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}C_{n}left [ frac{-alpha_{n} }{h}cos(alpha _{n}x) + B_{n}sin(alpha _{n}x) right ].$$



I am not showing my work that got me to this solution, because that would be a bit of time waster, both for me and whoever is reading.



My question is:




From this information, what would be the constants(usually given as an expression with an integral) of $C_{n}$ and $B_{n}$?




I usually do not have trouble with this, but the $C_{n}$ seems to be where I am confused. I understand that this would be a full Fourier seires, but I am not too sure how to continue. Could anyone provide me some feedback?



Thanks in advance!



Edit: The boundary conditions are:
$$u_{x}(0,t) +hu(0,t)=0 text{and} u_{x}(1,t)=0, t>0.$$
Also, I am just showing the solution for the positive eigenvalues, since I do not need help finding the constants for the negative one.







pde fourier-series






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 at 5:00

























asked Nov 29 at 4:49









MathIsLife12

561111




561111












  • What are your boundary conditions?
    – carsandpulsars
    Nov 29 at 4:56










  • @carsandpulsars Added!
    – MathIsLife12
    Nov 29 at 5:01










  • For determining the coefficients, the boundary of $x$ is important from the orthogonality relations, is it $[0,1]$?
    – DaveNine
    Nov 29 at 9:46










  • Yes. Sorry for not including that.
    – MathIsLife12
    Nov 29 at 13:41


















  • What are your boundary conditions?
    – carsandpulsars
    Nov 29 at 4:56










  • @carsandpulsars Added!
    – MathIsLife12
    Nov 29 at 5:01










  • For determining the coefficients, the boundary of $x$ is important from the orthogonality relations, is it $[0,1]$?
    – DaveNine
    Nov 29 at 9:46










  • Yes. Sorry for not including that.
    – MathIsLife12
    Nov 29 at 13:41
















What are your boundary conditions?
– carsandpulsars
Nov 29 at 4:56




What are your boundary conditions?
– carsandpulsars
Nov 29 at 4:56












@carsandpulsars Added!
– MathIsLife12
Nov 29 at 5:01




@carsandpulsars Added!
– MathIsLife12
Nov 29 at 5:01












For determining the coefficients, the boundary of $x$ is important from the orthogonality relations, is it $[0,1]$?
– DaveNine
Nov 29 at 9:46




For determining the coefficients, the boundary of $x$ is important from the orthogonality relations, is it $[0,1]$?
– DaveNine
Nov 29 at 9:46












Yes. Sorry for not including that.
– MathIsLife12
Nov 29 at 13:41




Yes. Sorry for not including that.
– MathIsLife12
Nov 29 at 13:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Let's start off with the eigenfunction in $x$



$$ X_n(x) = -frac{alpha_n}{h}cos(alpha_n x) + B_nsin(alpha_n x) $$



The first B.C. gives



$$ X_n'(0) + hX_n(0) = alpha_n B_n - alpha_n = 0 implies B_n = 1 $$



With that out of the way, the second B.C. gives



$$ X_n'(1) = alpha_nleft[frac{alpha_n}{h}sin alpha_n + cosalpha_nright] = 0 $$



$$ implies alpha_ntanalpha_n = -h $$



This is a necessary condition for $alpha_n$. There is no closed form, but you can solve it numerically given any $h$.





To show the eigenfunctions are orthogonal, note that for $nne m$ we have



$$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n = {X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 + int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' $$



However



begin{align}
{X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 &= -{X_m}'(0)X_n(0) + X_m(0){X_n}'(0) \
&= hX_m(0)cdot X_n(0) - X_m(0)cdot hX_n(0) = 0
end{align}



Therefore



$$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n - int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' = 0 implies -(alpha_m^2-alpha_n^2)int_0^1 X_mX_n = 0 $$



But $alpha_m ne alpha_n$, so the integral must be $0$





The remaining condition is



$$ u(x,0) = f(x) = sum_n C_n X_n(x) $$



where $f(x)$ is a known function. Using orthogonality



$$ int_0^1 f(x)X_m(x) dx = sum_n C_n int_0^1 X_n(x) X_m(x) dx = C_m int_0^1 big[X_m(x)big]^2 dx $$



$$ implies C_n = frac{int_0^1 f(x) X_n(x) dx}{int_0^1 big[X_n(x)big]^2 dx} $$



where the integrals depend on $alpha_n$. Again, numerical computation is useful here





If you follow the same method for the other case, i.e. $X'' = mu^2 X$, you'll find



$$ X_n(x) = frac{mu_n}{h}cosh(mu_n x) + sinh(mu_n x) $$



and $ mu_ntanhmu_n = h $. There is one solution if $h > 0$.



Note that the formula for $C_n$ works the same whether the eigenvalue is positive, negative, or zero.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018194%2fconstants-for-a-solution-to-the-laplace-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Let's start off with the eigenfunction in $x$



    $$ X_n(x) = -frac{alpha_n}{h}cos(alpha_n x) + B_nsin(alpha_n x) $$



    The first B.C. gives



    $$ X_n'(0) + hX_n(0) = alpha_n B_n - alpha_n = 0 implies B_n = 1 $$



    With that out of the way, the second B.C. gives



    $$ X_n'(1) = alpha_nleft[frac{alpha_n}{h}sin alpha_n + cosalpha_nright] = 0 $$



    $$ implies alpha_ntanalpha_n = -h $$



    This is a necessary condition for $alpha_n$. There is no closed form, but you can solve it numerically given any $h$.





    To show the eigenfunctions are orthogonal, note that for $nne m$ we have



    $$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n = {X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 + int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' $$



    However



    begin{align}
    {X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 &= -{X_m}'(0)X_n(0) + X_m(0){X_n}'(0) \
    &= hX_m(0)cdot X_n(0) - X_m(0)cdot hX_n(0) = 0
    end{align}



    Therefore



    $$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n - int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' = 0 implies -(alpha_m^2-alpha_n^2)int_0^1 X_mX_n = 0 $$



    But $alpha_m ne alpha_n$, so the integral must be $0$





    The remaining condition is



    $$ u(x,0) = f(x) = sum_n C_n X_n(x) $$



    where $f(x)$ is a known function. Using orthogonality



    $$ int_0^1 f(x)X_m(x) dx = sum_n C_n int_0^1 X_n(x) X_m(x) dx = C_m int_0^1 big[X_m(x)big]^2 dx $$



    $$ implies C_n = frac{int_0^1 f(x) X_n(x) dx}{int_0^1 big[X_n(x)big]^2 dx} $$



    where the integrals depend on $alpha_n$. Again, numerical computation is useful here





    If you follow the same method for the other case, i.e. $X'' = mu^2 X$, you'll find



    $$ X_n(x) = frac{mu_n}{h}cosh(mu_n x) + sinh(mu_n x) $$



    and $ mu_ntanhmu_n = h $. There is one solution if $h > 0$.



    Note that the formula for $C_n$ works the same whether the eigenvalue is positive, negative, or zero.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Let's start off with the eigenfunction in $x$



      $$ X_n(x) = -frac{alpha_n}{h}cos(alpha_n x) + B_nsin(alpha_n x) $$



      The first B.C. gives



      $$ X_n'(0) + hX_n(0) = alpha_n B_n - alpha_n = 0 implies B_n = 1 $$



      With that out of the way, the second B.C. gives



      $$ X_n'(1) = alpha_nleft[frac{alpha_n}{h}sin alpha_n + cosalpha_nright] = 0 $$



      $$ implies alpha_ntanalpha_n = -h $$



      This is a necessary condition for $alpha_n$. There is no closed form, but you can solve it numerically given any $h$.





      To show the eigenfunctions are orthogonal, note that for $nne m$ we have



      $$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n = {X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 + int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' $$



      However



      begin{align}
      {X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 &= -{X_m}'(0)X_n(0) + X_m(0){X_n}'(0) \
      &= hX_m(0)cdot X_n(0) - X_m(0)cdot hX_n(0) = 0
      end{align}



      Therefore



      $$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n - int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' = 0 implies -(alpha_m^2-alpha_n^2)int_0^1 X_mX_n = 0 $$



      But $alpha_m ne alpha_n$, so the integral must be $0$





      The remaining condition is



      $$ u(x,0) = f(x) = sum_n C_n X_n(x) $$



      where $f(x)$ is a known function. Using orthogonality



      $$ int_0^1 f(x)X_m(x) dx = sum_n C_n int_0^1 X_n(x) X_m(x) dx = C_m int_0^1 big[X_m(x)big]^2 dx $$



      $$ implies C_n = frac{int_0^1 f(x) X_n(x) dx}{int_0^1 big[X_n(x)big]^2 dx} $$



      where the integrals depend on $alpha_n$. Again, numerical computation is useful here





      If you follow the same method for the other case, i.e. $X'' = mu^2 X$, you'll find



      $$ X_n(x) = frac{mu_n}{h}cosh(mu_n x) + sinh(mu_n x) $$



      and $ mu_ntanhmu_n = h $. There is one solution if $h > 0$.



      Note that the formula for $C_n$ works the same whether the eigenvalue is positive, negative, or zero.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        Let's start off with the eigenfunction in $x$



        $$ X_n(x) = -frac{alpha_n}{h}cos(alpha_n x) + B_nsin(alpha_n x) $$



        The first B.C. gives



        $$ X_n'(0) + hX_n(0) = alpha_n B_n - alpha_n = 0 implies B_n = 1 $$



        With that out of the way, the second B.C. gives



        $$ X_n'(1) = alpha_nleft[frac{alpha_n}{h}sin alpha_n + cosalpha_nright] = 0 $$



        $$ implies alpha_ntanalpha_n = -h $$



        This is a necessary condition for $alpha_n$. There is no closed form, but you can solve it numerically given any $h$.





        To show the eigenfunctions are orthogonal, note that for $nne m$ we have



        $$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n = {X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 + int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' $$



        However



        begin{align}
        {X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 &= -{X_m}'(0)X_n(0) + X_m(0){X_n}'(0) \
        &= hX_m(0)cdot X_n(0) - X_m(0)cdot hX_n(0) = 0
        end{align}



        Therefore



        $$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n - int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' = 0 implies -(alpha_m^2-alpha_n^2)int_0^1 X_mX_n = 0 $$



        But $alpha_m ne alpha_n$, so the integral must be $0$





        The remaining condition is



        $$ u(x,0) = f(x) = sum_n C_n X_n(x) $$



        where $f(x)$ is a known function. Using orthogonality



        $$ int_0^1 f(x)X_m(x) dx = sum_n C_n int_0^1 X_n(x) X_m(x) dx = C_m int_0^1 big[X_m(x)big]^2 dx $$



        $$ implies C_n = frac{int_0^1 f(x) X_n(x) dx}{int_0^1 big[X_n(x)big]^2 dx} $$



        where the integrals depend on $alpha_n$. Again, numerical computation is useful here





        If you follow the same method for the other case, i.e. $X'' = mu^2 X$, you'll find



        $$ X_n(x) = frac{mu_n}{h}cosh(mu_n x) + sinh(mu_n x) $$



        and $ mu_ntanhmu_n = h $. There is one solution if $h > 0$.



        Note that the formula for $C_n$ works the same whether the eigenvalue is positive, negative, or zero.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Let's start off with the eigenfunction in $x$



        $$ X_n(x) = -frac{alpha_n}{h}cos(alpha_n x) + B_nsin(alpha_n x) $$



        The first B.C. gives



        $$ X_n'(0) + hX_n(0) = alpha_n B_n - alpha_n = 0 implies B_n = 1 $$



        With that out of the way, the second B.C. gives



        $$ X_n'(1) = alpha_nleft[frac{alpha_n}{h}sin alpha_n + cosalpha_nright] = 0 $$



        $$ implies alpha_ntanalpha_n = -h $$



        This is a necessary condition for $alpha_n$. There is no closed form, but you can solve it numerically given any $h$.





        To show the eigenfunctions are orthogonal, note that for $nne m$ we have



        $$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n = {X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 + int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' $$



        However



        begin{align}
        {X_m}'X_nBigg|_0^1 - X_n{X_m}'Bigg|_0^1 &= -{X_m}'(0)X_n(0) + X_m(0){X_n}'(0) \
        &= hX_m(0)cdot X_n(0) - X_m(0)cdot hX_n(0) = 0
        end{align}



        Therefore



        $$ int_0^1 {X_m}''X_n - int_0^1 X_m{X_n}'' = 0 implies -(alpha_m^2-alpha_n^2)int_0^1 X_mX_n = 0 $$



        But $alpha_m ne alpha_n$, so the integral must be $0$





        The remaining condition is



        $$ u(x,0) = f(x) = sum_n C_n X_n(x) $$



        where $f(x)$ is a known function. Using orthogonality



        $$ int_0^1 f(x)X_m(x) dx = sum_n C_n int_0^1 X_n(x) X_m(x) dx = C_m int_0^1 big[X_m(x)big]^2 dx $$



        $$ implies C_n = frac{int_0^1 f(x) X_n(x) dx}{int_0^1 big[X_n(x)big]^2 dx} $$



        where the integrals depend on $alpha_n$. Again, numerical computation is useful here





        If you follow the same method for the other case, i.e. $X'' = mu^2 X$, you'll find



        $$ X_n(x) = frac{mu_n}{h}cosh(mu_n x) + sinh(mu_n x) $$



        and $ mu_ntanhmu_n = h $. There is one solution if $h > 0$.



        Note that the formula for $C_n$ works the same whether the eigenvalue is positive, negative, or zero.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 29 at 21:16

























        answered Nov 29 at 20:50









        Dylan

        12.1k31026




        12.1k31026






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018194%2fconstants-for-a-solution-to-the-laplace-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

            Berounka

            I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...