Proof that Gauss- Seidel iteration method converges for any initial x if the matrix is self-adjoint and...











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am trying to create a direct proof that if the matrix A is self-adjoint and positive-definite, then the Gauss-Seidel iteration converges for any initial ${bf x}_{0}$



I think I need to prove $rho({bf T}) < 1$ so
I begin by letting my ${bf A} = {bf D} - {bf L} - {bf L}^*$ and ${bf T}_{G}= ({bf D}-{bf L})^{-1}{bf L}^*$ where



I can use the fact that I can multiply ${bf D}^{1/2}$ to both sides of ${bf T}_{G}$ since Eigenvalues are insensitive giving me the following:



${bf T}_1 = {bf D}^{1/2}{bf T}_{G}{bf D}^{-1/2} = ({bf I} -
{bf L}_{1})^{-1}{bf L}_{1}^*$
, where ${bf L}_{1} =
{bf D}^{-1/2}{bf L}{bf D}^{-1/2}$
.



I'm stuck as to what to do next. Any help is appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
    – Algebraic Pavel
    Nov 29 at 9:59















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am trying to create a direct proof that if the matrix A is self-adjoint and positive-definite, then the Gauss-Seidel iteration converges for any initial ${bf x}_{0}$



I think I need to prove $rho({bf T}) < 1$ so
I begin by letting my ${bf A} = {bf D} - {bf L} - {bf L}^*$ and ${bf T}_{G}= ({bf D}-{bf L})^{-1}{bf L}^*$ where



I can use the fact that I can multiply ${bf D}^{1/2}$ to both sides of ${bf T}_{G}$ since Eigenvalues are insensitive giving me the following:



${bf T}_1 = {bf D}^{1/2}{bf T}_{G}{bf D}^{-1/2} = ({bf I} -
{bf L}_{1})^{-1}{bf L}_{1}^*$
, where ${bf L}_{1} =
{bf D}^{-1/2}{bf L}{bf D}^{-1/2}$
.



I'm stuck as to what to do next. Any help is appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
    – Algebraic Pavel
    Nov 29 at 9:59













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I am trying to create a direct proof that if the matrix A is self-adjoint and positive-definite, then the Gauss-Seidel iteration converges for any initial ${bf x}_{0}$



I think I need to prove $rho({bf T}) < 1$ so
I begin by letting my ${bf A} = {bf D} - {bf L} - {bf L}^*$ and ${bf T}_{G}= ({bf D}-{bf L})^{-1}{bf L}^*$ where



I can use the fact that I can multiply ${bf D}^{1/2}$ to both sides of ${bf T}_{G}$ since Eigenvalues are insensitive giving me the following:



${bf T}_1 = {bf D}^{1/2}{bf T}_{G}{bf D}^{-1/2} = ({bf I} -
{bf L}_{1})^{-1}{bf L}_{1}^*$
, where ${bf L}_{1} =
{bf D}^{-1/2}{bf L}{bf D}^{-1/2}$
.



I'm stuck as to what to do next. Any help is appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question















I am trying to create a direct proof that if the matrix A is self-adjoint and positive-definite, then the Gauss-Seidel iteration converges for any initial ${bf x}_{0}$



I think I need to prove $rho({bf T}) < 1$ so
I begin by letting my ${bf A} = {bf D} - {bf L} - {bf L}^*$ and ${bf T}_{G}= ({bf D}-{bf L})^{-1}{bf L}^*$ where



I can use the fact that I can multiply ${bf D}^{1/2}$ to both sides of ${bf T}_{G}$ since Eigenvalues are insensitive giving me the following:



${bf T}_1 = {bf D}^{1/2}{bf T}_{G}{bf D}^{-1/2} = ({bf I} -
{bf L}_{1})^{-1}{bf L}_{1}^*$
, where ${bf L}_{1} =
{bf D}^{-1/2}{bf L}{bf D}^{-1/2}$
.



I'm stuck as to what to do next. Any help is appreciated!







linear-algebra numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra positive-definite






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 30 at 3:44

























asked Nov 29 at 4:38









Jennifer Laundey

84




84








  • 1




    Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
    – Algebraic Pavel
    Nov 29 at 9:59














  • 1




    Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
    – Algebraic Pavel
    Nov 29 at 9:59








1




1




Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
– Algebraic Pavel
Nov 29 at 9:59




Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
– Algebraic Pavel
Nov 29 at 9:59















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018186%2fproof-that-gauss-seidel-iteration-method-converges-for-any-initial-x-if-the-mat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018186%2fproof-that-gauss-seidel-iteration-method-converges-for-any-initial-x-if-the-mat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Different font size/position of beamer's navigation symbols template's content depending on regular/plain...

Berounka

I want to find a topological embedding $f : X rightarrow Y$ and $g: Y rightarrow X$, yet $X$ is not...