Proof that Gauss- Seidel iteration method converges for any initial x if the matrix is self-adjoint and...
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am trying to create a direct proof that if the matrix A is self-adjoint and positive-definite, then the Gauss-Seidel iteration converges for any initial ${bf x}_{0}$
I think I need to prove $rho({bf T}) < 1$ so
I begin by letting my ${bf A} = {bf D} - {bf L} - {bf L}^*$ and ${bf T}_{G}= ({bf D}-{bf L})^{-1}{bf L}^*$ where
I can use the fact that I can multiply ${bf D}^{1/2}$ to both sides of ${bf T}_{G}$ since Eigenvalues are insensitive giving me the following:
${bf T}_1 = {bf D}^{1/2}{bf T}_{G}{bf D}^{-1/2} = ({bf I} -
{bf L}_{1})^{-1}{bf L}_{1}^*$, where ${bf L}_{1} =
{bf D}^{-1/2}{bf L}{bf D}^{-1/2}$.
I'm stuck as to what to do next. Any help is appreciated!
linear-algebra numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra positive-definite
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am trying to create a direct proof that if the matrix A is self-adjoint and positive-definite, then the Gauss-Seidel iteration converges for any initial ${bf x}_{0}$
I think I need to prove $rho({bf T}) < 1$ so
I begin by letting my ${bf A} = {bf D} - {bf L} - {bf L}^*$ and ${bf T}_{G}= ({bf D}-{bf L})^{-1}{bf L}^*$ where
I can use the fact that I can multiply ${bf D}^{1/2}$ to both sides of ${bf T}_{G}$ since Eigenvalues are insensitive giving me the following:
${bf T}_1 = {bf D}^{1/2}{bf T}_{G}{bf D}^{-1/2} = ({bf I} -
{bf L}_{1})^{-1}{bf L}_{1}^*$, where ${bf L}_{1} =
{bf D}^{-1/2}{bf L}{bf D}^{-1/2}$.
I'm stuck as to what to do next. Any help is appreciated!
linear-algebra numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra positive-definite
1
Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
– Algebraic Pavel
Nov 29 at 9:59
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am trying to create a direct proof that if the matrix A is self-adjoint and positive-definite, then the Gauss-Seidel iteration converges for any initial ${bf x}_{0}$
I think I need to prove $rho({bf T}) < 1$ so
I begin by letting my ${bf A} = {bf D} - {bf L} - {bf L}^*$ and ${bf T}_{G}= ({bf D}-{bf L})^{-1}{bf L}^*$ where
I can use the fact that I can multiply ${bf D}^{1/2}$ to both sides of ${bf T}_{G}$ since Eigenvalues are insensitive giving me the following:
${bf T}_1 = {bf D}^{1/2}{bf T}_{G}{bf D}^{-1/2} = ({bf I} -
{bf L}_{1})^{-1}{bf L}_{1}^*$, where ${bf L}_{1} =
{bf D}^{-1/2}{bf L}{bf D}^{-1/2}$.
I'm stuck as to what to do next. Any help is appreciated!
linear-algebra numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra positive-definite
I am trying to create a direct proof that if the matrix A is self-adjoint and positive-definite, then the Gauss-Seidel iteration converges for any initial ${bf x}_{0}$
I think I need to prove $rho({bf T}) < 1$ so
I begin by letting my ${bf A} = {bf D} - {bf L} - {bf L}^*$ and ${bf T}_{G}= ({bf D}-{bf L})^{-1}{bf L}^*$ where
I can use the fact that I can multiply ${bf D}^{1/2}$ to both sides of ${bf T}_{G}$ since Eigenvalues are insensitive giving me the following:
${bf T}_1 = {bf D}^{1/2}{bf T}_{G}{bf D}^{-1/2} = ({bf I} -
{bf L}_{1})^{-1}{bf L}_{1}^*$, where ${bf L}_{1} =
{bf D}^{-1/2}{bf L}{bf D}^{-1/2}$.
I'm stuck as to what to do next. Any help is appreciated!
linear-algebra numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra positive-definite
linear-algebra numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra positive-definite
edited Nov 30 at 3:44
asked Nov 29 at 4:38
Jennifer Laundey
84
84
1
Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
– Algebraic Pavel
Nov 29 at 9:59
add a comment |
1
Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
– Algebraic Pavel
Nov 29 at 9:59
1
1
Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
– Algebraic Pavel
Nov 29 at 9:59
Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
– Algebraic Pavel
Nov 29 at 9:59
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018186%2fproof-that-gauss-seidel-iteration-method-converges-for-any-initial-x-if-the-mat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018186%2fproof-that-gauss-seidel-iteration-method-converges-for-any-initial-x-if-the-mat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Check, e.g., Theorem 4.5 here
– Algebraic Pavel
Nov 29 at 9:59